Satanic Personalities Section: A Community Project [JG Karnonnos + Update]

[Thersthara]

The Tale of Meleager

Meleager is one of the leading heroes of Greek mythology, best known for the Boar Hunt of Calydon. His story explores themes of fate, family relationships and tragic endings. Meleager's life, like that of many legendary heroes, is full of both divine and human elements. In this research project for JoS, I will explore Meleager's life, heroism, family and tragic end in detail.

Meleager was the son of Oineus and Althaea, king of Chalydon. Chalydon is a city in what is now Aetolia, in western Greece. Oineus was the king of the city and one of the most powerful rulers of Aetolia. Meleager's birth is far from the birth of an ordinary child, for he is a hero whose fate is predetermined.

One of the most remarkable events of Meleager's birth is related to the Moirae (Goddesses of Fate). According to legend, when Meleager was born, the Moirae, the Goddesses of Destiny, predetermined his fate. These goddesses say that Meleager's life depends on a piece of log. This log is a piece of wood that was burning in the family hearth when Meleager was born. The Moirae tell Althaea that if this log burns completely, Meleager will die. To protect her son Meleager, Althaea takes the log from the hearth and hides it in a safe place. Thus, Meleager's life depends on this log hidden by his mother.

This event shows that Meleager's fate was inevitable and that his death was directly related to the burning of a log. This concrete and inevitable nature of fate in Greek mythology is one of the most tragic elements of Meleager's story.

Meleager grows up to be a great warrior and hero. His father, Oineus, trained Meleager in the arts of war and he became famous for his bravery at a young age. Meleager is linked to other great heroes of Greek mythology and holds an important place among them. These heroes include Heracles, Theseus and Jason.

One of Meleager's most famous exploits was his adventure with the Argonauts on the ship Argo in search of the Golden Fleece. The Argonauts gathered under the leadership of Jason and traveled to Colchis to find the Golden Fleece. Meleager was among these heroes and faced many dangers. This was one of the highlights of his heroic career.

The most important adventure in Meleager's story is the Calydon Boar Hunt. According to this legend, Meleager's father, Oineus, made regular offerings to the gods for a year, but forgot one god, Artemis. In response to this disrespect, Artemis sent a gigantic wild boar to Calydon. This creature devastates the city, destroys the farmland and causes great harm to the people. To kill the boar, Oineus gathers heroes from all over Greece and organizes a great hunt.

This hunt becomes one of the most important events of Greek mythology. Meleager comes forward to lead this hunt and gathers the heroes who will take part in the hunt. Among the hunters are famous names such as Atalanta, Theseus, Castor and Pollux, Jason and Peleus. However, it is the famous female hunter Atalanta who attracts Meleager's special attention.

Atalanta is the first person to shoot an arrow at a wild boar during a hunt. This brave act deeply impresses Meleager and a romantic relationship blossoms between them. Meleager kills the boar and gives its hide to Atalanta as a reward for the hunt. However, this act causes a major conflict in Meleager's family.

Meleager's uncles, Toxeus and Plexippus, are vehemently opposed to giving the hunting trophy to a woman. They claim that this prize is their right and oppose Meleager. Meleager loses his temper and kills both uncles. This event becomes one of the most important turning points in Meleager's life and foreshadows his tragic end.

Meleager's murder of her uncles deeply affects her mother Althaea. Althaea cannot bear the death of her own brothers and decides to take revenge. Knowing that her son's life depends on that log, Althaea makes a tragic decision: She throws the log into the fire to kill Meleager.

Althaea's decision is considered one of the most tragic events in Greek mythology. A mother is forced to end her son's life. As the log burns, Meleager burns to death from the inside. His tragic end reveals the inevitability of fate and the deadly consequences of family conflicts.

After Meleager's death, his family and kingdom are devastated. Althaea kills herself with regret over her son's death or, according to some legends, is driven to suicide by grief. After Meleager's death, the kingdom of Calydon weakened and the city gradually lost its power.

The story of Meleager is one of the most complex narratives in Greek mythology. Although he achieves great success as a hero, his conflicts with his family and the inevitability of fate deeply affect his life. Meleager is both a shining star of heroism and a victim of inevitable tragedy brought about by fate. His story is one that makes us reflect deeply on the concepts of the human spirit, complex familial relationships and heroism from ancient Greek mythology. This hero's ending is one of the most striking in mythology and in many ways explores the concept of tragedy in depth.

The story of Meleager has been treated and told in various forms by many Greek writers and poets. In Homer's epic “Iliad”, the story of Meleager is indirectly mentioned. During his passive resistance in the Trojan War, Achilles remembers and learns from Meleager's tragic end. Homer, in describing Meleager's fate, draws parallels with Achilles' own fate and offers readers a profound narrative.

Tragedy writers such as Sophocles were also influenced by the dramatic structure of Meleager's story. His fate has been one of the sources of inspiration for Ancient Greek theater, as he has the same fate as other tragic heroes. The themes of family conflicts, revenge and death are common themes in the works of great tragedy writers such as Sophocles and Euripides.

 

[Thersthara]

The story of the legendary king Leonidas and the 300 Spartans

Leonidas is a well-known figure as king of Sparta, especially for his brave resistance at the 'Battle of Thermopylae'. His life, while shaped by the disciplined and military traditions of Sparta, became a symbol of heroism, sacrifice and national honor in Greek history and culture. Leonidas's life and leadership have been widely covered in both historical and mythological narratives. In this research project for JoS, I will discuss his life in detail.

Leonidas was born around 540 BC to Anaxandridas II, king of the Eurypontid dynasty of Sparta, and his second wife. The kings of Sparta usually came from two dynasties: Agiad and Eurypontid families. Leonidas belonged to the Agiad dynasty. Even the meaning of Leonidas' name is associated with heroism; Leonidas means “like a lion” in Greek, symbolizing his brave and strong nature.

Leonidas had three brothers, Agisilaos, Kleomenes I and Dorieus. In Sparta, the throne usually passed to the eldest son, so Leonidas was not initially a direct heir to the throne. Leonidas' eldest brother Kleomenes I became king after the death of their father Anaxandridas II. However, political disputes and military campaigns during Kleomenes' reign would increase the likelihood that Leonidas would one day become king.

In Sparta, every man, especially those belonging to the royal family, underwent rigorous military training. This training system is known as “Agoge” and is at the heart of Spartan society. Agoge is a brutal and harsh training process that focuses on physical endurance, strategy, martial art and discipline. Leonidas, like all Spartan men, endured great hardship during this process. In Sparta, even a king had to undergo military training, so Leonidas was also trained in this rigorous training.

Agoge training aims to increase the physical endurance of individuals, build resistance to pain and hunger, and instill the idea of service to society. Leonidas' training shaped his qualities of leadership and courage and set the stage for his later heroism.

In Sparta, the highest duty of a male warrior was to serve his community and go to war. Sparta was a society where military strength and discipline were the most important values. A Spartan leader was considered the defender and protector of his people, so Leonidas was raised with this sense of responsibility.

Leonidas became king only after the death of Kleomenes. During his reign, Kleomenes I fought many battles with the Persians and other Greek city-states, and even had serious conflicts with Athens and Argos. During the reign of Kleomenes I, Dorieus, another brother of Sparta, died while trying to establish a colony in Africa. Kleomenes failed to pass on the throne to his own children; some sources state that he lost his sanity before his death. With the death of Kleomenes, Leonidas became the strongest candidate for the throne and became king of Sparta in 490 BC.

At the time Leonidas became king, the Greek city-states were facing the expansion of the Persian Empire and threats to Greek territory. The Persian King Darius I had suffered a heavy defeat against the Athenians at the Battle of Marathon in 490 BC. However, this defeat did not stop Persian plans to invade Greek territory. Darius' son Xerxes began to prepare a large army to avenge his father and conquer Greece. It was this conflict that marked Leonidas' leadership.

In 480 BC, Xerxes mobilized a large land and naval force to invade Greece. There were disagreements among the Greek city-states about resistance to the Persians. While some cities chose to surrender rather than fight against the Persian power, cities like Athens and Sparta decided to resist. A defense alliance was formed between the Greek city-states and Leonidas emerged as one of its military leaders.


The Battle of Thermopylae, a turning point in Leonidas' life and Greek history, took place in 480 BC. Thermopylae is a narrow pass and a strategic point to prevent the Persians from landing their land forces on Greek soil. The leaders of the Greek city-states decided to set up a line of defense at Thermopylae to stop the large Persian army.

Leonidas participated in this battle with 300 elite Spartan warriors. The 300 Spartans were chosen for a deadly battle and were accompanied by a force of around 7,000 men from various Greek city-states. But the most famous aspect of this legendary battle is the relentless resistance of this small force against the massive Persian army.

King Xerxes of Persia demanded the surrender of Leonidas and his Greek forces. But Leonidas, true to Spartan discipline and honor, refused to surrender. During the first few days of the battle, Leonidas and his army managed to hold the Persian army in the narrow pass. Despite their numerical superiority, the Persians were unable to maneuver in the narrow pass and suffered heavy losses.

But the tide of the war began to turn in favor of the Persians. A Greek traitor named Efialtes showed the Persians a secret mountain road that led around the pass of Thermopylae. This gave the Persians the opportunity to flank the Greek army from behind. Although Leonidas could have retreated when news of this siege reached him, he decided to continue the war and resist to the end. This decision made him a symbol of heroism and sacrifice.

Together with 300 Spartans, Leonidas fought against the Persian army to the end. The Persians showered Leonidas and the Spartans with arrows and finally defeated them. But the resistance of Leonidas and his men bought time for the Greek city-states and became a great source of morale in the Greek world.

Leonidas' heroic death at Thermopylae became one of the greatest symbols of courage, sacrifice and patriotism in Greek history and the Western world. His leadership and resistance inspired later Greek victories over the Persians. Leonidas' sacrifice in battle encouraged other Greek city-states to fight in unity. In the following months, the Greeks won major victories against the Persians, such as the Sea Battle of Salamis (480 BC) and the Battle of Plataea (479 BC).

Leonidas' body, although destroyed by the Persians, was later honored by the Spartans and a monument was erected on the site of the Battle of Thermopylae. Today, there is a statue erected at Thermopylae in memory of Leonidas and 300 Spartans. On the statue are the following words, symbolizing the courage of the Spartans who participated in the battle: “Molon Labe” (Come and take it), Leonidas' famous words expressing his refusal to surrender to the Persians.

In ancient Greece, Leonidas' heroism was particularly deeply engraved in the history of Sparta. Since Sparta was a society based on discipline, war and honor, Leonidas' resistance at Thermopylae was an eternal source of pride for the people of Sparta. Leonidas was also remembered as a symbol of resistance among the Greeks and played a major role in uniting the entire Greek world against the Persian invasion.

Historians such as Herodotus wrote in detail about Leonidas' leadership and the Battle of Thermopylae. In telling the story of Leonidas, Herodotus emphasizes that his leadership and personal sacrifice was a turning point for all Greek city-states.

During the Roman Empire, Leonidas' story was also held in high esteem by the Romans. The Roman sense of military virtues and patriotism greatly admired the courage of the Spartans. Roman writers such as Plutarch wrote works immortalizing Leonidas' life and war. Many military leaders in Rome tried to emulate Leonidas' heroism and stand out as disciplined and courageous commanders.

 

[Wotanwarrior]

Yes, definitely. Voltaire was one of ours same as Diderot.

I suppose that the most prominent members of the French Enlightenment were into occultism and with the Gods.
This would also be the case of the naturalist and mathematician Georges Louis Lecrerc, better known as the Comte de Buffon.

 

[AristocraticDragon666]

I think the most powerful 2 mystics i know of would be Ramses the 2nd or Ramses the great the guy could control the weather slapped the shit out of israel multiple times and lived for many centuries and then the other one would have to be Nebuchadnezzar i do believe the 1st and 2nd was actually the same person he had a huge library filled with his journals because the guy lived for so long destroyed a jewish temple and was an absolute mad lad all around totally wiped the Jews city out destroyed that damn temple and scattered the jewish tribes i think his journals would suggest he was like 960 years old like he is a legend.

They were true legends of their time and made a greater contribution from the Ancient Egyptian state in the fight against the Jews and their enemy programs than other Ancient Egyptian figures.

+I also believe that they need to be added to the lists of heroes and immortalized.

 

[agni]

This project is literally the embodiment of my long-time dream. Finally, we will be able to fully touch the people who made history before us for the glory of our Gods. And also to dispel many myths regarding vague personalities (like Joan of Arc and Rasputin), buried under the sands of history (especially the one in which the enemy had a hand). I believe this will be a very inspiring project for each of us!

 

[AristocraticDragon666]

This project is officially under JG Karnonnos now.

Further, some have sent me certain people of our side who were martyrs. Yes, their martyrdom for the Gods should also be contained in their life.

Certain people have chosen to not bend the knee to the enemy and die with their spine straight, free and never as slaves. These people have done that choice in many areas of life, and that's how they entered legendary status. Galileo could have lied, converted and not supported the Truth in "fear" of his life, saying the Earth is Flat or be a coward. He chose to face imprisonment rather than lie on the behalf of the Christian Church which claimed "The world was flat".

Most of the Spiritual Satanists who were of great renown, did battle the enemy and they did not capitulate.

Most were heroes who have went against the conceptions of 99.5% of the planet at the time, or who resisted the impeding doom of the enemy programs. Many of them have succeeded doing this and also leading their lives; each life was very different from every other life. This also involves many warriors in the First century up to the 4th century where the program of the enemy started growing in power, or the Middle Ages.

We will hold the banner in honor for those who have not capitulated so that we remain free to follow the Gods today.

-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666

______________________

Greetings everyone, there will be two new Demon Rituals to be published shortly.

Other than this, I want to initiate a project for the Joy of Satan. This will involve articles that will be written about Spiritual Satanists [Followers of the Gods or those respecting the Ancient Gods] in history.

It is time if you really love any of these people, to give them a gift and immortalize their memory in the Joy of Satan. That way, they will inspire our people for centuries to come.

There were many graced personalities that were doing things like occultism, spirituality, or others that were very direct in their connection with the Gods and even admitted this explicitly. Others were more concealed and they did not reveal their affiliations, but information about their allegience to the Gods was proven by their works or historical review.

