There are two ways to look at history, one is the temporary way, and the other is the more eternal way. Nationalism is the limited way of viewing the history of the world; it takes in consideration the present, denies the past, and biology or many other things are not involved in this view, just forms of National Identities that were created for some centuries.
Adolf Hitler when he came to the world, instated a new way to look upon at history; he put the racial matter first. The eternal way consists of looking at very in-depth topics, and would take biology as a first way to look at something.
For example, two people being fundamentally from France and Germany [traditionally in recent history, if one wants to see this still that way, "National enemies"], are now seen from a different and biologically based perspective; then one sees they are 99,999% the same in their origins. If we close their mouths and put them on the same table to eat with a Briton, and they are just eating there, we will never figure out of any particular differences.
Yet for many thousands of years, humanity has lost this perception. The more is the loss of this perception, people form many groups and these groups fight one another ceaselessly, dividing what is fundamentally related to 99,999%, pretending this 0,001 difference is actually extremely important; denying the rest of this, and waging wars or making endless disputes which cause mostly chaos and divisions, in many cases where it does not even matter.
As humans really love divisions, or divisions became necessary for life [You had to hate your neighboring countries for a very long time, in order to survive due to National disputes], this became the norm to look at reality in this way. Biology and many other topics were not "important".
The German started to fight the Polish man, and the man from Switzerland wanted to fight them both, and from behind came the French man in order to attack him, and everyone started dividing and dividing over the course of time. The division level was the highest in the Dark Ages, where even singular Nations like France, were actually divided in many tens of smaller principalities, and before that time, in small regional villages who had consistent disputes.
To see how far that can go, the people who are all today Greeks, and had all 99.99% the same blood running in their veins, for reasons related to territory and nation State, had centuries long wars and disputes that kept one Town State having wars with another. The differences in culture were extremely small and marginal; the philosophers of the Ancient World drank from the same well, and the blood of the veins of all these people was basically exactly the same. But they waged war after war of annihilation for Nationalist and State affairs.
If back then you were born in Sparta, you were a Spartan, but if you were born just some miles up to another family, you were an Athenian. Fundamentally, your biological flesh, mind, spirit and soul was still the same. But since you were born in a different National Identity at the time, you would have to fight this or that other person consistently, for the survival of your City State.
As history progressed, people were united eventually and formed the Greek States. At some point when there was a problem with the Persian Empire, where the differences were even more and more actual, they had to fight people who were actually quite different than them, comparing to killing themselves over petty differences. Yet, as this process happened in many places.
Therefore, we have endless disputes on the earth, for a very long time. These disputes can range in importance; the Korean or Japanese person, is certainly different from the Chinese person in many ways, but they all fall under a fairly similar Asiatic category. Whether or nor these differences are "worth a war", it's another topic. I will leave this topic open here, as it will derail the topic.
Yet, if we take all these different Nationalities and put them all by the side; we will see something else. We will see that some people, are far more connected to others, and the similarities are so striking that if for example a Polish man does not open his mouth, we might not figure he is not a German or even a Ukrainian, or a Russian. If we just observe them as they are, they are mostly extremely similar.
If you were an alien visiting the earth, knowing of no National borders and no "National Identities" (humans form these) you would seriously question yourself in why people of the same biology, are in wars all the time. If you knew of no politics, you would be actually asking yourself why for example Europeans ever did that many wars. You would therefore see, that this species has not yet developed a very high biological understand, which would render 95% of wars among itself utterly useless.
If would also make more sense to you, that let's say, unless there are very big differences, that people have any reasons to kill each other at all, rather than work together. From a biological habitat perspective, Nationalism on it's own does not make much sense. It means that people have divided over certain cultural topics, and they are waging wars over these topics. Biology at the same time, supports that species of a same flock, must flock together.
Inside the flocks, there are of course organizations; the Flock would be for example a Yellow, Black or White flock; but inside the flock the beings would organize in regard to their ability of value, and do the best to govern themselves in order to live. You cannot put a bear into a bird flock, because it cannot fly.
However, if we take the same Polish man and put him on the side to compare him to a Japanese man or Chinese man, then we will see they are actually two rather distinctive types. They are so different, that when you put them on the side, you can see the differences. Then if we also put a man from Ghana and compare them with both, we will see very evident differences in all the three.
Still, one will notice that they are certainly of the same species, as they are both men. If we are to take this in example from another portion of the Animal Kingdom, we would have a Panther, a Jaguar and a Cheetah. Still, taking a few steps back, one would understand that these three types are still all felines and "big cats", but that they have some differences about them. Fundamentally, they still are the same underlying species, and not fish.
