Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Satanic Personalities Section: A Community Project [JG Karnonnos + Update]

All articles about Hypatia, Solon, Emperor Julian and Giordano Bruno are good. We will refurbish them with more hieratic information, biographical info and other things. There are certain things about Julian unknown and inaccessible just via the histories. He was not just a 'regular' person. Solon is also of a very elevated importance.

I would like to write something about artists like Da Vinci or Botticelli. Botticelli was influenced a lot by the Platonic Academy, which wanted to bring back to Italy the ideas of the Ancient Past. I could write something about that too, even if I'm not 100% sure it is something good or something corrupted.
One thing I don't understand is, should I do my research and then post everything in this thread? Or should I send it to JG Karnonnos? I need a guideline.
You can either post it in the thread or send it to me via conversation when it is completed.
 
All articles about Hypatia, Solon, Emperor Julian and Giordano Bruno are good. We will refurbish them with more hieratic information, biographical info and other things. There are certain things about Julian unknown and inaccessible just via the histories. He was not just a 'regular' person. Solon is also of a very elevated importance.


You can either post it in the thread or send it to me via conversation when it is completed.
Thanks, Guardian! Yes, I felt like I did not do Emperor Julian enough Justice, so any high level contribution would be great. Furthermore, he has "a lot" of information that would be relevant for a more detailed page, but I was a bit overwhelmed—I hope I didn't disappoint The Emperor.

Looking forward to the high level stuff 👌
 
All articles about Hypatia, Solon, Emperor Julian and Giordano Bruno are good. We will refurbish them with more hieratic information, biographical info and other things. There are certain things about Julian unknown and inaccessible just via the histories. He was not just a 'regular' person. Solon is also of a very elevated importance.


You can either post it in the thread or send it to me via conversation when it is completed.
Okay, thank you!
 
Dear Master Cobra

¿Could someone please send me (send us) the list you already have compiled? ¿Could you please let me (let us) know how many of these Heroes already have a page written? ¿Could you also let me (us) know, if you need Spanish translation of some of these pages? I want to participate! I used to do translations into Spanish for JoS back in 2014 to 2016, I may have some time now to help with these. I know my internet connect is not as good as many others here, but still, I'd like to give my support. I can also translate from Spanish into English.

Thank you!
 
Dietrich Eckart

1729191396987.png


Dietrich Eckart was born in Neumarkt, Bavaria on the 23rd of March, 1868.

The death of Eckart's mother in 1878, when he was only 10 years old, was an event that heavily affected him and made him rebellious against various forms of authority, most notably his father and the various schools he went to as a teenager.

In his early 20's, Eckart started cultivating his interest in literature and spirituality. In 1891, he decided to start writing poems and playwrights. He moved to Berlin in 1899, where he wrote a number of plays. In 1913, after 14 years of living in Berlin, he moved to Munich. Adolf Hitler, who at the time had no association with Eckart, also moved to Munich in 1913 from Vienna.

Dietrich Eckart, along with Gottfried Feder, Anton Drexler, and Karl Harrer, founded the DAP (Deutsche Arbeiterpartei) in January of 1919. The DAP was later rebranded into the NSDAP (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, commonly referred to as the "Nazi Party").

All four founders of the DAP were members of the Thule Society (from the Greek "Θούλη"), a Völkisch/Pagan occult group which denied both Abrahamism and communism. Its central ideas were Paganism/Satanism, anti-communism, anti-semitism, and Germanic racialism. There were also references to the "Holy Grail", not as a christian symbol, but rather as a metaphor for the Solar Chakra, where the elixir of life is stored.

The "Holy Grail" (Solar 666 Chakra) is also seen in Satanas's second Sigil:
1729194760272.png


Adolf Hitler, who soon became the leader of the NSDAP, was mentored by Dietrich Eckart. It is also stated that Eckart was a Dedicated Satanist. Many prominent members of the Third Reich were also members of the Thule Society, including Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler, Hitler's deputy in the NSDAP Rudolf Hess, as well as Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring.

Eckart's most notable work is "Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin", where he exposes christianity and communism as vehicles for Jewish world domination.