These involve many people; all the way from George Washington to Nikola Tesla, Friedrich Nietszche, Alexander the Great, Aristotle or Plato [They were worshipers of the Gods directly]. We must assemble a large list of all of these personalities, and articles have to be written in regard to them all, that will contain in-depth information.

Pioneers of both genders who did not comply to the enemy and advanced humanity forward regardless, in accordance to the ethical values and spiritual plans of the Gods need to be remembered. People who brought occult knowledge, criticized the enemy and reduced their power, did provide inordinate scientific value to mankind in the face of the oppression of the enemy [Like Gallileo to name a very well known case or Giordano Bruno], or those who caused great reformations or important achievements for the Gods in consistency with the compass of the Gods in this world, must be all included.

Emperors of the Roman Empire, other Great beings like Marcus Aurelius, were literally initiates of the Gods like you are today.

They do not have to only be perfect examples. People might do mistakes, life has obstacles. But they received great status and advanced in the path of the Gods, in many cases carrying huge amounts of people with them.

Many have done works they went not recognized for, affecting smaller numbers of souls. But that doesn't mean their works were also not of extreme importance. Smaller and inspiring examples of people from our history should also be included.

People who are known to have existed and became Gods historically, like Pythagoras or Asclepius, should also be included in this section [but also will be included in the new Demons section]. Ancient powerful followers of the Gods from India or worldwide should also be included, or other legends who are known beyond a doubt to have existed amogn us.

There must be no lying in this section. We do not want to say that everyone was part of this. We only want people who were verifiably on our side. There are already endless amounts.

We will focus on very evident cases; Ancient mystics and so on. These people can be from anywhere in the world and any timeline; Ancient Times until today.

If there are more than one people making research on a personality, articles can be combined.

All of these will also bring honor upon their people of their respective Nations, and their affiliations with the tasks of the Gods must be highlighted in their passing through life. So if you know of any regional important personality that struggled for the Gods, bring them to the light so they are commemorated and they receive honor.

There must be images, sources, historicity of a person, so their life can be seen and read about and an inspiration for SS to continue their journey.

There will be appointment of a JG Guardian at the head of this project and then everyone can contact them to organize with them, in order to make this section a reality.

As this is an official JoS project, advancement in the project will be taken in consideration for receiving positions or furthering one's position in the JoS Donor system also.

PS: Seminar arriving about Making Money Workings manifest within 24 hours for all Tiers.

-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666

It's just great
I think that a separate section or section on the site should be allocated for this project.

After a certain time, it is difficult to find some posts to leave a comment under them, a separate section will always be in front of your eyes as sections: Ask-Satan.net Forum; Joy Of Satan 666; Joy of Satan Art & Music, or a separate website dedicated to this project, where historical (reference) information will also be supplemented for each hero, so that the next generations of Spiritual Satanists and humanity will always remember our heroes.

Reinhard Heydrich should be immortalized among such heroes: https://ancient-forums.com/members/aristocraticdragon666.74066/#profile-post-1249

If i need to add historical (reference) information, I will add it.

 

[Thersthara]

Pericles, the father of democracy and the golden age of Athens


Pericles (495 - 429 BC) was the most influential statesman, military leader and orator of what is known as the Golden Age of Athens. Under Pericles' leadership, Athens reached its peak in art, literature, politics and philosophy; Athens became the most powerful and culturally influential city-state in the Greek world. The fact that his era is called the “Age of Pericles” is the greatest indication of the profound and lasting impact of his leadership.

In my JoS research project, I will explore the life and story of Pericles in detail, exploring both his personal development and his impact on Athens.


Pericles was born around 495 BC into one of the noble families of Athens. His father Xanthippos was a commander who won victory over the Persians at the Battle of Mykale in 480 BC, and his mother Agariste was from the famous Alcmaeonid family. Agariste was the granddaughter of Kleisthenes, the former tyrant of Athens, and belonging to this noble family gave Pericles a great advantage in his political career.

Although there are not many details about his youth, it is known that Pericles received a good education. It is thought that he came into contact with famous philosophers such as Anaxagoras and learned from sophist teachers. Under the influence of Anaxagoras, Pericles' worldview was shaped and he developed close relationships with Socrates and other philosophers who are known to have communicated directly with him. With this education, Pericles reinforced his commitment to the democratic structure of Athens, while at the same time developing into a logical and strategic leader.

Although Pericles' entry into the Athenian political scene began at a young age, it was his reforms with Ephialtes, an advocate of democracy, that had the greatest impact on the beginning of his career. In 462 BC, Pericles, together with Ephialtes, initiated important reforms aimed at limiting the power of aristocrats and increasing the influence of the people in politics. The most important of these reforms was to limit the powers of the Council of Areopagus. The Areopagus was a council dominated by the nobility and this move marked a turning point in the strengthening of Athenian democracy.

After Ephialtes was assassinated as a result of these reforms, Pericles became the most powerful political figure in Athens. After Ephialtes' death, Pericles further developed the democratic structure and made arrangements that allowed the people to take a more active role in politics.

Pericles' commitment to democracy led to unprecedented levels of popular participation in Athens. Pericles passed laws encouraging the people to participate directly in decision-making in the assembly (Ekklesia). Every male Athenian citizen had a voice in the assembly and important matters of state were debated and decided.

One of Pericles' most important reforms was the introduction of payment for public office. Whereas previously only the rich could hold public office, Pericles introduced this payment system, enabling poorer citizens to participate in public service. This greatly contributed to the expansion of Athens' democratic structure and increased participation.

Under Pericles' leadership, Athens became not only a military and political power, but also a cultural center. Pericles undertook major projects to make Athens the intellectual and artistic capital of the Greek world.

One of Pericles' greatest achievements was his massive construction projects on the Acropolis of Athens. The Parthenon is the largest and most famous of these projects. Built in the name of Athena Parthenos (Virgin Athena), this temple is considered one of the greatest works of architecture and art of the period. The Parthenon symbolized the wealth, power and cultural superiority of Athens.

These major construction projects transformed not only the appearance of Athens, but also the cultural identity of the Athenians. In a sense, under Pericles, Athens became not only a military power, but also a leading city in the arts, science and philosophy. During this period, Athens became a cultural center where sculptors like Fidias, philosophers like Socrates and playwrights like Euripides and Sophocles came to the fore.

(Parthenon)

Pericles made strategic moves to develop Athens' maritime power and expand the city-state's sphere of influence. He formed an alliance called the Delian League, which initially started as a defensive alliance against the Persian Empire, but over time it turned into a structure in which Athens established a hegemony. With the money collected from the members of the Union, Athens' naval power was increased and the most powerful fleet in the Mediterranean was established.

However, this hegemonic attitude began to cause discomfort among other Greek city-states. Especially Sparta was uncomfortable with Athens becoming so powerful and taking other city-states under its control. As a result, relations between Athens and Sparta became strained, and this tension would lead to the outbreak of the Peloponnesian War towards the end of Pericles' reign.

In 431 BC, the Peloponnesian War broke out between Athens and Sparta. This war would shake the Greek world for decades and mark the end of Pericles' career. When the war began, Pericles was the military leader of Athens and he guided strategic decisions. Pericles' war strategy was based on defense. He envisioned that the Athenians would stay within the city walls, while the navy would defeat the enemy at sea. Instead of engaging in direct combat against Sparta's powerful land army, he planned a long-term defensive war.

Pericles ordered the Athenians to stay inside the city and resist Spartan attacks. However, this strategy created unexpected problems in the long run. In 430 BC, a plague broke out in Athens. The city's large population was trapped inside the city walls and the disease spread rapidly. The plague killed a large part of the Athenian population and negatively affected the course of the war.

Pericles died of the plague in 429 BC. His death was a great loss for Athens. During his years as the leader of Athens, Pericles had won the trust of the people as a charismatic, strategic leader. After his death, Athens had a difficult time in the Peloponnesian War. Political instability increased in Athens after Pericles' leadership, and it was eventually defeated by Sparta.

After Pericles' death, Athens faced internal political conflicts and leadership problems. Without his strategic acumen and unifying leadership, Athens could not successfully sustain the war and surrendered to Sparta in 404 BC. This defeat marked the end of the Golden Age of Athens and the temporary prominence of Sparta in the Greek world.

Pericles' legacy was not only limited to Athens' political and military power, but also left a deep mark in the cultural, artistic and intellectual spheres. Many of the developments that led to the golden age of Athens and laid the foundations of Western civilization were shaped under Pericles' leadership.

One of Pericles' greatest legacies is his contribution to democracy. Pericles deepened and expanded democracy in Athens. Although Athenian democracy was not perfect, and large sections of the population, such as women, slaves and foreigners, could not vote, a system was created that allowed a large part of the population to have direct influence on politics. The democratic institutions developed under Pericles' leadership formed the cornerstones of Western democracy and were the source of many of today's democratic structures.

His reforms inspired the development of democratic ideals not only in Athens but also in later European states and the modern world. The ability of the people to participate directly in governance and have a say in political processes was strengthened in Pericles' Athens and became a part of Western thought.

 

[Thersthara]

General Themistokles and the great victory of Salamis

Themistokles (524 BC - 459 BC) was a Greek statesman and military leader, particularly known for his role in Athens' resistance to the Persian invasion. His strategic acumen and military achievements made Athens a maritime power in the Greek world and played a major role in the Greek victory at the Battle of Salamis against the Persian Empire. Themistocles faced many challenges in both his military and political career and was a complex figure.


Themistokles became an influential figure in Athens in 524 BC, although he did not come from a noble family. His father, Neocles, was a middling Athenian, and although little is known about his mother, she is thought to have been of foreign origin. This made Themistocles unpopular among the nobility, because at that time the nobility was the most powerful group that played an active role in the political arena. However, Themistokles, as a commoner, managed to gain the support of the people and thus started his political career.

Although there are not many details about his education and youth, it is known that Themistocles had a highly intelligent, ambitious and strategic mind. Even in his youth, he began to show leadership qualities and his interest in politics attracted attention.

Themistocles' rise on the political scene was closely linked to democratic developments in Athens. When the Persians began to invade Greece in 490 BC, Themistocles began to make strategic moves to put himself in the public eye. In Athens, he particularly distinguished himself as a politician who challenged the power of the nobility and won the support of the people. Themistocles participated in reforms that supported the development of democracy in Athens and promoted regulations that allowed for greater popular participation in politics.

He achieved his first major political success in 493 BC when he was elected archon (chief administrator). During this period, he proposed the construction of the port city of Piraeus to increase Athens' military preparedness. This move would later lay the foundation for Athens' naval power and prepare it for Persian wars.
In 490 BC, King Darius of Persia sent an army to subjugate the Greek city-states.

The first major battle between the Persian army and the Greeks took place at the Battle of Marathon. The Athenians, with an army under the command of Miltiades, won a victory over the Persians. Although Themistokles was not in a direct command position in this battle, he was one of the first leaders to recognize the magnitude of the Persian threat.

This battle showed that Athens needed to be more prepared for the Persian threat. Themistokles focused on strengthening Athens' naval forces, anticipating that the Persians would attack again. His greatest strategic insight was his realization that the future defense of Athens depended more on the navy than on the land army.

Under the leadership of Themistokles, Athens took great steps to increase its naval power. In 483 BC, a large silver reserve was discovered in the Laurium silver mines near Athens. The Athenians were divided on how to use this wealth. While many wanted the money to be divided among the people, Themistocles argued that it should be used to strengthen the navy.

Thanks to Themistokles' insistence, this silver reserve was used to expand Athens' navy. Athens built 200 trireme (warships with three rows of oars) and became the city-state with the largest naval power in Greece. This navy would play a critical role in future victories over Persia.

In 480 BC, the Persians organized a major expedition to Greece, this time under the command of King Xerxes. Xerxes moved towards Greece with a large army in the spring of 480 BC. The Greek city-states had to unite against this great threat. Thanks to the alliance with Sparta and other city-states, the Greeks formed a line of defense against the Persian army. During this period, Themistocles took command of the Greek navy.

The first major battle took place at the Thermopylae pass. A small Greek force under King Leonidas managed to hold off the Persian army for a while, but they suffered a heavy defeat. At the same time, Themistocles led the Greek fleet against the Persian fleet off Artemisium. The Naval Battle of Artemisium continued with a series of small skirmishes and both sides suffered heavy losses. However, the defeat at Thermopylae caused the Greek fleet to retreat.

The Battle of Salamis and Themistokles' Victory

The climax of Themistocles' military strategy was the Battle of Salamis in 480 BC. The Persian army had invaded Athens and the city was largely evacuated. As the Persians captured much of Greece, Themistocles devised a strategic plan to trap the Persian fleet.

Themistocles planned to draw the Persian fleet into a narrow strait. The narrow space would limit the maneuverability of the Persian ships, and the smaller and faster ships of the Greek fleet would gain the advantage. To implement this plan, he spread false information to the Persian commanders and lured them into the Salamis Strait.

The battle in the Salamis Strait ended in a victory for Themistokles. The Greek navy defeated the Persian navy in a great rout. This victory thwarted Persian plans to invade Greece and Xerxes was forced to retreat. Salamis is considered one of the most important naval victories in Greek history and Themistokles was the greatest architect of this victory.

After the victory at Salamis, Themistokles became one of Athens' most powerful leaders. But his rise also brought enemies. Themistokles' ambition and influence became the envy of other Athenian leaders. Aristides and other rivals made various moves to limit Themistocles' power.

In 471 BC, Themistokles was driven out of Athens by his enemies in ostrakismos (exile). Ostrakismos was a method used in Athens to banish a politician from the city for 10 years. After his exile, Themistokles sought refuge first in Argos and then in the Persian Empire. Ironically, he spent the last years of his life under Persian protection.

Themistocles was received with great respect at the Persian court by Artaxerxes, son of Xerxes. His asylum in the Persian Empire gave him both financial and political security. Themistocles was given the city of Magnesia and several other small cities in the Persian Empire, where he was allowed to settle.

Information about the last years of Themistocles' life is limited. According to some sources, he gained the trust of Artaxerxes in the Persian Empire and served as his advisor. However, some ancient authors state that Themistokles committed suicide because he shirked his duty to lead the Persian army against the Greeks.
However, the details of Themistokles' death are not clear. Some ancient authors state that he committed suicide by drinking poison because he did not want to take part in the Persian Empire's advance against Greece. Other sources say he died of natural causes. Although the manner of his death is disputed, it is generally accepted that Themistocles was respected by the Persians and lived a very wealthy life in the last years of his life.

