The two guys in the truck with the guns were acting in accordance with the law. Watch the bitchute video.Ol argedco luciftias said:The guys that did it are definitely guilty, they deserve to go to jail. Because they don't have the right to go chasing someone down the street with a gun, that is not self defence if they start it. It's not right to say that those guys are innocent. But it's also not right to say that the other guy was innocent either, he was a burgler not a jogger. He's not some innocent guy just walking around, he was a criminal who was seen in the middle of a crime.
of the true light said:https://www.bitchute.com/video/twtt_8x162c/
Let's see if the kike media talks about this new update.
More like just plain communism. But instead of making the poor be against everyone who is one dollar richer than them like they did most communist revolutions with, now they just divide people in every possible way. But with all the hatred focused against the most normal and most productive people, so all of society just collapses.HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:The enemy always wants crime to run rampant so that everyone collectively suffers.
Then they do race baiting to people so they can stay at the top while people fight over their disinformation to defend the lies that have been projected at them.
Then, they profit, and everyone else loses.
Cowboy123 said:of the true light said:https://www.bitchute.com/video/twtt_8x162c/
Let's see if the kike media talks about this new update.
The homeowner stated the under construction house wasn’t robbed
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/homeowner-linked-to-ahmaud-arbery-case-said-residence-was-never-robbed/
Plus the video shows he did nothing illegal. To break in a house the house must have closed doors and windows which the that house didn’t. Plus all he did in it was go in for three minutes and then leave. He didn’t touch or steal anything.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/05/10/ahmaud-arbery-shooting-new-video-shows-georgia-jogger-did-nothing-illegal/3105123001/
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:Checking in to rob a place, with signs that one has a valid intent of robbing, such as checking many times daily or trying to check rooms and premises, but not doing a robbery, is "reasonable grounds of suspicion". The same goes for properties. If you jump in someone's garden in some jurisdictions, or pass into private property as much as a foot, then you are trespassing.
If people see you, they can call the cops on you, despite of what the owner thinks if they are in danger or not. Whether or not a false positive it's rectified after arrest and possible questioning.
Even if it's claimed he didn't nothing as per the usual claim, and he was totally innocent, until he went on the run, and after the situation escalated, he tried to pull the gun from cops in general with the assumption that this is to shoot them with their own gun is not a good idea.
Trying to remove the gun from a cop is something you can get shot over, and obviously die from. He fought with the cop over the gun, did not pull the weapon successfully, and got shot, and died.
Where are the morals here, that he should have picked up the gun and killed the cop, and that this would make him even better of an innocent runner that didn't do nothing as per usual? Someone tries to pull the gun from the cop, they get shot. They went into a fight over a gun, the cop just lucked out and won. Innocence prior to the fact is lost after what he did, if it's assumed he had any.
If a "white" guy was pulling a gun from a black cop, and he would be killed trying to do this, this wouldn't be on the news. There would be no necessity for dindu nuffin and Media 24/7 race baiting of course. Because this is not really profitable for jews. This incident here however, was profitable to be misreported and going viral.
Always re-sparks the same situation where jews laugh and goyim fight. The usual crock of shit race baiting. The jew narrative over this is the only thing that really won anything out of anything.
Cowboy123 said:of the true light said:https://www.bitchute.com/video/twtt_8x162c/
Let's see if the kike media talks about this new update.
The homeowner stated the under construction house wasn’t robbed
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/homeowner-linked-to-ahmaud-arbery-case-said-residence-was-never-robbed/
Plus the video shows he did nothing illegal. To break in a house the house must have closed doors and windows which the that house didn’t. Plus all he did in it was go in for three minutes and then leave. He didn’t touch or steal anything.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/05/10/ahmaud-arbery-shooting-new-video-shows-georgia-jogger-did-nothing-illegal/3105123001/
From research, this appears to be true which is a very big point in deciding where the fault lies in this case.Cowboy123 said:They tried to make a citizen’s arrest which according to Georgia law you must witness the actual crime to do. Ahmaud committed no crime according to the laws even the home owner stated there was no robbery.
