Fiery Pluto said:
RepSel1001 said:
I'll reply shorter to make it easier.
For the one who says, yes Machiavelli was a man, well that means nothing here, since it's a description of behavior. You can't deny that some women at least act Machiavellistic, even if he was a man, so why not all of them?
Also, for the yin/yang arguments, doesn't that just prove my point more? If there's a yin and yang in everyone, and if there's masculinity and femininity in everyone, doesn't it make sense to say that men are fundamentally good and women are fundamentally evil, the "evil in the good" being a lack of enlightenment, and the "good in evil" being Machiavellianism? Yes, it's unfortunate that we have to rely on women so much, like for even being born. But if we're here to improve and enlighten, doesn't that inevitably mean we'll reach a point where we don't need the female sex at all, and should therefore strive for it?
As for where I'm from, yes I got it from MGTOW and Incel forums. The rough draft of Part 1 of a manifesto I'm working on is in my signature.
You continue not to show any reason about your point of view, so it has no value. Why do you think women are the evil?
Masculinity is about the path of healing, growth. Going your own way, at your own pace. Don't break your legs again trying to climb the mountain; take a bit of a break first, and then get back up.
Femininity on the other hand, is a fleeting, nearly mythical entity. However, unlike masculinity, which sees no gain from bragging towards the less-fortunate, femininity does so in great quantities; they seem to have this narcissistic quota to fill, that this gives them some form of perverse pleasure. If masculinity is about a permanent moral society, femininity is a "bang and collapse": First, in a diseased society, they will "bang", creating an anarchy where any amount of moral and immoral values may exist, and then a "collapse", where the moral values are removed and amplifying the immoral ones.
Masculinity is that perfect blend of self-acceptance and self-improvement. Rather than killing yourself, it asks that you both love yourself and fix your flaws. It is a permanent journey of betterment, where every day is better than before, where no one is present to demean on you.
Femininity on the other hand is the worst blend of self-hate and self-destruction. It identifies flaws in you, and rather than allowing one to ignore unfixable flaws and fix flaws that can be mended, all in an environment of self-understanding and self-love, it deems you "unfixable", and leads you to additional self-destruction. It's a thing that is "here today, gone tomorrow".
In the end of it, one was in a worse condition than before. Therefore, what is the point of holding this "bang and collapse" in such a high regard?
A perfect example is the MGTOW Man and The Lesbian: The MGTOW Man sees his fellow man in a position lower than him, and selflessly gives himself so that they may rise. The Lesbian on the other hand, especially in abrahamic societies, will actually bully other LGBT+ to suicide to harvest on their energies and suffering, and then "disappear", leaving only stricter anti-LGBT laws from that abrahamic society than before.
Now, you tell me: What is "moral" about such a thing?
Besides, my path of self-improvement began with misogyny. As a result of misogyny, I've been able to lay off the self-hate and workout, meditate, dedicate to Vishnu, return to school in hopes of going to University one day, so much more. The "fire" that was lacking in life seems to have not only returned, it burns bright and wonderful. What has femininity done to me, besides pain and suffering?
Why should all I have built under misogyny be swept away under the program of femininity? Why should my hopes and dreams be once again be washed out just so a temporary entity may rejoice in being evil?