Modern historians generally regard Themistokles as a strategic genius and a visionary leader. His victory over the Persian Empire was not only a military but also a diplomatic success. Themistocles skillfully used diplomacy and strategic planning to unite the Greek city-states and prevent the Persians from invading Greek territory.

At the same time, Themistocles' exile shows how fragile Athenian democracy could be. While the democratic structure of Athens encouraged public participation, it was also a system in which politicians could easily be targeted. The exile of Themistokles is an important example of how internal political rivalries and power played out in Athens.

Summary of the story. Themistokles is considered one of the most important figures in Greek history. His military victories, especially at the Battle of Salamis, were decisive in Greece's resistance to the Persian Empire. The building of Athens' naval power and turning the city into a maritime empire was the result of Themistokles' long-term vision. But the ups and downs of his political career, especially his exile, also reveal the complexity and fragility of Athenian democracy.

Themistocles' legacy has played a major role in shaping not only Greece but also Western civilization.

 

[Yzaurqp]

I was advised to drop this here in Outreach. I've got a lot to say on Satanic personalities, so more will be coming. Our Romanian SS should enjoy this.

Mihai Eminescu, The Satanist

Mihai Eminescu is the most widely known Romanian poet, and arguably the most widely known Romanian artist period. Beyond his glorification by Romanians, there are occult beliefs that he had that people aren't aware of.
He was part of Junimea, a society for prominent writers of that time period. What is not as widely known is that this was a club full of non-Christians, actually anti-Christians.
All its members studied in the West, specifically France and Germany. It is a common rumor that Eminescu, in his time studying abroad, was part of a Dyonisian Mystery School, due to practices and Rituals that Junimea practiced.
Theologically speaking, they were Gnostics. However, the opinions on Christ were split. Some members believed Lucifer manifested as Jesus, some believed Lucifer was a real being and Jesus just an alegory. Mihai Eminescu and a couple close friends believed that Jesus Christ was a hoax and a tired relic. In the later half of his life, Eminescu was clearly not your average Gnostic, but a genius whose only shortcomings in Satanism were the fact that there literally weren't sources to study.

This is "O, Satan", a poem of Eminescu, that is lesser known. While some of his mentions of Satan are clearly Gnostic, this one, written later in his life, is clearly identifying Satan with the same beliefs that Spiritual Satanism is.
The link is to the poem in Romanian, but you can simply translate the site. Symbolism of Poseidon's deep sea, and symbolism that points to the Stars shows his clear knowledge of Satan.
https://religiasatanista.org/Media/Poezii/13.O,_Satan/index.php

His greatest work is Lucifer, a longform poem about the Genius symbol. It tells a story of Lucifer, the God, trying to gain mortality and incarnate as a human because he fell in love with a princess. In the later half of the poem, Lucifer sees that the girl is now with a regular human. The names used for the characters change every fourth of the poem, to symbolize their condition. The princess from the first quarter becomes nothing but another peasant in the 4th quarter, as Lucifer now sees her for the simpleton she is. It uses cosmology, mythology and Gnostic framework to paint a picture of how genius is power, but it makes one feel isolated from less smart people. I linked it in English, as I quite like this translation.
https://www.estcomp.ro/eminescu/cuclin1.html

While Eminescu is widely known for his poetry, he also wrote newspaper articles regularly. While the paper that was publishing his work did everything to censor him, he still snuck in the important messages. He was never allowed to criticize the Jew or Christian, but he used hidden symbols to do so anyway. This article is in Romanian (again, translate the site) and it is named "Old Icons and new Icons". A direct nod to Christianity. It talks about the greed of heads of state of the time. Any SS can easily see who he is talking about.
https://www.criticarad.ro/actualitatea-lui-eminescu-netrebnicii-care-ne-conduc-ziarul-timpul-1877/

For this criticism, Titu Maiorescu conspired with the Royal family to get rid of him. An attack was staged, and he was declared mad. He was incorrectly administered mercury for years, which led to his death.
He never lost hope until the last day of his sanity, as Lucifer was finished while he was in the asylum and under about a year of mercury poisoning. His soul fought until the last second.

Greetings from Romania! God bless us!^^

 

[EasternFireLion666]

I was advised to drop this here in Outreach. I've got a lot to say on Satanic personalities, so more will be coming. Our Romanian SS should enjoy this.

Mihai Eminescu, The Satanist

Mihai Eminescu is the most widely known Romanian poet, and arguably the most widely known Romanian artist period. Beyond his glorification by Romanians, there are occult beliefs that he had that people aren't aware of.
He was part of Junimea, a society for prominent writers of that time period. What is not as widely known is that this was a club full of non-Christians, actually anti-Christians.
All its members studied in the West, specifically France and Germany. It is a common rumor that Eminescu, in his time studying abroad, was part of a Dyonisian Mystery School, due to practices and Rituals that Junimea practiced.
Theologically speaking, they were Gnostics. However, the opinions on Christ were split. Some members believed Lucifer manifested as Jesus, some believed Lucifer was a real being and Jesus just an alegory. Mihai Eminescu and a couple close friends believed that Jesus Christ was a hoax and a tired relic. In the later half of his life, Eminescu was clearly not your average Gnostic, but a genius whose only shortcomings in Satanism were the fact that there literally weren't sources to study.

This is "O, Satan", a poem of Eminescu, that is lesser known. While some of his mentions of Satan are clearly Gnostic, this one, written later in his life, is clearly identifying Satan with the same beliefs that Spiritual Satanism is.
The link is to the poem in Romanian, but you can simply translate the site. Symbolism of Poseidon's deep sea, and symbolism that points to the Stars shows his clear knowledge of Satan.
https://religiasatanista.org/Media/Poezii/13.O,_Satan/index.php

His greatest work is Lucifer, a longform poem about the Genius symbol. It tells a story of Lucifer, the God, trying to gain mortality and incarnate as a human because he fell in love with a princess. In the later half of the poem, Lucifer sees that the girl is now with a regular human. The names used for the characters change every fourth of the poem, to symbolize their condition. The princess from the first quarter becomes nothing but another peasant in the 4th quarter, as Lucifer now sees her for the simpleton she is. It uses cosmology, mythology and Gnostic framework to paint a picture of how genius is power, but it makes one feel isolated from less smart people. I linked it in English, as I quite like this translation.
https://www.estcomp.ro/eminescu/cuclin1.html

While Eminescu is widely known for his poetry, he also wrote newspaper articles regularly. While the paper that was publishing his work did everything to censor him, he still snuck in the important messages. He was never allowed to criticize the Jew or Christian, but he used hidden symbols to do so anyway. This article is in Romanian (again, translate the site) and it is named "Old Icons and new Icons". A direct nod to Christianity. It talks about the greed of heads of state of the time. Any SS can easily see who he is talking about.
https://www.criticarad.ro/actualitatea-lui-eminescu-netrebnicii-care-ne-conduc-ziarul-timpul-1877/

For this criticism, Titu Maiorescu conspired with the Royal family to get rid of him. An attack was staged, and he was declared mad. He was incorrectly administered mercury for years, which led to his death.
He never lost hope until the last day of his sanity, as Lucifer was finished while he was in the asylum and under about a year of mercury poisoning. His soul fought until the last second.

Thank you for this information! I really like what you provided here. I did not know about the O, Satan poem. I was suspecting about him being an SS even before I was dedicated, mainly because of the famous Luceafarul/Lucifer poem. The Alchemist7 also spoke about this subject.

 

[Imhotep]

I will definitely include him in my research! If you would like, we could collaborate and share information. My email is [email protected], or if you would prefer, we can keep in contact via the forums.

I would like to thank you very much for your support, Charlotte666. Your message reached me after I had already started recording the "Imhotep" project, which is now thriving. However, I won't be posting it here for another 2-3 days, as I unfortunately still have some work commitments and therefore often have to take time off. The practical exercises, which take 2-3 hours a day, also take up some of my time, so I can usually only work on the project for a maximum of 1 hour.

Hail Satanas!
Hail Luciferus!
Hail Wotanas!

 

[HPS Lydia]

Joan of Arc was not a Satanist. Just because someone was accused of having "demonic abilities", does not guarantee they were a Satanist.

There have been psychics who were xian, and xianity was against psychic ability, so sometimes those xians were also persecuted, especially in times of political upheaval and war. It doesn't mean they were with us.

Joan d'Arc was simply a psychic fanatic xian who was visited by jewish angel thoughtforms, and did their bidding. She was a puppet. She wasn't the first nor the last, although she did become one of the most famous.

 

[SATchives]

Iamblichus
"(ca. 242–ca. 325) was a Syrian Neoplatonist and disciple of Porphyry of Tyre, the editor of Plotinus’ works. One of the three major representatives of early Neoplatonism (the third one being Plotinus himself), he exerted considerable influence among later philosophers belonging to the same tradition, such as Proclus, Damascius, and Simplicius. His work as a Pagan theologian and exegete earned him high praise and made a decisive contribution to the transformation of Plotinian metaphysics into the full-fledged system of the fifth-century school of Athens, at that time the major school of philosophy, along with the one in Alexandria. His harsh critique of Plotinus’ philosophical tenets is linked to his pessimistic outlook on the condition of the human soul, as well as to his advocacy of salvation by ritual means, known as “theurgy”. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/iamblichus/"

Empedocles
"In the middle of the fifth century BCE, Empedocles of Acragas formulated a philosophical program in hexameter verse that pioneered the influential four-part theory of roots (air, water, earth, and fire) along with two active principles of Love and Strife, which influenced later philosophy, medicine, mysticism, cosmology, and religion. The philosophical system responded to Parmenides’ rejection of change while embracing religious injunctions and magical practices. As a result, Empedocles has occupied a significant position in the history of Presocratic philosophy as a figure moving between mythos and logos, religion and science. Modern debate arises from the lack of consensus on the number of his verse works, their relation to one another, and the coherence of his philosophical system as a whole. This entry will introduce Empedocles, his life and work—traditionally referred to as On Nature and the Purifications—as well as the scholarly debates that continue to dominate study of his philosophical system. It closes with the influence Empedocles had upon his successors. The numbering of the fragments in this article follows that of the Diels-Kranz edition [DK] and Laks and Most 2016; translations are from Laks and Most.
The sixth edition of Diels-Kranz’s Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker remains the gold standard for the fragments of the Presocratic philosophers. In this system of classification, each Presocratic thinker is numbered (roughly) chronologically – Empedocles is DK 31 in the series, for example. Following this number (which we omit in cases where it is clear we are referring to Empedocles), fragments of each philosopher are subdivided into one of three categories: testimonia, or witnesses to the philosopher’s thought, constitute ‘A’ fragments; the actual words of the philosopher fall under the category of ‘B’ fragments; imitations come under ‘C’ fragments. After a fragment’s letter, each also receives a sequential distinguishing number. For example, the first fragment of Empedocles referred to in this article, DK 31 A 1, signals that it arises from the Diels-Kranz edition, focuses on Empedocles, and is testimonium no. 1. In 2016, a new and updated edition of the Presocratic philosophers was published with a facing translation by André Laks and Glenn W. Most. It is now essential to consult this monumental work of scholarship in addition to Diels-Kranz. For this reason, we also include notations from Laks and Most’s edition following Diels-Kranz. Laks and Most follow a different system of notation for the fragments: ‘P’ (= person) fragments include those in which a philosopher’s person is discussed. These give information on a philosopher’s biography, personality, and memorable sayings. ‘D’ (= doctrine) fragments refer to all references to the doctrine of the philosopher, including their own words. Finally, ‘R’ (= reception) fragments preserve later conceptions of the philosopher’s doctrine."

Empedocles (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Epimenides​

Flourished: c.600 BCE - c.501 BCE

"Epimenides (flourished 6th century bce?) was a Cretan seer, reputed author of religious and poetical writings, including a Theogony, Cretica, and other mystical works. Religious theories of an Orphic character were attributed to him as well. He conducted purificatory rites at Athens, according to Plato. Stories of his advanced age, his miraculous sleep, his dealings with oracles, and his wanderings outside the body have led some scholars to regard him as a legendary figure of a shamanistic type. For his reputed claim—cited by St. Paul the Apostle (Titus 1:12)—that all Cretans are liars, Epimenides, a Cretan, is credited with invention of the paradox of the liar, in which a sentence says of itself that it is false, thus being true if it is false and false if it is true."

Epimenides | Prophet, Philosopher, Poet

Epimenides was a Cretan seer, reputed author of religious and poetical writings, including a Theogony, Cretica, and other mystical works. Religious theories of an Orphic character were attributed to him as well. He conducted purificatory rites at Athens, according to Plato. Stories of his advanced

www.britannica.com

 

[SATchives]

Sorry, page 14650* of the Ecyclopedia, The Gods of the Gentiles, the Demons and the Jewish War Against our Gods"- High Priest Hooded Cobra 666 - publ. Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:55 am
It also seems I had a Unicode error in the last post I made. I fixed it.

These in the hebraic literature are reversed identities, and the "Agathodemones" of the Gentiles/Greeks
(their Gods etc) have been turned into heinous monsters and labeled as 'demons' whom the enemy tries
to convince everyone are inferior. For instance, the Demon Andras in the Goetic Demons, means in
Greek "MAN". "Andrelaphos" is an Ancient Greek Name and so are many others, so is Asmodeus
(Ασμοδαίος). Daimon or Demon just meanss knowledgeable one, and Demon also means “Spirit or Astral
body. For a Demon to be called a God, they have to be of supreme power, influence and strength as
Iamblichus states.

 

[Ara666]

I suppose that the most prominent members of the French Enlightenment were into occultism and with the Gods.
This would also be the case of the naturalist and mathematician Georges Louis Lecrerc, better known as the Comte de Buffon.

I'm beginning to think they were.

Even Buffon's book L'histoire Naturelle was criticized by the church. If the enemy doesn't like what you do, you know you're on the right path.

 

[Wotanwarrior]

Joan of Arc was not a Satanist. Just because someone was accused of having "demonic abilities", does not guarantee they were a Satanist.

There have been psychics who were xian, and xianity was against psychic ability, so sometimes those xians were also persecuted, especially in times of political upheaval and war. It doesn't mean they were with us.