In 1923, on his deathbed, Eckart stated the following:
"Follow Hitler! He will dance, but it is I who have called the tune."

Part of Adolf Hitler's "Mein Kampf" was dedicated to Eckart.
 
Dietrich Eckart

View attachment 4369

Dietrich Eckart was born in Neumarkt, Bavaria on the 23rd of March, 1868.

The death of Eckart's mother in 1878, when he was only 10 years old, was an event that heavily affected him and made him rebellious against various forms of authority, most notably his father and the various schools he went to as a teenager.

In his early 20's, Eckart started cultivating his interest in literature and spirituality. In 1891, he decided to start writing poems and playwrights. He moved to Berlin in 1899, where he wrote a number of plays. In 1913, after 14 years of living in Berlin, he moved to Munich. Adolf Hitler, who at the time had no association with Eckart, also moved to Munich in 1913 from Vienna.

Dietrich Eckart, along with Gottfried Feder, Anton Drexler, and Karl Harrer, founded the DAP (Deutsche Arbeiterpartei) in January of 1919. The DAP was later rebranded into the NSDAP (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, commonly referred to as the "Nazi Party").

All four founders of the DAP were members of the Thule Society (from the Greek "Θούλη"), a Völkisch/Pagan occult group which denied both Abrahamism and communism. Its central ideas were Paganism/Satanism, anti-communism, anti-semitism, and Germanic racialism. There were also references to the "Holy Grail", not as a christian symbol, but rather as a metaphor for the Solar Chakra, where the elixir of life is stored.

The "Holy Grail" (Solar 666 Chakra) is also seen in Satanas's second Sigil:
View attachment 4370

Adolf Hitler, who soon became the leader of the NSDAP, was mentored by Dietrich Eckart. It is also stated that Eckart was a Dedicated Satanist. Many prominent members of the Third Reich were also members of the Thule Society, including Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler, Hitler's deputy in the NSDAP Rudolf Hess, as well as Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring.

Eckart's most notable work is "Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin", where he exposes christianity and communism as vehicles for Jewish world domination.

In 1923, on his deathbed, Eckart stated the following:
"Follow Hitler! He will dance, but it is I who have called the tune."

Part of Adolf Hitler's "Mein Kampf" was dedicated to Eckart.

I feel that the name "Dietrich" is of a huge importance.

First, we have Fuhrer Dietrich in history who cultivated his interest in literature and spirituality, and then, we have our esteemed HPS Maxine Dietrich who played an immense role in publishing knowledge to all of us and had a very high degree in education, as well as Mensa university.

May the name of Dietrich be blessed and honored 🎖
 

Enheduanna​

Daughter or Sargon of Akkad the King of Sumeria, Enheduanna was appointed by her father as High Priestess of Inanna she composed a variety of hymns and prayers to all the Anunnaki but of course most notably Inanna to whom she wrote the Exaltation of Inanna, Lady of Heaven and Inanna and Ebih as well as a wide variety of temple hymns, she is in fact the oldest known author in human civilization, much of her life remains mysterious due to the sheer amount of time that has passed and the incredible amount of destruction the world had experienced however we know that she remained the High Priestess of Inanna throughout her life including when a usurper to the city of Ur usurped the throne of her Father's Grandson called Naram-Sin, as you can see Enheduanna was clearly extremely long lived as not only was she still High Priestess at the time but she had enough vitality to openly refuse to acknowledge the usurpers power leading to her exile from the city during which she performed a great act of Theurgy to Inanna known as the Nin me šara after which Naram-Sin successfully brought the usurpers to their knees not just in the city of Ur but across his entire empire after which the remainder of reign was stable and prosperous.

Enheduanna has no known date of death nor any description of her death has ever been found, it seems likely to me that she ascended the realm of the Gods whom she had spent her entire life serving along with her having served her people to such an extent that even the usurper would not dare to lay a hand on her and thus was forced to resort to a short lived exile for the High Priestess.
 
Was the military statesman Horatio Nelson in the occult?

