AskSatanOperator
Well-known member
I'm gay, can satan make the male I love, love me back so that I can be happy?
I recommend that you familiarize yourself and be guided by: https://satanisgod.org/Sex_Magick.htmlI'm gay, can satan make the male I love, love me back so that I can be happy?
Listen, Buddy....I'm gay, can satan make the male I love, love me back so that I can be happy?
I think that feelings as naive and beautiful as love should not be made artificial with spells. If someone loves you, wouldn't it be better if they loved you for who you are?
We should not run to spells in everything and think about what we really want.
A love spell would make someone love you for who you are in some sense. The ethics of all of this are dependent on the affirmation and intention. It is not necessarily like the spell will brainwash the person, but it would create avenues for love to exist. It is not fake at all, and this should be respected with its own depth, as we don't want to create love with just anyone.
All of magic and even life is about the breaking or creation of patterns, so not everything in life must be judged on its current state. That doesn't mean we should force situations which would not realistically happen, like two incompatible lovers, but we also shouldn't assume that any changes to such a relationship are uncalled for, or artificial, and so on. Everything is subject to advancement.
The hard truth is that almost nobody loves you for who you are. Most people love you for how you make them feel. If you change or their opinion of you change so they think you're making them feel bad now, they'll stop loving you and start hating you.I think that feelings as naive and beautiful as love should not be made artificial with spells. If someone loves you, wouldn't it be better if they loved you for who you are?
We should not run to spells in everything and think about what we really want.
The hard truth is that almost nobody loves you for who you are. Most people love you for how you make them feel. If you change or their opinion of you change so they think you're making them feel bad now, they'll stop loving you and start hating you.
Great reply!A love spell would make someone love you for who you are in some sense. The ethics of all of this are dependent on the affirmation and intention. It is not necessarily like the spell will brainwash the person, but it would create avenues for love to exist. It is not fake at all, and this should be respected with its own depth, as we don't want to create love with just anyone.
All of magic and even life is about the breaking or creation of patterns, so not everything in life must be judged on its current state. That doesn't mean we should force situations which would not realistically happen, like two incompatible lovers, but we also shouldn't assume that any changes to such a relationship are uncalled for, or artificial, and so on. Everything is subject to advancement.
Hello BlitzkreigA love spell would make someone love you for who you are in some sense. The ethics of all of this are dependent on the affirmation and intention. It is not necessarily like the spell will brainwash the person, but it would create avenues for love to exist. It is not fake at all, and this should be respected with its own depth, as we don't want to create love with just anyone.
I think people are getting their results of a love spell thru movies. From years of experience it is anything but.Hello Blitzkreig
If the person already , and genuinely has no interest in you as a person in the first place, then a love spell would just be manipulation.
And, think about it, how would you feel if you found out someone you barely know and have no interest in, has been casting love spell on you for like a week? obviously you would wanna avoid that person, and even if they manage to get you, they wont be able to tell you because it would be like this dark secret thay have, and it will break all trust in the relationship if it is revealed.
I believe the OP should just get to know the other person, open up to them, and try to establish a connection or friendship first. If someone doesn't even wanna be your friend, then they clearly never had that first spark that makes them attracted to you.
Sure, you could do some spells to bring out the authentic charm and beauty in yourself, but I still don't believe that a love spell is ethical or fair.
When you are using magick, it is VASTLY different from showing off some nice stuff or attractive qualities.I think people are getting their results of a love spell thru movies. From years of experience it is anything but.
If sweet talking and showing your nice fit physique to the said interest to attract them even if they aren't showing any interest isn't bad then how is the spell bad? Besides the obvious specific reason like someone else has a partner already and happy or something similar then both the above would be unethical but besides that there's nothing nefarious at play here.
It has nothing to do with having someone do something out of heir own will and has more to do more with influencing ther sacral and throat chkara the same way any beautiful person that has a good personality can do to those they attracted to.
But with that logic you can literally say the same thing about courtship(flirting and seduction). Why court a women if she's destined to love you then there's no point in flirting with her or seducing her because she'll already feel that way and influencing her to like you more and wanting to show her your worth having sex with is just glorified manipulation then as well.When you are using magick, it is VASTLY different from showing off some nice stuff or attractive qualities.
Magick messes with the mind. not that you said "influence " yourself, which is just glorified manipulation. Unless you are destined to be with the other person through karma or a great synastry, which would karmically lead you to making that love spell, I really am not a fan of the idea of love spells. heck, I place death spells above them in terms of being ethical.
Thats literally how that works. I also have experience, maybe not as long as you have, but enough experience of some really weird shit happening to prove to me that indeed, love magick DOES work like the "movies", even though i did everything perfectly, affirmation, direction etc.