As one sees the above, one might feel for example that one type of the above, the Cheetah, must prevail over the Panther, and another will think the Jaguar is the "best" and most fit to live. However, in the case of nature, it has put them all under a rather similar and broader category. Yet, nature has also divided them in order so that they are all different; yet they are still fundamentally under the same larger classification. They are not fish, so they cannot flock with fish under no circumstance. Jaguars will mate and co-exist with Jaguars, Panthers with Panthers, and Cheetah's with Cheetah's.
Now, the reason we engage this topic, it's because it's a scientific and reality based, natural topic. None of this knowledge is meant to instate anything negative in humanity, but rather stop ceaseless warfare. As humans understand if they are Jaguar or Cheetah, that does not mean the two entities must devolve into a battle for war and territory. It just means one has self awareness. This self awareness means one must work to improve the species of the Jaguar or the Cheetah, but must actually also keep in the back of their minds, that the other Feline they are observing, is also a feline in need to advance itself.
Spiritual Satanism takes biology and race in consideration, because when you see these three people in a line compared, then you will see there is beautiful bio-diversity in life. The only reason one would need to do this, is not to create pointless division, but to observe reality as it is. From that reality, humans can choose to do anything evil or anything good. As far as I am concerned, observing this bio-diversity of life, we should seek to protect it and prolong it; not find causes for wars, disputes and destruction, but rather see how we can remain biologically diverse and rich, like many other species out there in the cosmos try to do.
Others of course of a more argumentative manner, will see the above three people and imagine they have "to fight at all costs" based on these differences. In regard to the species of the Felines as a category, that would be suicidal. Some would say that these three cats, if they all fought it our, there would be a "winner" and that this is what makes you "win". If "winning" is about progress and development, man is also graced with something else compared to animals: logic and a very broad mind.
If the mind is applied to essentially causing wars between Cheetah's and Jaguars, any "development" that arises will be limited. Still, the need to fight and being war ready, is not a bad idea; it keeps both the Cheetah's and the Jaguars and the Panthers in a developing situation so they can be sharp and ready for war. However, the advent of an actual war is going to be detrimental to all of them; the winner is losing forces that could have went to development, and others will also perish.
It is also true, that if there is a war among the Felines, it's very far more likely, that each sub-species of these, will attempt to flock to what is closer to itself, rather than what is opposed to itself. That much is also true, so we cannot deny this reality either. Biologically it would make more sense for Cheetah to go against a Jaguar over territoral disputes or food source, rather than Cheetah's killing each other.
Yet, were men and human beings differ with wild animals, is that humans can actually come up and say: "Hello, so we need 10 pounds of meat. Instead of doing a battle to the death to take the limited resource, why don't we instead create two farms, so we can generate 100 pounds of meat to eat, and we do not have to fight over it?". Animals do not have this ability, only humans do.
A delicate balance between dispute and love has to exist, until species develop a semblance of consciousness to understand that pointless wars and divisions, are to have a very necessary background for them to happen. In that case as humans are spiritually fallen, they see many disputes. Many people even fight inside their own households and beat up their own family, their own life living unit. They create chaos, unrest and disloyalty even in the small unit that they call in family, or do wrong even to their descendants; that's how confusing this is.
Again, seen from a distant perspective, that would not make any sense, as doing damage to your family, reduces your chances of survival and theirs dramatically. One had everything to gain by being a loyal and a good person to their family, and minimizing disputes and raising peace and co-operation to the highest level; they would be happier and others would be happier also.
But still humans do that dumb shit and more dumb shit. So humans are irrational. This extends onward and creates more and more divisions, until the point that humanity rips itself to shreds over minimal or inconsequential reasons, destroying nature's progression and not understanding how to use forces of development in a good way.
While even animals understand this, humans still do not in many cases; that is because like the Cheetah's above, they do not have developed yet the very necessary reason and higher creative ability to escape the tight confines of existence that involve natural brutal law. Animals however on their level, perform better than humans in many cases. So man is also evolving to understand more of his place in existence also.
As a final note, our side and the Gods want both to stop ceaseless and dumb warfare. If the two factions are at war, they are not at war with their families. They are at war because our side is humanoid and the other side is a virus; they have no longer any common grounds. These sides both want to "unite humanity", the enemy for a slave plantation (easy control, mass forced homogenization, de-militarization, ultimate control like we control a vegetable plantation.
Our side wants to prolong our existence in the cosmos, so we can support nature's development and undertaking and life can continue freely so they can observe it. In this future high reason and high spirituality will be necessary, because the destiny here is not plantation and slavery. Clearly, we must go for this path and not the other, as the destiny of humanity is doomed in the first option.
Either way, I hope that enriched everyone's perspective on these topics.
Of course you can, but if only one or the other is only supported, this can lead to errors.
If one is only a Nationalist, then they will deny race in the end. If one is only a racialist, they will deny the obvious reality of the world.
Both are required to survive and to understand what is pertinent to the present, and what is important for the longterm existence of a species.
-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666
Adolf Hitler when he came to the world, instated a new way to look upon at history; he put the racial matter first. The eternal way consists of looking at very in-depth topics, and would take biology as a first way to look at something.
For example, two people being fundamentally from France and Germany [traditionally in recent history, if one wants to see this still that way, "National enemies"], are now seen from a different and biologically based perspective; then one sees they are 99,999% the same in their origins. If we close their mouths and put them on the same table to eat with a Briton, and they are just eating there, we will never figure out of any particular differences.
Yet for many thousands of years, humanity has lost this perception. The more is the loss of this perception, people form many groups and these groups fight one another ceaselessly, dividing what is fundamentally related to 99,999%, pretending this 0,001 difference is actually extremely important; denying the rest of this, and waging wars or making endless disputes which cause mostly chaos and divisions, in many cases where it does not even matter.
As humans really love divisions, or divisions became necessary for life [You had to hate your neighboring countries for a very long time, in order to survive due to National disputes], this became the norm to look at reality in this way. Biology and many other topics were not "important".
The German started to fight the Polish man, and the man from Switzerland wanted to fight them both, and from behind came the French man in order to attack him, and everyone started dividing and dividing over the course of time. The division level was the highest in the Dark Ages, where even singular Nations like France, were actually divided in many tens of smaller principalities, and before that time, in small regional villages who had consistent disputes.
To see how far that can go, the people who are all today Greeks, and had all 99.99% the same blood running in their veins, for reasons related to territory and nation State, had centuries long wars and disputes that kept one Town State having wars with another. The differences in culture were extremely small and marginal; the philosophers of the Ancient World drank from the same well, and the blood of the veins of all these people was basically exactly the same. But they waged war after war of annihilation for Nationalist and State affairs.
If back then you were born in Sparta, you were a Spartan, but if you were born just some miles up to another family, you were an Athenian. Fundamentally, your biological flesh, mind, spirit and soul was still the same. But since you were born in a different National Identity at the time, you would have to fight this or that other person consistently, for the survival of your City State.
As history progressed, people were united eventually and formed the Greek States. At some point when there was a problem with the Persian Empire, where the differences were even more and more actual, they had to fight people who were actually quite different than them, comparing to killing themselves over petty differences. Yet, as this process happened in many places.
Therefore, we have endless disputes on the earth, for a very long time. These disputes can range in importance; the Korean or Japanese person, is certainly different from the Chinese person in many ways, but they all fall under a fairly similar Asiatic category. Whether or nor these differences are "worth a war", it's another topic. I will leave this topic open here, as it will derail the topic.
Yet, if we take all these different Nationalities and put them all by the side; we will see something else. We will see that some people, are far more connected to others, and the similarities are so striking that if for example a Polish man does not open his mouth, we might not figure he is not a German or even a Ukrainian, or a Russian. If we just observe them as they are, they are mostly extremely similar.
If you were an alien visiting the earth, knowing of no National borders and no "National Identities" (humans form these) you would seriously question yourself in why people of the same biology, are in wars all the time. If you knew of no politics, you would be actually asking yourself why for example Europeans ever did that many wars. You would therefore see, that this species has not yet developed a very high biological understand, which would render 95% of wars among itself utterly useless.
If would also make more sense to you, that let's say, unless there are very big differences, that people have any reasons to kill each other at all, rather than work together. From a biological habitat perspective, Nationalism on it's own does not make much sense. It means that people have divided over certain cultural topics, and they are waging wars over these topics. Biology at the same time, supports that species of a same flock, must flock together.
Inside the flocks, there are of course organizations; the Flock would be for example a Yellow, Black or White flock; but inside the flock the beings would organize in regard to their ability of value, and do the best to govern themselves in order to live. You cannot put a bear into a bird flock, because it cannot fly.
However, if we take the same Polish man and put him on the side to compare him to a Japanese man or Chinese man, then we will see they are actually two rather distinctive types. They are so different, that when you put them on the side, you can see the differences. Then if we also put a man from Ghana and compare them with both, we will see very evident differences in all the three.
Still, one will notice that they are certainly of the same species, as they are both men. If we are to take this in example from another portion of the Animal Kingdom, we would have a Panther, a Jaguar and a Cheetah. Still, taking a few steps back, one would understand that these three types are still all felines and "big cats", but that they have some differences about them. Fundamentally, they still are the same underlying species, and not fish.
As one sees the above, one might feel for example that one type of the above, the Cheetah, must prevail over the Panther, and another will think the Jaguar is the "best" and most fit to live. However, in the case of nature, it has put them all under a rather similar and broader category. Yet, nature has also divided them in order so that they are all different; yet they are still fundamentally under the same larger classification. They are not fish, so they cannot flock with fish under no circumstance. Jaguars will mate and co-exist with Jaguars, Panthers with Panthers, and Cheetah's with Cheetah's.
