Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Ahmaud Arbery Was NOT Jogging, Caught on Camera Committing Crimes, Men Were Justified

Cast Cat

Active member
Joined
Sep 23, 2019
Messages
870
https://www.bitchute.com/video/twtt_8x162c/

Let's see if the kike media talks about this new update.
 
I've been seeing about this. Caught on camera inside of the house, probably stealing tools. He was not jogging, he was walking slowly when he came to the house then he was in there more than 5 minutes, then he went out the front door and ran away because someone saw him. People steal tools from construction sites all the time, probably the most commonly stolen thing. Because it's easy, there's noone watching at night, tools stay valuable even if they are old, and easy to sell.

That neighborhood had many robberies in the past about 6 months. And the guys that killed him, a month earlier than that someone broke into their truck and stole a gun that was in there. So they thought the guy had a big chance of having it with him. And they saw this guy inside the house, so they knew he was robbing it, so he was probably the same one who robbed all the other places around there.

The guys that did it are definitely guilty, they deserve to go to jail. Because they don't have the right to go chasing someone down the street with a gun, that is not self defence if they start it. It's not right to say that those guys are innocent. But it's also not right to say that the other guy was innocent either, he was a burgler not a jogger. He's not some innocent guy just walking around, he was a criminal who was seen in the middle of a crime.

If the guy who died was white, nobody would care. Nobody would have heard about it. This whole thing is just an excuse to try to create racial tensions, resentment, and instability on both sides. I don't see this as anything racial, and anybody who is truly not racist should also see that race has nothing to do with it. But they don't see the whole story, they only are shown the smallest piece of the story in a way to purposefully make them mad.
 
Interesting you never can trust the kike media. This looked pretty bad and senseless at first but since when does the media ever stand on the side of what’s right. There is always more to the story OR things are used just to stir up anger against whites.
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
The guys that did it are definitely guilty, they deserve to go to jail. Because they don't have the right to go chasing someone down the street with a gun, that is not self defence if they start it. It's not right to say that those guys are innocent. But it's also not right to say that the other guy was innocent either, he was a burgler not a jogger. He's not some innocent guy just walking around, he was a criminal who was seen in the middle of a crime.
The two guys in the truck with the guns were acting in accordance with the law. Watch the bitchute video.
 
Absolute hatred of the color of the skin against joggers by White America.
 
There are more security camera videos. He went into that house several times, including several times at night. This house is about 10 miles away from his home. Why would you walk 10 miles in the middle of the night just to go into someone else's house where they are doing construction? If it's not to steal tools, what reason is there?
 
The enemy always wants crime to run rampant so that everyone collectively suffers.

Then they do race baiting to people so they can stay at the top while people fight over their disinformation to defend the lies that have been projected at them.

Then, they profit, and everyone else loses.
 
of the true light said:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/twtt_8x162c/

Let's see if the kike media talks about this new update.


The homeowner stated the under construction house wasn’t robbed

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/homeowner-linked-to-ahmaud-arbery-case-said-residence-was-never-robbed/

Plus the video shows he did nothing illegal. To break in a house the house must have closed doors and windows which the that house didn’t. Plus all he did in it was go in for three minutes and then leave. He didn’t touch or steal anything.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/05/10/ahmaud-arbery-shooting-new-video-shows-georgia-jogger-did-nothing-illegal/3105123001/
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
The enemy always wants crime to run rampant so that everyone collectively suffers.

Then they do race baiting to people so they can stay at the top while people fight over their disinformation to defend the lies that have been projected at them.

Then, they profit, and everyone else loses.
More like just plain communism. But instead of making the poor be against everyone who is one dollar richer than them like they did most communist revolutions with, now they just divide people in every possible way. But with all the hatred focused against the most normal and most productive people, so all of society just collapses.

Everyone hating against white people. Everyone hating against men. Everyone hating against skinny people. Everyone hating against straight people. Everyone hating against people who identify as their biological sex. Everyone hating against anyone who is determined and successful in any area. Everyone hating against anyone who is physically or mentally healthy.