I strongly believe that the other person should have free will in who they choose to fall in love with. Most thing you could do with magick is to make yourself more appealing, but that is very different from leeching in some specifics persons mind and subjecting them to implanted thoughts.
At this point I'm waiting for the thread to become so granular we start questioning it all. We started from a normal love spell and now we are in "But what is love? What is happiness?". Love to see itHapiness is an ilusion, it come from the satisfaction of getting what we desire
When you are using magick, you are operating on the level of the astral. These are all energies, and they are all deeper than some societal, subconscious notions, or thoughts even. You are operating on a very deep level that sometimes even goes past the subconscious, and is of the spirit. It is very deep and serious. The simple fact that you are willing to use concealed means to influence the other person's mind and environment for your own advantage, is unethical itself.But with that logic you can literally say the same thing about courtship(flirting and seduction). Why court a women if she's destined to love you then there's no point in flirting with her or seducing her because she'll already feel that way and influencing her to like you more and wanting to show her your worth having sex with is just glorified manipulation then as well.
I would like to know your point of view of how courtship and love spells are different.
Both spiritual and physical flirting/seduction can be used in an abusive/unethical manner but that's on the person acting not the spell itself.
Love spells are just Astral flirting. If there's bad or weird outcomes after a simple spell then it's not the spell itself but the practitioner, in my opinion.
The Love/Sex spells weren't given to us with the intent of brainwashing non SS into being our sex slaves.
Thats interesting, i was thinking more about Nietzsche whit That afirmationAt this point I'm waiting for the thread to become so granular we start questioning it all. We started from a normal love spell and now we are in "But what is love? What is happiness?". Love to see it
Getting what we desire produces certain molecules in our brain (serotonin, dopamine, oxytocin), so can we say that happiness is nothing more than a bunch of molecules? What is love but a chemical reaction in the brain? Can a person be "drugged" chemically into loving someone? Can you just drug yourself to be "happy"? Aldous Huxley's Brave New World is a good book to read on this, it might give some perspective. This is not addressed to you but the thread in general, I just liked your comment more because it goes into a good topic.
Damn, I missed the point then. I went full biology there . I have not read Nietzsche enough to understand the thought behind the afirmation, though.Thats interesting, i was thinking more about Nietzsche whit That afirmation
Maybe is not so far One thing from anotherDamn, I missed the point then. I went full biology there . I have not read Nietzsche enough to understand the thought behind the afirmation, though.
It seems interesting book i Will look for it ,At this point I'm waiting for the thread to become so granular we start questioning it all. We started from a normal love spell and now we are in "But what is love? What is happiness?". Love to see it
Getting what we desire produces certain molecules in our brain (serotonin, dopamine, oxytocin), so can we say that happiness is nothing more than a bunch of molecules? What is love but a chemical reaction in the brain? Can a person be "drugged" chemically into loving someone? Can you just drug yourself to be "happy"? Aldous Huxley's Brave New World is a good book to read on this, it might give some perspective. This is not addressed to you but the thread in general, I just liked your comment more because it goes into a good topic.
Again this same logic would perfectly go with flirting and seduction. Without it in many cases (not all) the person who you are interested in wouldn't consider you until you started opening her/him to the idea of you two being together.You are being influenced to think and feel in a certain way, which otherwise you maybe would, or maybe wouldn't feel or think. THAT is the unethical part. It doesn't matter if you are literally the best person in the world for them, you are still dictating things to happen, because of selfish desires.
Flirting and seduction comes in many ways. Upfront or hidden. Not every way of seduction is upfront. So how would a love spell and wearing very good smelling perfume/cologne in front of someone you like but they have no idea you like them any different then?When you are flirting with someone, you are aware that the other person KNOWS your tactics and KNOWS you are flirting with them, and thus you already give them a chance to either agree or disagree, but magick works much deeper and more powerfully than just a few winks or compliments.
Normal in the way you're using it is just an opinion of a personal view. Magick is objectively normal. We just live in a world that isn't objectively normal. I feel like some of these simple spells are to be seen as normal day to day stuff and will be in the very near future.Let's stop equating magick with day to day activities that are normalized, because the nature of magick itself is not "normal" nor even WORKS like normal activities.
I am not very advanced, so I understand if what I say may not be accurate, but I have thought long and hard about this, and I am open to criticism, generally, because we do not know EXACTLY how magick works in terms of examining the deepest molecules and quantum science of it yet as a species, people have different ideas about how it works and there exists a lot of confusion in it, so if I am wrong, then im fine with that. But I personally would not respect anyone who used magick to get a specific person to love them.
Afterwards you go into your opinion of a love spell but didn't elaborate on how it is vastly different.When you are using magick, it is VASTLY different from showing off some nice stuff or attractive qualities.
I'm sure it was understood but just in case... and will be responsible with something that a none SS (unfortunately most likely some newish SS as well) would abuse* otherwise.
I think that feelings as naive and beautiful as love should not be made artificial with spells. If someone loves you, wouldn't it be better if they loved you for who you are?
We should not run to spells in everything and think about what we really want.
It would not be unethical in the case of warfare for example (RTRs), because it is a necessary act that is being done for the highest good of all gentiles and the Earth, but in this case, you are completely ignoring the consent that comes with love, and instead of "astral flirting", you are just astrally manipulating. Imagine if for example, I was attracted to you as a person, and I wanted to use magick to make you notice me more, and to make you start having loving thoughts about me.
No matter if the emotions are valid, real or not, it is still being done without your consent and without your awareness. You are being influenced to think and feel in a certain way, which otherwise you maybe would, or maybe wouldn't feel or think. THAT is the unethical part. It doesn't matter if you are literally the best person in the world for them, you are still dictating things to happen, because of selfish desires. These things are very personal and should be left to the decision of the person themselves.
Please do not make false judgements. What I said was very simple and does not need much complexity. In fact because magick DOES work so profoundly, it is better not to use it on a specific person for love.Spells and vibrations are the opposite of artificial, they involve creation on the most baseline level of reality.
Jews do not go up to their rabbis and say "uhm, yeah, I don't feel like cursing goyim today. It's not as real to me as crushing their skull with a mallet. Feels artificial bro. "
Members love using 'consent' and 'reality' as an excuse not to do x, y and z on a plethora of subjects. What you are saying is that you don't think Magick really works, not as much as the 'old fashioned, tried and true way', which actually has an ambiguous relationship with the feminist idea of consent in the real world and even an ambiguous relationship with ethics as it is rare for any two people to be on equal levels of parity and awareness, or positive qualities, or physical or mental power. Dwelling on this enough is going to produce ideas like 'sex with an ugly man is rape' or whatever stupid tweets I've read.
The 'tried and true' method involves Magick, imprinting on someone AND invasive thinking of another (which 9/10 times in any blooming relationship is not 'immediately reciprocated' or 'ethical' anyway): our approach just involves affirmation and direction of intent, making said Magick effective, possibly speeding up the process and nullifying problems, if the energy is affirmed well.
Most people's desires are stupid and involve sketchy reasoning. A Satanist's job is to get out of this prison, so truly, completely one-sided attractions need to be discarded. If the OP is attracted to a generally highly heterosexual man, he needs to leave alone. If he is being an immature child and just wants this man as some sort of sexual novelty, this is also shit. If he is not being conscious and mature about who this man is, the same applies. I've seen this on the JoS over the years with a few silly kids. To that extent I agree with you, Sonne.
That also goes for the recipient of the spell, however. This is where you are going wrong.
We can take the average teenage Satanist who really is a decent person and has a crush on a highschool sweetheart, who uses Love Magick to charm her in addition to the obvious method of interaction. Although she gives off mixed signals, he knows either via real life cues or by divination that she has potential to be strongly attracted to him and he is a good influence. The energetic setup was favorable, good things happen, they get together and get married. This is constructive for life and constructive for civilization too. The direction of energy partially made this possible.
[Another thing worth mentioning is that when a Satanist opens up their soul, quite often those with past life ties do come boomeranging back into the life. When it comes to those broadly beneficial to you from those lives, this idea of 'I don't want that, I want what Netflix is telling me I should want!' can be questionable...]
Then we look at the alternative where the Satanist does not use this and perhaps falls short at guaranteeing a permanent arrangement instead: she goes to college and gets the usual pumping and dumping by frat bros, that leave her a neurotic and mental wreck, as women aren't meant to live like this. Or if they live in a neighborhood of Stockholm, she is 'initiated' by immigrants and just flits to lower and lower quality men, and ends up being absorbed by a foreign culture. He, bitter from this experience, ends up cynical and jaded.
We should always respect her amazing and wonderful decisions. He on the other hand is some pest or vermin, clearly, for daring to intrude on her sacrosanct existence.
Some members would go as far as saying wanting to go with a girl like this is useless anyway, because she turned out to be of 'low value' in one potentiality and therefore her decisions prove her to be worthless in every possible scenario. This is just ignoring the fact that people often change based on whatever positive inputs are available; men are especially meant to act as guiding figures for women more often than not. Yet men are largely abandoning this principle entirely, which means women lacking any good role models do go to the wolves. Is that ethical?
And yes, again, this can apply to men going to the wolves without positive female guidance too, including such spells, as a lot of men are naive and stupid, and make decisions (especially via their penis) that a dog would not make. Therefore women should be proactive with Love Magick as well, especially because the use of such was actually abundant among women, not men, even in the xian era.