Now, the reason we engage this topic, it's because it's a scientific and reality based, natural topic. None of this knowledge is meant to instate anything negative in humanity, but rather stop ceaseless warfare. As humans understand if they are Jaguar or Cheetah, that does not mean the two entities must devolve into a battle for war and territory. It just means one has self awareness. This self awareness means one must work to improve the species of the Jaguar or the Cheetah, but must actually also keep in the back of their minds, that the other Feline they are observing, is also a feline in need to advance itself.
Spiritual Satanism takes biology and race in consideration, because when you see these three people in a line compared, then you will see there is beautiful bio-diversity in life. The only reason one would need to do this, is not to create pointless division, but to observe reality as it is. From that reality, humans can choose to do anything evil or anything good. As far as I am concerned, observing this bio-diversity of life, we should seek to protect it and prolong it; not find causes for wars, disputes and destruction, but rather see how we can remain biologically diverse and rich, like many other species out there in the cosmos try to do.
Others of course of a more argumentative manner, will see the above three people and imagine they have "to fight at all costs" based on these differences. In regard to the species of the Felines as a category, that would be suicidal. Some would say that these three cats, if they all fought it our, there would be a "winner" and that this is what makes you "win". If "winning" is about progress and development, man is also graced with something else compared to animals: logic and a very broad mind.
If the mind is applied to essentially causing wars between Cheetah's and Jaguars, any "development" that arises will be limited. Still, the need to fight and being war ready, is not a bad idea; it keeps both the Cheetah's and the Jaguars and the Panthers in a developing situation so they can be sharp and ready for war. However, the advent of an actual war is going to be detrimental to all of them; the winner is losing forces that could have went to development, and others will also perish.
It is also true, that if there is a war among the Felines, it's very far more likely, that each sub-species of these, will attempt to flock to what is closer to itself, rather than what is opposed to itself. That much is also true, so we cannot deny this reality either. Biologically it would make more sense for Cheetah to go against a Jaguar over territoral disputes or food source, rather than Cheetah's killing each other.
Yet, were men and human beings differ with wild animals, is that humans can actually come up and say: "Hello, so we need 10 pounds of meat. Instead of doing a battle to the death to take the limited resource, why don't we instead create two farms, so we can generate 100 pounds of meat to eat, and we do not have to fight over it?". Animals do not have this ability, only humans do.
A delicate balance between dispute and love has to exist, until species develop a semblance of consciousness to understand that pointless wars and divisions, are to have a very necessary background for them to happen. In that case as humans are spiritually fallen, they see many disputes. Many people even fight inside their own households and beat up their own family, their own life living unit. They create chaos, unrest and disloyalty even in the small unit that they call in family, or do wrong even to their descendants; that's how confusing this is.
Again, seen from a distant perspective, that would not make any sense, as doing damage to your family, reduces your chances of survival and theirs dramatically. One had everything to gain by being a loyal and a good person to their family, and minimizing disputes and raising peace and co-operation to the highest level; they would be happier and others would be happier also.
But still humans do that dumb shit and more dumb shit. So humans are irrational. This extends onward and creates more and more divisions, until the point that humanity rips itself to shreds over minimal or inconsequential reasons, destroying nature's progression and not understanding how to use forces of development in a good way.
While even animals understand this, humans still do not in many cases; that is because like the Cheetah's above, they do not have developed yet the very necessary reason and higher creative ability to escape the tight confines of existence that involve natural brutal law. Animals however on their level, perform better than humans in many cases. So man is also evolving to understand more of his place in existence also.
As a final note, our side and the Gods want both to stop ceaseless and dumb warfare. If the two factions are at war, they are not at war with their families. They are at war because our side is humanoid and the other side is a virus; they have no longer any common grounds. These sides both want to "unite humanity", the enemy for a slave plantation (easy control, mass forced homogenization, de-militarization, ultimate control like we control a vegetable plantation.
Our side wants to prolong our existence in the cosmos, so we can support nature's development and undertaking and life can continue freely so they can observe it. In this future high reason and high spirituality will be necessary, because the destiny here is not plantation and slavery. Clearly, we must go for this path and not the other, as the destiny of humanity is doomed in the first option.
Either way, I hope that enriched everyone's perspective on these topics.
Of course you can, but if only one or the other is only supported, this can lead to errors.
If one is only a Nationalist, then they will deny race in the end. If one is only a racialist, they will deny the obvious reality of the world.
Both are required to survive and to understand what is pertinent to the present, and what is important for the longterm existence of a species.
-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666
Last edited:
![Blitzkreig [JG]](/data/avatars/m/21/21286.jpg?1704756304){kind=avatar}
to see am not the only one say it