This is the only thing the colleges teach about in classes like Gender Studies. If you are not a 600 pound, mixed race, transsexual, gender fluid, gay, vegan, liberal democrat, smoking weed all day long and taking 500 antipsychotic pills, then you are pure evil and you are the absolute cause of every problem in the history of the universe.

If you are white, you are evil. If you are a man, you are evil. If you are not morbidly obese, you are evil. If you are heterosexual, you are evil. If you are not the most extreme possible marxist liberal democrat, you are evil. If you are mentally healthy, you are evil. If you are physically healthy, you are evil. If you want to live and exist, you are evil. If you want your family to live and exist, you are evil. If you want your country to live and exist, you are evil. If you want your race to live and exist, you are evil. If you want to have a safe, healthy, and functioning world, you are evil.

What a worthless and evil alien mindset to have to believe all that. Almost like all regular normal healthy white people are the sparks of Amelek and Ha-Satan and are the absolute enemy of judah.... Then let the sparks of Amelek Satan burn even brighter like the purifying flame of a forge which creates the strongest metal, and use it to build a strong healthy happy world.

I don't listen to dumb rats on what they think is healthy.
 
Checking in to rob a place, with signs that one has a valid intent of robbing, such as checking many times daily or trying to check rooms and premises, but not doing a robbery, is "reasonable grounds of suspicion". The same goes for properties. If you jump in someone's garden in some jurisdictions, or pass into private property as much as a foot, then you are trespassing.

If people see you, they can call the cops on you, despite of what the owner thinks if they are in danger or not. Whether or not a false positive it's rectified after arrest and possible questioning.

Even if it's claimed he didn't nothing as per the usual claim, and he was totally innocent, until he went on the run, and after the situation escalated, he tried to pull the gun from cops in general with the assumption that this is to shoot them with their own gun is not a good idea.

Trying to remove the gun from a cop is something you can get shot over, and obviously die from. He fought with the cop over the gun, did not pull the weapon successfully, and got shot, and died.

Where are the morals here, that he should have picked up the gun and killed the cop, and that this would make him even better of an innocent runner that didn't do nothing as per usual? Someone tries to pull the gun from the cop, they get shot. They went into a fight over a gun, the cop just lucked out and won. Innocence prior to the fact is lost after what he did, if it's assumed he had any.

If a "white" guy was pulling a gun from a black cop, and he would be killed trying to do this, this wouldn't be on the news. There would be no necessity for dindu nuffin and Media 24/7 race baiting of course. Because this is not really profitable for jews. This incident here however, was profitable to be misreported and going viral.

Always re-sparks the same situation where jews laugh and goyim fight. The usual crock of shit race baiting. The jew narrative over this is the only thing that really won anything out of anything.

Cowboy123 said:
of the true light said:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/twtt_8x162c/

Let's see if the kike media talks about this new update.

The homeowner stated the under construction house wasn’t robbed

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/homeowner-linked-to-ahmaud-arbery-case-said-residence-was-never-robbed/

Plus the video shows he did nothing illegal. To break in a house the house must have closed doors and windows which the that house didn’t. Plus all he did in it was go in for three minutes and then leave. He didn’t touch or steal anything.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/05/10/ahmaud-arbery-shooting-new-video-shows-georgia-jogger-did-nothing-illegal/3105123001/
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Checking in to rob a place, with signs that one has a valid intent of robbing, such as checking many times daily or trying to check rooms and premises, but not doing a robbery, is "reasonable grounds of suspicion". The same goes for properties. If you jump in someone's garden in some jurisdictions, or pass into private property as much as a foot, then you are trespassing.

If people see you, they can call the cops on you, despite of what the owner thinks if they are in danger or not. Whether or not a false positive it's rectified after arrest and possible questioning.

Even if it's claimed he didn't nothing as per the usual claim, and he was totally innocent, until he went on the run, and after the situation escalated, he tried to pull the gun from cops in general with the assumption that this is to shoot them with their own gun is not a good idea.

Trying to remove the gun from a cop is something you can get shot over, and obviously die from. He fought with the cop over the gun, did not pull the weapon successfully, and got shot, and died.

Where are the morals here, that he should have picked up the gun and killed the cop, and that this would make him even better of an innocent runner that didn't do nothing as per usual? Someone tries to pull the gun from the cop, they get shot. They went into a fight over a gun, the cop just lucked out and won. Innocence prior to the fact is lost after what he did, if it's assumed he had any.

If a "white" guy was pulling a gun from a black cop, and he would be killed trying to do this, this wouldn't be on the news. There would be no necessity for dindu nuffin and Media 24/7 race baiting of course. Because this is not really profitable for jews. This incident here however, was profitable to be misreported and going viral.

Always re-sparks the same situation where jews laugh and goyim fight. The usual crock of shit race baiting. The jew narrative over this is the only thing that really won anything out of anything.

Cowboy123 said:
of the true light said:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/twtt_8x162c/

Let's see if the kike media talks about this new update.

The homeowner stated the under construction house wasn’t robbed

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/homeowner-linked-to-ahmaud-arbery-case-said-residence-was-never-robbed/

Plus the video shows he did nothing illegal. To break in a house the house must have closed doors and windows which the that house didn’t. Plus all he did in it was go in for three minutes and then leave. He didn’t touch or steal anything.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/05/10/ahmaud-arbery-shooting-new-video-shows-georgia-jogger-did-nothing-illegal/3105123001/


The man was a former cop not on duty and his son. Which is why they called the cops. Even the 911 operator asked what did ahmaud do wrong. If it was reasonable grounds of suspicion they should have waited for the actual police. They tried to make a citizen’s arrest which according to Georgia law you must witness the actual crime to do. Ahmaud committed no crime according to the laws even the home owner stated there was no robbery. Ahmaud as the vid shows went in for three minutes then left he didn’t steal anything. So they were wrong to even attempt a citizens arrest. Also the video of the shooting shows ahmaud running and the father and son were already ahead of him waiting for him. Which means they chased him and got ahead of him to catch him while he was running. We know because the vid was recorded on the third guys cell phone who was in the truck behind him chasing ahmaud. The son had the shotgun and was standing outside the car to the left ahmaud was scared as he had strangers chase him and he saw they were armed as the son stood outside the car with a shotgun the father stood in the back of the truck. Ahmaud went to the right around the truck and acted in a fight or flight mode. Since he couldn’t turn back because the third guy was in a truck behind him and they were in front he chose to fight and lost his life.

The facts are they should’ve waited for the actual police. They assumed he committed a crime which we find out that he didn’t and pursued him. He was being chased by unknown people who were armed and they essentially cornered him so he fought and was killed.
 
And come to find out the footage of “Ahmaud” in the house at night wasn’t him. It’s been confirmed by family.

https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/investigation-death-ahmaud-arbery-heats-70607481

So apparently the killers saw ahmaud and figured he’s a black male so therefore it must’ve been him. Which it wasn’t.
 
And come to find out the footage of “Ahmaud” in the house at night wasn’t him. It’s been confirmed by family.

https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/investigation-death-ahmaud-arbery-heats-70607481

So apparently the killers saw ahmaud and figured he’s a black male so therefore it must’ve been him. Which it wasn’t.
 
Cowboy123 said:
They tried to make a citizen’s arrest which according to Georgia law you must witness the actual crime to do. Ahmaud committed no crime according to the laws even the home owner stated there was no robbery.
From research, this appears to be true which is a very big point in deciding where the fault lies in this case.

Yes, he attacked a man with a gun and then it was a life or death struggle and his actions in that circumstance certainly led to his death. His behavior was suspicious and had he just been walking around minding his own affairs he would be alive today. However, he also would be alive today if he wasn’t chased by men with weapons, who it appears had no legal right to chase him and conduct a citizens arrest in the first place.