Joan d'Arc was simply a psychic fanatic xian who was visited by jewish angel thoughtforms, and did their bidding. She was a puppet. She wasn't the first nor the last, although she did become one of the most famous.

The same with other historical figures in more recent times such as John Dee, Eliphas Levi, Albert Pike or Rudolf Steiner, who were involved in jewish occultism.
In the case of Eliphas Levi, he was so obsessed with jewish kabbalah that he changed his name to look like a jewish rabbi.

 

[Thersthara]

The tale of Achilles and his place in mythology

The story of Achilles is one of the most comprehensive and detailed epics of Greek mythology. This hero, with his superhuman abilities and foibles, is at the center of a narrative that revolves around gods, kings and heroes. In this JoS project, I will explore the story from his birth to his death.

Achilles is a demigod figure in Greek mythology. His father was a mortal man, Peleus, a king of Mirmidon in the region of Thessaly. His mother is Thetis, the goddess of the sea. Thetis is a Nereid, or sea nymph, and is recognized as a powerful, immortal being. According to legends, Thetis was planned to marry a god, but a prophecy said that the consequences of this marriage would be devastating for the gods. According to the prophecy, the child Thetis would give birth to would be more powerful than his father. Therefore, Zeus, the king of the gods, decided to marry Thetis to Peleus instead.

Thetis wanted her son to be immortal. In one of the legends, Thetis tried to make Achilles immortal by dunking him in the River Styx. However, as she held Achilles by his heel while immersing him in the river, only his heel remained weak while the rest of his body became immortal. In another narrative, it is said that Thetis tried to purify Achilles by burning him in the fire at night to destroy his mortal side, but Peleus intervened when he saw this ritual. Therefore, Achilles' mortal side is preserved. Both narratives explain that Achilles' efforts to become immortal fall short and that his ultimate weakness is his heel.

Achilles was raised as a child born with abilities far superior to those of other mortals. His mother Thetis, knowing in advance that he would die in the Trojan War, did her best to keep him away from the battle. Peleus entrusted Achilles' education to the legendary centaur Kheiron. Kheiron is known in mythology as a wise creature and trainer of warriors. Here Achilles learned not only the skills of warfare, but also music, medicine, hunting and ethics.

Achilles' innate abilities of speed and strength made him stand out not only as a warrior, but also as a hunter and athlete. His best friend Patroclus also grew up with him during this period. The relationship between the two is not only one of friendship but, according to some accounts, of a deeper bond; this closeness between Achilles and Patroclus will be a major dramatic element in the Iliad.

When the Trojan War begins, his mother Thetis hides him on Skyros Island to prevent him from joining the war. Thetis planned to hide Achilles in the palace of the king Lycomedes on the island, disguised as a girl. Achilles lived here among Lycomedes' daughters and even secretly married Lycomedes' daughter Deidameia during this time and had a son, Neoptolemos.

However, Achilles' absence in the Trojan War is a major omission. Odysseus, one of the leaders of the Greek army, realizes that Achilles is hiding. Odysseus devises a plan to reveal Achilles' identity by placing precious jewels and a sword in front of the royal daughters. Achilles' warrior spirit prevails and when he chooses the sword, his identity is revealed. Achilles is thus forced to join the war.

Achilles joins the Trojan War as the leader of an army of strong and fearless warriors called the Mirmidons. The Greeks attack Troy and begin a great campaign that lasts for ten years. Achilles' fame on the battlefield spreads rapidly. Homer's epic Iliad also tells the story of Achilles' heroism in the Trojan War.

During the battle, Achilles encounters many great warriors and kills many enemies from the Trojan ranks. However, one of the most important events in the war that would determine Achilles' fate was his great disagreement with Agamemnon, the commander of the Greek army.

During the Trojan War, a woman named Briseis is the prize given to Achilles among the spoils the Greeks obtained. However, Agamemnon is dissatisfied with the bounty given to him and takes Briseis away from Achilles. Achilles takes this as a great dishonorable insult and stops fighting. This conflict is one of the central events of the Iliad and shows how strong Achilles' pride is. With Achilles' withdrawal from the battle, the Greek army shows great weakness and begins to decline against the Trojan army.

Achilles' failure to return to the battle demoralizes the Greek army and leads to a major defeat. In this situation, his best friend Patroklos decides to join the battle wearing Achilles' armor to motivate the Greek army. Patroclus shows great heroism on the battlefield, mistaken for Achilles, but is killed when he encounters Troy's greatest warrior, Hector.

The death of Patroclus shakes Achilles deeply. The death of his friend drives him to great anger and a desire for revenge. Achilles vows to return to battle and his mother Thetis appeals to the god Hephaistos to make him a new suit of armor.

After putting on his new armor, Achilles returns to the battle and arrives at the gates of Troy. He is now full of revenge and his only goal is to kill Hector. The duel between Hector and Achilles is one of the most dramatic moments of the Trojan War. Achilles defeats Hector on the battlefield and kills him. However, Achilles' revenge does not end there; he ties Hector's body to his chariot and drags it around the walls of Troy. This act causes great pain to Hector's family and the people of Troy.

Hector's father Priamos sneaks into Achilles' tent under the cover of night and begs for his son's body back. In the face of Priamos' pathetic plea, Achilles' anger subsides and he returns Hector's body with honor.

Achilles' death was foretold by a prophecy. According to legend, near the end of the Trojan War, the Trojan prince Paris shot Achilles with an arrow guided by the god Apollo. Shooting Achilles in the heel, Achilles' weak point, brings his end. Paris manages to kill Achilles not with his warrior skills but with this lucky shot. Achilles' death affects the fate of the Trojan War and is a great loss for the Greek army.

After Achilles' death, his son Neoptolemos continued his father's legacy by participating in the Trojan War. Neoptolemos plays an important role in the fall of Troy. Achilles' bravery and warriorism were symbolized in Ancient Greek culture as the ideal of heroism. Throughout Homer's Iliad, Achilles stands out as a figure where both gods and men come together, where strength and weakness are intertwined. While Achilles leads a life close to that of the gods, with his strength and desire for immortality, he also exhibits deep human weaknesses and emotions. His humanity shapes his character as a tragic hero, and Achilles seeks an honorable death despite knowing that his death is inevitable.

his body is buried with great honor by the Greek army. Achilles, who showed humanity by handing over Hector's body, is remembered as a great hero even after his own death. The Greeks built a tomb in his memory in the Troad region and this tomb is seen as a sacred monument in the Ancient Greek world. After his death, Achilles' soul is said to rest in Elysium (a heavenly realm) or the Sea of Islands. Like other heroes, he is believed to have gained immortal fame.

The story of Achilles is a perfect example of tragedy in ancient Greek mythology. His greatest weakness is hybris (excessive pride) and anger. His disagreement with Agamemnon and his pride cause him to withdraw from the war and eventually lead to the death of Patroclus. This pride is a reflection of his human weaknesses. On the other hand, Achilles' violent rage and desire for revenge when he returns to the battle makes him a figure who transcends human limits, but this rage further isolates him.

Despite the help of the gods and his superior fighting skills, Achilles cannot escape the mortal nature of man. Killing Hector at the gates of Troy and dragging his corpse is a symbol of Achilles' uncontrolled rage. However, when Priamos comes to Achilles and asks for Hector's body back and Achilles' empathy for this pain is the moment when he remembers his human side. This shows that Achilles' greatness lies not only in his physical strength, but also in his ability to understand pain and loss.

Achilles' legacy had a profound impact on the Ancient Greek world and beyond. Homer's Iliad presents Achilles as a model hero. But his tragic end shows that heroism also comes with a price. Achilles is characterized not only by his valor as a warrior, but also by his deep human frailties.

Even today, Achilles' name is synonymous with “heroism” and “weakness”. The phrase “Achilles' heel” has come to refer to the weakest and most vulnerable part of a person. His story has inspired many works of art, literary texts and philosophical thoughts. In Western literature and culture, Achilles is a symbol of both strength and weakness.

 

[Thersthara]

The story of Patroclus and his relationship with Achilles

Patroclus is one of the most important characters of Greek mythology and especially of Homer's Iliad. As Achilles' closest friend and a key figure in the war, Patroclus is remembered as much for his heroism on the battlefield as for his profound tragedy. The story of Patroclus stands out not only as a warrior, but also as a symbol of friendship, loyalty and a tragic fate.

Patroclus is the son of Menoitios from the city of Opus. Like many heroes of Greek mythology, Patroclus' family was noble, but his childhood was shaped by misfortune. According to legend, when Patroclus was a young boy, he accidentally killed another boy during a game. This event would change his life forever. Because in Ancient Greece, killing a man, no matter how accidental, was a capital offense. His father Menoitios sends his son into exile in order to protect Patroklos and ensure his impunity. Patroclus' exile marks the period when he meets Achilles and their deep friendship begins.

While in exile, Patroclus was adopted by Achilles' father Peleus and grew up with Achilles. Achilles and Patroclus grew up together and were trained as warriors. Patroclus is one of the many heroes trained by Kheiron. Kheiron is recognized as one of the wisest centaurs in Greek mythology and is the trainer of warriors and heroes.

Patroclus' relationship with Achilles is based on deep friendship and loyalty. The nature of this relationship is not explicitly stated in Homer's Iliad, but the importance of Patroclus in Achilles' life is evident in many parts of the epic. Patroclus is Achilles' closest friend, confidant and supporter on the battlefield. In contrast to Achilles' angry and proud character, Patroclus is more calm and understanding. This makes their relationship important as a balancing factor.

Patroclus is best known in history for his role in the Trojan War. Patroclus participates in the war with Achilles. However, at an important turning point in the war, a disagreement arises between Achilles and Agamemnon, the leader of the Greek army. As a result of this disagreement, Achilles withdraws from the war because his pride is hurt and refuses to fight. This is a big blow for the Greek army and they are weakened against the Trojan army.

Patroclus, meanwhile, sees that the Greek army is in a difficult situation and begs Achilles to return to the battle. However, Achilles refuses to return to the battle because he is too fond of his honor. At this point, Patroclus makes a big decision: He decides to put on Achilles' armor and go to the battlefield instead. In this decision, Patroclus wants both to raise the morale of the Greek army and to keep Achilles' glory alive. Patroclus' aim is to push back the Trojan army and ensure that the Greeks regain the upper hand in the war.

When Patroklos puts on Achilles' armor and appears on the battlefield, everyone mistakes him for Achilles. This boosts the morale of the Greek army and the Trojan army begins to retreat. Patroklos fights with great courage in Achilles' armor and kills many Trojan soldiers. He even achieves an important success by killing Sarpedon, one of the chief commanders of the Trojan army.

However, although Patroklos is not a mighty warrior like Achilles, he gets caught up in the excitement of the battle and forgets the instructions given to him by him and advances to the walls of Troy. Achilles had told Patroclus to only defend the Greek army, but not to go beyond the walls of Troy. However, despite this warning, Patroclus charges forward and encounters Hector in front of the walls.

Patroclus' tragic end begins with his encounter with Hector. Hector is the greatest warrior of Troy and, mistaking Patroclus for Achilles, decides to fight him. Meanwhile, the gods begin to intervene in the battle. Apollo attacks Patroklos from behind, shattering his armor and weakening his strength. Without armor, Patroklos is at a great disadvantage when he faces Hector.

Hector manages to kill Patroklos and realizes that he is not Achilles. However, Patroclus says the following words to Hector before he dies: “Achilles will kill you to avenge me.” These prophetic words will determine Hector's fate and change the course of the Trojan War.

The death of Patroclus is one of the most important turning points of the Iliad. The news of Patroclus' death shakes Achilles deeply and plunges him into great grief. Although Achilles had refused to return to battle until Patroclus' death, this loss changes him completely. Achilles vows to return to the battlefield to avenge the death of his friend. Patroclus' death fuels Achilles' anger and desire for revenge and leads him to kill Hector, Troy's greatest warrior.

Achilles organizes Patroclus' funeral with great pomp. Patroclus' body is cremated and Achilles organizes funeral games to honor his memory. These games are one of the important rituals that show the respect for heroes in Ancient Greek culture. During Patroclus' funeral games, competitions between Greek warriors are organized and Achilles makes a great effort to keep the memory of his friend alive.

Patroclus' funeral

Controversies about the Relationship between Patroclus and Achilles

The friendship of Patroclus and Achilles was seen as a deep bond in the Ancient Greek world. The nature of their relationship has led to debates throughout history as to whether they were lovers or best friends. In Ancient Greece, friendship and comradeship in war were woven with deep emotional bonds. The relationship between Patroclus and Achilles has led to different interpretations as to whether it was simply a friendship or a romantic bond.

In ancient Greece, same-sex relationships were common and socially accepted. For this reason, some classical authors and later writers have argued that this relationship involved some kind of romantic bond. However, Homer does not explicitly state the nature of this relationship in the Iliad; it is interpreted more in terms of friendship and brotherhood.

Patroclus and Achilles

Patroclus is remembered in Greek mythology not only as Achilles' friend, but also as a great hero. His sacrifice, his bravery on the battlefield for his friend, and ultimately his tragic death, occupy an important place in Greek heroic culture. Patroclus' death is one of the most important events in the story of Achilles.

Patroclus' loyalty and heroism are matched by his courage on the battlefield. He is not only a figure overshadowed by Achilles; he is also a hero in his own right. His tragedy, however, is that his courage and sacrifices in battle result in his death. Patroclus, like many characters in the Iliad, is a figure who succumbs to the inevitability of fate, and his death brings Achilles' story to its climax.


Patroclus' Influence on Achilles

The death of Patroclus is one of the most dramatic events of the Iliad. It is considered the turning point in Achilles' life and completely changes his character. Whereas at the beginning of the war there was an arrogant, angry and proud Achilles, with the death of Patroclus there is an Achilles in mourning, in deep pain and full of desire for revenge.

Achilles' love for Patroclus is the most important factor that brings him back to the battlefield. With the loss of Patroclus, Achilles gives up his own desire for immortality and his personal ambitions. In order to avenge Patroclus, Achilles deliberately takes steps to hasten his own death. Because he knows that after he kills Hector, he will also die. But this is no longer important to Achilles. What is important for him is to keep Patroclus' memory alive and avenge his friend. This makes the human weaknesses and emotional depth of Achilles' character more apparent.

Achilles weeps over the death of Patroclus and his anger reaches its peak. This shows the depth of friendship and loyalty between the heroes in Greek mythology. After Patroklos' death, Achilles' anger is so intense that he drags and humiliates Hector's corpse after killing him. However, when Priamos comes to Achilles to retrieve his son's body and shares his grief, Achilles' anger is calmed. At this point, Patroclus' death reawakens not only a sense of revenge, but also humanity and empathy.

The death of Patroclus and his relationship with Achilles had a great impact on Ancient Greek literature and later on Western culture. Philosophers such as Plato analyzed the relationship between Patroclus and Achilles in depth. In Plato's works, especially in his dialogue Symposium, this relationship is discussed in terms of “idealized love” and comradeship. Plato argues that such friendships and relationships contribute to a virtuous and heroic life.

Looking at the history of art, the friendship of Patroclus and Achilles has inspired many artists. Especially Renaissance paintings and sculptures depicted the relationship of these two heroes in dramatic scenes. The death scene of Patroclus is a common theme in art. Achilles' mourning has continued to be a strong theme in both literature and visual art.

The death of Patroclus shows how profound the loss of a friend can be and its effect on heroes. In Greek culture, Patroclus' sacrifice and friendship is seen as a virtue as important as heroism. Patroclus is remembered not for his heroism on the battlefield, but for his loyalty and sacrifice to his friend. This makes him one of the most memorable figures of Greek mythology.

Patroclus may seem like a character in Greek mythology overshadowed by Achilles, but he is a hero in his own right. His story becomes a symbol of loyalty, friendship and sacrifice. His heroism in the Trojan War, his tragic death and especially his influence on Achilles make him one of the most tragic and poignant figures in mythology.

Patroclus' story also helps us understand Achilles' mortality and human frailty. Patroclus is not only Achilles' comrade-in-arms on the battlefield, but also a friend who brings out his soul and human side. This relationship adds a deeply human dimension to the heroic narratives of mythology and has inspired many artists and writers throughout history.

 

[David Chacón]

It's great that all people here are also followers of God's of hell as Tesla and the others.

 

[Charlotte666]

I would like to thank you very much for your support, Charlotte666. Your message reached me after I had already started recording the "Imhotep" project, which is now thriving. However, I won't be posting it here for another 2-3 days, as I unfortunately still have some work commitments and therefore often have to take time off. The practical exercises, which take 2-3 hours a day, also take up some of my time, so I can usually only work on the project for a maximum of 1 hour.

Hail Satanas!
Hail Luciferus!
Hail Wotanas!

Of course, I understand. Life can get in the way. I also am limited with the time I have. I've been researching Imhotep and others for a few days, although I'm still a bit trepidatious about the information I've gathered, as I'm not sure about its accuracy.

 

[OttoHart]

Romanian Satanic Personalities

I left out a few bigger personalities that will get their own longer essays, but this does have 10+ of the greatest Satanic Personalities of Romanian history.
I'll be working on similar documents for other nations.

Any personalities mentioned here or their works mentioned here are absolutely worth checking out and looking into for any SS, but especially our Romanian SS.

 

[David Chacón]

Romanian Satanic Personalities

I left out a few bigger personalities that will get their own longer essays, but this does have 10+ of the greatest Satanic Personalities of Romanian history.
I'll be working on similar documents for other nations.

Any personalities mentioned here or their works mentioned here are absolutely worth checking out and looking into for any SS, but especially our Romanian SS.

Thanks I dowload

 

[Wotanwarrior]

Were the Roman emperors of the Flavian dynasty really Jews or puppets of the enemy? I believe that is not true and the one who mainly promoted this was Magestein in his writings.

The emperor Titus fought against Judea just as Hadrian did later and the Jews even cursed him in several verses of the Bible, for example the text of Onkelos:

Redpillers FAQ: Jesus Being In Boiling Excrement? Does The Talmud Say That?

Alright, I know the title is disgusting. But aren't jews? Of course they are. It's the case that we have to actually analyze these lizards and their scato-phillia. Around the web, there is this nonsense meme the Jews promote, that supposedly, Jesus is attacked on the "Talmud". This leads many...

ancient-forums.com

One is Titus. Titus was a Roman emperor. According to Titus, who was summoned by "Onkelos", what one has to do with jews in this world, is to exterminate them and fight against them. There is a curse following this saying implying that Titus is "made into ashes and scattered on the sea".

"Balaam" in this fake tale, is summoned first. Then, he tells the Roman "Onkelos" to never seek the welfare of the jews under any circumstance in his life. Then, there is a curse on Balaam on how he is "Boiling in hot semen".

Then, "Yeshu" or "Jesus" is summoned, and he tells "Onkelos", that he should always seek their welfare and other positive matters. Also, Jesus explains, that he himself being a jew, recommends that whomever attacks the jews in the afterlife will be boiled in boiling excrement, and how one should always listen to the Sages [Rabbis].

 

[Hp. Hoodedcobra666]

Controversies about the Relationship between Patroclus and Achilles

The friendship of Patroclus and Achilles was seen as a deep bond in the Ancient Greek world. The nature of their relationship has led to debates throughout history as to whether they were lovers or best friends. In Ancient Greece, friendship and comradeship in war were woven with deep emotional bonds. The relationship between Patroclus and Achilles has led to different interpretations as to whether it was simply a friendship or a romantic bond.

In ancient Greece, same-sex relationships were common and socially accepted. For this reason, some classical authors and later writers have argued that this relationship involved some kind of romantic bond. However, Homer does not explicitly state the nature of this relationship in the Iliad; it is interpreted more in terms of friendship and brotherhood.

These are basically the usual garbage "Controversies" where perverts are misinterpreting the texts which are very clear; Patroclus and Achilles were best friends, not lovers. Homer writes something "And they slept on the tent together" and perverts and other sex addicts who just look for reasoning to justify their present time nonsense, conveniently try to make up that they had a "Homosexual relationship" in order to justify their choices.

Then Dr Rosenstein or someone with a name like this tries to project his perversion that men sleeping in tents together (which is common also in modern day barracks in wars) are somehow all having sexual relations. Same literary garbage has been written about Alexander the Great yet none of it really has any actual standing information; the texts do not go into these topics about either of them.

After this they make sure to make some movies and slander, because internally Jews believe that homosexuality is a sin, yet they want to tease the "homosexuals" with constantly telling them that their "Sexual identity is so important" and that if Alexander was gay that every GBLT parader out there is literally Alexander trying to take Asia. That simultaneously insults people of that vocation, the historical figure related into that jargon, so jews can manipulate on all directions.

The same nonsense happens with feminists and others who project their own internal conflicts on the texts. When for example they find a woman who was successful from the Ancient World (common situation back then) or who was a Scientist, they write on one page how the Ancient Greeks kept women back and slaves (to agitate women) and then the next page because they cannot justify Hypatia or numerous other women in Ancient history like Cleopatra, they just write things like "Cleopatra broke the glass ceiling" and other nonsense.

While all the examples are not showing any repression, since they live by pretending to be repressed since aeons ago, they have to make up any situation; Achilles was having sex with Patroclus in a tent, Aristotle said something once about women (fully twisted - maybe never said it either- Aristotle had married a courtesan and had 5 children if I recall correctly. So where is the "hate for the women which were supposedly perceive as lower rank?" - Nowhere, made up nonsense as usual) and they will conjure just about anything.

They just mix and confuse the information so they can pretend to be victims and that "All women are victims of the evil patriarchical order!" as per usual.

They need to write this literary garbage for reasons of projection and to pretend that all the past was corrupted, so they can sell more books and pretend they are "revolutionaries", while in the Ancient World things were in most places pretty balanced, with a lot of women having a lot of power.

It's a known topic the Ancients were meritocratic and did not have any grudges against Women. Only Abrahamism brought this around, with also removing female divinities from the Pantheons all together, barring women from scientific or other pursuits, and shrinking them to no existence.

 

[David Chacón]

Romanian Satanic Personalities

I left out a few bigger personalities that will get their own longer essays, but this does have 10+ of the greatest Satanic Personalities of Romanian history.
I'll be working on similar documents for other nations.

Any personalities mentioned here or their works mentioned here are absolutely worth checking out and looking into for any SS, but especially our Romanian SS.

Thanks to this PDF I now have download books about the first personality that appears in the pdf Mircea Eliade

 

[OttoHart]

Thanks to this PDF I now have download books about the first personality that appears in the pdf Mircea Eliade

I do recommend Hyperborean Dacia next, but Eliade is a great author.

 

[Blitzkreig [JG]]

Satanic Personalities List​

Updated: 10/1/2024
Tag for project head: @Karnonnos [JG]

The purpose of this list is to organize what articles currently exist.
Note: Multiple authors can submit articles or other content or edits for the same Personality. What is listed below does not reflect the final product.

Full Articles:​

• Mihai Eminescu by Ottohart
• Friedrich Hölderlin by Imhotep
• Hephaestion by Thersthara666
• Pharaoh Horemheb by kaelgr
• Maria Oršić by ba666 2.0
• Carl Gustav Jung by Imhotep
• Savitri Devi by Isisd
• Gediminas by OttoHart
• Atalanta by Thersthara666
• Philoctetesby Thersthara666
• Meleager by Thersthara666
• Leonidas by Thersthara666
• Pericles by Thersthara666
• Themistokles by Thersthara666
• Achilles by Thersthara666
• Patroclus by Thersthara666
• Epimenidesby Thersthara666
• Zarqa al Yamamaby golden dragon
• Solonby Thersthara666
• Hypatia by Enastri
• Giordana Bruno by OttoHart
• Romanian Satanic Personalitiesby Ottohart
  
  • Mircea Eliade
  • Emil Cioran
  • Vsaile Lovinescu
  • Lucian Blaga
  • Gheorghe Asachi
  • Demetrius of Cantemir
  • Alexandru Macedonski
  • Gheorghe I. Brătianu
  • Burebista
  • Octavian Goga
  • Gura de Zalmoxis
  • Deceneus
  • Neagoe Basarab

 

[Thersthara]

These are basically the usual garbage "Controversies" where perverts are misinterpreting the texts which are very clear; Patroclus and Achilles were best friends, not lovers. Homer writes something "And they slept on the tent together" and perverts and other sex addicts who just look for reasoning to justify their present time nonsense, conveniently try to make up that they had a "Homosexual relationship" in order to justify their choices.

Then Dr Rosenstein or someone with a name like this tries to project his perversion that men sleeping in tents together (which is common also in modern day barracks in wars) are somehow all having sexual relations. Same literary garbage has been written about Alexander the Great yet none of it really has any actual standing information; the texts do not go into these topics about either of them.

After this they make sure to make some movies and slander, because internally Jews believe that homosexuality is a sin, yet they want to tease the "homosexuals" with constantly telling them that their "Sexual identity is so important" and that if Alexander was gay that every GBLT parader out there is literally Alexander trying to take Asia. That simultaneously insults people of that vocation, the historical figure related into that jargon, so jews can manipulate on all directions.

The same nonsense happens with feminists and others who project their own internal conflicts on the texts. When for example they find a woman who was successful from the Ancient World (common situation back then) or who was a Scientist, they write on one page how the Ancient Greeks kept women back and slaves (to agitate women) and then the next page because they cannot justify Hypatia or numerous other women in Ancient history like Cleopatra, they just write things like "Cleopatra broke the glass ceiling" and other nonsense.

While all the examples are not showing any repression, since they live by pretending to be repressed since aeons ago, they have to make up any situation; Achilles was having sex with Patroclus in a tent, Aristotle said something once about women (fully twisted - maybe never said it either- Aristotle had married a courtesan and had 5 children if I recall correctly. So where is the "hate for the women which were supposedly perceive as lower rank?" - Nowhere, made up nonsense as usual) and they will conjure just about anything.

They just mix and confuse the information so they can pretend to be victims and that "All women are victims of the evil patriarchical order!" as per usual.

They need to write this literary garbage for reasons of projection and to pretend that all the past was corrupted, so they can sell more books and pretend they are "revolutionaries", while in the Ancient World things were in most places pretty balanced, with a lot of women having a lot of power.

It's a known topic the Ancients were meritocratic and did not have any grudges against Women. Only Abrahamism brought this around, with also removing female divinities from the Pantheons all together, barring women from scientific or other pursuits, and shrinking them to no existence.

Thank you HPHC for clarifying the misinformation that is being spread around!

I have presented this research text to people without changing the sources I have obtained and as much as possible as they are described in history. Certainly people need to read these texts through their own Satanic filters.

because half of this information is allegorical and the other half is already subject to misunderstanding from person to person.

 

[Thersthara]

The story of the great philosopher Epimenides

Epimenides was a rather enigmatic philosopher and a prophet who lived on the very margins of Greek mythology and history. His life is told through legends and myths as well as through direct historical sources, making him an interesting and unusual character as a seer and mystic. Epimenides is considered to have been born in Crete in the 6th century BC, but his date of birth is uncertain. During his lifetime he was revered as a poet, philosopher, priest and seer. The extraordinary events and supernatural abilities attributed to him in legends shaped the mystical beliefs of Ancient Greece over time.

The most famous story told about Epimenides' youth is about him falling into a long sleep. One day, Epimenides went out to look for a flock of sheep belonging to his father. Exhausted, he decided to rest in a cave, where he slept for a while. But this sleep was no ordinary sleep. According to legends, Epimenides slept in this cave for 57 years. When he awoke, time on earth had already passed, but he had gained mystical wisdom.

This long sleep led him to develop a special relationship with the gods. Epimenides' sleep and the wisdom he gained afterward is thought to have been a kind of divine inspiration. This story set the stage for him to spend the rest of his life associated with supernatural powers, divination and religious rituals. Many sources state that Epimenides was recognized as a seer and mystic who was able to communicate directly with the gods after this event.

Epimenides was known as a Cretan, born on the island of Crete. In the ancient Greek world, the Cretans were a people devoted to their gods, but at the same time notorious as “liars”. His paradoxical thought about the Cretans, beginning with his famous statement, “All Cretans are liars”, caused a great stir in philosophical debates (later to be called the Paradox of Epimenides).