As seen in the video, the two men asked Ahmed to stop so that they could talk to him. He attacked the men and got killed so that was in self defense. These two men did nothing wrong except the fact they shouldn't have taken matters into their own hands and tried to make a citizens arrests. Ahmed's death is on him.Cowboy123 said:And come to find out the footage of “Ahmaud” in the house at night wasn’t him. It’s been confirmed by family.
https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/investigation-death-ahmaud-arbery-heats-70607481
So apparently the killers saw ahmaud and figured he’s a black male so therefore it must’ve been him. Which it wasn’t.
Why did he go inside the construction site in the first place. There should have been a no trespassing sign at the construction site and he went inside regardless. If he had been questioned, he might have revealed his intent to steal small construction tools,Cowboy123 said:HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:Checking in to rob a place, with signs that one has a valid intent of robbing, such as checking many times daily or trying to check rooms and premises, but not doing a robbery, is "reasonable grounds of suspicion". The same goes for properties. If you jump in someone's garden in some jurisdictions, or pass into private property as much as a foot, then you are trespassing.
If people see you, they can call the cops on you, despite of what the owner thinks if they are in danger or not. Whether or not a false positive it's rectified after arrest and possible questioning.
Even if it's claimed he didn't nothing as per the usual claim, and he was totally innocent, until he went on the run, and after the situation escalated, he tried to pull the gun from cops in general with the assumption that this is to shoot them with their own gun is not a good idea.
Trying to remove the gun from a cop is something you can get shot over, and obviously die from. He fought with the cop over the gun, did not pull the weapon successfully, and got shot, and died.
Where are the morals here, that he should have picked up the gun and killed the cop, and that this would make him even better of an innocent runner that didn't do nothing as per usual? Someone tries to pull the gun from the cop, they get shot. They went into a fight over a gun, the cop just lucked out and won. Innocence prior to the fact is lost after what he did, if it's assumed he had any.
If a "white" guy was pulling a gun from a black cop, and he would be killed trying to do this, this wouldn't be on the news. There would be no necessity for dindu nuffin and Media 24/7 race baiting of course. Because this is not really profitable for jews. This incident here however, was profitable to be misreported and going viral.
Always re-sparks the same situation where jews laugh and goyim fight. The usual crock of shit race baiting. The jew narrative over this is the only thing that really won anything out of anything.
Cowboy123 said:The homeowner stated the under construction house wasn’t robbed
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/homeowner-linked-to-ahmaud-arbery-case-said-residence-was-never-robbed/
Plus the video shows he did nothing illegal. To break in a house the house must have closed doors and windows which the that house didn’t. Plus all he did in it was go in for three minutes and then leave. He didn’t touch or steal anything.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/05/10/ahmaud-arbery-shooting-new-video-shows-georgia-jogger-did-nothing-illegal/3105123001/
The man was a former cop not on duty and his son. Which is why they called the cops. Even the 911 operator asked what did ahmaud do wrong. If it was reasonable grounds of suspicion they should have waited for the actual police. They tried to make a citizen’s arrest which according to Georgia law you must witness the actual crime to do. Ahmaud committed no crime according to the laws even the home owner stated there was no robbery. Ahmaud as the vid shows went in for three minutes then left he didn’t steal anything. So they were wrong to even attempt a citizens arrest. Also the video of the shooting shows ahmaud running and the father and son were already ahead of him waiting for him. Which means they chased him and got ahead of him to catch him while he was running. We know because the vid was recorded on the third guys cell phone who was in the truck behind him chasing ahmaud. The son had the shotgun and was standing outside the car to the left ahmaud was scared as he had strangers chase him and he saw they were armed as the son stood outside the car with a shotgun the father stood in the back of the truck. Ahmaud went to the right around the truck and acted in a fight or flight mode. Since he couldn’t turn back because the third guy was in a truck behind him and they were in front he chose to fight and lost his life.
The facts are they should’ve waited for the actual police. They assumed he committed a crime which we find out that he didn’t and pursued him. He was being chased by unknown people who were armed and they essentially cornered him so he fought and was killed.
According to documents obtained by The New York Times, a prosecutor who had the case for a few weeks told the police that the pursuers had acted within the scope of Georgia’s citizen’s arrest statute, and that Travis McMichael, who held the shotgun, had acted out of self-defense.
This fits in with the case that he was there to steal construction items and he ran awayIn his letter to the police, Mr. Barnhill, the prosecutor, noted that Mr. Arbery had a criminal past. Court records show that Mr. Arbery was convicted of shoplifting and of violating probation in 2018. Five years earlier, according to The Brunswick News, he was indicted on charges that he took a handgun to a high school basketball game.
