Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Who was Gengis Khan?

ZmajEriksson said:
Aquarius said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Seems I'm the only white person in this thread willing to accept what the high priests have already said. The videos from Sepehr, someone recommended by a High Priest, prove what they've always said. That Asia was white till very recently. And Genghis Khan being a good man doesn't contradict anything they said. They only said their was Jewish influence in the empire. An empire that lasted multiple generations. Just because there was influence during their fall doesn't mean the whole thing was Jewish to the core. Pull your heads out of your asses and fucking think. Rome was built by satanic Aryans and fell by Jewish infiltration. Same with Egypt, Sumeria, and every other Aryan empire. Why do you think it's impossible for this age old formula to apply to Mongols just because it started in an area that turned brown a couple centuries ago? That's fucking stupid. The empire was formed under satanic principals and several rulers later fell into decay. Same as every other empire in history. All the evidence proves it and it doesn't contradict a single thing the High Priests have said
Mhhh maybe because we even have proof that his degenerate army invaded russia and that's why many russians have mongol features?
At this point you're totally someone to not take seriously in these forums, all you do is promote things that make no sense, like a racemixer who drinks goat's blood, and that gengis khan was a good boy.

Actually the evidence shows his grandson started the race mixing

Like in "Death of Communism- Jewish criminal history in China" wrote that jews moved to north when they kicked out to China, so we know that Mongolis was infected with jews, but jews are everywhere like in Roman Empire so we can not be sure on what side Gengish Ghan was but what about race mixing I think that some Russians do not have mongolic blood only because of Mongolian Empire but probably there were race mixing in early Russian Empire when hardcore christian Ivan Terrible conquer paganic mongolic Siber native people and tried them to mixe into white chistianised russians. Ivan Terrible destroyed white paganic finno-ugric nations, I really hate he. When I read about Ivan Terrible shit, it was my final redpill why I leaved christianity. But what about Gengish Ghan jewish media and history is pushing how terrible barbar he was, but I do not know, maybe he was really bad. Officialy he was tengrist(asian paganist) its look like good.
 
mayanprophecy said:
red headed mongoloids do exist you don't have to be european to have red hair
Red hair is an Aryan trait and Aryans aren't exclusively European. Technically we're Asiatic as we come from central and southern Asia and there's Scythian (Eurasian nomads and the original Indo-Europeans) cultural and genetic remnants as far east as Japan. The Ainu and Daimo were almost pure Scythian untill the tail end of the Samurai era
 
ZmajEriksson said:
lAryans aren't exclusively European. Technically we're Asiatic as we come from central and southern Asia and there's Scythian (Eurasian nomads and the original Indo-Europeans) cultural and genetic remnants as far east as Japan. The Ainu and Daimo were almost pure Scythian untill the tail end of the Samurai era
True, but there is a difference between what we now call asian and what is white.

Japanese was a mix of asian and white DNA some where around 14,000 or 20,000 years ago. This is why now they are obviously asian, but they do have some white physical traits. Some Koreans also have some amount of white DNA, but less than Japanese.
 
I'm surprised that you didn't go down with mageson when it was revealed that he was all bs, and an infiltrator. The nerve you got, spewing all this nonsense again.
 
ÁrjaBüszkeség said:
I'm surprised that you didn't go down with mageson when it was revealed that he was all bs, and an infiltrator. The nerve you got, spewing all this nonsense again.
When was Mageson ousted as an infiltrator? I hadn't heard about that
 
https://www.ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43359
https://www.ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=43356
You can find it here. Well, not everything mageson said is invalid, because HP Cobra, and Maxine HP checked his posts before we could see the sermons. So the meditations are working but his sermons about socialism, etc are questionable. Jake Carlson was demoted because of inactivity. Mageson also took credit for many of the works of Cobra and Maxine and he pretended to be someone else. mageson furthermore had another account spreading discord and confusion. He had poor grammar, despite of his claim that he was native british.. so other HPs had to correct his posts, do his share of work for him, and delete some stupid stuff with he intended to poison us for a long time. The enemy intended to end the Jos with rats again, but they were weeded out. He also banned people for no valid reason just because criticising him. So mageson was an infiltrator, hiding behind his status as HP, but he was finally revealed, thanks to the Gods and hardworking SS.
 
https://www.ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43359
https://www.ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=43356
You can find it here. Well, not everything mageson said is invalid, because HP Cobra, and Maxine HP checked his posts before we could see the sermons. So the meditations are working but his sermons about socialism, etc are questionable. Jake Carlson was demoted because of inactivity. Mageson also took credit for many of the works of Cobra and Maxine and he pretended to be someone else. mageson furthermore had another account spreading discord and confusion. He had poor grammar, despite of his claim that he was native british.. so other HPs had to correct his posts, do his share of work for him, and delete some stupid stuff with he intended to poison us for a long time. The enemy intended to end the Jos with rats again, but they were weeded out. He also banned people for no valid reason just because criticising him. So mageson was an infiltrator, hiding behind his status as HP, but he was finally revealed, thanks to the Gods and hardworking SS. But we could've realised this sooner if you think about his slotz tales.. There is no way a gentile could write something that is so extremely disgusting.
 
ZmajEriksson said:
mayanprophecy said:
red headed mongoloids do exist you don't have to be european to have red hair
Red hair is an Aryan trait and Aryans aren't exclusively European. Technically we're Asiatic as we come from central and southern Asia and there's Scythian (Eurasian nomads and the original Indo-Europeans) cultural and genetic remnants as far east as Japan. The Ainu and Daimo were almost pure Scythian untill the tail end of the Samurai era

There are three cradles of civilisation: Ancient Egypt, Vedic India and Ancient Mesopotamia. Not all Whites come from Asia, but we all shared the same culture and customs, with minimal regional variations, until circa the beginning of the Age of Aries.
 
Stormblood said:
ZmajEriksson said:
mayanprophecy said:
red headed mongoloids do exist you don't have to be european to have red hair
Red hair is an Aryan trait and Aryans aren't exclusively European. Technically we're Asiatic as we come from central and southern Asia and there's Scythian (Eurasian nomads and the original Indo-Europeans) cultural and genetic remnants as far east as Japan. The Ainu and Daimo were almost pure Scythian untill the tail end of the Samurai era

There are three cradles of civilisation: Ancient Egypt, Vedic India and Ancient Mesopotamia. Not all Whites come from Asia, but we all shared the same culture and customs, with minimal regional variations, until circa the beginning of the Age of Aries.

Egyptians were refugees from Atlantis and Mesopotamia was mainly populated by people who migrated from India, Anatolia and the Eurasian Steppes. And if I'm not mistaken humanity was created in Sri Lanka
 
ZmajEriksson said:
Stormblood said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Red hair is an Aryan trait and Aryans aren't exclusively European. Technically we're Asiatic as we come from central and southern Asia and there's Scythian (Eurasian nomads and the original Indo-Europeans) cultural and genetic remnants as far east as Japan. The Ainu and Daimo were almost pure Scythian untill the tail end of the Samurai era

There are three cradles of civilisation: Ancient Egypt, Vedic India and Ancient Mesopotamia. Not all Whites come from Asia, but we all shared the same culture and customs, with minimal regional variations, until circa the beginning of the Age of Aries.

Egyptians were refugees from Atlantis and Mesopotamia was mainly populated by people who migrated from India, Anatolia and the Eurasian Steppes. And if I'm not mistaken humanity was created in Sri Lanka

Speculation. It's a theory I tend to agree upon. But from Sri Lanka being part of Atlantis/Mu/Lemuria or, to use a better term, Kumara Kandam, people moved mainly to create 3 initial cradles, which are the ones I mentioned.
 
Stormblood said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Stormblood said:
There are three cradles of civilisation: Ancient Egypt, Vedic India and Ancient Mesopotamia. Not all Whites come from Asia, but we all shared the same culture and customs, with minimal regional variations, until circa the beginning of the Age of Aries.

Egyptians were refugees from Atlantis and Mesopotamia was mainly populated by people who migrated from India, Anatolia and the Eurasian Steppes. And if I'm not mistaken humanity was created in Sri Lanka

Speculation. It's a theory I tend to agree upon. But from Sri Lanka being part of Atlantis/Mu/Lemuria or, to use a better term, Kumara Kandam, people moved mainly to create 3 initial cradles, which are the ones I mentioned.

Sri Lanka wasn't part of Atlantis. Atlantis was the Mid Atlantic Ridge. It was above water during the time Plato said Atlantis was around and there's hundreds of pyramids there
 
And anyway it is not certain that millions of people are descended directly from Genghis Khan because his body was buried in a secret place and nowadays this place has not yet been discovered. To verify this theory, of the millions of descendants of Genghis Khan, it would be necessary to study his DNA obtained directly from his corpse. And on top of this story, it reminds me a lot about the mystery of the origins of the Inca emperors, who were elite human specimens compared to the last descendants you can find today in Peru or somewhere in South America. The mummies of the emperors were burned and destroyed, while others were well hidden. Scientists say that in order to discover the true origins of these ancient populations, they must study the DNA obtained from some mummy of some emperor who represented the elite class of this mythical race.
 
I have heard that he had raped many women. So, regardless of Satanic or jewish origin, he's someone extremely detesting and disgusting to me.
 
ZmajEriksson said:
Stormblood said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Egyptians were refugees from Atlantis and Mesopotamia was mainly populated by people who migrated from India, Anatolia and the Eurasian Steppes. And if I'm not mistaken humanity was created in Sri Lanka

Speculation. It's a theory I tend to agree upon. But from Sri Lanka being part of Atlantis/Mu/Lemuria or, to use a better term, Kumara Kandam, people moved mainly to create 3 initial cradles, which are the ones I mentioned.

Sri Lanka wasn't part of Atlantis. Atlantis was the Mid Atlantic Ridge. It was above water during the time Plato said Atlantis was around and there's hundreds of pyramids there

That was debunked in sermons already. Atlantis is East, not West. The only above-water portions of it remaining are Sri Lanka, New Zealand, Easter Island and a few others.
 
Stormblood said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Stormblood said:
Speculation. It's a theory I tend to agree upon. But from Sri Lanka being part of Atlantis/Mu/Lemuria or, to use a better term, Kumara Kandam, people moved mainly to create 3 initial cradles, which are the ones I mentioned.

Sri Lanka wasn't part of Atlantis. Atlantis was the Mid Atlantic Ridge. It was above water during the time Plato said Atlantis was around and there's hundreds of pyramids there

That was debunked in sermons already. Atlantis is East, not West. The only above-water portions of it remaining are Sri Lanka, New Zealand, Easter Island and a few others.

The Mid-Atlantic Ridge was above water before the flood and is home to more pyramids than Egypt. Atlantis was west. There were multiple kingdoms that fell in worldwide cataclysms. They happen every 12,000 years and we've been here for millions
 
ZmajEriksson said:
Stormblood said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Sri Lanka wasn't part of Atlantis. Atlantis was the Mid Atlantic Ridge. It was above water during the time Plato said Atlantis was around and there's hundreds of pyramids there

That was debunked in sermons already. Atlantis is East, not West. The only above-water portions of it remaining are Sri Lanka, New Zealand, Easter Island and a few others.

we've been here for millions
Yes, we're here from far more than the age of our creator. lol...
 
Aquarius said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Stormblood said:
That was debunked in sermons already. Atlantis is East, not West. The only above-water portions of it remaining are Sri Lanka, New Zealand, Easter Island and a few others.

we've been here for millions
Yes, we're here from far more than the age of our creator. lol...

Aryans have the same biospirit as the gods. We're the same race as them. So yes, we as a species, have been here much longer than any individual
 
ZmajEriksson said:
Aquarius said:
ZmajEriksson said:
we've been here for millions
Yes, we're here from far more than the age of our creator. lol...

Aryans have the same biospirit as the gods. We're the same race as them. So yes, we as a species, have been here much longer than any individual
You said we've been here for millions of years, that's not possible since not even Satan is million of years old, He is about 500000 years old.
 
ZmajEriksson said:
Stormblood said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Sri Lanka wasn't part of Atlantis. Atlantis was the Mid Atlantic Ridge. It was above water during the time Plato said Atlantis was around and there's hundreds of pyramids there

That was debunked in sermons already. Atlantis is East, not West. The only above-water portions of it remaining are Sri Lanka, New Zealand, Easter Island and a few others.

The Mid-Atlantic Ridge was above water before the flood and is home to more pyramids than Egypt. Atlantis was west. There were multiple kingdoms that fell in worldwide cataclysms. They happen every 12,000 years and we've been here for millions

You can killing for unsubstantiated beliefs as much as you kept shilling for Genghis Cohen. No one believes you anyway.
 
Aquarius said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Aquarius said:
Yes, we're here from far more than the age of our creator. lol...

Aryans have the same biospirit as the gods. We're the same race as them. So yes, we as a species, have been here much longer than any individual
You said we've been here for millions of years, that's not possible since not even Satan is million of years old, He is about 500000 years old.

Satan wasn't the first Aryan. He has parents and other ancestors. Our species is much older than him and we have artificial structures confirmed to be millions of years old. There's nothing impossible about it
 
Stormblood said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Stormblood said:
That was debunked in sermons already. Atlantis is East, not West. The only above-water portions of it remaining are Sri Lanka, New Zealand, Easter Island and a few others.

The Mid-Atlantic Ridge was above water before the flood and is home to more pyramids than Egypt. Atlantis was west. There were multiple kingdoms that fell in worldwide cataclysms. They happen every 12,000 years and we've been here for millions

You can killing for unsubstantiated beliefs as much as you kept shilling for Genghis Cohen. No one believes you anyway.

Actually this is becoming a very popular belief among archaeologists that the ministry has used as sources many times. Satan wasn't the first Aryan. He has parents and other ancestors. Our species is much older than him and we have artificial structures confirmed to be millions of years old. There's nothing impossible about it.

And, as I already explained last year, Genghis Khan was Aryan and there's absolutely no evidence to suggest otherwise. You and countless others think Genghis was the only Mongol emperor for some reason. He was ordered by Satan to do what he did. It was his grandson that was a shabos goy, not him. This is pretty obvious if you actually take the time to research these topics rather than pulling unsubstantiated claims out of your ass just so you can be right. It's immature morons like you that make people hate JoS
 
ZmajEriksson said:
Stormblood said:
ZmajEriksson said:
The Mid-Atlantic Ridge was above water before the flood and is home to more pyramids than Egypt. Atlantis was west. There were multiple kingdoms that fell in worldwide cataclysms. They happen every 12,000 years and we've been here for millions

You can killing for unsubstantiated beliefs as much as you kept shilling for Genghis Cohen. No one believes you anyway.

Actually this is becoming a very popular belief among archaeologists that the ministry has used as sources many times. Satan wasn't the first Aryan. He has parents and other ancestors. Our species is much older than him and we have artificial structures confirmed to be millions of years old. There's nothing impossible about it.

And, as I already explained last year, Genghis Khan was Aryan and there's absolutely no evidence to suggest otherwise. You and countless others think Genghis was the only Mongol emperor for some reason. He was ordered by Satan to do what he did. It was his grandson that was a shabos goy, not him. This is pretty obvious if you actually take the time to research these topics rather than pulling unsubstantiated claims out of your ass just so you can be right. It's immature morons like you that make people hate JoS
There's no need to go on with this bullshit discussion, it lasted too long. At this point you're not someone to be taken seriously.
 
ZmajEriksson said:
Stormblood said:
ZmajEriksson said:
The Mid-Atlantic Ridge was above water before the flood and is home to more pyramids than Egypt. Atlantis was west. There were multiple kingdoms that fell in worldwide cataclysms. They happen every 12,000 years and we've been here for millions

You can killing for unsubstantiated beliefs as much as you kept shilling for Genghis Cohen. No one believes you anyway.

Actually this is becoming a very popular belief among archaeologists that the ministry has used as sources many times. Satan wasn't the first Aryan. He has parents and other ancestors. Our species is much older than him and we have artificial structures confirmed to be millions of years old. There's nothing impossible about it.

And, as I already explained last year, Genghis Khan was Aryan and there's absolutely no evidence to suggest otherwise. You and countless others think Genghis was the only Mongol emperor for some reason. He was ordered by Satan to do what he did. It was his grandson that was a shabos goy, not him. This is pretty obvious if you actually take the time to research these topics rather than pulling unsubstantiated claims out of your ass just so you can be right. It's immature morons like you that make people hate JoS



ZmajEriksson said:
Stormblood said:
ZmajEriksson said:
The Mid-Atlantic Ridge was above water before the flood and is home to more pyramids than Egypt. Atlantis was west. There were multiple kingdoms that fell in worldwide cataclysms. They happen every 12,000 years and we've been here for millions

You can killing for unsubstantiated beliefs as much as you kept shilling for Genghis Cohen. No one believes you anyway.

Actually this is becoming a very popular belief among archaeologists that the ministry has used as sources many times. Satan wasn't the first Aryan. He has parents and other ancestors. Our species is much older than him and we have artificial structures confirmed to be millions of years old. There's nothing impossible about it.

And, as I already explained last year, Genghis Khan was Aryan and there's absolutely no evidence to suggest otherwise. You and countless others think Genghis was the only Mongol emperor for some reason. He was ordered by Satan to do what he did. It was his grandson that was a shabos goy, not him. This is pretty obvious if you actually take the time to research these topics rather than pulling unsubstantiated claims out of your ass just so you can be right. It's immature morons like you that make people hate JoS

Get over it ZmajEriksson ,You can't handle the truth, no one is against you.
You worship gengee Just like Arabs worship mohammed .

Stop worshiping criminals,and stop defending them.
 
Aquarius said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Stormblood said:
You can killing for unsubstantiated beliefs as much as you kept shilling for Genghis Cohen. No one believes you anyway.

Actually this is becoming a very popular belief among archaeologists that the ministry has used as sources many times. Satan wasn't the first Aryan. He has parents and other ancestors. Our species is much older than him and we have artificial structures confirmed to be millions of years old. There's nothing impossible about it.

And, as I already explained last year, Genghis Khan was Aryan and there's absolutely no evidence to suggest otherwise. You and countless others think Genghis was the only Mongol emperor for some reason. He was ordered by Satan to do what he did. It was his grandson that was a shabos goy, not him. This is pretty obvious if you actually take the time to research these topics rather than pulling unsubstantiated claims out of your ass just so you can be right. It's immature morons like you that make people hate JoS
There's no need to go on with this bullshit discussion, it lasted too long. At this point you're not someone to be taken seriously.

I can say the same for you. You're incapable of adapting to new information and contradict the information provided by the Ministry just so you can be right in your mind
 
sonnenkraft said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Stormblood said:
You can killing for unsubstantiated beliefs as much as you kept shilling for Genghis Cohen. No one believes you anyway.

Actually this is becoming a very popular belief among archaeologists that the ministry has used as sources many times. Satan wasn't the first Aryan. He has parents and other ancestors. Our species is much older than him and we have artificial structures confirmed to be millions of years old. There's nothing impossible about it.

And, as I already explained last year, Genghis Khan was Aryan and there's absolutely no evidence to suggest otherwise. You and countless others think Genghis was the only Mongol emperor for some reason. He was ordered by Satan to do what he did. It was his grandson that was a shabos goy, not him. This is pretty obvious if you actually take the time to research these topics rather than pulling unsubstantiated claims out of your ass just so you can be right. It's immature morons like you that make people hate JoS



ZmajEriksson said:
Stormblood said:
You can killing for unsubstantiated beliefs as much as you kept shilling for Genghis Cohen. No one believes you anyway.

Actually this is becoming a very popular belief among archaeologists that the ministry has used as sources many times. Satan wasn't the first Aryan. He has parents and other ancestors. Our species is much older than him and we have artificial structures confirmed to be millions of years old. There's nothing impossible about it.

And, as I already explained last year, Genghis Khan was Aryan and there's absolutely no evidence to suggest otherwise. You and countless others think Genghis was the only Mongol emperor for some reason. He was ordered by Satan to do what he did. It was his grandson that was a shabos goy, not him. This is pretty obvious if you actually take the time to research these topics rather than pulling unsubstantiated claims out of your ass just so you can be right. It's immature morons like you that make people hate JoS

Get over it ZmajEriksson ,You can't handle the truth, no one is against you.
You worship gengee Just like Arabs worship mohammed .

Stop worshiping criminals,and stop defending them.

Hitler was a criminal and you worship him. Learn to adapt to new information. Stubborn ignorance is not cash money and law doesn't define morality. Genghis Khan was the Alexander of his day and all the evidence makes it obvious. And there were obviously Aryans on Earth before "humans" even if you assume Satan was the first of the gods to step foot on earth which is a big assumption and goes against the true Satanic chronology laid out in the Vedic texts
 
ZmajEriksson said:
Hitler was a criminal and you worship him
Ahahahah, gotcha, was just about time that you would expose yourself this much.
 
ZmajEriksson said:
sonnenkraft said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Actually this is becoming a very popular belief among archaeologists that the ministry has used as sources many times. Satan wasn't the first Aryan. He has parents and other ancestors. Our species is much older than him and we have artificial structures confirmed to be millions of years old. There's nothing impossible about it.

And, as I already explained last year, Genghis Khan was Aryan and there's absolutely no evidence to suggest otherwise. You and countless others think Genghis was the only Mongol emperor for some reason. He was ordered by Satan to do what he did. It was his grandson that was a shabos goy, not him. This is pretty obvious if you actually take the time to research these topics rather than pulling unsubstantiated claims out of your ass just so you can be right. It's immature morons like you that make people hate JoS



ZmajEriksson said:
Actually this is becoming a very popular belief among archaeologists that the ministry has used as sources many times. Satan wasn't the first Aryan. He has parents and other ancestors. Our species is much older than him and we have artificial structures confirmed to be millions of years old. There's nothing impossible about it.

And, as I already explained last year, Genghis Khan was Aryan and there's absolutely no evidence to suggest otherwise. You and countless others think Genghis was the only Mongol emperor for some reason. He was ordered by Satan to do what he did. It was his grandson that was a shabos goy, not him. This is pretty obvious if you actually take the time to research these topics rather than pulling unsubstantiated claims out of your ass just so you can be right. It's immature morons like you that make people hate JoS

Get over it ZmajEriksson ,You can't handle the truth, no one is against you.
You worship gengee Just like Arabs worship mohammed .

Stop worshiping criminals,and stop defending them.

Hitler was a criminal and you worship him.
Thanks for showing us your true colours yet again.
 
Stormblood said:
ZmajEriksson said:
sonnenkraft said:
Get over it ZmajEriksson ,You can't handle the truth, no one is against you.
You worship gengee Just like Arabs worship mohammed .

Stop worshiping criminals,and stop defending them.

Hitler was a criminal and you worship him.
Thanks for showing us your true colours yet again.

Where's the lie? Hitler went to prison. He was literally a criminal. I was simply trying to make the point that legality =/= morality. Try thinking about what you read
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
Aquarius said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Hitler was a criminal and you worship him
Ahahahah, gotcha, was just about time that you would expose yourself this much.
What a rat. At least it admits it.

Legality =/= morality. That's my point. Kinda obvious. Y'all are morons
 
ZmajEriksson said:
Y'all are morons
Just a reminder that you think Gengis Khan was aryan and you were shilling very hard for a politician who was a race mixer and a goat sacrificer.
Don't think too high of yourself.
 
Aquarius said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Y'all are morons
Just a reminder that you think Gengis Khan was aryan and you were shilling very hard for a politician who was a race mixer and a goat sacrificer.
Don't think too high of yourself.

And you shill for a politician who killed white Europeans for the zog in WWI. You're an immature moron incapable of understanding simple facts. I've proven Genghis Khan was aryan. You refusing to accept it just shows you let the Jews win by allowing them to fabricate your views on history. I accept the facts and adapt to new information so the enemy loses with me
 
I'm not gonna keep arguing, you have exposed yourself already. I'm outta here.
 
ZmajEriksson said:
Aquarius said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Y'all are morons
Just a reminder that you think Gengis Khan was aryan and you were shilling very hard for a politician who was a race mixer and a goat sacrificer.
Don't think too high of yourself.

And you shill for a politician who killed white Europeans for the zog in WWI. You're an immature moron incapable of understanding simple facts. I've proven Genghis Khan was aryan. You refusing to accept it just shows you let the Jews win by allowing them to fabricate your views on history. I accept the facts and adapt to new information so the enemy loses with me
You can have your opinon but don't say that you accept the facts and that you adapt to new info because If you were, you would have read everything in the Jos about Hitler and you would have understood what a great person he was and how many lies have been told about him
 
Νίκος said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Aquarius said:
Just a reminder that you think Gengis Khan was aryan and you were shilling very hard for a politician who was a race mixer and a goat sacrificer.
Don't think too high of yourself.

And you shill for a politician who killed white Europeans for the zog in WWI. You're an immature moron incapable of understanding simple facts. I've proven Genghis Khan was aryan. You refusing to accept it just shows you let the Jews win by allowing them to fabricate your views on history. I accept the facts and adapt to new information so the enemy loses with me
You can have your opinon but don't say that you accept the facts and that you adapt to new info because If you were, you would have read everything in the Jos about Hitler and you would have understood what a great person he was and how many lies have been told about him

Again, for the billionth time, legality =/= morality. Hitler was a hero but that doesn't change the facts. He fought in WWI. That means he killed Aryans for Jews, because Aryans were the ones fighting and Jews controlled all sides. I don't hold it against him but it's still a fact. And he was arrested and imprisoned for a failed revolution (failed the first time, not the second). He literally wrote Mein Kampf in prison. That makes him a criminal by definition, regardless of morality. Honestly, does anyone in this group know how to think for themselves? I don't mean any disrespect to anyone but you guys are rediculous
 
ZmajEriksson said:
Νίκος said:
ZmajEriksson said:
And you shill for a politician who killed white Europeans for the zog in WWI. You're an immature moron incapable of understanding simple facts. I've proven Genghis Khan was aryan. You refusing to accept it just shows you let the Jews win by allowing them to fabricate your views on history. I accept the facts and adapt to new information so the enemy loses with me
You can have your opinon but don't say that you accept the facts and that you adapt to new info because If you were, you would have read everything in the Jos about Hitler and you would have understood what a great person he was and how many lies have been told about him

Again, for the billionth time, legality =/= morality. Hitler was a hero but that doesn't change the facts. He fought in WWI. That means he killed Aryans for Jews, because Aryans were the ones fighting and Jews controlled all sides. I don't hold it against him but it's still a fact. And he was arrested and imprisoned for a failed revolution (failed the first time, not the second). He literally wrote Mein Kampf in prison. That makes him a criminal by definition, regardless of morality. Honestly, does anyone in this group know how to think for themselves? I don't mean any disrespect to anyone but you guys are rediculous
Well, it seems the main disagreement is on the "legality =/=morality" thing!
I will try put a simple example there :
In some countries saying the Holocaust is a hoax is illegal but the truth is that it is a hoax! The legal thing to do there is to say that it is not a hoax but the moral thing to do is to tell the Truth!In this case they are different!
Are they always different? No!Killing someone because he told you "you look stupid/ugly/etc. is not legal and it is not moral either!
So saying that legality always means morality
is not right!
Also regarding the killing Aryans thing, sorry if I will devastate your dreams, but WAR IS NOT A GAME! It is natural for casualties to exist on both sides!
 
Oh, please, do you think the enemy would shill for Genghis Cohen if he wasn't a criminal and a traitor to mankind? They would not. Very few people know about his orders about raping Eastern Europeans. Only those who actually bother to research, as they do not put it in school books and the average person does not have the soul quality to go beyond the surface. Now, go pray to Saint Sepehr, your Hutt friend.
 
Νίκος said:
ZmajEriksson said:
Νίκος said:
You can have your opinon but don't say that you accept the facts and that you adapt to new info because If you were, you would have read everything in the Jos about Hitler and you would have understood what a great person he was and how many lies have been told about him

Again, for the billionth time, legality =/= morality. Hitler was a hero but that doesn't change the facts. He fought in WWI. That means he killed Aryans for Jews, because Aryans were the ones fighting and Jews controlled all sides. I don't hold it against him but it's still a fact. And he was arrested and imprisoned for a failed revolution (failed the first time, not the second). He literally wrote Mein Kampf in prison. That makes him a criminal by definition, regardless of morality. Honestly, does anyone in this group know how to think for themselves? I don't mean any disrespect to anyone but you guys are rediculous
Well, it seems the main disagreement is on the "legality =/=morality" thing!
I will try put a simple example there :
In some countries saying the Holocaust is a hoax is illegal but the truth is that it is a hoax! The legal thing to do there is to say that it is not a hoax but the moral thing to do is to tell the Truth!In this case they are different!
Are they always different? No!Killing someone because he told you "you look stupid/ugly/etc. is not legal and it is not moral either!
So saying that legality always means morality
is not right!
Also regarding the killing Aryans thing, sorry if I will devastate your dreams, but WAR IS NOT A GAME! It is natural for casualties to exist on both sides!

We're literally saying the same thing
 
Interestingly i never heard Dschinghis Khan doing harm to Jews or Judaism.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top