tabby said:
Nothing that I've said can be disproven in any way whatsoever. All you've done is bring up specific instances of hypothetical scenarios and situations ,trying to make a moral case of what I'm saying is right or wrong. While I've specifically said from the beginning that I don't believe in "Right or Wrong" and that I'm just saying how the situation is and on a emotionless utilitarian and pragmatic approach.
I didn't derail this thread. Lunardance was the one who first tried to attack me, trying to paint me as a villain. I had to respond by presenting my point of view that everything I was saying was correct .And after I presented the facts everyone got pissed due to experiencing cognitive dissonance of being unable to accept reality (facts and statistics.)
I have not once gotten emotional. I've written everything from a purely rational, pragmatic perspective. I haven't once demeaned, insulted or personally attracted anyone. If anything the opposite is the case.
Everyone here has personally attacked me, wishing me I'll will in my personal life and wishing me romantic failure and called me all sorts of names. This is regardless of me already saying that I'm not personally talking about anyone and that I'm talking in generalities.
All you've shown is the inability to listen and agree with reality and immature behavior of personal attacks and insults and victim blaming.
Every single one of my points is based on facts and logic and reality. No matter what you personally have to say about reality, doesn't change reality.
Truth is Objective. Your appreciation of the Truth is Subjective. This is the delusional behavior of saying "my truth." There is no "my truth." Social behavior is judged based on Generalities and statistics of what the majority of people do, not what you personally believe is right and wrong.
And this doesn't have anything to do with Christianity . The entirety of Ancient history agrees with my view with hundreds of thousands of Philosophers and Statesmen making the exact same points that I have made. Just read the work of Plato and Socrates on the Topic of Women in Society. Read the views of Adolf Hitler and other prominent Nazis on the same. You are historically unaware of civilization . Female Independence and Promiscuity is a predictor of Civilizational collapse. Not just in Christian times. Every single Pagan civilization follows the same route where Female Independence and Promiscuity immediately follows civilizational collapse. Ancient Philosophers works would be considered borderline misogynistic and incendiary by you if you read them.
Not a single one of my points is inaccurate or wrong and your debating methods prove my point that women are more emotional than men and are on a balance of probabilities incapable of critical thinking.
All you've proven is that everything I've said is correct and your refusal to accept that reality. Your Contrarian revolt against pertinent facts and evidence is another reason why women can't be leaders and politicians. There were no Nazi party leaders who were involved in policy as women because Adolf Hitler knew that women can't accept logic and reason, and they only listen to emotion and peer pressure from the culture.
There is no biological difference between women in western society and those in Nazi Germany. They employed the same mass communication, propaganda and emotional persuasion albeit in different directions. Just like a society can manufacture worthless sluts ,a society can manufacture dutiful wives and mothers. The only difference is that the people in control must be willing to do the things that are required of them.
You're fighting me on every single point of fact that I'm presenting and making yourself look stupid because this is incontrovertible evidence. It doesn't matter what anyone's personal opinion is. The reality is the reality. Regardless of whether one is a SS "woman " or not ,you're still having the same points of contention across the board of all races who have been brought up by Feminism.
Women inherently desire Sexist men who feel that they have to protect women from themselves, take care of them and lead them in a relationship.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/theconversation.com/amp/why-women-including-feminists-are-still-attracted-to-benevolently-sexist-men-101067
Your appreciation of whether or not you like this or not is of no consequence as is your opinion that no self respecting woman should be like this. The fact of the matter is that your subjective interpretation of things are in direct conflict with actual reality. You are living in a delusional world of your own making. Women overwhelming desire men who treat them like a being that needs taking care of, that cannot be a leader or independent. They wanted to be taken care of. They want to leave responsibility over to the man to make tough decisions in life and life changing choices. You fighting me on this is simply you refusing to accept reality.
In the real world women who are high earners and independent are the unhappiest demographic of women in the United States.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/high-octane-women/201109/meet-the-least-happy-people-in-america
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/06/14/619338703/u-s-suicides-rates-are-rising-faster-among-women-than-men
https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/women-and-prescription-drug-use_n_1098023
https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/womens-impact-on-the-economy
So everyone here who is arguing against me is in direct conflict with lived in reality and is arguing just to make a point. Its like me arguing the Suns gaze shouldn't be Hot. I feel like the Suns Gaze should be cool .
It doesn't matter what I think is correct or wrong. Reality is reality, human biology is human biology.
There's nothing wrong with women wanting to be taken care of, not wanting to work and be dependent upon a man and give responsibility unto him. This is how the world worked since hundreds of thousands of years of human existence till the last century when Feminism and this idea of female financial and sexual independence was created out of the Marxist Frankfurt school.
When I say women, I am talking about the majority of women. And that constitutes reality. If you're fighting me on any of my points you're making a contrarian outlier argument that isn't based on reality.
Also ,I don't take responsibility for anything that I've said makes you feel any type of way. According to my Free Speech rights I can make any kind of incendiary and inflammatory speech that I like that doesn't involve specifics.
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.[1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".[2][3]:702 Specifically, the Court struck down Ohio's criminal syndicalism statute, because that statute broadly prohibited the mere advocacy of violence
If that woman feels sad ,that's her problem. I'm not going to change my tone in anyway whatever just to appease someone else.
I never bring my personal opinion about topics related to Gender and Social issues because what I personally think don't matter.
For example I personally don't think that Jews should be in any kind of powerful position in any country and that they shouldn't be inside of any countries period. My personal view is that they should be shipped to Islands where they can't interact with other humans as we start thinking about methods of the Final Solution.
But regardless of my view, the fact is that jews are entrenched in any single political organization, company of lobbying groups ,scientific establishment, banking, media etc.
I personally like women who are submissive, hold the same positions ideologically that I do and are not combative ,gives me peace and isn't naggy and complaint, is fit like I am. Regardless of what you think about this woman I'm destined to meet this woman and she's destined to be my wife because that's what I'm attracted to and my RAS is pulling towards me. Your opinion here doesn't change the fact that I was meant to be the husband of a woman who was naturally born as submissive like I was born Dominant. Your judgment about what is good or bad has no bearing on the outcome. I have never coerced any woman to love me through any kind of manipulation. They know what I believe in and what I stand for.
This is similar to you saying that you do not like women who feel attracted to men who want to take care of them and don't want them to be independent or responsible in any significant way. Or that you don't like my view that women can't and don't want to be leaders, or work or be independent.
https://www.nber.org/papers/w14969#:~:text=Relative%20declines%20in%20female%20happiness,subjective%20well%2Dbeing%20for%20men.
Regardless of how you feel about these women ,the fact of reality is that they exist in the majority. That the majority of attractive men with good genes are Sexist and majority of humanity who haven't taken the vaccines and are going to inherit the earth after the defeat of the jews hold similar positions like I do on these topics.
Also I feel like I'm beating the skeleton of a dead horse that has decomposed and has since caught fire.
Pictured : Arguing with women is like beating the decomposed dead horse
I'm just doing this because I want to present to men the image that they should never be ashamed or bullied for wanting to speak facts, just because women will say "How Dare you. "
No matter what anyone says a man must always defend himself and not bend before social pressure. We must offend, we must make incendiary and extremist statements. We must push the overtone window because we must always put our ideals before our emotions. I never argue with women in relationships because I know women can't be argued with. The only way to change her mind is to change her emotions and then get her to agree using compliance ladders with what your saying. Arguing logically against a woman for something you want from her is like digging a grave for yourself to jump inside.
Also there is no need for me to tailor my message to women because they aren't going to take any action either way. It is the men who take action, who will lead the women in their personal lives and it is they who will impart value to a woman and the women will follow. The only demographic that needs to be convinced of what I'm saying is men across all cultures. And they will listen to ideological instructions and statistics and logic,not confusing emotional drivel.
I've laid all the facts and logic which aren't up for debate across the table and I implore everyone reading to come to a conclusion from the lens of critical thinking. Emotion is reserved for actions you take in your personal lives while dealing with another person. Ideological positions must always be based on reality, not your personal view of the world. That is my final message on this topic ,on this thread. Peace out.