Newly released CCTV footage from Feb. 23 shows a man dressed in clothes matching those of Ahmaud Arbery on a private construction site approximately 240 yards from the scene of Arbery’s fatal shooting on that day.
Jack said:As seen in the video, the two men asked Ahmed to stop so that they could talk to him. He attacked the men and got killed so that was in self defense. These two men did nothing wrong except the fact they shouldn't have taken matters into their own hands and tried to make a citizens arrests. Ahmed's death is on him.Cowboy123 said:And come to find out the footage of “Ahmaud” in the house at night wasn’t him. It’s been confirmed by family.
https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/investigation-death-ahmaud-arbery-heats-70607481
So apparently the killers saw ahmaud and figured he’s a black male so therefore it must’ve been him. Which it wasn’t.
LMAO :lol:Jack said:RIP Ahmed Arbury, know good boy and dedicated supporter of all that is good and noble.
Ahmed Arbury ,dedicated supporter of all that is good
Aquarius said:LMAO :lol:Jack said:RIP Ahmed Arbury, know good boy and dedicated supporter of all that is good and noble.
Ahmed Arbury ,dedicated supporter of all that is good
Ol argedco luciftias said:...Black Lives Matters...BLM...
Ol argedco luciftias said:Two old white people were visiting their dead son's grave in a cemetary, and a black guy killed both of them with a scoped rifle like he was hunting deer. I don't see anyone complaining about that, when that is a much more horrible story. When black people kill white people, nobody ever hears about it. But if a white person kills a black person, it's the only thing that anyone ever hears about. And the only thing they are told is the color of the people, not what the actual situation is or what really happened. When most of the time, race has nothing to do with it.
If all these Black Lives Matter people actually cared about black people, why do they never mention how almost all the black people who get killed, it is another black person who killed them in some dumb gang fight? That is the statistic, almost always what the situation is. But they will never mention this, because they don't actually care anything about supporting black people, all they care about is creating racial tensions and resentment and hating all white people. They are communist agents working to create chaos and disorder to allow the next communist revolution to come through, that's all it's about.
What is funny about a black man hunting two white people with a rifle?animeman666 said:Ol argedco luciftias said:Two old white people were visiting their dead son's grave in a cemetary, and a black guy killed both of them with a scoped rifle like he was hunting deer. I don't see anyone complaining about that, when that is a much more horrible story. When black people kill white people, nobody ever hears about it. But if a white person kills a black person, it's the only thing that anyone ever hears about. And the only thing they are told is the color of the people, not what the actual situation is or what really happened. When most of the time, race has nothing to do with it.
If all these Black Lives Matter people actually cared about black people, why do they never mention how almost all the black people who get killed, it is another black person who killed them in some dumb gang fight? That is the statistic, almost always what the situation is. But they will never mention this, because they don't actually care anything about supporting black people, all they care about is creating racial tensions and resentment and hating all white people. They are communist agents working to create chaos and disorder to allow the next communist revolution to come through, that's all it's about.
haha yeah, that's what the high priest/ess says, anyways I'm new, I'm from the Asian race, you?
Ol argedco luciftias said:What is funny about a black man hunting two white people with a rifle?animeman666 said:Ol argedco luciftias said:Two old white people were visiting their dead son's grave in a cemetary, and a black guy killed both of them with a scoped rifle like he was hunting deer. I don't see anyone complaining about that, when that is a much more horrible story. When black people kill white people, nobody ever hears about it. But if a white person kills a black person, it's the only thing that anyone ever hears about. And the only thing they are told is the color of the people, not what the actual situation is or what really happened. When most of the time, race has nothing to do with it.
If all these Black Lives Matter people actually cared about black people, why do they never mention how almost all the black people who get killed, it is another black person who killed them in some dumb gang fight? That is the statistic, almost always what the situation is. But they will never mention this, because they don't actually care anything about supporting black people, all they care about is creating racial tensions and resentment and hating all white people. They are communist agents working to create chaos and disorder to allow the next communist revolution to come through, that's all it's about.
haha yeah, that's what the high priest/ess says, anyways I'm new, I'm from the Asian race, you?
You're new? Says your account is 2 years old.
I'm white.
"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan