Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Andrew Tate?

HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Karnonnos said:

There is a sinister aspect to this lately. I don't use the CCP spyware trash, but for example I hear that on Tiktok, Muslim and hijabi content is being pushed endlessly on the algorithm all day, especially in Europe. I've had many people tell me this (including children I talk to) and they all said to me they were not even remotely looking for this type of content, nor anything even related to religion. Yet it is promoted endlessly.

I've also seen on other sites some videos of this content. They typically include Muslims lying about their own religion to gain converts (nothing new) and going around encouraging random people to try on modest clothing or say shahadah. This may be the usual ((gulf money)) shilling, but it might also be what you describe is beginning to happen.

Perhaps Tate's explosion is calculated to coincide with this, but I had the feeling his content would blow up eventually anyway.

I can definitely imagine the CCP which imprisons Islamics there to keep them from growing into camps, definitely would like these to expand and to take hold in Europe, as they strongly believe in the idea of cultural upset and confusion. So TikTok would definitely promote this in Europe for sure. This is a very common line of thought in strategic Chinese thought when it comes to cultural warfare. For example, zero Muslim tolerance in China, but promoting this in your hostile or antagonistic continent.

The situation of Tate going viral seems to be indirect, but your comment has brought in me a new realization over this. I am very much clueless about TikTok because I never had one, besides that I know very young children are doing deplorable acts in this platform thinking it's a game, which is again related to the problems with the loose morals in Europe going out of control and how this reflects upon children.

We will sorely regret the feeding of the TikTok algorithm. The CCP will definitely use it to feed all the facial recognition technology in the universe with it.

In youtube there is also such thing as history, for example you use smart TV and they know what you watched. So, despite of what content you prefer, even if it is scientific, in Russian youtube they would forever force on you here and there both islam and orthodox xianity (which is almost as vile as islam: they have a book which describes how man should beat and totally control his wife and family acting like NKVD interrogator to them). Also if you are interested in some combination of science and spirituality or some controversial theories, or just quantum physics, they would push all sorts of "proof that gawd exists" on you using profane mix of everything that has nothing to do with it, all "proving bible" nonsense, of course extreme blasphemy against Satan, since he is used as "anti-hero" of every their popular jewFOlogical pseudo-scientific nonsense.


In my country women enjoy being behind the strong backs of their men. I even read a fairy tale of one of the people's of my multi-national country about female hero who left her armor willingly to give herself to her man and people said: "hail him, the strong man, and hail her, the weak woman!" The last was considered a compliment back then. And still is in many places. I think this is much an allegory, so nothing to take literally, just the way people put it to describe extremely close union of two spiritual forces. Yet millions align their lives with these tales of their youth.

For me there is a reason in Nature why men are responsible for women and everything: responsibility is natural way to the top. It is man's path to Godhead - to protect what is his.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Lately a person named Andrew Tate has went viral, which is also very much noticed over the fact that they have been literally crucified in the style that is commonly accepted in the mob trials of our present day world.

Andrew I don't appreciate that you took the Cobra title because you aren't for it, of all times after you probably read some JoS article somewhere, but I digress.

I can also not comment on the so called Trafficking allegations but will rather focus on "Tate" as a persona on the internet, as I am not a judge nor anyone based on the news I have knows if any of the allegations about him are true or factual. They could be all lies and that is very common. Whether or not these are allegations of a political persecution will be found out in the appropriate offices.

As far as I have watched, they have called him anything from a woman hater to an anti-semite, "far right extremist" and other nonsense which is almost always the buzzword for when you are about to be persecuted for having different beliefs than the status quo these days.

Regardless, watching Tate's videos I can tell that he is mainly using excessive humor to try to get some points across in a very straightforward manner. I have not followed many of his videos nor I could find anymore anything further as his latest videos where the allegations against him are pointed at, are missing.

His manner of doing said videos might not be the most acceptable, but many of his points are exaggerated realities which we get to experience everyday and many people simply do not want to accept.

I have a difficult time to understand why people haven't seen this person yet as a form of comedian, which they pretty much are. A large part of their persona is a comedian and the fact we have taken this all so seriously that the whole internet is screaming to deplatform him is stupid.

Many of his rantings about women, or about rather the behavior of the striking majority of women in the Western world are agitating people who for all intents are really behaving as the exaggerated meme source of the joke of Tate's arguments. Tate has a square logic and tries to look at reality and life at face value.

For example, quite a few women who behave in the erratic manners Tate describes, are the ones who will equally react to his statements simply because they are into the categories he describes. Which in fact reinforces the joke and the social problems that are being illustrated in a very illustrative manner in Tate's videos.

At the same time, "Women" in our civilization are told and constantly prompted to look at the lowest dross of a society as their "Idols", including women who are the grossest materialists and the worse idols to look after. This has been ongoing for decades and has been producing likewise masses of similar women that have been doing the ultimate wrong to themselves by following the stupidest "women" they could find.

Yet somehow the above escaped our notice or rather it was as the Jew intended, so now we have a problem with Tate which is not exactly what they had planned. So we got to deplatform that one.

In my view Tate's only weakness is his way of passing his points verbally, and also that he still believes in the hoax of the Christian "God". He's clearly a man that strives to improve himself and he also appears to be somehow spiritually interested. Yet this cannot happen through his belief system which is based on the enemy and overall a foolish simplicity of understanding, but that is all there is to it.

Other than this, the sudden shocks of exaggerations and jokes that we "no longer tolerate" as a society just goes on to show how weak and false we have become in our own claimed "virtues".

Recently as they dragged him into a form of public trial I cannot hide the fact that I saw much of myself and the Joy of Satan which constantly comes under fire and attacks for no reason in particular other than having ideas that don't conform to the median basic logic of the low self awareness and falsely virtuous people of this world, that despite of having no knowledge on any of the subject talked about JoS just want to point out their programmed emotional responses as "Valid arguments".

Little do they know these responses are programmed by the very people they want to protect, who are the paragons of the real evil in this world, compared to the falsely and solely "perceived" evil that "Satanism" is or more accurately, what popular media told them "Satanism is".