For that reason, the men with the shotgun have legitimate legal fault in this case. Despite Ahmauds suspicious behavior, they should have never gone at him with a gun. They should of left this to on duty police officers.

Their intent was fine, but the way they went about it was breaking the law and led to a mans death. This appears to be the facts with the evidence available at the moment.
 
Cowboy123 said:
And come to find out the footage of “Ahmaud” in the house at night wasn’t him. It’s been confirmed by family.

https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/investigation-death-ahmaud-arbery-heats-70607481

So apparently the killers saw ahmaud and figured he’s a black male so therefore it must’ve been him. Which it wasn’t.
As seen in the video, the two men asked Ahmed to stop so that they could talk to him. He attacked the men and got killed so that was in self defense. These two men did nothing wrong except the fact they shouldn't have taken matters into their own hands and tried to make a citizens arrests. Ahmed's death is on him.
 
Ahmed was in full sprint on the left side of the road toward the white truck. He went to the right of the truck and turned left in front of the truck and attacked the guy with the shotgun. Why would you do that? You can't even pull your own gun on someone with a gun pointed at you much less attack someone with a gun by hand. Watching the bitchute video above clears up everything. The jogger was in the wrong. Yeah I jog in my boots. Yeah I would trespass on construction sites in the 90's when I was underage. I don't do it now because I'm an adult and that's illegal.... Ahmed was in the wrong here all the way here.
 
Cowboy123 said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Checking in to rob a place, with signs that one has a valid intent of robbing, such as checking many times daily or trying to check rooms and premises, but not doing a robbery, is "reasonable grounds of suspicion". The same goes for properties. If you jump in someone's garden in some jurisdictions, or pass into private property as much as a foot, then you are trespassing.

If people see you, they can call the cops on you, despite of what the owner thinks if they are in danger or not. Whether or not a false positive it's rectified after arrest and possible questioning.

Even if it's claimed he didn't nothing as per the usual claim, and he was totally innocent, until he went on the run, and after the situation escalated, he tried to pull the gun from cops in general with the assumption that this is to shoot them with their own gun is not a good idea.

Trying to remove the gun from a cop is something you can get shot over, and obviously die from. He fought with the cop over the gun, did not pull the weapon successfully, and got shot, and died.

Where are the morals here, that he should have picked up the gun and killed the cop, and that this would make him even better of an innocent runner that didn't do nothing as per usual? Someone tries to pull the gun from the cop, they get shot. They went into a fight over a gun, the cop just lucked out and won. Innocence prior to the fact is lost after what he did, if it's assumed he had any.

If a "white" guy was pulling a gun from a black cop, and he would be killed trying to do this, this wouldn't be on the news. There would be no necessity for dindu nuffin and Media 24/7 race baiting of course. Because this is not really profitable for jews. This incident here however, was profitable to be misreported and going viral.

Always re-sparks the same situation where jews laugh and goyim fight. The usual crock of shit race baiting. The jew narrative over this is the only thing that really won anything out of anything.

Cowboy123 said:
The homeowner stated the under construction house wasn’t robbed

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/homeowner-linked-to-ahmaud-arbery-case-said-residence-was-never-robbed/

Plus the video shows he did nothing illegal. To break in a house the house must have closed doors and windows which the that house didn’t. Plus all he did in it was go in for three minutes and then leave. He didn’t touch or steal anything.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/05/10/ahmaud-arbery-shooting-new-video-shows-georgia-jogger-did-nothing-illegal/3105123001/