This is just a guess and I have not been able to find any information that directly suggests he was involved in Freemasonry or the occult.
But I find it very curious that after coming into contact with some people who seem to have been involved his life changed radically: he left his Christian wife and his relationship with the model and dancer Emma Hamilton was compared in that time to Marcus Antonius and Cleopatra.

The most interesting part is that just after his death this painting called Apotheosis of Nelson was painted in which he is depicted with the Gods.

1024px-Apotheosis_of_Nelson.jpg
 
I am disappointed I could not have studied and contributed more, especially about Imhotep and Hypatia. I understand that it is late, and this may not provide much, but this is what I have found from the figure who I studied: Florence Nightingale. She was a peculiar woman, her logic and abstract thinking was well-founded, but her reasoning always led back to her Xian beliefs. I am going to be quoting directly from her book Notes on Nursing: What it is and What it is Not, so this may be a rather lengthy post.

Underlying Occult Messages
Right at the beginning, Nightingale proposes that disease is a reparative process, "an effort of nature and to remedy a process of poisoning or decay" and compares it to Mont Blanc. This book was written during the Romantic Era, so the comparison isn't all that surprising. If accepted as a general principle, it is immdiately met with instances that prove the contrary, so too would the claim that all climates of earth are made to be habitable by man. "Will the top of Mont Blanc ever be made habitable? Our answer would be, it will be many thousands of years before we have reached the bottom of Mont Blanc in making the earth healthy. Wait till we have reached the bottom before we discuss the top". This could be her way of implying "As Above, So Below", as is what I initially thought.

Preceeding this statement, Nightingale crticizes the Roman Catholic Church. They see no point in there being a nurse, if it does not meet their needs or serves them in any way that is not "religious". Nurses need no vow, no special accomodations, however, a nun or priest will see much of these. "But is a "vow" necessary to convince us that the true spirit for learning any art, most especially an art of charity, alright, is not a disgust to everything or something else? Do we really place the love of our kind (and of nursing, as one branch of it) so low as this?"

General Findings
While this is more so applied to the health of an individual, she emphasizes clean and fresh air. Air that is not cold or polluted and is well ventilated. "...keep the air breathed by her patient as pure as the air without." We know the effects of breathing in filthy air and what this does to a person's lungs. What about a sick person's lungs? She advised to open the windows, day and night (an idea that was argued against at the time).

She also makes a point to highlight, that although there are many things that ought to be done for the health of a patient, this does not necessarily mean that the nurse must be the one to go about it. In fact, she says it is favorable that the nurse not be at the bedside at all times. It is better to teach others how to care for patients so the same care is given when you are not present. "To look to all these things yourself does not mean to do them yourself. If you do it, it is by so much the better, certainly, than if it were not done at all. But can you not ensure that it is done when not done by yourself? Can you ensure that it is not undone when your back is turned? The former only implies that just what you can do with your own hands is done. The latter that what ought to be done is always done."

Although discussed breifly, it is something I want to include. "If you believed in and observed the laws for preserving the health of houses, and which, by the way, are laws, as implicitly as you believe in the popular opinion, for it is nothing more than an opinion, don't you think that upon the whole your child would be more likely to escape (disease) altogether?" Laws are something that she emphasizes. Granted it is viewed through the lens of a Xian, it is still applied rather well in this context. She is referring to parents whom all too often would listen to a popular rather than medical opinion. It was believed that every child must have measles, hooping-cough or scarlet fever, yet no one questioned if there were ways to prevent this. It was simply accepted as fact. Nightingale is trying to convey that if we all adhered to these laws of health, then there would be no need to anticipate an ill child.

This must be mentioned again, but in different way; in regards to not always being present. Nightingale says, "You ought to go, we will suppose. Health or duty requires it. Then say so to the patint openly." She mentions how this will in fact stregthen the relationship with the patient, as he is not anxiously waiting for the nurse's return. Reports of suicides are included, as a result of the nurse "not being there". She finds it incredible that this is true, but even more so that it is accepted as sufficient reason. Yes, the person in charge was not present, but this is not the issue. No provision was made to supply the absence. "When the sun is under a total eclipse or during his nightly absence, we light candles." So, then, what must be done? Not for the nurse or whomever is in charge to always be present, but for their absence to be properly replaced. Dependency cannot be allowed to manifest, especially in these situations with the sick. "...let whoever is in charge keep this simple question in her head (not, how can I always do this right thing myself, but) how can I provide for this right thing to be always done?"

I am particularly drawn to this part. "Let your doubt be to yourself, your decision to them." What is said to a patient must have already been decided in the nurse's mind. No hesitation can be in her voice, or it will instill fear and confusion. It is up to the nurse to be professional and collected when speaking, carrying out assessments, or oftentimes sharing final moments with a patient before their death. This does not necessarily have to applied only to nursing or the medical profession. I am sure many members of JoS who have taken on more responsibilities have had this feeling before. Being apart of the Clergy is a rewarding experience, I am sure. It comes with leadership and pride, as it should. The work of the Clergy and the Guardians is astounding. I have appreciated HP Hooded Cobra for always giving us a black and white answer, no hesitation, only the truth but with an uplifting theme. Does the positivity change the truth? No. In fact it gives us more motivation to do what we must. This is what makes a leader.

Here, Nightingale refers to the physical effects on patients for want of nature. "People say the effect is only on the mind. It is no such thing. The effect is on the body, too. Little as we know about the way in which we are affected by form, by color and light, we do know this; that they have an actual physical effect." She also correctly draws attention to how we truly take these things for granted. Those who are of perfect health, may see the sun shine through their window and while they may enjoy it for that moment, they will not go outdoors and genuinely appreciate it. Perhaps by duty to family or occupation or simple laziness, those in health do not tend to think much of these things while they have them. It is only when they can no longer stand on their own feet to venture in the woods, feel the sun's warmth and see the greenery of the earth, that they come to regret. It is unknown if she is aware of the spiritual effect of the sun, as it gives vitality, physical strength and endurance. Perhaps by these patients facing towards the sun, they are reveling in some of its energy. Flowers and light, particularly sunlight, is what a patient longs for especially when confined to a hospital for months or even years. "The sun is not only a painter but a sculptor. Where there is sun there is thought."

The next part I'd like to share is about those who care a bit too much for the sick. As I mentioned, positivity is not a bad thing, however, in this context, it is. "I would appeal most seriously to all friends, visitors, and attendants of the sick to leave off this practice of attempting to 'cheer' the sick by making light of their danger and by exaggerating their probabilities of recovery." One can certainly see the issue here. This is similar to the blind faith that xians have. Nightingale even goes on to say how many times she has had to hear a patient being told things like, "I hope that it will please god yet to give you twenty years". "How often we see at the end of biographies or of cases recorded in medical papers, 'after a long illness A. died rather suddenly', or, 'unexpectedly both to himself and others'. 'Unexpectedly' to others, perhaps, who did not see, becauuse they did not look; but by no means 'unexpectedly to himself'. There was every reason to expect that A. would die, and he knew it; but he found it useless to insist upon his own knowledge to his friends." In chronic cases, this adds insult to injury. That person may never be able to walk again, yet friends and family just love to "pray" that he will. They are in fact praying for his downfall. Nightingale insists that this patient needs a balance. Not to be filled with useless hopes nor just with the admitting issue. It is alright to tell him what is the matter, but while you're at it, don't you think it right to tell him something pleasant? This does not mean filling him with hopes for a future that may very well not happen. But perhaps about his family visiting while he slept or the lovely weather.

Next, is the need for observation. “They boldly assert that there was nothing to observe, not that their observation was at fault.” This can be applied to so many situations, not only observation. How many times have people made a mistake or an intentionally wrong action, and instead of admitting their fault, they blame others or find some way to not take responsibility? What ought to be done, is for that person to recognize that a mistake was made and reflect on how to improve. As SS, we strive to go beyond even this. We don’t only reflect on our actions but also on ourselves. What are these issues that are leading us to repeat these behaviors and how can we change these for the better?

Conclusion

I truly loved reading Nightingale's book, it confirmed to me that being a nurse is my true calling. Applying our Ethics and approach to life to the medical profession is an amazing opportunity. As I learn more about the human body and the nursing profession, I see so many parallels to Spiritual Satanism. It proves to me the truth of what we are all about: life. My studies are still not as in-depth as I’d like, but with time, I am sure that I can help a lot of people. I would hate for my time and energy put into this area of study to be wasted. I have grown so much, yet the sky is the limit. I am proud to be here, partaking in the most important movement for humanity. We are a community that seeks to better ourselves and the world around us, and that begins from within. May we move ever forward and may the Gods bless each of our steps.
 
THE PAGAN WORKS OF SANDRO BOTTICELLI

Sandro Botticelli was born in Florence in 1445 and he is remembered as one of the leading painters of the Florentine Renaissance. He was a prolific painter, including portraits, religious works, and subjects with allegorical-mythological themes.
Although a work of art's beauty may transcend time, it is not possible to analyze and understand it without considering the historical and cultural period in which it was created.
Renaissance Italy was divided into many states, some of which had great political power such as the Republic of Venice, the Republic of Florence, the Papal State, and the Kingdom of Naples. In the Republic of Florence, where Botticelli lived and worked, one of the most important families was the Medici family for whom the painter created several works. The most important protagonist of that period was Lorenzo de' Medici, known as Lorenzo il Magnifico (the Magnificent), who became lord of Florence in 1469 and brought the Florentine Renaissance into its most brilliant period.​

At the time, the artist rarely decided himself what to depict, but the subject of the works was decided by his patron, a local lord, a powerful family or the Church, and those same works were not always shown to everyone but served to decorate churches, private chapels, the mansions of lords or served as gifts to other powerful families to celebrate marriages or political agreements. For example, the aforementioned Lorenzo de' Medici implemented a policy of cultural exchange with other Italian powers, and Botticelli, along with other artists, left for Rome to create frescoes for the Sistine Chapel. In fact, the Church of the time was no different from the other powers and their courts with all the political intrigues and illegitimate children, it had a very strong political and cultural clout and above all clearly visible, overt, and therefore it was to be treated like all other kingdoms by the other Italian kingdoms.

Lorenzo was a great diplomat and surrounded himself with a large group of diverse men who shaped the thinking of the time. With this group of artists and philosophers, Lorenzo revived the Neoplatonic Academy, which had come into being several decades earlier following the first Latin translations of Plato. According to the Neoplatonists during ancient times there was a single and true wisdom, or religion, common to every age and place ranging from Pythagoras to Socrates, to Plato, to Aristotle, and so on given to humanity by God himself.
Botticelli lived fully in this cultural period and was its voice bearer. His two most famous works are the Primavera (the Spring) and La Nascita di Venere (the Birth of Venus). Although they were painted about five years apart these two paintings are to be analyzed together. Not only because they are thought to have been exhibited side by side at Villa di Castello, but also because they both depict Venus, known to us as Astarte. For the Neo-Platonists, the goddess Venus had a central symbolism in their thinking: she represented love and beauty, through which humanity could rise from the material realm to the spiritual one.

La Primavera (The Spring), 1480

1732551319588.png

La Primavera is the first painting with a mythological character that Botticelli painted and is imbued with allegorical meanings. It was created for Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco de' Medici, cousin of Lorenzo the Magnificent, and this painting's affiliation with the de' Medici family is made clear by the setting in which the scene takes place, namely an orange grove laden with fruit. Oranges were one of the symbols of the family. There are many mythological figures in the painting, and the scene should be read from right to left, so a story begins to unfold whose meaning can be interpreted in one way thanks to Neoplatonic philosophy.
Venus stands in the center of the painting. Behind her is drawn a myrtle, her sacred plant, and above her is her son Cupid, god of love. Both are symbolic of the love that drives humanity to betterment.
The three figures on the right interpret a myth. The blue-skinned god Zephyrus embraces the nymph Clori who has flowers sprouting from her mouth, transforming her into Flora, the very representation of spring and here the third figure in this scene; a woman whose dress is richly decorated with flowers. They thus represent an earthly and not spiritual humanity, but it's not wrong because it is the source of life (Flora).
This human act is mediated by the figure of Venus and is transformed into the dance of the three Graces. In this picture, the three Graces embody three concepts of Neoplatonism: beauty, chastity (understood differently than today), and desire. From above Venus, Cupid is about to shoot his arrow at them, a symbol of change. The three Graces are engaged in a dance that depicts the basic principle of love, according to Seneca, that is, giving, receiving, and returning, which filtered through the Neoplatonic perspective means that God gives, the soul receives, awakens and returns to him, that is, reaches out to a spiritual world. Just replace the word “God” with Satan and this picture immediately becomes an important allegory for the journey our soul takes.
Finally, there is Mercury, the leftmost and loneliest figure in the painting. He is looking upward and is chasing away clouds with his caduceus, creating a clear sky of soul awareness. He is the messenger of the gods and also one of the transporters of souls to the afterlife. So Mercury transports the soul, now transformed, out of the picture and upward.
This then is a painting about the journey that the human soul undertakes aided by the love and beauty of Venus to move from the sensual love and materiality of Zephyr, Chloris and Flora to the spiritual values of the dance of the three Graces and then to ultimate enlightenment with Mercury.

La Nascita di Venere (Birth of Venus), 1485

1732551359231.png


This painting also depicts Venus, but in a different form than the previous painting. Here she is naked and it's one of the first times a human figure is depicted naked without a trace of shame. Previously it was allowed only to Eve and only because it was connected to the feeling of shame felt by her. Venus, on the other hand, has a relaxed attitude, barely and delicately covering herself, and has become the perfect idea of female beauty in the art world.
The painting follows the mythological story in which Venus is born already an adult woman and reaches the island of Cyprus aboard a shell, propelled by the wind Zephyrus, in the pose of the Venus Pudica typical of Hellenistic sculptures.
Zephyrus, as in the previous painting, is depicted with blue skin and embraced by the nymph Clori. On the other side is a nymph, or the goddess Flora, who hands Venus a cloak to protect her from the weather.
Venus here is an allegory based on the Neoplatonic concept of love as the life-giving and life-moving energy of the natural world, and her birth from water and nudity have a spiritual, non-sensual character that is meant to celebrate true beauty. Botticelli shared the classical idea that beauty was the sole purpose of art.
Neoplatonists followed the thought of Plato who divided Venus into two figures: the celestial Venus and the terrestrial Venus. The former represented love as an intellectual feeling, while the latter represented a more physical love. However, physical beauty was a way to attain spiritual beauty, and for the Neoplatonists, it was the way love is manifested in the earthly world.
One cannot be sure which Venus is which in the Spring and the Birth.
Because of her nakedness, it is thought that the Venus of the Birth is the spiritual one whose beauty inspired those who looked at her to spiritual elevation, while the Venus of the Spring is the more earthly one.
Here, too, the commission of the Medici family is emphasized by the presence of an orange grove in the background.

Pallade e il Centauro (Pallas and the Centaur), 1482-84

1732551417943.png


This is another painting closely related to the Neoplatonic philosophy of the time. The woman is Pallas or the goddess Minerva, goddess of wisdom and reason, armed and dressed in a gown that features a decoration of intertwined rings, another symbol of the Medici family.
The goddess admonitively clutches the tufts of hair of a centaur, a symbol of a half-human, half-beast man. This centaur, following Plato's philosophy, becomes the bearer of humanity in perpetual conflict between its lowest and highest instincts, matter and the divine. It is man's task to rise from material life to true spirituality. With her hand and presence Minerva, the reason, helps and guides humanity on this path and keeps it in check, for it's easy to indulge in the passions and irrationality present in humanity and lose the way.

Venere e Marte (Venus and Mars), 1482-83

1732551850752.png


This work was probably commissioned by the Vespucci family, another important Italian family, given the presence of wasps in the upper left-hand corner (wasps = vespe in Italian), for a wedding given the form that frames it as an espalier, a type of painting intended for the antechamber in the house of the bride and groom.
We find Venus again, watching the god Mars abandoned in deep sleep while around them little satyrs play with the god's weapons. For the Neoplatonists, there was a harmony of opposites represented by the dualism of Venus and Mars, Love and War, in which, however, Venus had the superiority as a symbol of love and concord that keeps hatred and discord in check.
Having been a painting dedicated to a wedding it can also be seen as an augury towards the bride where the woman represents a force that succeeds in pacifying man's warlike energies while maintaining a state of balance, an interpretation aided by the symmetry of the scene.
The scene itself, is light and cheerful; historical sources describe Botticelli as a man who loved jokes.

These were the only paintings with mythological and spiritual themes that Botticelli created that we know of, and the motivation must be sought in the changes that came at the end of the century.
A friar arrived in Florence, Girolamo Savonarola, a strong preacher who railed against the corruption of customs, vanity, and vices he saw and called for a return to a time of strong and repressive religiosity. Neoplatonism, with its love of pagan times and philosophies, also ended up in his crosshairs. Taking advantage of a period of uncertainty because Lorenzo de' Medici's death in 1492, the discovery of America, and Charles VIII's descent into Italy, Savonarola seized power in Florence and established a theocratic regime. The period of splendor came to an end. Savonarola organized bonfires of vanities in which he burned everything he considered sinful seized from Florentine homes. Clothes, makeup, jewelry, books, musical instruments, and works of art.
Botticelli himself was deeply affected by the sermons he had heard from the friar, and a deep disturbance and sense of guilt arose in him that led him to a crisis and to disavow what he had created, returning to works of a religious character, though more somber and rigid than the previous ones he painted.
On February 7, 1497, Savonarola lit the largest bonfire of vanities in which Botticelli and other artists burned some of their works that were not in line with the thinking that had been established. After this bonfire, however, Savonarola lost acceptance from both the common people and the Church, which he strongly criticized. He was excommunicated and a year later was burned at the stake in the same spot as the bonfire of the vanities.
Botticelli continued to work for several years, but gradually his fame began to wane. His last painting was in 1501. He died in 1510 alone and in poverty.
 
@Karnonnos [JG]

Hello, has anyone already dealt or will deal with the reinassance hero, Gemistus Plethon?


What about the mathematician and astronomer/astrologer Girolamo Cardano and his father, Fazio? Fazio was also a friend of Leonardo Da Vinci. Girolamo had some innate siddhi that he refers to as the Cardano wonders, including the innate ability to go into a trance. He wrote a commendation for Nero, although he was hated for allegedly burning Christians.
If you think it might be interesting I can do some more in-depth research on him directly from his writings whose language I understand and which are digitized.

In the meantime I feel like quoting some passages from the article Fazio and His Demons

When Cardano published the horoscope of his father in his De exemplis centum geniturarum (1547), he duly noted Fazio’s « knowledge of occult disciplines ». According to Girolamo, his father had « such a great expertise in necromancy that he surpassed everyone in our time ». Most of all, people knew that « he had a familiar spirit, something that, in a naive way, he himself would admit ». 3 This is confirmed by Girolamo, who tells us how Fazio relied a great deal on the services of his personal demon. Only in cases of extreme gravity would he resort to the more orthodox help of saints. Girolamo tells the story of when, at the age of eight, ill with dysentery and fever, he was on the
brink of death, and his father turned to St Jerome for help rather than to his familiar spirit, as was his want in cases like these.
Revisiting the episode in his autobiography (written in 1575), Cardano writes that he « steadfastly refrained from investigating » this tainted relationship. 4
It is important to remember that the time when Cardano was recollecting these childhood memories was after the tragic experience of his imprisonment in 1570, very likely to have occurred because of his unwise meddling with divinatory topics and practices. It comes as no surprise, then, that he felt the need to specify how, unlike his father, he had not indulged in such activities as predicting the future and entertaining the company of demons. In fact, we know that not only did Cardano investigate demonic matters ; he, too, had his own familiar spirit. 5
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top