Andrew Tate does not say anything that women don't say about men in their private conversations, and his perceived misogyny is nothing but extrapolated and expressed hate that both genders have because of the currently chaotic situation in gender relations in our society. He just talks about this, while many others are haters of women and men likewise in the silent.

If you read ultra-feminist materials, you will only find this and more vehement hatred against men being openly purported and spoke against vocally. Some jewish feminists go as far as to say that men need to have their genitals cut off or other crazy things. Yet "our society" will listen to these but wants to censor Tate, which points us at to an organized form of attack against Masculinity.

Of course, the Masculinity that is attacked is any form of uprising Western masculinity. In other words, if Somalian invaders or Arabic terrorists come in the West, we generally call this "enrichment". These people for example liberally can have 5 wives and it's called "Enrichment", or might tell you in public television they beat their wives up, and your average TV presenter girl will look at them with the same blanked out face with the same smile, saying "yes, that is enrichment" as this is what Rabbi Shmuel told her to say about this in her headpiece.

But the moment any Whitey or any Western person tries to step up for themselves even a tiny bit, we call this "Toxic masculinity" and press the ban hammer on any of these opinions.

Because we are living in a cowardly world where we no longer want to accept what kind of crap we have created with social media and other forms of popularized insanity, that has made us into abominations which cannot relate properly to one another, we perceive that the "Real problem" must be Tate or his opinions, or rather, anyone who speaks from any perspective against this total mess.

The reality is that the average woman's dopamine system has been hijacked to extents never seen before in history, that many young men have become incels and pussified, and that this state of affairs was caused by Zuccerberg and other jews in an attempt to falsely "bring humanity closer" in a way that has distanced us from one another more than ever before.

Under the current state of dopamine and serotonin destruction, many people have come to behave like rats in a lab that behave in a cracked up way towards one another. Somehow, we have been celebrating this falsely as an "evolution" and as the "future", while instead humans are becoming dysfunctional to extents never seen before in history because of these means of "communication" such as Social Media.

Social Media and a world that has been subjected to the lowest drives, has drove men into a loop circle where they chase imaginary, overtly falsely valued vagina that only appears in pixels in front of a screen.

This situation alongside socio-economic ladder and climbing issues that affect the youth and many men beneath their 30's, have turned women into the most inferiorized materialistic states coupled with psychological states of egopathy of the sickest extents they have ever been, and men into a deprived state of behaving as lowly as addicted and depressed pigs.

Somehow our present society enjoys this and considers this "progressive", all while we are literally going extinct and we are clapping as invasions and the progressive downfall of all ethical norms created by our ancestors are literally taking place in front of our very eyes.

We are falsely told that every moral norm that comes "from the outside" is wrong, and we no longer want to even tolerate obvious facts in history such as that women for example want powerful men or powerful offspring, which we are programmed against our biology to consider "strange", "negative" or even "messages against women".

It would do us a lot of good as a society to in general man up and start accepting freedom of speech which is a decaying quality in the Western World, even from sources which apparently are "evil" like Andrew Tate. In fact, Tate's "worst speech" is nothing compared to the local Imam or Jew in a synagogue.

Yet since it arguably highlights sometimes self reliance, to man up, and to effectively take the situation of life on one's own hands, coupled with some toxic statements per a hundred texts of line, our "world" considered it so important to launch a crusade against this.

That is because we don't stand by our ethical laws, and because we are retarded slowpokes that think that really "deplatforming Tate" is going to solve anything on this matter or that people like Tate really pose some sort of cultural evil. Yet, the real cultural evil that happens everyday and promotes itself as Virtuous, is literally eating our souls and our society alive.

The fact that we have to live persecuted in our own Nations for our own values, while Al Queida and other terrorists can do whatever they want, but we concern ourselves with the exaggerated jokes of Andrew Tate just shows how morally subversive we have become towards our own culture and ourselves.

From the perspective of humor, we could not be lower as a Western World. We are to where every joke is coming with a criminal penalty with it. We are becoming humourless retards that can only laugh with canned laughter on our "Netflix PROGRAMS", no different than the borg. We are creating a homourless civilization through this too which is a terrible civilization to be in.

Personally the only thing this situation with Tate is telling me is what I mentioned higher in this post.

If anyone knows more about this situation what are your thoughts?

-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666

I heard he was part of illuminati and his dad was a CIA agent.

https://youtu.be/RlI5hYXDVcY
 
mercury_wisdom said:
Btw what I meant by you praising him is this part :"Top G Andrew Tate and Tristan as well, come and practice spirituality here."

After rereading it I've totally misread it so I apologize. I thought you said that they come here to meditate and don't tell friends meant that I as a person shouldn't tell my friends that they are secret SS haha. That was really dumb.

So yes, I've exaggerated this due to this misunderstanding. But I've never mentioned banning you or saying HP is bad or something like that.

I just was really angry because I hate islam so much and western bootlickers to islam just piss me off so much.

Sorry for this brother you know how much I value you anyway as a brother to me you and HP both so saying a few curse words doesn't mean I hate you or anything lol.

Then it is a simple misunderstanding, don't worry about it Mercury, happy this was understood now.
 
CaspianTheDreamer said:
mercury_wisdom said:
NakedPluto said:
I miss the part where I have praised him, by talking about him? You praised him more than me within the above. The original post of HP. Is extremely on point and about the subject. If you want to be angry at me because I address Tate without hating him that's alright, but not the purpose of the discussion.

I don't understand these strong reactions within the world and here regarding this, aimed then at HP, then at me. I think I actually know but to what value to you or others since there's only reactive dismissal in an already chaotic toxic feminism vs toxic masculinity theater play aimed exactly for this.

It is not about agreeing with him or not as stated already. All valid information from him is of a primal basic logic amplified by character, and cynical tones over focused on survival or otherwise specific realities of some people, or of life that is valid only in a rhythmical time chronology. For example when he does spank his girl with the belt, he doesn't think of suffering and trauma to fuck that bitch, in his own language. The over focusing on specific realities doesn't produce the invalidation of the others, such as a not refined base chakra masculine energy does not negate the sexual chakras one, yet they are both of a low level frequency.

People prefer an artificial yes or no without caring about the depth of the damage or the positive, in a complex situation. We can only understand the damage or how to deal with this only by overcoming this "Evil Naked Pluto praised Andrew Tate, who talked bad about women therefore Ban and Attack".

I actually prefer to not to be shamed or virtue signaled on already agreed by default points( such as promoting islam etc) and open the path for continuation of this.

I have stated a month or two ago in private that this is the whole purpose of Tate, promoting Islam.
Btw what I meant by you praising him is this part :"Top G Andrew Tate and Tristan as well, come and practice spirituality here."

After rereading it I've totally misread it so I apologize. I thought you said that they come here to meditate and don't tell friends meant that I as a person shouldn't tell my friends that they are secret SS haha. That was really dumb.

So yes, I've exaggerated this due to this misunderstanding. But I've never mentioned banning you or saying HP is bad or something like that.

I just was really angry because I hate islam so much and western bootlickers to islam just piss me off so much.

Sorry for this brother you know how much I value you anyway as a brother to me you and HP both so saying a few curse words doesn't mean I hate you or anything lol.

Aw ☹️ its ok. I hate pisslam too you arent alone.
I do have an idea tho: gather all your countrymen who are SS like you, and you would all agree that from now on you would also direct the energies of FRTR into your own country, everytime you do FRTR. Just like how HP Cobra said in his post called Advanced Spiritual Warfare or something where he explained that you can imagine the energies of FRTR doing sonething extra as well as doing their original job.

What do you think?
Man, I've been struggling finding atheists here. Imagine trying to find SS. Haha.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
If anyone knows more about this situation what are your thoughts?

-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666

I do not know anything about this guy. But all I can say is that the West is very obsessed with respect (tolerance). This ideal of equality through diversity is really killing societies. You see, even in your position as a HP, you have to mind your words in order not to offend people (or to offend the least possible). I think this may be a characteristic of the current time, even though everything you have written adds up to the situation. Maybe astrology has the answers?

There is a trouble to finding the right balance between respect and freedom of speech nowadays. Maybe the Third Reich had something good about it, since it had a very diversed army with people respecting each other and I do not see it as censoring everybody for the sake of diversity. I think there is even something in the Reich's constitution about any of these.
 
Edward Lonsa said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Karnonnos said:
There is a sinister aspect to this lately. I don't use the CCP spyware trash, but for example I hear that on Tiktok, Muslim and hijabi content is being pushed endlessly on the algorithm all day, especially in Europe. I've had many people tell me this (including children I talk to) and they all said to me they were not even remotely looking for this type of content, nor anything even related to religion. Yet it is promoted endlessly.

I've also seen on other sites some videos of this content. They typically include Muslims lying about their own religion to gain converts (nothing new) and going around encouraging random people to try on modest clothing or say shahadah. This may be the usual ((gulf money)) shilling, but it might also be what you describe is beginning to happen.

Perhaps Tate's explosion is calculated to coincide with this, but I had the feeling his content would blow up eventually anyway.

I can definitely imagine the CCP which imprisons Islamics there to keep them from growing into camps, definitely would like these to expand and to take hold in Europe, as they strongly believe in the idea of cultural upset and confusion. So TikTok would definitely promote this in Europe for sure. This is a very common line of thought in strategic Chinese thought when it comes to cultural warfare. For example, zero Muslim tolerance in China, but promoting this in your hostile or antagonistic continent.

The situation of Tate going viral seems to be indirect, but your comment has brought in me a new realization over this. I am very much clueless about TikTok because I never had one, besides that I know very young children are doing deplorable acts in this platform thinking it's a game, which is again related to the problems with the loose morals in Europe going out of control and how this reflects upon children.

We will sorely regret the feeding of the TikTok algorithm. The CCP will definitely use it to feed all the facial recognition technology in the universe with it.

In youtube there is also such thing as history, for example you use smart TV and they know what you watched. So, despite of what content you prefer, even if it is scientific, in Russian youtube they would forever force on you here and there both islam and orthodox xianity (which is almost as vile as islam: they have a book which describes how man should beat and totally control his wife and family acting like NKVD interrogator to them). Also if you are interested in some combination of science and spirituality or some controversial theories, or just quantum physics, they would push all sorts of "proof that gawd exists" on you using profane mix of everything that has nothing to do with it, all "proving bible" nonsense, of course extreme blasphemy against Satan, since he is used as "anti-hero" of every their popular jewFOlogical pseudo-scientific nonsense.

I knew that islam gives rights to men to bully and treat women worse than cattle but I didn't know that christianity does that too.

Just yesterday I saw in the news, in Afghanistan the many men have literally lashed out at their women for the violence they have suffered in the war. They burned with acid as usual and brutalized in other ways many women and they are in the hospital. What terribly ignorant and stupid men.

The good thing is that these problems are publicly exposed and work is being done to solve them.

This is not the case for every single man but it is the case for many. Although the other wrong extreme the feminism is not the solution, somehow this problem must be solved once and for all. No one has the right to bully and mistreat others, to deprive them of their human rights and desires, to demean the other and make them slaves and literary property (livestock).
 
Edward Lonsa said:

In my country women enjoy being behind the strong backs of their men. I even read a fairy tale of one of the people's of my multi-national country about female hero who left her armor willingly to give herself to her man and people said: "hail him, the strong man, and hail her, the weak woman!" The last was considered a compliment back then. And still is in many places. I think this is much an allegory, so nothing to take literally, just the way people put it to describe extremely close union of two spiritual forces. Yet millions align their lives with these tales of their youth.

For me there is a reason in Nature why men are responsible for women and everything: responsibility is natural way to the top. It is man's path to Godhead - to protect what is his.

Now I understand better what HPHC meant, I thank you for the explanation. Maybe I went too far with what I said above. There is always hope and it is indeed the last to die. In Germany, France and other Western countries there are whole neighborhoods in many small and large cities filled with migrants. Often these invaders once they have grown enough in numbers and especially when they are the same ethnic group or people, exert racism on the natives. The problem is that these will grow and take territory, of course all if they can.
 
