After the recent post and the overwhelming positive and necessary points about future goals and advancement. That has been an impressive post.
I marvelled reading the many positive comments, especially those who mentioned how much Spiritual Satanism and the Gods have changed you and improved you. We must build further on this.
Most of the things mentioned are already under way. Admittedly that is very positive. The communal value is supposed to increase all the time.
Part of this is dealing with potential mistakes.
Now, it would also be a good idea before the end of the material year, to start another conversation.
This would be over things where you think there should be improvement or constitute mistakes.
Here, we might speak of mistakes or even criticism, but we must focus on this: It has to be functional and of use, and presented properly.
For useful conversation, even if this is aimed at other members or the community, it would be a good idea to express in a respectable manner. Among kin and like minded people with a common mission that is important.
If someone also has negative feedback or even very negative comments, I am open to listen to these of course, but I would request to treat other JoS members with respect, especially people who toil for everyone else everyday.
That is not a question for infiltrators, but for members. Except if maybe you are lukewarm infiltrators who are actually with us but you still say bullshit to yourself that you dislike "us" while you actually do not fall in this category in the end of the day.
That is not a post to isolate a member and start judging them, but rather for community improvement.
The degree of tolerance for error must be understood as being part of nature. We are disgnosing to raise the bar here, not to break people who already want to give.
Further, if one is new or one has not much to point out, then maybe one could write about how they would expect to have a better experience. Or what made you struggle in learning or something similar.
Recognition of errors must happen on a basis of experience. But all opinions welcome.
Example: There has been a lot of editorial errors in many posts or even webpages. There were mistakes. We located them and fixed them. The outcome is that through pointing these mistakes and doing the proper criticism, then putting the work, the errors are being more and more fixed. The aim is to remove these mistakes.
The aim is this: To find out potential areas of improvement and have an upwards going trajectory for the good of the Gods and the JoS community, to reflect this back on members, for our collective growth.
-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666
I marvelled reading the many positive comments, especially those who mentioned how much Spiritual Satanism and the Gods have changed you and improved you. We must build further on this.
Most of the things mentioned are already under way. Admittedly that is very positive. The communal value is supposed to increase all the time.
Part of this is dealing with potential mistakes.
Now, it would also be a good idea before the end of the material year, to start another conversation.
This would be over things where you think there should be improvement or constitute mistakes.
Here, we might speak of mistakes or even criticism, but we must focus on this: It has to be functional and of use, and presented properly.
For useful conversation, even if this is aimed at other members or the community, it would be a good idea to express in a respectable manner. Among kin and like minded people with a common mission that is important.
If someone also has negative feedback or even very negative comments, I am open to listen to these of course, but I would request to treat other JoS members with respect, especially people who toil for everyone else everyday.
That is not a question for infiltrators, but for members. Except if maybe you are lukewarm infiltrators who are actually with us but you still say bullshit to yourself that you dislike "us" while you actually do not fall in this category in the end of the day.
That is not a post to isolate a member and start judging them, but rather for community improvement.
The degree of tolerance for error must be understood as being part of nature. We are disgnosing to raise the bar here, not to break people who already want to give.
Further, if one is new or one has not much to point out, then maybe one could write about how they would expect to have a better experience. Or what made you struggle in learning or something similar.
Recognition of errors must happen on a basis of experience. But all opinions welcome.
Example: There has been a lot of editorial errors in many posts or even webpages. There were mistakes. We located them and fixed them. The outcome is that through pointing these mistakes and doing the proper criticism, then putting the work, the errors are being more and more fixed. The aim is to remove these mistakes.
The aim is this: To find out potential areas of improvement and have an upwards going trajectory for the good of the Gods and the JoS community, to reflect this back on members, for our collective growth.
-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666