Zeus, Satya, Reforms & The Time Before "Satanism" - Moving Into the Golden Age [Update 1: Resources]

[Hp. Hoodedcobra666]

I agree with everything you said but I don't know if in my mind I could ever call him anything but father Satan. I am sure even the rituals will completely change what we call him over time and sort of have already, but mentally I still feel like it's 2003. JoS already has been redefined and I look forward to seeing it in it's purest form. I'd like to move forward with it and get out of the past.

The historical inversion where Zeus and our Gods became Satan and Demons is well known; there is nothing bad behind this [the primary approach for us is that it's based on Satya]. You can of course do this, knowledge about this will be in the JoS same as all the knowledge about the figure of Satan. But it will be contextualized better so people understand how we ended up in this and from where - and for what reasons. It's part of our history and our present. SATANAMA and SATYA are eternal concepts, they cannot be changed or altered.

The name Sat-an or Sat-an-as are still holy names, but they are more for initiated and smart people who can escape the programming around them. People over time, will understand this and deprogram completely from the enemy. But we cannot wait 1 century for this to proceed with enlightening people. It will happen later on.

One quick question to everyone, I thought this over and feel it appropriate to ask. Is it ok if instead of using the term Zeus for father Satya, I instead use the term Odin, since he is also known as Odin in history. I am Norse/Nordic by heritage, Norwegian lineage to be precise, and for me it feels deeper.

Although, I do know who he is and am learning to speed with him slowly. The main issue is it is challenging for me to hear what he says, likely because my soul needs to evolve further.

Hail Satan/Satya/Odin/Zeus! All the same being, just different names, and the true highest of the God's!

Absolutely. Everyone should understand, the God and the Being behind all of this, is the same. We worship the All-Father. Father Satan you can refer to as Odin, Zeus, Wotan, Shiva and under any other Name. The difference in JoS is the DEPTH of knowledge about this and the fact we have the most decided initiates in our midst, we are very strongly bonded. So any relative title for ease or for comfort is how you go about it.

 

[Egon]

5. What be our new name for our religion. It's was "Spiritual Satanism". Is it changed or not?

Calling oneself as a Hellene, Follower of the Hellenic Gods or Follower of Dharma etc. are good candidates imho;
"I am a Hellene to the bones!" -Adolf Hitler.

Even this term "Pagan" has also been overused and misrepresented in modern times thanks to Wicca and other weak competition to christardanity. It's just a Xtian Latin term to denigrate the followers of the Gods as some "folk superstition", basically calling people "hillbillies" of that times, it is a much weaker term that also resonate with modern "Satanists".

Also under HP HC the understanding of racial reality has been to most straightforward and strict the JoS ever had, including debunking the loosening of the definitions of who is White by some weirdos in the past: https://ancient-forums.com/threads/mixed-race-people-arabs-and-white-yezidis.18382
There's no way it could be any different as the proper following of the Will of the Gods increases EVEN MORE from now on.

 

[Pippin23]

No more black metal? Why? Some of us happen to like that genre of music...

I didn’t read that as no more black metal! I think he was explaining that we were disparaged via black metal by labeling it as devil worship and such by the Christian’s.

The historical inversion where Zeus and our Gods became Satan and Demons is well known; there is nothing bad behind this [the primary approach for us is that it's based on Satya]. You can of course do this, knowledge about this will be in the JoS same as all the knowledge about the figure of Satan. But it will be contextualized better so people understand how we ended up in this and from where - and for what reasons. It's part of our history and our present. SATANAMA and SATYA are eternal concepts, they cannot be changed or altered.

The name Sat-an or Sat-an-as are still holy names, but they are more for initiated and smart people who can escape the programming around them. People over time, will understand this and deprogram completely from the enemy. But we cannot wait 1 century for this to proceed with enlightening people. It will happen later on.



Absolutely. Everyone should understand, the God and the Being behind all of this, is the same. We worship the All-Father. Father Satan you can refer to as Odin, Zeus, Wotan, Shiva and under any other Name. The difference in JoS is the DEPTH of knowledge about this and the fact we have the most decided initiates in our midst, we are very strongly bonded. So any relative title for ease or for comfort is how you go about it.

It is about who you are referring to and not the name. Which makes sense. Our creator would go by many names. As he has seen and guided so many civilizations.


I am so curious if you’ve seen ‘Ancient Apocalypse’ on Netflix. Summarized a guy is going around and exposing humanity as having great footing prior to Christianity. It aligns with everything we claim to be true.

snakes worshipped all over the world. Depictions of ancient civilization forming from these giant god like humans helping them.


Thank you for the work you’ve done here. I just finished the series last night and couldn’t stop thinking about all of us and the knowledge that has been built here.


Love you all I’m going to go meditate.

 

[Blackcat]

I always see the numbers, 666, 777, 111, what do they mean, can someone explain it to me?

 

[WoadWarrior]

The historical inversion where Zeus and our Gods became Satan and Demons is well known; there is nothing bad behind this [the primary approach for us is that it's based on Satya]. You can of course do this, knowledge about this will be in the JoS same as all the knowledge about the figure of Satan. But it will be contextualized better so people understand how we ended up in this and from where - and for what reasons. It's part of our history and our present. SATANAMA and SATYA are eternal concepts, they cannot be changed or altered.

The name Sat-an or Sat-an-as are still holy names, but they are more for initiated and smart people who can escape the programming around them. People over time, will understand this and deprogram completely from the enemy. But we cannot wait 1 century for this to proceed with enlightening people. It will happen later on.



Absolutely. Everyone should understand, the God and the Being behind all of this, is the same. We worship the All-Father. Father Satan you can refer to as Odin, Zeus, Wotan, Shiva and under any other Name. The difference in JoS is the DEPTH of knowledge about this and the fact we have the most decided initiates in our midst, we are very strongly bonded. So any relative title for ease or for comfort is how you go about it.

So is Zeus a shared identity between Lord and Satanas and Lord Baalzebul? Or are you saying that Lord Baalzebul is in fact not Zeus!?

I'm sorry but I really do need more clarification, this seems very important and the more I think about it, the more confused I become because if its the latter and that Lord Baalzebul is not Zeus then that raises a lot of questions.

 

[WoadWarrior]

So is Zeus a shared identity between Lord and Satanas and Lord Baalzebul? Or are you saying that Lord Baalzebul is in fact not Zeus!?

Nevermind you did explain:

"The head God as summarized, has been always a centrism between Father Satan and Beelzebul; these two beings have been interchangeable and in the enemy's doctrine, they ended up as Satan and Beelzebul respectively."

How I could have missed that is genuinely embarrassing.

I will read more carefully next time as to not to waste time with stupid questions that were already answered in the original sermon.

Feel free to delete my previous comment.

This actually supports some suspicions I have had for a while now, thank you for this Sermon, honestly it mostly confused me because I somehow missed that line but now the whole topic makes perfect sense.