Epimenides was deeply connected to Cretan mythology and cultural identity. Cretan religious beliefs and culture at the time were heavily imbued with supernatural and mystical elements. The island, a legacy of the Minoan civilization, was considered a place where gods and superhuman beings often intervened. Epimenides was seen as a product of this mystical cultural atmosphere and became a figure representing the religious beliefs of Crete.

The Paradox of Epimenides: “All Cretans are liars.”

The reason why this statement is paradoxical is that Epimenides himself was a Cretan. Therefore, logically, the following two situations arise:

If what Epimenides says is true, then all Cretans are liars. But since Epimenides is also a Cretan, he must also be a liar. But if he is a liar, then what he says is assumed to be a lie, and so the statement “all Cretans are liars” is also a lie. This would mean that the Cretans are telling the truth, so a contradiction arises.

If what Epimenides said is a lie, then not all Cretans are liars and some must be telling the truth. But in this case, since Epimenides is a Cretan, he cannot be telling the truth. So there is an inconsistency here too.

This paradox was discussed especially by the Stoic philosophers and later became an important topic in modern logic. The paradox has been addressed by many thinkers who have investigated the nature of self-refuting sentences and their implications for the philosophy of logic.

The Gift of Prophecy

Epimenides was known not only for his poetry and writings, but also for his immediate prophetic abilities. He traveled outside Crete to various Greek cities and helped them as a seer. The best-known story is about him ending the plague in Athens.

Around 600 BC, a great plague broke out in Athens. It was believed to be the wrath of the gods. When the Athenians heard of Epimenides' fame, they invited him to the city. The oracle skills that Epimenides showed on this occasion are quite interesting. He proposed a solution in accordance with the rituals and religious beliefs of the time: black and white sheep should be left to roam freely in the city and sacrifices should be offered on the altar at those points according to where the sheep stopped and rested.

After this ritual was carried out, the plague ended. The people of Athens saw Epimenides as a favor from the gods and treated him with deep respect. This led to him being recognized as an important religious authority and oracle in Greek cities. Some of the religious ceremonies and temples that he later established in Athens survived for a long time in the Greek world.

Famous Poems of Epimenides

Most of Epimenides' writings have not survived ( due to the Jews), but many sources in Ancient Greece indicate that he wrote religious and mystical works. Among these works, two genres stand out in particular: Theogony (poems on the origin of the gods) and Cathartic Poems (poems on purification and religious purity). He is also known to have written Hymns and Religious Songs. His poetry was not only an artistic expression, but also had a religious function. His poems dealt with the relationship between gods and humans, divine justice and divine order.

Epimenides was also known in the Greek world as the “purifier” or “purification expert”. His poetry often dealt with the themes of ritual purification and the cleansing of sin. His poems about rituals were of great importance for religious practices in Crete and the surrounding regions. He is also known for his poems on cosmology and the divine order of the universe. These cosmological poems dealt directly with the spiritual order of nature and divine intervention.

His influence on the Stoics

Epimenides' religious and mystical thoughts had a profound influence, especially on the Stoics. The Stoics adopted his ideas about nature and the divine order. In Epimenides' belief system, it was thought that the universe had a divine order and that the worship of gods and rituals were of great importance in order to keep this order intact. This belief was quite compatible with the Stoic worldview. The Stoics argued that the gods shaped the nature of the universe and that humans should live a life in accordance with this nature.

Epimenides' writings and thoughts were integrated into Stoic teachings about the universe and the gods. By incorporating his understanding of the divine order into their ethical and metaphysical system, the Stoics emphasized the unity of the Universe and the importance of the relationship between nature and man.

There are also many legends about Epimenides' death. Some sources say that he died at exactly 154 years of age, while other sources describe his death in a more supernatural way. In Greek mythology, Epimenides is even said to be immortal and taken to the sky by the gods. Indeed, stories of his longevity and extraordinary longevity have led to him being associated with divine qualities.

After Epimenides' death, temples and altars were built in his name. In Athens and other Greek cities, his religious rites were continued and he became a cult figure

 

[golden dragon]

Zarqa al Yamama
First before starting that this is my first participation in the forums I have been browsing the main site and forums for several years and decided to finally register my native language is Arabic so I apologize if my English is very bad, I use translation sites sometimes
As for the subject, as you all know that Islam, with its coming, destroyed all the monuments about the Arab civilization before it, and nothing reached us except through the texts of Islam, most of which are lies and distortions to obscure the facts, but we also know that the truth appears amid piles of lies, you only need insight, insight and patience to research and analyze
In order not to prolong it for you, the Arab civilization before Islam was flourishing in all aspects and women had very big roles in various aspects of life, which is the opposite of the Islamic lies that say that the Arabs before Islam were killing their daughters, and this character that I am about to talk about is a simple example of Islam's lie
Zarqa Al-Yamamah is classified by most historians as a legendary figure, but the transmission of news about her among the Arabs before and after Islam makes us doubt that she is just a legend
Its original name is al-Yamama, meaning (Dove), and the nickname Zarqa means (blue)
As for the reason for the nickname, as most historians have said, because she had blue eyes, which is unusual for Arabs
She lived in the Yamama region in the center of the Arabian Peninsula near the country of Yemen in the south and the region was then prosperous at all levels
Qualities of al Yamama :
She was, as historians describe, with wide blue eyes and very long black hair that she dragged behind her when walking, which she became famous for until her news reached our time is that she has a very strong visual acuity to the point that she sees the white hair in the milk glass and she sees people a whole day's walk away from her

The truth about it :
What I quoted above is the opinion of most Muslim historians, but some modern neutral Arab historians had other opinions, they said that she had the gift of clairvoyance and prediction, and therefore not visual acuity, hence her fame (in my opinion, this does not prevent her from having visual acuity in addition to clairvoyance and prediction)
Also that she was nicknamed Zarqa not only because her eyes are blue, but for another reason, I will detail it as follows :
First: Arab historians mentioned that some Arabs before Islam worshiped planets, and among these planets is Venus, and those who specialized in worshiping planets are the southern Arabs, especially and some of their affiliated areas, including the Yamama region (which took its name from them) they worshiped Venus by the name of Attar and symbolized him with the Nubian ibex or bull most archaeologists today say that Attar is a male god, but some texts in
Also, some unknown Arabic historical texts indicated that the Arabs who worshiped Venus were called ISIS and some historians said that uthtar is a masculine name derived from Ishtar 1 .
However, the worship of Venus as a feminine was common among some Arabs, including the Arabs of Al-Yamamah
Second: as you know, the goddess Astaroth, as mentioned on the site, is one of her colors, the color blue, and it helps in clairvoyance and prediction, and the bull's head is one of her symbols, since it is Venus and ISIS
We conclude that the title of Zarqa is related to the worship of Venus, and therefore Zarqa the Dove was a clairvoyant and prophetess, and also a priestess of Venus
According to some Arab historians, the Yamama region was prosperous at that time with pastures, vast green lands, rivers and water springs, and there was a great civilization in it, and Zarqa al Yamama was their queen and priestess, so because of her high spiritual talents, she warned her people before any invasion coming to them so that they prepare and indeed they were winning in their battles
Until Hassan Yuha'min, the king of the kingdom of Hamir in Yemen at that time, who was a Jew, conquered them
We do not know exactly what happened, but the Islamic history states that he and his soldiers disappeared behind the trees and moved to the Yamama region, and when she told her people about them, they did not believe her, so they invaded them, but it is never logical, there must be another reason we do not know
Whatever it was, this Jewish King conquered them and destroyed the kingdom of the Yamama and killed everyone in it directly, except Zarqa al Yamama, he tortured her, gouged out her eyes and crucified her until she died
From this heinous method of murder, we know that it really worried and worried the Jews and that it was a pagan and satanic who protected her people and made them prosper
I apologize for the lengthening and for any linguistic error, I hope that my first post will be of benefit to everyone in enlightening them with some of the Arab history buried among the rubble of the lies of Islam
Note: most of the sources I relied on are in Arabic only, so I didn't mention them because they are not translated into any language
I also have some photos, but I didn't know how to add them, so I'll just put the links, I apologize
1 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ʿAṯtar
Images links

Behance

https://www.artstation.com/artwork/xzGoRO

Brooklyn Museum

www.brooklynmuseum.org

File:Yamama english.jpg - Wikimedia Commons

commons.m.wikimedia.org

Hail Satan
Hail isis

 

[Thersthara]

Solon the Father of Law

Solon was one of the most important legislators and reformers of Athens in Ancient Greece, who lived between 638-558 BC. his life and works are full of reforms that radically changed the political, economic and social structure of Athens. He is known as a statesman who laid the foundations of Athenian democracy and made important arrangements to ensure justice and social balance. Solon's story tells the story of the transformation from an economic system based on slavery to a society where the first seeds of democracy were sown.

Solon was born into an aristocratic family, but it is thought that his family was not very wealthy. Coming from the established aristocratic class of Athens, Solon was brought up among the traditional nobility, but personally had more democratic values. Despite his aristocratic background, Solon is known for his reforms that focused on improving the welfare of the people and ensuring social justice. Solon is known to have been an educated young man and gained wealth through trade.


His Contribution to Literature

Solon was also famous as a poet and writer. In his poetry he wrote about moral values, social justice and political reform. Solon's poetry contains writings that express his political views and prioritize the welfare and order of society. Solon's talent as a poet helped him both in his political career and in his public reputation. In his poems, he defended justice, morality and order, and gave strong messages to the Athenians.

Solon's poems often refer to Solon addressing the Athenian people and making laws for their welfare. These works are important for understanding the thinking behind Solon's reforms, because his writings as a poet reflect the ideological underpinnings of his reforms. For example, he criticized the gap between the rich and the poor and expressed in his poetry the steps he took to reduce inequalities.


Solon's Intervention in Athens' Political Crisis

Solon's political career began at a time when Athens was experiencing internal turmoil and serious social inequalities. At that time, Athens was ruled by aristocrats and the rich, and most of the people lived in poverty. Society was on the brink of a major economic and social crisis. Many citizens had fallen into slavery due to debts and had lost their land. This was causing serious polarization and internal unrest in Athenian society. On the one hand, the aristocratic class held political power, while the lower classes lived in great poverty.

In Athens, the exploitation of the poor people by the rich aristocrats and the prevalence of debt slavery had reached the point of revolt. The people began to revolt against economic injustices and the society was about to be dragged into a great civil war. At this stage, both the rich and the poor commissioned Solon to solve this problem. It was believed that he would be a fair and balanced leader who would protect the rights of all.

Solon's Reforms and Laws

Solon was elected as archon (chief judge) to solve these social and economic problems in Athens. Solon, who was appointed as archon, undertook the task of making balanced reforms that would satisfy all segments of society. However, his reforms were aimed at improving the whole of society, not just one class. Solon's reforms led to radical changes in the political and social structure of Athens.

Seisachtheia - Debt Relief and Abolition of Slavery
One of Solon's most famous reforms is the debt relief law called Seisachtheia, or “removal of burdens”. With this reform, Solon freed Athenians who had become slaves due to debts from slavery. It also allowed those who had lost their land to regain possession of it. This reform meant an end to debt slavery and debt relief for the poor. Solon also banned the pledging of land for debt and ensured that Athenian citizens would no longer be enslaved. This step brought great relief to society.

Achieving Balance between Social Classes
Solon divided society into four classes to balance political power in Athens. These classes were based on the economic power and income of the citizens:

Pentakosiomedimnoi: The richest class, large landowners.
Hippeis: Rich farmers, those who could afford to serve as horsemen in war.
Zeugitai: Middle-class farmers, those who served as infantry soldiers.
Thetes: The poorest class, landless peasants and laborers.

To balance these classes, Solon also made political participation class-based. The richest class could run for the highest government posts, but lower classes could also play a certain role in politics. Thus, Solon tried to ensure that not only the rich but also the wider society participated in governance. However, the poorest class, the thetes, still had a limited role in decision-making.

Strengthening the People's Council and The Courts
Solon strengthened the popular assembly and the courts to establish a more democratic structure in Athens. The People's Assembly (Ekklesia) became a body that all male citizens could attend and had a say in important state matters. This led to increased political participation of the people. Solon also gave the people a direct say in the justice system by establishing popular courts called Heliaia. Citizens could now oversee the implementation of the laws and participate in the trials.

New Constitution
Solon revised the laws in force in Athens and drafted a new constitution. This constitution had a structure that balanced the rights of the rich and the poor. Solon's reform aimed to achieve social justice in Athens. The laws were designed to protect everyone's interests, and Solon forbade them to be changed for ten years to ensure that they would remain valid for a long time.

Economic Reforms
Solon's reforms were not limited to the political and social spheres; economic reforms also played an important role. He took various measures to revitalize Athens' trade and agricultural economy. For example, Athenian citizens were banned from exporting agricultural products except olive oil. This was intended to strengthen Athens' foreign trade while protecting the domestic supply of agricultural products. In addition, craftsmanship and trade were encouraged to improve the economic welfare of the poor.


Solon's Later Years and his self-isolation

After implementing his reforms, Solon announced that he would stay away from Athens for ten years and observe the reforms take hold. During this time, Solon visited various countries, such as Egypt and Cyprus, and engaged in trade. When he returned home after leaving Athens, he did not see his reforms fully implemented. Despite Solon's reforms, internal strife continued in Athens and the tyrannical regime of Peisistratos began. Solon did not support Peisistratos' tyranny, but he did not completely oppose him either.

When Solon returned to Athens in his old age, he found that his reforms had not been fully implemented and the tyrannical regime of Peisistratos had begun, but he did not openly oppose his rule. Although he did not support Peisistratos' tyranny, the tyrant is known to have respected Solon and benefited from his prestige. Peisistratos remained faithful to the general outlines of Solon's laws and preserved his reforms. During this period, Solon remained in the background in Athens, but continued to be a sage whose ideas and advice were sought.

Although the exact year of Solon's death is not known, it is estimated that he died around 558 BC. Even after his death, the Athenian people held him in high esteem and Solon was considered a cornerstone in the development of Athenian democracy. His reforms laid the foundation for the democratic system that followed the tyranny of Peisistratos and became one of the most important symbols of justice, law and social order in Athens for centuries.