The man was a former cop not on duty and his son. Which is why they called the cops. Even the 911 operator asked what did ahmaud do wrong. If it was reasonable grounds of suspicion they should have waited for the actual police. They tried to make a citizen’s arrest which according to Georgia law you must witness the actual crime to do. Ahmaud committed no crime according to the laws even the home owner stated there was no robbery. Ahmaud as the vid shows went in for three minutes then left he didn’t steal anything. So they were wrong to even attempt a citizens arrest. Also the video of the shooting shows ahmaud running and the father and son were already ahead of him waiting for him. Which means they chased him and got ahead of him to catch him while he was running. We know because the vid was recorded on the third guys cell phone who was in the truck behind him chasing ahmaud. The son had the shotgun and was standing outside the car to the left ahmaud was scared as he had strangers chase him and he saw they were armed as the son stood outside the car with a shotgun the father stood in the back of the truck. Ahmaud went to the right around the truck and acted in a fight or flight mode. Since he couldn’t turn back because the third guy was in a truck behind him and they were in front he chose to fight and lost his life.

The facts are they should’ve waited for the actual police. They assumed he committed a crime which we find out that he didn’t and pursued him. He was being chased by unknown people who were armed and they essentially cornered him so he fought and was killed.
Why did he go inside the construction site in the first place. There should have been a no trespassing sign at the construction site and he went inside regardless. If he had been questioned, he might have revealed his intent to steal small construction tools,
https://mobilevideoguard.com/the-5-most-common-types-of-theft-at-construction-sites/amp/

And even if he didn't, if he did nothing wrong then why did he attack the men that tried to stop and question him ?

Obviously because he was either thinking of committing a crime or thinking he had done something wrong and was running away. You don't just go inside a construction site alone ,look around and then leave. He was obviously looking for things to steal.

This Happened in February and Only Now the Media Says It’s Important


Instead, it was only the beginning. This shooting happened on Feb. 23, about two and a half months ago. There were no arrests, because it was clearly self defense. As late as April 14, there appeared to be only local news coverage of the District Attorney removing himself from the case.
According to documents obtained by The New York Times, a prosecutor who had the case for a few weeks told the police that the pursuers had acted within the scope of Georgia’s citizen’s arrest statute, and that Travis McMichael, who held the shotgun, had acted out of self-defense.

Then, in the last two days, the media decided that it was headline news, and the police obliged them and made arrests.

Ahmed Arbury was a criminal who had earlier been arrested.

In his letter to the police, Mr. Barnhill, the prosecutor, noted that Mr. Arbery had a criminal past. Court records show that Mr. Arbery was convicted of shoplifting and of violating probation in 2018. Five years earlier, according to The Brunswick News, he was indicted on charges that he took a handgun to a high school basketball game.
This fits in with the case that he was there to steal construction items and he ran away
Newly released CCTV footage from Feb. 23 shows a man dressed in clothes matching those of Ahmaud Arbery on a private construction site approximately 240 yards from the scene of Arbery’s fatal shooting on that day.
 
First off I think we can all agree Ahmaud is a lowlife piece of garbage.

Second off, the GA citizens arrest law will determine the fate of the father and son....

Summary and Other relevant facts of what happened:
25yo male felon, with probation violations for weapons charges in 2018, seen running from unoccupied home. Neighbor is on the phone with with 911. Other neighbors try to detain him. Suspect attacks and tries to wrestle gun away. Gets shot.

--------------------------------------------------------

2010 Georgia Code
TITLE 17 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 4 - ARREST OF PERSONS
ARTICLE 4 - ARREST BY PRIVATE PERSONS
§ 17-4-60 - Grounds for arrest
"A private person may arrest an offender if the offense is committed in his presence or within his immediate knowledge. If the offense is a felony and the offender is escaping or attempting to escape, a private person may arrest him upon reasonable and probable grounds of suspicion."

----------------------------------------------------

Offense committed within father/son's Immediate knowledge? Check
- Black male seen running from unoccupied home. Neighbor is on the phone with with 911. Father and son go to detain him on that knowledge

Offense is a felony? Depends
- Ahmaud's actions are considered a burglary (felony) or criminal trespass (misdemeanor)

----------------------------------------------------

2014 Georgia Code
Title 16 - CRIMES AND OFFENSES
Chapter 7 - DAMAGE TO AND INTRUSION UPON PROPERTY
Article 1 - BURGLARY
§ 16-7-1 - Burglary

"(b) A person commits the offense of burglary in the first degree when, without authority and with the intent to commit a felony or theft therein, he or she enters or remains within an occupied, unoccupied, or vacant dwelling house of another or any building, vehicle, railroad car, watercraft, aircraft, or other such structure designed for use as the dwelling of another. A person who commits the offense of burglary in the first degree shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than 20 years. Upon the second conviction for burglary in the first degree, the defendant shall be guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two nor more than 20 years. Upon the third and all subsequent convictions for burglary in the first degree, the defendant shall be guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than 25 years."

"(c) A person commits the offense of burglary in the second degree when, without authority and with the intent to commit a felony or theft therein, he or she enters or remains within an occupied, unoccupied, or vacant building, structure, vehicle, railroad car, watercraft, or aircraft. A person who commits the offense of burglary in the second degree shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years. Upon the second and all subsequent convictions for burglary in the second degree, the defendant shall be guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than eight years."

----------------------------------------------------

2010 Georgia Code
TITLE 16 - CRIMES AND OFFENSES
CHAPTER 7 - DAMAGE TO AND INTRUSION UPON PROPERTY
ARTICLE 2 - CRIMINAL TRESPASS AND DAMAGE TO PROPERTY
PART 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS
§ 16-7-21 - Criminal trespass

(b) A person commits the offense of criminal trespass when he or she knowingly and without authority:

(1) Enters upon the land or premises of another person or into any part of any vehicle, railroad car, aircraft, or watercraft of another person for an unlawful purpose;

-----------------------------------------------------

Burglary depends on the intention of the criminal as shown by the underlined and italicized section above. It is irrelevant in GA law if the building was open and not actually broken into.

If the facts show that Ahmaud did not have an intent to commit a felony therein, (steal anything over a certain value/had a history of canvassing the property on other occasions/was caught stealing on nearby properties) then he will most likely have been committing Criminal Trespass. Therefore, father and son are not protected by the Citizen's arrest law because Ahmaud was committing a misdemeanor

---------------------------------------------------------

Based on the facts above, father and son will likely be charged with voluntary manslaughter, not murder. They have a lot of defenses that will mitigate their conviction. This means they will face anywhere from 1-20 years. I predict prosecutor is pressured to go hard on them so the dumb race baiters don't riot...so dad who shot him will probably get 10 years, son may not be charged at all since he didn't take the shot, or he may be charged as an accessory and probably get 3-7 years

As soon as Ahmaud charged and grabbed the son's gun he was considered armed and dangerous. However, this is irrelevant because father and son had no authority under the law of GA to make a citizens arrest in this instance, assuming Ahmaud was simply criminally trespassing. Therefore, father and son were committing assault with a deadly weapon when they held up Ahmaud. Prosecutor against father and son can claim that Ahmaud reasonably feared for his life and tried to fight back.

Honestly this also all hinges on how retarded the jury is going to be. If its an OJ jury they are fu**ed. If its a Zimmerman Jury they may live to see the light of day

If I was the judge and jury, and the facts show that Ahmaud was intending to steal from the property, then I would acquit the father and son because they did all of us a favor by getting rid of a career criminal


----------------------------------------------------------

kike media reaction:

1. They use an innocent looking high school picture of Ahmaud to show the masses that whitey killed a saint, instead of showing a more recent intimidating mugshot of him:
Screen-Shot-2020-05-06-at-1.31.04-PM-1068x573.png


2. They say he was jogging when in fact he was fleeing a crime scene

3. This is just another Michael Brown 2.0
 
RIP Ahmed Arbury, know good boy and dedicated supporter of all that is good and noble.
arbery-mugshot.jpg

Ahmed Arbury ,dedicated supporter of all that is good
 
Jack said:
Cowboy123 said:
And come to find out the footage of “Ahmaud” in the house at night wasn’t him. It’s been confirmed by family.

https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/investigation-death-ahmaud-arbery-heats-70607481

So apparently the killers saw ahmaud and figured he’s a black male so therefore it must’ve been him. Which it wasn’t.
As seen in the video, the two men asked Ahmed to stop so that they could talk to him. He attacked the men and got killed so that was in self defense. These two men did nothing wrong except the fact they shouldn't have taken matters into their own hands and tried to make a citizens arrests. Ahmed's death is on him.


That is not at all what happened. The vid of shooting shows they were ahead of him which means they chased him and got in front of him and stopped. They waited for him to run to them the guy recording was in the second truck behind him chasing him. He felt his life was in danger after being chased by strangers who he later found out were armed and defended himself sense he couldn’t run back the other way.
 
The awkward moment when the supposed "racist" country spends all the time to rectify the death of a black person in a supposed oppressed land that hates black people, according to the media.

Meanwhile a few thousand white people will disappear somewhere in some other country and be sold for organs, but lol, who has time for that shit in these places?

What happened will be rectified in court, testimonies etc. This is all some jewish attention whoring to spark the usual "oppression" and race war they have been doing since 1920's, the foundation Communist idea of using race baiting to destroy everyone.

Crimes done against Whites who are overwhelming are not made into a medley into the media, it's more like the opposite.

"It happens months ago but let's make it a thing now that the United States is increasingly suffering and divided, it will harm the goyim more. Use the usual line of dinduism, evil whitey, oppressed and therefore beyond judgement minority etc, you know the drill. Make them feel like Jewsus on the cross and the need to repent for existing. Pretend the legal system never did a mistake and that this was central to the person in question for rayyyyceest reasons, ok" -Some jew in some newspaper
 
Jack said:
RIP Ahmed Arbury, know good boy and dedicated supporter of all that is good and noble.
arbery-mugshot.jpg

Ahmed Arbury ,dedicated supporter of all that is good
LMAO :lol:
 
Aquarius said:
Jack said:
RIP Ahmed Arbury, know good boy and dedicated supporter of all that is good and noble.
arbery-mugshot.jpg

Ahmed Arbury ,dedicated supporter of all that is good
LMAO :lol:

He was a dedicated jogger too. Probably could have represented the USA in the olympics for track and field

0a54d4ced34e6b5e7130cbc11e7c175834a2d63f706477869805db9eed1044db.jpg
 
The whole internet is like fighting over this, many forums and even in Reddit, I saw this sometime ago.

Meanwhile, we are facing the greatest strive of the enemy in like decades, but it's ok, let everyone waste time on the carrots dropped on by the jews on a murder alongside other thousands which take place daily, so that they can inflame us racially and have us bicker etc, and waste out time.

Well nope, I am sure most people can see beyond this.
 
Two old white people were visiting their dead son's grave in a cemetary, and a black guy killed both of them with a scoped rifle like he was hunting deer. I don't see anyone complaining about that, when that is a much more horrible story. When black people kill white people, nobody ever hears about it. But if a white person kills a black person, it's the only thing that anyone ever hears about. And the only thing they are told is the color of the people, not what the actual situation is or what really happened. When most of the time, race has nothing to do with it.

If all these Black Lives Matter people actually cared about black people, why do they never mention how almost all the black people who get killed, it is another black person who killed them in some dumb gang fight? That is the statistic, almost always what the situation is. But they will never mention this, because they don't actually care anything about supporting black people, all they care about is creating racial tensions and resentment and hating all white people. They are communist agents working to create chaos and disorder to allow the next communist revolution to come through, that's all it's about.
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
...Black Lives Matters...BLM...

It's just like the "Chess pawns website" that talked about racial issues. It's a shame it was taken down and no one made a http copy of it.

Like the chess pawns website stated "Do all black lives matter? and the answer would No, not all of them do."

B.L.M. = Useful idiots, the fact the organization connects with ISIS/ISIL/Al-Qaida/Terrorists is proof enough of subversive, racially tense idiots who parrot non-sense.

(FYI for those of you who don't remember the Chess Pawns website it was a JoS affiliate website created to promote racial awareness particularly in Blacks this was before Shannon's website, albeit I think many of our black members read it and agreed with it on the yahoo and Prophp former forums.)
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
Two old white people were visiting their dead son's grave in a cemetary, and a black guy killed both of them with a scoped rifle like he was hunting deer. I don't see anyone complaining about that, when that is a much more horrible story. When black people kill white people, nobody ever hears about it. But if a white person kills a black person, it's the only thing that anyone ever hears about. And the only thing they are told is the color of the people, not what the actual situation is or what really happened. When most of the time, race has nothing to do with it.

If all these Black Lives Matter people actually cared about black people, why do they never mention how almost all the black people who get killed, it is another black person who killed them in some dumb gang fight? That is the statistic, almost always what the situation is. But they will never mention this, because they don't actually care anything about supporting black people, all they care about is creating racial tensions and resentment and hating all white people. They are communist agents working to create chaos and disorder to allow the next communist revolution to come through, that's all it's about.


haha yeah, that's what the high priest/ess says, anyways I'm new, I'm from the Asian race, you?
 
animeman666 said:
Ol argedco luciftias said:
Two old white people were visiting their dead son's grave in a cemetary, and a black guy killed both of them with a scoped rifle like he was hunting deer. I don't see anyone complaining about that, when that is a much more horrible story. When black people kill white people, nobody ever hears about it. But if a white person kills a black person, it's the only thing that anyone ever hears about. And the only thing they are told is the color of the people, not what the actual situation is or what really happened. When most of the time, race has nothing to do with it.

If all these Black Lives Matter people actually cared about black people, why do they never mention how almost all the black people who get killed, it is another black person who killed them in some dumb gang fight? That is the statistic, almost always what the situation is. But they will never mention this, because they don't actually care anything about supporting black people, all they care about is creating racial tensions and resentment and hating all white people. They are communist agents working to create chaos and disorder to allow the next communist revolution to come through, that's all it's about.


haha yeah, that's what the high priest/ess says, anyways I'm new, I'm from the Asian race, you?
What is funny about a black man hunting two white people with a rifle?

You're new? Says your account is 2 years old.

I'm white.
 
Dr. Phil did a segment on it today and totally cucked out as usual...saying Arbery did not attack the two white men etc. when it was clear he was on video punching the guy with the shotgun and then trying to take it from him.

He even went so far as to post a tribute video of Arbery on his FB.

Pretty disgusting.
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
animeman666 said:
Ol argedco luciftias said:
Two old white people were visiting their dead son's grave in a cemetary, and a black guy killed both of them with a scoped rifle like he was hunting deer. I don't see anyone complaining about that, when that is a much more horrible story. When black people kill white people, nobody ever hears about it. But if a white person kills a black person, it's the only thing that anyone ever hears about. And the only thing they are told is the color of the people, not what the actual situation is or what really happened. When most of the time, race has nothing to do with it.

If all these Black Lives Matter people actually cared about black people, why do they never mention how almost all the black people who get killed, it is another black person who killed them in some dumb gang fight? That is the statistic, almost always what the situation is. But they will never mention this, because they don't actually care anything about supporting black people, all they care about is creating racial tensions and resentment and hating all white people. They are communist agents working to create chaos and disorder to allow the next communist revolution to come through, that's all it's about.


haha yeah, that's what the high priest/ess says, anyways I'm new, I'm from the Asian race, you?
What is funny about a black man hunting two white people with a rifle?

You're new? Says your account is 2 years old.

I'm white.


you're right, I reread the post. there was nothing funny about it at all. I don't know what I was thinking, my account says 2 years but i have "been" SS for 5 now, I trying but I got pressured into doing drugs heavily by an oriental Christian when I was in my teens. im still trying to break free from him and fight the jews, lol
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top