Any dark truths regarding MLK?

[DisillusionedCitizen]

I've been having doubts about MLK. For someone considered a magnificent speaker, I felt he hid a dark secret behind his supposedly "powerful" voice and activist image. Even before coming here, I vaguely remember reading a website that revealed that MLK, or rather, Michael King, was a Communist who abused women, and I remember better that the Black Panther Party was more of a threat than King was

If any of this is true, I'm more than willing to knock King off his pedestal.

 

[Aquarius]

He was indeed a communist, also controlled opposition.

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

He was indeed a communist, also controlled opposition.

I suspected as such. A lot of black people are under his spell. How did he undermine the black community, or more precisely, how did he deceive so many black with his non-violent movement? I know of the answer is ignorance, but what else allowed King to deceive people into believing he was a saint? Lastly, I mis-phrased the question a bit. I should said secrets instead of truths. Are there any other sinister secrets about MLK?

Was Gandhi also controlled opposition for that matter?

 

[Mergethor]

Everything said already. A constructed hero for the black-communities in America

Here is some proof, just check who wrote his speeches.

https://in4faqs.com/who-wrote-mlk-speeches/#Who_Wrote_Mlk_Speeches

Did MLK write his own speeches?​

King didn’t write the speech entirely by himself. The first draft was written by his advisers Stanley Levison and Clarence Jones, and the final speech included input from many others.

In the early 1950s, the FBI considered Levison to be a major financial coordinator for the Communist Party USA (CPUSA)

Footnote: If someone in the public has "advisors" it is in most cases just PR.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

Read the documents that were recently declassified a couple years ago, from the FBI's investigation on him. It said things like there was at least one time when he helped his friend rape a woman in a hotel room. He held her down so she couldn't get away.

 

[Aquarius]

I suspected as such. A lot of black people are under his spell. How did he undermine the black community, or more precisely, how did he deceive so many black with his non-violent movement? I know of the answer is ignorance, but what else allowed King to deceive people into believing he was a saint? Lastly, I mis-phrased the question a bit. I should said secrets instead of truths. Are there any other sinister secrets about MLK?

Was Gandhi also controlled opposition for that matter?

I wouldn't call Gandhi controlled opposition simply because his teachings were degenerate, there was literally no real opposition from his side, just wishy washy pacifism.
He was also an extreme pervert, making his niece sleep with him naked.

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

Read the documents that were recently declassified a couple years ago, from the FBI's investigation on him. It said things like there was at least one time when he helped his friend rape a woman in a hotel room. He held her down so she couldn't get away.

Sorry for necroing this, but which state did this take place in and when did it take place?

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

Sorry for necroing this, but which state did this take place in and when did it take place?

I don't remember the location and time. But you can do an internet search about it.

 

[OttoHart]

I don't think it gets darker than... well, his actual story.

Malcolm X actually had some decent reforms for the Black population while still being pro-segregation in certain aspects, and the influences on the US quickly got rid of him.
Then, they installed MLK as a puppet, who was easily manipulatable due to his shitty pseudo-socialist opinions.
Then, when they had their fun with MLK, they attempted bullying him into suicide, then murdered him, because that's just what the system does to these people.

I disagree with a wide majority of MLK's politics, but he still was done dirty, despite ultimately playing the jews' game.

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

I don't think it gets darker than... well, his actual story.

Malcolm X actually had some decent reforms for the Black population while still being pro-segregation in certain aspects, and the influences on the US quickly got rid of him.
Then, they installed MLK as a puppet, who was easily manipulatable due to his shitty pseudo-socialist opinions.
Then, when they had their fun with MLK, they attempted bullying him into suicide, then murdered him, because that's just what the system does to these people.

I disagree with a wide majority of MLK's politics, but he still was done dirty, despite ultimately playing the jews' game.

What were his politics again? Just Pro-Integration?

Additionally, did people learn from his (mostly pacifistic) messages too well? Because I'm suspecting that might be the case, as people did with Gandhi.

 

[OttoHart]

What were his politics again? Just Pro-Integration?

Additionally, did people learn from his (mostly pacifistic) messages too well? Because I'm suspecting that might be the case, as people did with Gandhi.

1. Pro-integration and black rights, yes. Malcolm-X was pro black rights as well, but he focused on building a black identity, distinct and "powerful", distanced from white people. He essentially never fought to end segregation, was for keeping races separate.

2. The pacifism is actually just completely a psyop.
I dislike MLK, but he was no pacifist. He actively fought against being "moderate" and pushed certain messages that were anti-establishment enough to get him killed.
And what did his "followers" do when he died? Mass rioting. Doesn't sound like they were pacified to me.

The Pacifism actually comes from later influences in the US, notably from the Cold War, where there have been many shady operations to prevent dissent.

The same kind of shit that Communism gets away with, just more veiled. They do play both sides.

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

The Pacifism actually comes from later influences in the US, notably from the Cold War, where there have been many shady operations to prevent dissent.

The same kind of shit that Communism gets away with, just more veiled. They do play both sides.

Just as I suspected... This confirms my suspicions about an implication some of the High Priests suspected before I did; both Communism and Pacifiism both benefits the Jew twofold, all while with they strike gentiles with several Morton's Forks (since they play both sides, of course).

You mentioned Pacifism does the same stuff Communism gets away with. Are there any more similarities besides what I've described?

 

[OttoHart]

You mentioned Pacifism does the same stuff Communism gets away with. Are there any more similarities besides what I've described?

Not just pacifism, the US's idea of "democracy" as well.
"Democracy" and capitalism are heavily used by jews as well.

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

Not just pacifism, the US's idea of "democracy" as well.
"Democracy" and capitalism are heavily used by jews as well.

What is the US's idea of "democracy?" An oligarchy?

Furthermore... Is it just me, or does it appear that the Jew's entire scheme tends to based on socially pleasant concepts with strong moral and social principles (IE: Trust, non-violent, happiness, perseverance, achievement)?

What lesson did we gentiles fail to learn (Besides the Jew being dangerous, of course)? If not that, then what lesson did we learn too well? It's a crapshoot, and thinking about this tends to hurts my head.

 

[OttoHart]

Is it just me, or does it appear that the Jew's entire scheme tends to based on socially pleasant concepts with strong moral and social principles (IE: Trust, non-violent, happiness, perseverance, achievement)?

Even the enemy programs need to be "1% rooted in truth".
A complete lie without this kind of trickery would not be popular.

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

Even the enemy programs need to be "1% rooted in truth".
A complete lie without this kind of trickery would not be popular.

A lie can be accepted, even when it's 0.5% true? That's more absurd than it sounds. Wait, what do we call half-truths if the lies can be 10% true?