Solon's Influence
His laws and reforms formed the cornerstones of Athenian democracy, and these reforms continued to have an impact on the Greek world and the world at large for centuries. Solon, on the one hand, limited the power of the aristocratic class and granted political rights to a wider mass of people, while on the other hand, he attached great importance to the preservation of social balance. Therefore, his reforms were neither fully democratic nor aristocratic. However, this balance paved the way for the preservation of social peace and the development of a democratic structure in Athens.

Foundations of Athenian Democracy
Solon laid the foundations of Athenian democracy, especially by strengthening the popular assembly and the courts. His reforms were further developed centuries later by Kleisthenes and Pericles and a full democratic system was established in Athens. This process initiated by Solon was later taken as an example by many city-states in the Greek world.

Rule of Law
His reforms were based on the rule of law and the provision of justice. His adjustments to the legal system aimed to ensure both the participation of the people in governance and the equal distribution of justice. This served as a model for the developing judicial system of Athens. Solon's understanding of justice and equality became an important reference point in the philosophy of law in later periods.

His Impact Around the World
His ideas and reforms had great influence beyond the Greek world. The Roman Empire and later European legal systems were influenced by Solon's laws. His democratic principles played an important role in the development of modern legal and political philosophy.

Solon's name has been revered in Athens and throughout the Greek world for centuries. Athenians saw him as a symbol of justice, wisdom and balanced government. His reforms are considered to be the first step in the processes that ushered in the golden age of Athens and have been emulated by many philosophers, thinkers and legislators throughout history.

Solon is honored with monuments in Athens and his name is among the most important leaders in Greek history. His legacy is centered around the principles of democratic values, social justice and the rule of law, which have left a lasting mark on both Ancient Greece and world history.

Solon's story is one of the best examples of how a statesman can influence society not only in his own time but also in the future. His reforms were based on justice and social balance and reshaped the political and social structure of Athens. For this reason, Solon continues to be remembered as one of the most important and respected figures in Athenian history.

 

[Enastri]

Hypatia (370 - 415)​

The life of Hypatia was one enriched with a passion for knowledge. Hypatia was the daughter of Theon, who was considered one of the most educated men in Alexandria, Egypt. Theon raised Hypatia in a world of education. Most historians now recognize Hypatia not only as a mathematician and scientist, but also as a philosopher.

Historians are uncertain of different aspects of Hypatia's life. For example, Hypatia's date of birth is one that is highly debated. Some historians believe that Hypatia was born in the year 370 AD. On the other hand, others argue that she was an older woman (around 60) at the time of her death, thus making her birth in the year 355 AD.

Throughout her childhood, Theon raised Hypatia in an environment of thought. Historians believe that Theon tried to raise the perfect human. Theon himself was a well known scholar and a professor of mathematics at the University of Alexandria. Theon and Hypatia formed a strong bond as he taught Hypatia his own knowledge and shared his passion in the search for answers to the unknown. As Hypatia grew older, she began to develop an enthusiasm for mathematics and the sciences (astronomy and astrology).

Most historians believe that Hypatia surpassed her father's knowledge at a young age. However, while Hypatia was still under her father's discipline, he also developed for her a physical routine to ensure for her a healthy body as well as a highly functional mind. In her education, Theon instructed Hypatia on the different religions of the world and taught her how to influence people with the power of words. He taught her the fundamentals of teaching, so that Hypatia became a profound orator. People from other cities came to study and learn from her.

Hypatia's studies included astronomy, astrology, and mathematics. References in letters by Synesius, one of Hypatia's students, credit Hypatia with the invention of the astrolabe, a device used in studying astronomy. However, other sources date this instrument back at least a century earlier. Claudius Ptolemy wrote extensively on the projection used on the plane astrolabe, and Hypatia's father wrote an astrolabe treatise that was the basis for much of what was written later in the Middle Ages. Hypatia did teach about astrolabes as Synesius had an instrument made that was arguably a form of astrolabe.

Hypatia was known more for the work she did in mathematics than in astronomy, primarily for her work on the ideas of conic sections introduced by Apollonius. She edited the work On the Conics of Apollonius, which divided cones into different parts by a plane. This concept developed the ideas of hyperbolas, parabolas, and ellipses. With Hypatia's work on this important book, she made the concepts easier to understand, thus making the work survive through many centuries. Hypatia was the first woman to have such a profound impact on the survival of early thought in mathematics.

Hypatia lived in Alexandria when Christianity started to dominate over the other religions. In the early 390's, riots broke out frequently between the different religions. Cyril, a leader among the Christians, and Orestes, the civil governor, opposed each other. Hypatia was a friend of Orestes and it is believed that Cyril spread virulent rumors about her. In 415 AD, on Hypatia's way home, a mob attacked her, stripped her and killed her with pieces of broken pottery. Later, the mob dragged her through the streets.

Hypatia's life ended tragically, however her life's work remained. Later, Descartes, Newton, and Leibniz expanded on her work. Hypatia made extraordinary accomplishments for a woman in her time. Philosophers considered her a woman of great knowledge and an excellent teacher.

Hypatia - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Blitzkreig [JG]]

Solon the Father of Law

Solon was one of the most important legislators and reformers of Athens in Ancient Greece, who lived between 638-558 BC. his life and works are full of reforms that radically changed the political, economic and social structure of Athens. He is known as a statesman who laid the foundations of Athenian democracy and made important arrangements to ensure justice and social balance. Solon's story tells the story of the transformation from an economic system based on slavery to a society where the first seeds of democracy were sown.

Solon was born into an aristocratic family, but it is thought that his family was not very wealthy. Coming from the established aristocratic class of Athens, Solon was brought up among the traditional nobility, but personally had more democratic values. Despite his aristocratic background, Solon is known for his reforms that focused on improving the welfare of the people and ensuring social justice. Solon is known to have been an educated young man and gained wealth through trade.


His Contribution to Literature

Solon was also famous as a poet and writer. In his poetry he wrote about moral values, social justice and political reform. Solon's poetry contains writings that express his political views and prioritize the welfare and order of society. Solon's talent as a poet helped him both in his political career and in his public reputation. In his poems, he defended justice, morality and order, and gave strong messages to the Athenians.

Solon's poems often refer to Solon addressing the Athenian people and making laws for their welfare. These works are important for understanding the thinking behind Solon's reforms, because his writings as a poet reflect the ideological underpinnings of his reforms. For example, he criticized the gap between the rich and the poor and expressed in his poetry the steps he took to reduce inequalities.


Solon's Intervention in Athens' Political Crisis

Solon's political career began at a time when Athens was experiencing internal turmoil and serious social inequalities. At that time, Athens was ruled by aristocrats and the rich, and most of the people lived in poverty. Society was on the brink of a major economic and social crisis. Many citizens had fallen into slavery due to debts and had lost their land. This was causing serious polarization and internal unrest in Athenian society. On the one hand, the aristocratic class held political power, while the lower classes lived in great poverty.

In Athens, the exploitation of the poor people by the rich aristocrats and the prevalence of debt slavery had reached the point of revolt. The people began to revolt against economic injustices and the society was about to be dragged into a great civil war. At this stage, both the rich and the poor commissioned Solon to solve this problem. It was believed that he would be a fair and balanced leader who would protect the rights of all.

Solon's Reforms and Laws

Solon was elected as archon (chief judge) to solve these social and economic problems in Athens. Solon, who was appointed as archon, undertook the task of making balanced reforms that would satisfy all segments of society. However, his reforms were aimed at improving the whole of society, not just one class. Solon's reforms led to radical changes in the political and social structure of Athens.

Seisachtheia - Debt Relief and Abolition of Slavery
One of Solon's most famous reforms is the debt relief law called Seisachtheia, or “removal of burdens”. With this reform, Solon freed Athenians who had become slaves due to debts from slavery. It also allowed those who had lost their land to regain possession of it. This reform meant an end to debt slavery and debt relief for the poor. Solon also banned the pledging of land for debt and ensured that Athenian citizens would no longer be enslaved. This step brought great relief to society.

Achieving Balance between Social Classes
Solon divided society into four classes to balance political power in Athens. These classes were based on the economic power and income of the citizens:

Pentakosiomedimnoi: The richest class, large landowners.
Hippeis: Rich farmers, those who could afford to serve as horsemen in war.
Zeugitai: Middle-class farmers, those who served as infantry soldiers.
Thetes: The poorest class, landless peasants and laborers.

To balance these classes, Solon also made political participation class-based. The richest class could run for the highest government posts, but lower classes could also play a certain role in politics. Thus, Solon tried to ensure that not only the rich but also the wider society participated in governance. However, the poorest class, the thetes, still had a limited role in decision-making.

Strengthening the People's Council and The Courts
Solon strengthened the popular assembly and the courts to establish a more democratic structure in Athens. The People's Assembly (Ekklesia) became a body that all male citizens could attend and had a say in important state matters. This led to increased political participation of the people. Solon also gave the people a direct say in the justice system by establishing popular courts called Heliaia. Citizens could now oversee the implementation of the laws and participate in the trials.

New Constitution
Solon revised the laws in force in Athens and drafted a new constitution. This constitution had a structure that balanced the rights of the rich and the poor. Solon's reform aimed to achieve social justice in Athens. The laws were designed to protect everyone's interests, and Solon forbade them to be changed for ten years to ensure that they would remain valid for a long time.

Economic Reforms
Solon's reforms were not limited to the political and social spheres; economic reforms also played an important role. He took various measures to revitalize Athens' trade and agricultural economy. For example, Athenian citizens were banned from exporting agricultural products except olive oil. This was intended to strengthen Athens' foreign trade while protecting the domestic supply of agricultural products. In addition, craftsmanship and trade were encouraged to improve the economic welfare of the poor.


Solon's Later Years and his self-isolation

After implementing his reforms, Solon announced that he would stay away from Athens for ten years and observe the reforms take hold. During this time, Solon visited various countries, such as Egypt and Cyprus, and engaged in trade. When he returned home after leaving Athens, he did not see his reforms fully implemented. Despite Solon's reforms, internal strife continued in Athens and the tyrannical regime of Peisistratos began. Solon did not support Peisistratos' tyranny, but he did not completely oppose him either.

When Solon returned to Athens in his old age, he found that his reforms had not been fully implemented and the tyrannical regime of Peisistratos had begun, but he did not openly oppose his rule. Although he did not support Peisistratos' tyranny, the tyrant is known to have respected Solon and benefited from his prestige. Peisistratos remained faithful to the general outlines of Solon's laws and preserved his reforms. During this period, Solon remained in the background in Athens, but continued to be a sage whose ideas and advice were sought.

Although the exact year of Solon's death is not known, it is estimated that he died around 558 BC. Even after his death, the Athenian people held him in high esteem and Solon was considered a cornerstone in the development of Athenian democracy. His reforms laid the foundation for the democratic system that followed the tyranny of Peisistratos and became one of the most important symbols of justice, law and social order in Athens for centuries.


Solon's Influence
His laws and reforms formed the cornerstones of Athenian democracy, and these reforms continued to have an impact on the Greek world and the world at large for centuries. Solon, on the one hand, limited the power of the aristocratic class and granted political rights to a wider mass of people, while on the other hand, he attached great importance to the preservation of social balance. Therefore, his reforms were neither fully democratic nor aristocratic. However, this balance paved the way for the preservation of social peace and the development of a democratic structure in Athens.

Foundations of Athenian Democracy
Solon laid the foundations of Athenian democracy, especially by strengthening the popular assembly and the courts. His reforms were further developed centuries later by Kleisthenes and Pericles and a full democratic system was established in Athens. This process initiated by Solon was later taken as an example by many city-states in the Greek world.

Rule of Law
His reforms were based on the rule of law and the provision of justice. His adjustments to the legal system aimed to ensure both the participation of the people in governance and the equal distribution of justice. This served as a model for the developing judicial system of Athens. Solon's understanding of justice and equality became an important reference point in the philosophy of law in later periods.

His Impact Around the World
His ideas and reforms had great influence beyond the Greek world. The Roman Empire and later European legal systems were influenced by Solon's laws. His democratic principles played an important role in the development of modern legal and political philosophy.

Solon's name has been revered in Athens and throughout the Greek world for centuries. Athenians saw him as a symbol of justice, wisdom and balanced government. His reforms are considered to be the first step in the processes that ushered in the golden age of Athens and have been emulated by many philosophers, thinkers and legislators throughout history.

Solon is honored with monuments in Athens and his name is among the most important leaders in Greek history. His legacy is centered around the principles of democratic values, social justice and the rule of law, which have left a lasting mark on both Ancient Greece and world history.

Solon's story is one of the best examples of how a statesman can influence society not only in his own time but also in the future. His reforms were based on justice and social balance and reshaped the political and social structure of Athens. For this reason, Solon continues to be remembered as one of the most important and respected figures in Athenian history.

Hello brother. How are you making these articles so quickly? Although they appear good on the surface, I don't see any source material or anything to indicate where this information was derived from. This is important not just now, but also later as others may wish to add to this work and would need to understand how to evaluate specific statements or facts. Similarly, it makes it easier for JG Karnonnos or others to verify what is written.

 

[Thersthara]

Hello brother. How are you making these articles so quickly? Although they appear good on the surface, I don't see any source material or anything to indicate where this information was derived from. This is important not just now, but also later as others may wish to add to this work and would need to understand how to evaluate specific statements or facts. Similarly, it makes it easier for JG Karnonnos or others to verify what is written.

Hello, actually the answer to this question is very personal and I am glad you noticed my effort.

I have the whole day free at the moment and I usually dedicate all my time to my research. I don't write a single article at a single moment. Many of the articles I have posted in the past days were written piece by piece at the same time. If you notice, the stories of the personalities I share are usually intertwined. (like Meleager and Atalanta) I write them in small bits and pieces in my native Turkish, and then when it's time to share them with the community, I edit them and translate them into English using DeepL, I can translate them myself, but it's easier for me to get help from AI. Because I write my articles more conveniently and faster in my native language.

In fact, if I am fully committed, I can maybe even produce 3 articles a day. But the cons here are the following. The DeepL app translates my native language into English quite inaccurately, and going back and checking afterwards tires me even more than writing the article itself.

As for the bibliography, I use information sources in my native language. There are many videos on Youtube that tell the life stories of these characters. There are many sites like Wikipedia. However, I don't think I am yet aware enough to put my writings through a Satanic lens. For this reason, I present to people that I read directly what is told in history without changing it at all

Of course, writing what I read and hear from historical sources and videos leads to some information problems. Like the homosexual nickname for Alexander the Great. However, such mistakes are already corrected by HPHC and other knowledgeable SS brothers.

this project is perfect for me. I am grateful to the esteemed HPHC for giving such an opportunity.

 

[TheHermit]

I would like to write something about artists like Da Vinci or Botticelli. Botticelli was influenced a lot by the Platonic Academy, which wanted to bring back to Italy the ideas of the Ancient Past. I could write something about that too, even if I'm not 100% sure it is something good or something corrupted.
One thing I don't understand is, should I do my research and then post everything in this thread? Or should I send it to JG Karnonnos? I need a guideline.

 

[Thersthara]

I would like to write something about artists like Da Vinci or Botticelli. Botticelli was influenced a lot by the Platonic Academy, which wanted to bring back to Italy the ideas of the Ancient Past. I could write something about that too, even if I'm not 100% sure it is something good or something corrupted.
One thing I don't understand is, should I do my research and then post everything in this thread? Or should I send it to JG Karnonnos? I need a guideline.

Oh really? i have been wanting to share a post about Davinci. i have even written part of the article for 2 days, but i still need time to complete it because there is so much information about Davinci. if you wish, i can send you what i have written via DM and we can even write it together.

 

[OttoHart]

Giordano Bruno (1548-1600)

Possibly one of the most influential Anti-Abrahamic figures of that period. He was a Renaissance philosopher who was deeply critical of Christianity and Judaism, particularly doctrines of monotheism and their aversion to psychic abilities and spiritual development. Bruno had studied Hermeticism, Neoplatonism, and quite a few Pagan paths, which he saw as ancient, esoteric wisdom with a better understanding of the cosmos and divinity. He was somewhat pantheistic, believing the Universe itself, and life itself, was inherently Divine, and that all Divinity was not exclusively transcendental, but rather a part of Existence.
Bruno believed in an infinite and eternal universe with countless worlds, societies, dimensions and the like.
His studies of Kemetic and Greek polytheism led him to understand that their Gods were real beings, and that they harnessed key elements of the Universe's Divine nature.
He had a close study relationship with Hermes Trismegistus, which he singlehandedly helped fix the reputation of, as the belief that all Pagan Gods were evil and looking to mislead humanity was common. Bruno argued that the Christian church’s labeling of pagan gods as demons was a misinterpretation rooted in Christian fear and Jewish control.
Giordano Bruno spoke quite a lot on aliens, and his beliefs about them were deeply tied to his belief in an infinite, eternal and Divine Universe. While some historians would say he starkly rejected Geocentrism, he understood that the Ancient ideas of Geocentrism were allegorical, and not necessarily to mean that the Earth is the center of the Universe physically, but rather that this had spiritual meaning to Human life and our purpose to expand and learn, beliefs he drew from Platonism. Regardless, he popularized the scientific belief that Stars were just other Suns, with other planets surrounding them, and the highly spiritual conclusion from that, that other societies, beings and even spiritual paths guided by the Divine could be found on other planets. This is a highly spiritual belief, because at the time, the concept that life could be found outside of Earth, and intelligent life outside of humanity, was complete and total anathema to the Abrahamic cosmology.
His beliefs of the Jewish people are the most corrupted, directly by "certain influences". For example, his book "De Judais" (On the Jews), doesn't have much left nowadays, a lot of it has been "lost to time".
He thought of the Jews as spiritually backwards, spiritually blocking others from advancing, and not just ignorantly wrong about Divinity, but maliciously wrong about Divinity. While no direct quote of him calling them "alien" has remained, it is clear that he had that belief by the way what did remain is written.
Some of his works identify the Jews as "Satanic". I believe this is pure corruption and his texts being rewritten. He had a clear idea that the Abrahamic Demons were Pagan Gods, and even drew quite a few connections between popular Abrahamic evil demons and some Greek and Egyptian Gods. Why would he, then, backpedal and agree with the exclusively Judaic belief that Satan is evil? This simply builds upon the Gnostic beliefs he had in his early works. But no trace of Gnosticism is found in his later works, after he studies Platonism, besides this mention of the Jews being "Satanic". Anyone can clearly see this is the Jews playing damage control.

The gaps in his works are arguably more telling than words would be. In his "De gli eroici furori", he talks about the concept of hierarchy. He says that advancement comes in hierarchies, and that each and every part of Existence has a gravity-like direction in this hierarchy. When he starts talking about spiritual development and how beings can be more or less spiritually advanced, there are missing parts. Could he be talking about a certain group of people with a different soul structure due to spiritual impairment?
Later on in his works, he does equate the god of the Old Testament with the Gnostic Demiurge, as a being of evil. However, he does not say these are the same. By this time, he had long since saw past Gnosticism. He simply compared the two. But this does point to him understanding that the entities the Jews called their god were evil in nature. Needless to say, a lot of that book is also missing.
Sources:
Giordano Bruno - De Judaeis
Giordano Bruno - De gli eroici furori
Giordano Bruno - La cena de le Ceneri
Giordano Bruno - De la causa, principio e l'Uno
Giordano Bruno - Spaccio della Bestia Trionfante
Giordano Bruno - De l’infinito, universo e mondi
Giordano Bruno - De monade, numero et figura
Frances A. Yates – Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition
Ingrid D. Rowland – Giordano Bruno: Philosopher/Heretic
Hilary Gatti – Giordano Bruno and Renaissance Science
Michael J. Crowe – The Extraterrestrial Life Debate, 1750-1900

 

[TheHermit]

Oh really? i have been wanting to share a post about Davinci. i have even written part of the article for 2 days, but i still need time to complete it because there is so much information about Davinci. if you wish, i can send you what i have written via DM and we can even write it together.

Yes, it could be fun. Send me everything you want

 

[Imhotep]

Unfortunately, I still need more time to present Imhotep properly. I will then make a pdf file available for download, as the scope of the work is too large to put it here.
I have tried to compile a lot of sources from different languages and I will provide page references for everything. I will then summarize the highlights in the forum to whet your appetite for the pdf. Let me surprise you. Until then, I wish you all the continued blessing of Lord Satanas and his hellish demons.
Hail Satanas!
Hail Luciferus!
Hail Wotanas!

 

[GoldenxChild1]

Emperor Julian the “Apostate”
Flavius Claudius Julianus (331–June 26, 363) was a Roman Emperor (361–363) of the Constantinian dynasty. He was known as the last Pagan emperor and attempted to halt the spread of Christianity that had been spreading rapidly since the 2nd century, for his rule saw swift religious reforms driven by a desire to return Rome to its polytheistic roots and minimize the influence of Christianity with strict, anti-Christian edicts. Furthermore, Julian was initiated into at least two mystery schools during his life, receiving his Pagan education from Neo-Platonic philosophers like his teacher, Maximus of Ephesus, a student of Iamblichus (Tierney 593). As an emperor, philosopher, and soldier, Julian stands out as a remarkable figure in the late days of Rome. This exploration will reveal his upbringing and rise to power, rule, and Hellenistic affiliations, presenting him as a heroic example against the corruption of Judeo-Christianity.

Julian’s early life was marked by significant stress and anxiety. Raised in Arian Christianity under the guidance of a bishop, he ultimately rejected Christianity in favor of Greek Hellenism by the age of twenty (Tierney 585–586; Wikisource contributors). In 337, to secure his position as sole emperor, Julian’s zealous Arian Christian cousin, Constantius II, orchestrated a massacre of Julian’s family, leaving only Julian and his half-brother Gallus alive. They were subsequently exiled to the imperial estate of Macellum in Cappadocia. Their exile ended when Julian turned 18, and in 351, he returned to Asia Minor to study Neo-Platonism (New World Encyclopedia).

Julian quickly rose to prominence when he was called to serve Rome. His brother Gallus, who preceded him, became a tyrant and was executed in 354. In response, Constantius II turned to his only remaining male relative, Julian, appointing him “Caesar of the West” to assist in defending against surrounding barbarian nations. Over the next five years, Julian achieved a series of victories, leading his men to proclaim him emperor. Although civil war seemed likely, it did not occur, as Constantius II died and reportedly recognized Julian as emperor in his last will (New World Encyclopedia). Consequently, Julian was free to rule Rome as he saw fit.

Now, to focus Julian further as a personality worth contributing to the Joy of Satanas, the following events followed:

After gaining the purple, Julian started a religious reformation of the state, which was intended to restore the lost strength [Hellenic Polytheism] of the Roman State. He also forced the Christian church to return the riches, or fines equaling them, looted from the pagan temples after the Christian religion was made legitimate by Constantine. He supported the restoration of the old Roman faith, based on polytheism. His laws tended to target wealthy and educated Christians, and his aim was not to destroy Christianity but to drive the religion out of "the governing classes of the empire—much as Buddhism was driven back into the lower classes by a revived Confucian mandarinate in thirteenth-century China” (Brown, as cited in New World Encyclopedia).

The anti-Christian edicts provide some of the clearest evidence of Julian’s policies. In his school edict, he prohibited Christian teachers from using any pagan texts, stating, “If they want to learn literature, they have Luke and Mark: Let them go back to their churches and expound on them” (Brown, as cited in New World Encyclopedia). This aimed to diminish Christian influence on youth education and financially starve Christian scholars, tutors, and teachers. Additionally, the Tolerance Edict of 362 “decreed the reopening of pagan temples and the restitution of alienated temple properties” (New World Encyclopedia). Julian established new priesthoods for these temples, excluded Christians from court and state positions, and revoked grants and immunities for Christian bishops (Tierney 596). Overall, these measures sought to marginalize Christians as much as possible.

Julian, however, died early, leaving his legacy with him. With a retreat, on June 26, 363, Julian died near Maranga, aged 31, during a battle against the Sassanid army. Afterwards, the Christian tide swept in, and Rome would never see a Pagan ruler again, but this does not diminish his heroic ideals and his pious nature towards the true gods that he displayed. Therefore, from three of his most notable works, that is his “Hymn to the Mother of the Gods and his “Hymn to King Helios, as well as a “Fragment of a letter to a priest,” some of his wisdom is illustrated (please note this is not exhaustive):

It is without doubt that Julian was a member of the Mithraic Mysteries and Eleusinian Mysteries. Furthermore, like in the Joy of Satanas today, he understood the Gods as both real and allegorical, as well as syncretic across cultures (Wikisource contributors; Tierney).

From the “Hymn to King Helios:”

“For I am a follower of King Helios. And of this fact I possess within me, known to myself alone, proofs more certain than I can give.”

“Besides these, another marvelous activity of Helios the King of the All is that by which he endows with superior lot the nobler races — I mean gods, daemons, heroes, and those divided souls which remain in the category of model and archetype and never give themselves over to bodies.”

“For the priests of the mysteries tell us what they have been taught by the gods or mighty daemons…”

“For the Romans themselves not only belong to the Greek race, but also the sacred ordinances and the pious belief in the gods which they have established and maintain are, from beginning to end, Greek. And beside this they have established a constitution not inferior to that of any one of the best governed states, if indeed it be not superior to all others that have ever been put into practice.”

From the “Hymn to the Mother of the Gods:”

“Who then is the Mother of the Gods? She is the source of the intellectual and creative gods, who in their turn guide the visible gods: she is both the mother and the spouse of mighty Zeus; she came into being next to and together with the great creator; she is in control of every form of life, and the cause of all generation; she easily brings to perfection all things that are made; without pain she brings to birth, and with the father's aid creates all things that are; she is the motherless maiden, enthroned at the side of Zeus, and in very truth is the Mother of all the Gods.”

From the “Fragment of a letter to a priest” (which provides the most practical wisdom for an SS):

“Though just conduct in accordance with the laws of the state will evidently be the concern of the governors of cities, you in your turn will properly take care to exhort men not to transgress the laws of the gods, since those are sacred.”

“…and the gods created us all together, at the first when the world began, not one man and one woman only, but many men and many women at once.”

“Then let everyone make the basis of his conduct moral virtues, and actions like these, namely reverence towards the gods, benevolence towards men, personal chastity; and thus let him abound in pious acts, I mean by endeavoring always to have pious thoughts about the gods, and by regarding the temples and images of the gods with due honour and veneration, and by worshipping the gods as though he saw them actually present.”

“For zeal to do all that is in one's power is, in truth, a proof of piety, and it is evident that he who abounds in such zeal thereby displays a higher degree of piety; whereas he who neglects what is possible, and then pretends to aim at what is impossible, evidently does not strive after the impossible, since he overlooks the possible. For even though God stands in need of nothing, it does not follow that on that account nothing ought to be offered to him. He does not need the reverence that is paid in words. What then? Is it rational to deprive him of this also? By no means. It follows then that one ought not to deprive him either of the honour that is paid to him through deeds, an honour which not three years or three thousand years have ordained, but all past time among all the nations of the earth.”

“And it is reasonable to honour the priests also as officials and servants of the gods; and because they minister to us what concerns the gods, and they lend strength to the gods' gift of good things to us; for they sacrifice and pray on behalf of all men.”

“As for men who with reckless minds work wickedness against the priests of the deathless gods and plot against their privileges with plans that fear not the gods, never shall such men travel life's path to the end, men who have sinned against the blessed gods whose honour and holy service those priests have in charge."

*All quotes sourced from Wikisource contributors.

Works Cited​

Brown, Peter Robert Lamont. The World of Late Antiquity: AD 150-750. (Library of world civilization) New York: W.W. Norton, 1989.

"Julian the Apostate." New World Encyclopedia, . 12 May 2024, 09:46 UTC. 4 Oct 2024, 20:10 <https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/p/index.php?title=Julian_the_Apostate&oldid=1143586

Tierney, Michael. “Julian the Apostate and the Religion of Hellenism.” Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, vol. 20, no. 80, 1931, pp. 583–97. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/30094833. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.

Wikisource contributors. "The Works of the Emperor Julian/Hymn to King Helios." Wikisource . Wikisource, 7 Mar. 2024. Web. 4 Oct. 2024.

Wikisource contributors. "The Works of the Emperor Julian/Hymn to the mother of the gods." Wikisource. Wikisource , 7 Mar. 2024. Web. 4 Oct. 2024.

Wikisource contributors. "The Works of the Emperor Julian/Fragment of a letter to a priest." Wikisource. Wikisource, 7 Mar. 2024. Web. 4 Oct. 2024.