Sunny said:
Edward Lonsa said:

In my country women enjoy being behind the strong backs of their men. I even read a fairy tale of one of the people's of my multi-national country about female hero who left her armor willingly to give herself to her man and people said: "hail him, the strong man, and hail her, the weak woman!" The last was considered a compliment back then. And still is in many places. I think this is much an allegory, so nothing to take literally, just the way people put it to describe extremely close union of two spiritual forces. Yet millions align their lives with these tales of their youth.

For me there is a reason in Nature why men are responsible for women and everything: responsibility is natural way to the top. It is man's path to Godhead - to protect what is his.

Now I understand better what HPHC meant, I thank you for the explanation. Maybe I went too far with what I said above. There is always hope and it is indeed the last to die. In Germany, France and other Western countries there are whole neighborhoods in many small and large cities filled with migrants. Often these invaders once they have grown enough in numbers and especially when they are the same ethnic group or people, exert racism on the natives. The problem is that these will grow and take territory, of course all if they can.

That will depend on the future. If the countries manage this, it might not happen. Many of these people are of Syriac and said roots, and they are too from the Gods. So if there is a massive awakening taking place, the escalation might not be a deadly one. Many blacks have grown in France and have gotten really uplifted and then they return to Africa or to their own.

And they might decided to return peacefully with us avoiding the fatal scenario the jews are preparing. But that is a far off scenario with the jews in power, who will do everything to cause a schism and even deadly war between Islam and Christianity, ie, the useful idiots trapped in their programs.

The other scenario of the jews which is the doomsday is what they want out of the Gentiles, to basically die off and raze down the important civilizations, ultimately the "conquerors" killing themselves off too. It will only take the jews about 10 or 20 years to eliminate all the jihadist idiots who might take down the West, as these are below the means required to run the civilizations they might swarm into. Then their death will be even worse.

One Rabbi explained their plan is to forcibly create war, or mix people. Then, they will use Muslims as the "Broom" to "scrape off" the Whites from Europe. Or this might end up in civil war.

Then their "Plan" is to move foward after this elimination where the intelligence level and internal issues of Europe will have it on it's last legs, and force it to collapse.

However, the jews know of another scenario which is least popular and has occurred before, and that is the awakening of all these Gentile races and how this might go back all their way into their native lands, which will be a fatal thing for the jews. One can only imagine if enlightened Iranians for example could change Iran. That is only one example.

That would be the end of the jews and the end of their global dynasty. But that with the current state of ignorance is a long way to this.
 
Sunny said:
Edward Lonsa said:

In youtube there is also such thing as history, for example you use smart TV and they know what you watched. So, despite of what content you prefer, even if it is scientific, in Russian youtube they would forever force on you here and there both islam and orthodox xianity (which is almost as vile as islam: they have a book which describes how man should beat and totally control his wife and family acting like NKVD interrogator to them).

I knew that islam gives rights to men to bully and treat women worse than cattle but I didn't know that christianity does that too.

There are very important spiritual reasons why orthodox country could be made into Soviet Union. Xian orthodox pastor made a sermon on that: his words are literally that perfect slavery is a basis of Soviet Union and ability to be a perfect slave is also a spirit of orthodox xianity. This is very important link and without it you would never have built communist superpower like that. It is essentially impossible.

"Christianity is a religion of conscious and voluntary slavery."

"Even the USSR was able to recover within the Russian Empire, only thanks to the potential of the slave psychology, still by inertia preserved from Orthodoxy on a subconscious level in the Russian people."

- archipriest A. Chaplin
http://www.blagogon.ru/digest/737/

There are also very important reasons why Europe and White World as a whole went further than Slavs in many ways, though Slavs are genetically extremely talented and made a lot of world geniuses such as Tesla and Maria Orsic. Russian Empire had extremely powerful geniuses in science (including women) who immigrated, such as Kovalevskaya, and best composers in music, yet it lived in serfdom till 20cen because of this specific orthodox type of xianity where you can't even sit in church. When you come in, the only word addressing you you hear is "slave of gawd". Slavs are humble by nature, but orthodoxes specifically concentrate on humiliation, especially the one of women. This is for a reason. Gentile women symbolically represent Gentile Spiritual Power literally in every legend.

Feminism also severely attacks women: look at sports they are pushing mtf into women sports that already led to life mutilation of several biological women in combat sports. This was done by the Left.

Legends literally tell us that we are powerful through our women, while every women (except those in the West) know that her only Power, way to Rights, everything is through her men. Women will never ever win in any sex war because they are designed by Nature to gain things through her Yang, male energy of society and of themselves: men gave them Rights, men gave them love, protection, everything, they need men to win anywhere. Men also never truly "won". Look, moslen monsters, orthodoxes and others like that are not happy: they have no woman's choice. They can rape but they will never be desired, chosen, especially by more advanced women that matter. Look at how they live: they are so afraid that their women might cheat because they deserve to be cheated, deep inside they know that this woman will never choose them, never, she will choose anyone to them, even death, which she does. Exactly as in medieval Europe: they literally were blaming their totally imprisoned wives of sleeping with spirits because they understood how they are undeserving of them and they understood that ANY woman would cheat them at first opportunity and with absolutely anyone - since anyone is better than them. Whomever they rape they are still betas and never truly owned a woman. Why? Because they went the way of a dung (which they are rightfully called in their quran). The right one is to deserve things, not to violate them.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Sunny said:
Edward Lonsa said:
In my country women enjoy being behind the strong backs of their men. I even read a fairy tale of one of the people's of my multi-national country about female hero who left her armor willingly to give herself to her man and people said: "hail him, the strong man, and hail her, the weak woman!" The last was considered a compliment back then. And still is in many places. I think this is much an allegory, so nothing to take literally, just the way people put it to describe extremely close union of two spiritual forces. Yet millions align their lives with these tales of their youth.

For me there is a reason in Nature why men are responsible for women and everything: responsibility is natural way to the top. It is man's path to Godhead - to protect what is his.

Now I understand better what HPHC meant, I thank you for the explanation. Maybe I went too far with what I said above. There is always hope and it is indeed the last to die. In Germany, France and other Western countries there are whole neighborhoods in many small and large cities filled with migrants. Often these invaders once they have grown enough in numbers and especially when they are the same ethnic group or people, exert racism on the natives. The problem is that these will grow and take territory, of course all if they can.

That will depend on the future. If the countries manage this, it might not happen. Many of these people are of Syriac and said roots, and they are too from the Gods. So if there is a massive awakening taking place, the escalation might not be a deadly one. Many blacks have grown in France and have gotten really uplifted and then they return to Africa or to their own.

And they might decided to return peacefully with us avoiding the fatal scenario the jews are preparing. But that is a far off scenario with the jews in power, who will do everything to cause a schism and even deadly war between Islam and Christianity, ie, the useful idiots trapped in their programs.

The other scenario of the jews which is the doomsday is what they want out of the Gentiles, to basically die off and raze down the important civilizations, ultimately the "conquerors" killing themselves off too. It will only take the jews about 10 or 20 years to eliminate all the jihadist idiots who might take down the West, as these are below the means required to run the civilizations they might swarm into. Then their death will be even worse.

One Rabbi explained their plan is to forcibly create war, or mix people. Then, they will use Muslims as the "Broom" to "scrape off" the Whites from Europe. Or this might end up in civil war.

Then their "Plan" is to move foward after this elimination where the intelligence level and internal issues of Europe will have it on it's last legs, and force it to collapse.

However, the jews know of another scenario which is least popular and has occurred before, and that is the awakening of all these Gentile races and how this might go back all their way into their native lands, which will be a fatal thing for the jews. One can only imagine if enlightened Iranians for example could change Iran. That is only one example.

That would be the end of the jews and the end of their global dynasty. But that with the current state of ignorance is a long way to this.

Damn how evil the jews are. In the infinite thing that is the universe, they cannot all be allies and friends. Beyond that, there are inferiors and superiors. They are just fleas who literally want to eat wolves, lions, eagles and so on. That is their existential level.
 
Edward Lonsa said:
Sunny said:
Edward Lonsa said:
In youtube there is also such thing as history, for example you use smart TV and they know what you watched. So, despite of what content you prefer, even if it is scientific, in Russian youtube they would forever force on you here and there both islam and orthodox xianity (which is almost as vile as islam: they have a book which describes how man should beat and totally control his wife and family acting like NKVD interrogator to them).

I knew that islam gives rights to men to bully and treat women worse than cattle but I didn't know that christianity does that too.

There are very important spiritual reasons why orthodox country could be made into Soviet Union. Xian orthodox pastor made a sermon on that: his words are literally that perfect slavery is a basis of Soviet Union and ability to be a perfect slave is also a spirit of orthodox xianity. This is very important link and without it you would never have built communist superpower like that. It is essentially impossible.

"Christianity is a religion of conscious and voluntary slavery."

"Even the USSR was able to recover within the Russian Empire, only thanks to the potential of the slave psychology, still by inertia preserved from Orthodoxy on a subconscious level in the Russian people."

- archipriest A. Chaplin
http://www.blagogon.ru/digest/737/

There are also very important reasons why Europe and White World as a whole went further than Slavs in many ways, though Slavs are genetically extremely talented and made a lot of world geniuses such as Tesla and Maria Orsic. Russian Empire had extremely powerful geniuses in science (including women) who immigrated, such as Kovalevskaya, and best composers in music, yet it lived in serfdom till 20cen because of this specific orthodox type of xianity where you can't even sit in church. When you come in, the only word addressing you you hear is "slave of gawd". Slavs are humble by nature, but orthodoxes specifically concentrate on humiliation, especially the one of women. This is for a reason. Gentile women symbolically represent Gentile Spiritual Power literally in every legend.

Feminism also severely attacks women: look at sports they are pushing mtf into women sports that already led to life mutilation of several biological women in combat sports. This was done by the Left.

Legends literally tell us that we are powerful through our women, while every women (except those in the West) know that her only Power, way to Rights, everything is through her men. Women will never ever win in any sex war because they are designed by Nature to gain things through her Yang, male energy of society and of themselves: men gave them Rights, men gave them love, protection, everything, they need men to win anywhere. Men also never truly "won". Look, moslen monsters, orthodoxes and others like that are not happy: they have no woman's choice. They can rape but they will never be desired, chosen, especially by more advanced women that matter. Look at how they live: they are so afraid that their women might cheat because they deserve to be cheated, deep inside they know that this woman will never choose them, never, she will choose anyone to them, even death, which she does. Exactly as in medieval Europe: they literally were blaming their totally imprisoned wives of sleeping with spirits because they understood how they are undeserving of them and they understood that ANY woman would cheat them at first opportunity and with absolutely anyone - since anyone is better than them. Whomever they rape they are still betas and never truly owned a woman. Why? Because they went the way of a dung (which they are rightfully called in their quran). The right one is to deserve things, not to violate them.

Christianity obviously comes from Judaism. The not having and owning nothing because everything is 'God's', even your body and soul... is Jewish slavery. These things the Jews have to keep for themselves and they have to get out of our territories, but they want to conquer us and take us with them down and into nothingness.

We will make our kingdoms and governments much better and superior from Jewish bullshit like Christianity, Islam, communism etc.

Speaking of Russia, I think Russia does not need to split into 100 separate and different small states. The bigger a kingdom or state is, the stronger, more powerful and richer it is.
 
Sunny said:
I knew that islam gives rights to men to bully and treat women worse than cattle but I didn't know that christianity does that too.
In deep christianity there is definitely a paradigm of completely diminishing women and their rights, however is definitely not as bad as islam. For example in eastern orthodox countries, women are not allowed to enter a church without having their head and hair covered and without being dressed at least from the knees up. And this paradigm reflects a lot in the numerous countryside families and generally in deeply christian families, what nowadays we label as "traditional families", where many men force their wives to stay at home and take care of the household while only they can work and bring money home, thefore making their wives completely dependent on them financially. I don't know to tell if this is good or bad but I think the Nazi Germany system is the best approach, where women could work if they wanted to, but also women that wanted to take care of their children and the household were given generous incentives and benefits, also depending on how many children they had as there was a strong state-stimulated program to increase the German population.
 
The Alchemist7 said:
Sunny said:
I knew that islam gives rights to men to bully and treat women worse than cattle but I didn't know that christianity does that too.
In deep christianity there is definitely a paradigm of completely diminishing women and their rights, however is definitely not as bad as islam. For example in eastern orthodox countries, women are not allowed to enter a church without having their head and hair covered and without being dressed at least from the knees up. And this paradigm reflects a lot in the numerous countryside families and generally in deeply christian families, what nowadays we label as "traditional families", where many men force their wives to stay at home and take care of the household while only they can work and bring money home, thefore making their wives completely dependent on them financially. I don't know to tell if this is good or bad but I think the Nazi Germany system is the best approach, where women could work if they wanted to, but also women that wanted to take care of their children and the household were given generous incentives and benefits, also depending on how many children they had as there was a strong state-stimulated program to increase the German population.

Yes, islam is more bestial. As for whether women should work or not, I would say it depends on several factors but it's not just about money, you also have to socialise.
 
I have listened to Andrew Tate recently since he got banned as I like to get the full picture before having an opinion on someone. I will mention here that he does have some wrong views especially on women but it's not as extreme as the media made it out to be. He has never actually trafficked anyone. This was an event where he had a party at his house and some guy whose girlfriend was at the party made a fake claim to the American embassy in Romania that his girlfriend was being kept hostage at Tate's house.

The police arrived and found no evidence that anyone was being held hostage. Tate has actually provided CCTV footage to show what happened. Wikipedia, the media and people who are trying to cancel him picked up the story and twisted it to human trafficking claims.

Regarding the violence against women claim, the girl from the clip that has circulated has come out on three different occasions has come out and stated that it was BDSM and was consensual, and that he's very respectful to women in real life. And has never abused a woman.

I mentioned earlier he does have some flawed beliefs. For one, he believes it's okay for a man to cheat on the occasion but totally unacceptable for a woman to cheat. I think the fact that he gravitates toward Islam has shaped some of his views on women. But he never goes to any extreme point like actually beating up women. That was a lie the media pushed to cancel him. Apparently he has charities in Romania that help women and children (he has provided the evidence for this as well). I also find him too materialistic but then again this world runs on money and the more you have, the more you can do.

He also falls for the enemy illusion that "xtianity=weakness, Islam=strength so Islam=better and good". He has a strong survival mindset and will from his tough upbringing and this is why he rejects things that weaken him and gravitates to things that make him strong. I hope he comes to see the BS that Islam is someday.

As for all the triggering short clips people have been seeing, there's two aspects to this. One, it's the marketing tactic that made him the most Googled person on earth. He has an online institution called Hustler's University where he teaches people to make money. One of the methods people who sign up use is a form of affiliate marketing where you find Tate clips, especially those that are controversial, then promote them on your TikTok. Get other men to sign up and pay the $49 for signing up, then you keep half the money.

This is why many accounts have been posting clips of him everywhere and why he became famous in just a few months. The fact that he ridicules the leftist views also makes him appealing to people who are tired of the leftist system running the west. Combined with what he says about money, this plan made him famous and greatly increased his wealth (I think Hustler's University is actually a monthly subscription and is valued at several hundreds of millions according to him).

The other aspect about it is that he is very verbally abrasive. He likes to trigger people with his words, especially sensitive people. He has come out and stated that he doesn't mean everything he says especially when it sounds misogynistic. He takes something like the fact that men are physically stronger than women, and says it like 'Women are weak'. This triggers sensitive people especially left leaning people.

When he speaks like that, some people cut off the rest of the video where he explains his 'triggering' takes and then circulate it on social media for whatever reason. An example is the one where he stated that women should try to be responsible for their safety from sexual predators. This has been used by the media to claim that he says women are responsible for when they get sexually abused. Even on his Wikipedia page they use this attack. In reality, he explained further that we don't live in an ideal world where you just say 'men shouldn't rape' and walk alone in a shady place as a woman.

He also has a bit of a dark sense of humor. Much of what he says is just ridiculing how soft people have become, and other current issues.

As to why he was actually canceled, watch this interview from 1 hour 23 minutes - 1 hour 27 minutes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nvcZaD8vQk

He exposes the fact that the world is being run by a group of people (as to whether he knows it's the jews, I am unaware). That the LGBT, climate change and related things are just fronts for pushing sinister agendas. He mentions that they want to take people's rights and control them, bring on a new world order and lastly he mentions that the end goal is COMMUNISM. This interview was from back in June, just a few weeks before he was banned and smeared by every single major media platform in the west (even Rolling Stone wrote a smear piece on him). This is exactly why Tate was canceled. And he is actually doing serious damage to the enemy, whether or not he is aware.

It wasn't about women or anything like that. It's because Tate is quite a rebel who doesn't care much about what anyone thinks or says about him. And in the process, he ends up exposing the enemy. I have also seen that he has been exposing the covid fake pandemic right from the start.

Tate was banned on all social media platforms, YouTube and every other major platform that is controlled by the enemy. His instagram was just him posting his wealthy lifestyle, nothing about the videos that were triggering. Instagram banned him without notice, simultaneously with all other major platforms. He was also banned by most banks like Barclays which froze his money that was in there, banned by companies like Uber, Airbnb, money transfer platforms like PayPal, it was just ridiculous.

Eventually you can see this wasn't about women. Why on earth would Uber ban you for being misogynistic, assuming that was even true? This is just the enemy trying to silence someone who was talking too much about the fact the world is a sort of simulation run by some shady people. Nowadays, when you even remotely refer to the enemy even without mentioning them, they don't hesitate to ban you. I've never even heard of anyone who got banned to that extent.

And of course many people, us included won't agree with some of the things he says. But why should anyone be banned on social media, let alone every other application you need to have a life? The enemy preys on people's petty feelings to censor anyone they consider dangerous for their agenda.

Unfortunately for them, Tate is pretty wealthy and there's nothing they can do about it. Hustler's University alone brings him several million dollars every month. After YouTube banned him he went on Rumble and got half a million subscribers in a few days. Rumble stock also went up. Tate now focuses solely on exposing them (at least at the capacity of what he knows) and is bigger than ever. I suspect they'll try black magic or assassination at this point because not only is he exposing how the financial system enslaves people, but also talks about the fake climate change agenda, the fake pandemic and other things that would make Klaus Schwab have a heart attack.

In closing, this was a complicated case of good marketing, someone who is verbally aggressive and has a dark sense of humor, as well as crossing certain lines the enemy deems unforgivable like exposing their Communist and world control agenda. I don't think SS have much to gain from him as we have all that we need here, including even the advice on how to be strong. And while he pushes things like Islam and some backward views on women (nothing extreme that validates being banned even by Airbnb or something), he is doing damage to the enemy. I am just watching how it will unfold now that the enemy is going on full attack mode against him.

Hail Satan!
 
Blackdragon666 [JG said:
" post_id=389941 time=1664012031 user_id=19170]Tate was banned on all social media platforms, YouTube and every other major platform that is controlled by the enemy. His instagram was just him posting his wealthy lifestyle, nothing about the videos that were triggering. Instagram banned him without notice, simultaneously with all other major platforms. He was also banned by most banks like Barclays which froze his money that was in there, banned by companies like Uber, Airbnb, money transfer platforms like PayPal, it was just ridiculous.

Eventually you can see this wasn't about women. Why on earth would Uber ban you for being misogynistic, assuming that was even true? This is just the enemy trying to silence someone who was talking too much about the fact the world is a sort of simulation run by some shady people. Nowadays, when you even remotely refer to the enemy even without mentioning them, they don't hesitate to ban you. I've never even heard of anyone who got banned to that extent.

And of course many people, us included won't agree with some of the things he says. But why should anyone be banned on social media, let alone every other application you need to have a life? The enemy preys on people's petty feelings to censor anyone they consider dangerous for their agenda.

Unfortunately for them, Tate is pretty wealthy and there's nothing they can do about it. Hustler's University alone brings him several million dollars every month. After YouTube banned him he went on Rumble and got half a million subscribers in a few days. Rumble stock also went up. Tate now focuses solely on exposing them (at least at the capacity of what he knows) and is bigger than ever. I suspect they'll try black magic or assassination at this point because not only is he exposing how the financial system enslaves people, but also talks about the fake climate change agenda, the fake pandemic and other things that would make Klaus Schwab have a heart attack. (nothing extreme that validates being banned even by Airbnb or something).

Perhaps I shouldn't say this cause either it make me completely arrogant or quite the opposite.

There is no middle ground with what I'm going to say. So I'll just say it outright.

Companies from various parts of the World, banned him. Yes, yes they did, several including even life sustaining ones like for example Uber whether the car or the food. Sure there is a ton more food apps but seriously food?

But my question isn't about that. My question isn't simply banned.

My question no matter how naive has never been asked by anyone neither on this forums, nor the cancels of the past other people(Real News London interview with David Icke March/April 2020. Icke was like Alex Jones on Tim Cast IRL not even being controversial nothing was said like HP.Cobra said "He named the enemy without naming them"). Or any other person in the entire World famous or not famous.

A company or companies go "You rabble rouser we deny you our services". Which I assume this is technically illegal or can violate legalities or can be sueable. I suppose this might be like websites that enforce if using our website you agree to our services. If I never hit the okay or yes or understand button. I'm using your website without agreeing to your terms. Or servers your renting our servers. Even if you own the servers you don't really own them your putting it out in public and letting random people come. If anything it reminds me of video game servers which kick or ban you only to make you wonder can they really do that? What if someone was an expert hacker and turned it around on it's owners they kick and ban the entire clan and open it up to the public or unban people.

My question is:

How can companies in one or more countries or around the World. How or whom do they just up and ban a person?

Like seriously I'm asking doesn't it seem strange several companies agree to do this and be almost above the law?

I've never heard a person ask or say "If we have companies. Whom are the people in this company that go "person XYZ did ABC we must crush him". How or what entity or entities in this building this large building whether a long building or a skyscraper.

It's like I'm imagining people going "Sir CEO we need to ban Andrew Tate we just need to brutalize him for doing wrong think, wrong speech, and plainly cause fuck him".

No seriously how does a person, persons inside a company gravitate to such stupidity and get one person barred from some company.

I tell you this reminds me of back in the late 80s-90s when these personal revenge issues popped up(potential false flags in modern day thinking?) came out and people would come to work armed and shoot up their work office. It's like the 1996-1997 game Postal it was made cause one or more people did end up "going postal".

I wonder is there a cabal of people who decide this stuff. Who are the lunatic companies freezing(read stealing) their account. How can your money just be stolen by a bank. Or how can you be banned from these places it makes no sense.

It's almost like they're enforcing of meme. It's like companies want someone to shoot them up or sue them or break them apart or have a government smash them.

Seriously inside a company. Is there a CBO(Chief Banning Officer) official or *shoo* wink, wink he works here but hush secret lol kekeke.

No seriously how does a company just decide to ban a person?

And then people wonder why there is Rumble and Parallel Economies and people making money in organizations being counter-firing all this cancel, woke non-sense. It reminds me of airports are we going to have alt companies providing services to cancelled people in front of normal banning airline companies.

Is it going to enter the half-communist, half-Anti groups being in countries or especially here in the U.S. where this shit is popping up. And be like okay divided we stand from now on.

Seriously who decides to ban these people?
 
Gear88 said:
Blackdragon666 [JG said:
" post_id=389941 time=1664012031 user_id=19170]Tate was banned on all social media platforms, YouTube and every other major platform that is controlled by the enemy. His instagram was just him posting his wealthy lifestyle, nothing about the videos that were triggering. Instagram banned him without notice, simultaneously with all other major platforms. He was also banned by most banks like Barclays which froze his money that was in there, banned by companies like Uber, Airbnb, money transfer platforms like PayPal, it was just ridiculous.

Eventually you can see this wasn't about women. Why on earth would Uber ban you for being misogynistic, assuming that was even true? This is just the enemy trying to silence someone who was talking too much about the fact the world is a sort of simulation run by some shady people. Nowadays, when you even remotely refer to the enemy even without mentioning them, they don't hesitate to ban you. I've never even heard of anyone who got banned to that extent.

And of course many people, us included won't agree with some of the things he says. But why should anyone be banned on social media, let alone every other application you need to have a life? The enemy preys on people's petty feelings to censor anyone they consider dangerous for their agenda.

Unfortunately for them, Tate is pretty wealthy and there's nothing they can do about it. Hustler's University alone brings him several million dollars every month. After YouTube banned him he went on Rumble and got half a million subscribers in a few days. Rumble stock also went up. Tate now focuses solely on exposing them (at least at the capacity of what he knows) and is bigger than ever. I suspect they'll try black magic or assassination at this point because not only is he exposing how the financial system enslaves people, but also talks about the fake climate change agenda, the fake pandemic and other things that would make Klaus Schwab have a heart attack. (nothing extreme that validates being banned even by Airbnb or something).

Perhaps I shouldn't say this cause either it make me completely arrogant or quite the opposite.

There is no middle ground with what I'm going to say. So I'll just say it outright.

Companies from various parts of the World, banned him. Yes, yes they did, several including even life sustaining ones like for example Uber whether the car or the food. Sure there is a ton more food apps but seriously food?

But my question isn't about that. My question isn't simply banned.

My question no matter how naive has never been asked by anyone neither on this forums, nor the cancels of the past other people(Real News London interview with David Icke March/April 2020. Icke was like Alex Jones on Tim Cast IRL not even being controversial nothing was said like HP.Cobra said "He named the enemy without naming them"). Or any other person in the entire World famous or not famous.

A company or companies go "You rabble rouser we deny you our services". Which I assume this is technically illegal or can violate legalities or can be sueable. I suppose this might be like websites that enforce if using our website you agree to our services. If I never hit the okay or yes or understand button. I'm using your website without agreeing to your terms. Or servers your renting our servers. Even if you own the servers you don't really own them your putting it out in public and letting random people come. If anything it reminds me of video game servers which kick or ban you only to make you wonder can they really do that? What if someone was an expert hacker and turned it around on it's owners they kick and ban the entire clan and open it up to the public or unban people.

My question is:

How can companies in one or more countries or around the World. How or whom do they just up and ban a person?

Like seriously I'm asking doesn't it seem strange several companies agree to do this and be almost above the law?

I've never heard a person ask or say "If we have companies. Whom are the people in this company that go "person XYZ did ABC we must crush him". How or what entity or entities in this building this large building whether a long building or a skyscraper.

It's like I'm imagining people going "Sir CEO we need to ban Andrew Tate we just need to brutalize him for doing wrong think, wrong speech, and plainly cause fuck him".

No seriously how does a person, persons inside a company gravitate to such stupidity and get one person barred from some company.

I tell you this reminds me of back in the late 80s-90s when these personal revenge issues popped up(potential false flags in modern day thinking?) came out and people would come to work armed and shoot up their work office. It's like the 1996-1997 game Postal it was made cause one or more people did end up "going postal".

I wonder is there a cabal of people who decide this stuff. Who are the lunatic companies freezing(read stealing) their account. How can your money just be stolen by a bank. Or how can you be banned from these places it makes no sense.

It's almost like they're enforcing of meme. It's like companies want someone to shoot them up or sue them or break them apart or have a government smash them.

Seriously inside a company. Is there a CBO(Chief Banning Officer) official or *shoo* wink, wink he works here but hush secret lol kekeke.

No seriously how does a company just decide to ban a person?

And then people wonder why there is Rumble and Parallel Economies and people making money in organizations being counter-firing all this cancel, woke non-sense. It reminds me of airports are we going to have alt companies providing services to cancelled people in front of normal banning airline companies.

Is it going to enter the half-communist, half-Anti groups being in countries or especially here in the U.S. where this shit is popping up. And be like okay divided we stand from now on.

Seriously who decides to ban these people?

It's the jews. They own all these companies. They are extremely well coordinated. This was how they pulled a fake pandemic on a global scale. Tate's level of being banned is so extreme, Coinbase and other similar platforms will freeze your crypto wallets for some weeks or months if you make a purchase on any of his sites using crypto.

I don't agree with much of what he says but if someone supports this, this is like living in the Soviet Union and celebrating that your neighbor who you have petty issues with has been captured by the NKVD because of disagreeing with the state. It's obvious we have a much bigger enemy than 'Tate' and his views.
 
After hearing/seeing some of his videos i came to the conclusion that he may be a gatekeeper,
since he is constantly blaming everything except the jews/judaism.

I heard him a couple of times blaming mainstream "satanism",
which the jews promote to blame us for all the evil in this world.

He is either not enlightened yet about this subject, or he is deliberately not calling out the root problem.
For not wanting to "die" if he told the world who is behind it all (his words).

To be honest, i am sick of all this gatekeeper bullshit, i heard it all:
satan/satanism, the vatican, the jesuits, the reptilians, the mafia, the shadow government,
the matrix (he says that all the time), the muslims, the planet saturn or kronos, the rothschilds and so on...

He is saying some truths in general, but when it comes to who is behind it, he is tiptoeing around.
Maybe that is ok, maybe not, but i am glad we have the Joy of Satan and say it like it is always.

It would be good to have him on our side (if he is not a jew) just because he has a large influence and can talk well.

Also i noticed some similarities between him and HP Cobra (with all due respect),
for example Andrew Tate calls himself Cobra and even has a "War Room" wtf? :lol: :shock:
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top