The OP is maybe not so relevant here, but most people's idea of 'consent' and 'living muh own life' is leading to somewhere with a birth rate of 0.8 like Korea, leading into a society that is dead and miserable, not to mention people never, ever growing into stable adulthood, which 9/10 times requires companionship. It is leading to the opposite of anything ethical whatsoever, actually it is leading to barbarism, because people living teflon existences are going to give way to those who practice nature without a second thought.
If Love and Sex Magick was so unethical and 'unconsenting' it wouldn't be on the website, nor would HPS Maxine advocate for it so much. Soon every aspect of Magick involving others will be 'against consent', just like feminist hags claiming men looking at them is 'against their consent', and soon the FRTR will be put in the same basket, 'blooo blooo what if jewish women get btfo because FRTR '
Of course, real consent is important. The operator being delusional about the other person is like giving a retard nuclear weapons. A stalker lunatic HATED by the other person should not wield these spells. Doing so for true manipulative and sadistic purposes, to make someone like a slave like M****r did, is completely sick, and not looked upon kindly by the Gods. Breaking up excellent-quality relationships, especially those that can generate high-value children, is guttersnipe behavior. Ditto goes for using spells on the vulnerable and using innocents who can't physically have sex, which is what fiendish predators do; this is only a destructive act, NOT love.
Spells are still conditioned strongly by Synastry and fate, and in Satanist's case especially, by the will of the Gods. The real meaning of consent lies in compatibility and positive exchange. That's why someone should know their stuff before making a move. Regardless, courtship can be fractious. It can involve disappointment and misleading interactions. The best thing for a Satanist to try to aim for with love spells is to have the most amount of foresight imaginable and weigh up the benefits.
But sorry, that goes for the 'tried and true' method too. Actually, doing it without Magick is worse, as we can affirm love and sexual energy to manifest in the BEST way and even supplement this with workings to elevate the other person, while doing it 'tried and true' can lead to the worst results, operating on the worst kinds of karma. Most people don't have intuition, foresight or any psychic ability. Completely garbage relationships are everywhere, especially nowadays.
Venus energy more or less always involves others. This extends broadly to any self improvement workings too, including cleansing Chakras. When you do any of these, you are not just operating 'on yourself', like a self-contained circuit. You are creating shifts in how others are hooked up to you that perhaps override their 'baseline' ideas of engaging with you.
I would tell you not to butt in, but you are right.Karnonnos reply was to make a point and he was also going off of what another skeptical member said which was an outrage claim to make but it can easily be seen like you were alluding to the false "artificial" narrative.
I asked politely for you to explain yourself as you keep only putting in your own opinions without elaborating on the logic behind it.
Instead you wrote a wall of text of how you felt of another member's reply . All he did was explain thoroughly but bluntly. Everything he said had a strong point and this can be seen if you took a step back and maybe even waited to reply instead of a knee jerk/reactive post. Or at least that's what it seems like especially since my reply was completely ignored. That's beside the point.
I actually don't believe any of it was directly towards you at all and again he was just trying to make a point which you didn't even try to contradict instead just doubling down on your opinion.
But if that's where you want to leave it at then so be it, I guess...
A main takeaway point from this is that no one here who is a serious SS is doing love spells for nefarious reasons.I would tell you not to butt in, but you are right.
I am sorry if my posts hurt anyone's feelings. really.
I just... cannot wrap my head around this one subject.
I really don't understand how a love spell can't be unethical and selfish, if it is directed at a single person.
Nevertheless, apologies to whoever I replied harshly to.
From the tone in some replies, I felt as if I was being schooled or ridiculed, which i dont know was the intention or not.
Of course brother. Thank you.A main takeaway point from this is that no one here who is a serious SS is doing love spells for nefarious reasons.
It's up to the individual who visits the JoS what they choose to practice even it comes to spirituality, divinity and the occult.
The problem is those here who, in the first place, are doing what the gods want us to do, are being shamed just for practicing something that's given to us by them and their messengers like HPS Maxine.
It's okay to have your own opinions on the tools we have but, in this specific situation, it's another thing when trying to down talk others that are just using the tools we have with no evil intentions behind. The bad intentions are mostly accusations based on nothing solid with the minor exceptions being infiltrators and similar, but thats the not topic here.
The above applies to all parties but remember, in this topic and others before, it's the ones who wrote they oppose the love/sex spells the ones who initiated a bit of an argument by making outrages claims that will make those who practice these spells look bad, without any thorough explanation. Doing so paints your brothers and sisters as gross individuals who want to mind control others for their emotional needs.
The reply given by Karnonnos can be seen as warranted after this context but I don't think you're seeing that part. I did my best to view your side and now I ask for you to do the same for others even if you still don't change your mind it's considerate to do the above when in a civil discussion.
At the end you can still claim being morally right and not sway from your opinion but it will be proper to take all the above into consideration.
This reply wasn't to prolong the discussion as it seems to be over and done with. It's more of a general thought that I wanted to share.
"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan