SouthernWhiteGentile
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2020
- Messages
- 1,687
Not to clutter the current post about sewing I decided to make a new one and hopefully reset the behavior from the last post and in turn create a more productive discussion about these issues.
1. This data is interesting and helps us understand human nature.
2. Sexual behaviors can be very indicative of ones personality and mental well being which also reflects on the state of our backwards clown society. Knowing the reason why someone likes X or Y may be insignificant and natural for them but it can also be very important psychological information. Lots of sexual and other behaviors can be attributed to trauma.
This is like the Ancap rugged individualism argument for legalizing all drugs or something.
“Why do you care what someone does with their body it’s none of my business if someone wants to shoot heroin”. Well yes it is your business, my business and the state’s business. These people are our neighbors, countrymen and part of our collective that we should be viewing as family and working towards keeping healthy, and they say they don’t care if they destroy their lives as junkies? That’s a very sadistic attitude. This is why NS is inherently authoritarian. In the current fallen state of humanity many people cannot be trusted to make the right lifestyle choices for themselves.
To elaborate, when there is something like a soda tax or a ban on big gulp drinks the individualists say, “government doesn’t know what’s best for people”. They are half right. This current government occupied by the enemy doesn’t know what’s best but an enlightened one certainly would. Why should foods and beverages that propagate the obesity epidemic be allowed? If someone is willing to drink 64 ounces of pure processed sugar in the first place it is already a serious problem. Yes it’s hard to stay healthy when ZOGCHOW that is processed and filled with sugar is the only option for most people, but it goes further. Someone that is obese has been very mentally and spiritually damaged and they use food as a coping mechanism and it becomes an addiction. The same can be applied to sexuality.
People today have no idea what freedom actually is. The idea of “freedom” in a liberal democracy is eating 10 pounds Mickey dees, then smoking a bag of that green stuff until your brain is fried and then finally finishing off the night by masturbating to some interracial cuckold pornography. Is that really freedom? It is truly the opposite. You are being enslaved under the enemy and theirweapons used against us in the form of these commodities.
I know this was a tangent that didn’t have much to do with the sexuality point but I just wanted to dismantle the whole “who cares blah blah blah”argument.
I completely disagree. This is like being against studying nutritional habits and what it means. We need to know about this because.jrvan said:Actually it's true. Sexual dynamics can include many different variations, and there's many women who prefer to be dominant in bed. I think a lot of it has to do with a person's unique balance of energies, personality, and maybe other factors (nature vs nurture argument as always, but maybe both in some cases). Likewise some men prefer being submissive sexually, and there's nothing wrong with that nor does it render them "not a man" or anything else toxic that traditional minded males would suggest. Sexuality at the end of the day is very personal, private, and unique to each person. In my opinion, endless research studies on what men or women prefer sexually is kind of degrading and pointless because overarching generalizations are impossible to make with any bit of intellectual honesty. I also see no need for it, and it just seems like more crazy over the top jewish soviet spying on peoples' private lives that are none of their business. Like why the fuck do we need to know what men and women prefer in terms of pleasuring their diddly parts? Why can't we just teach basic health and sex ed for the basics of sex anatomy, pleasure mechanics, and reproduction? Why go further? Why do we need stats on what the general trend and percentage of people who prefer dildos, or lingerie, or this or that sex position, dom/sub, etc..? There's absolutely no need for that data. Why do people need to know it or study it? It's such a personalized thing that it doesn't matter at all in the big picture of society. All these weird studies are so stupid. Since we're already wasting so much time and money on such studies in society, maybe we should focus those strange studies instead on the researchers performing fellatio on their jewish funders, and which ways they like to give it to them, and how it makes them feel/if they are submissive enough to their kike lord, and if they yell "PRAISE JEWSUS" when they're taking it from behind. The damned freaks shouldn't be getting any funding. It's such a waste of time, and it's divisive just like the jews want which is probably why they pay for it to be produced.
1. This data is interesting and helps us understand human nature.
2. Sexual behaviors can be very indicative of ones personality and mental well being which also reflects on the state of our backwards clown society. Knowing the reason why someone likes X or Y may be insignificant and natural for them but it can also be very important psychological information. Lots of sexual and other behaviors can be attributed to trauma.
This is like the Ancap rugged individualism argument for legalizing all drugs or something.
“Why do you care what someone does with their body it’s none of my business if someone wants to shoot heroin”. Well yes it is your business, my business and the state’s business. These people are our neighbors, countrymen and part of our collective that we should be viewing as family and working towards keeping healthy, and they say they don’t care if they destroy their lives as junkies? That’s a very sadistic attitude. This is why NS is inherently authoritarian. In the current fallen state of humanity many people cannot be trusted to make the right lifestyle choices for themselves.
To elaborate, when there is something like a soda tax or a ban on big gulp drinks the individualists say, “government doesn’t know what’s best for people”. They are half right. This current government occupied by the enemy doesn’t know what’s best but an enlightened one certainly would. Why should foods and beverages that propagate the obesity epidemic be allowed? If someone is willing to drink 64 ounces of pure processed sugar in the first place it is already a serious problem. Yes it’s hard to stay healthy when ZOGCHOW that is processed and filled with sugar is the only option for most people, but it goes further. Someone that is obese has been very mentally and spiritually damaged and they use food as a coping mechanism and it becomes an addiction. The same can be applied to sexuality.
People today have no idea what freedom actually is. The idea of “freedom” in a liberal democracy is eating 10 pounds Mickey dees, then smoking a bag of that green stuff until your brain is fried and then finally finishing off the night by masturbating to some interracial cuckold pornography. Is that really freedom? It is truly the opposite. You are being enslaved under the enemy and theirweapons used against us in the form of these commodities.
I know this was a tangent that didn’t have much to do with the sexuality point but I just wanted to dismantle the whole “who cares blah blah blah”argument.
I completely agree. How people can be in a relationship for years on end and not know anything about each other is insane to me. Just look online and you will see stories of people losing their spouses over things such as voting for Trump or being against vaccination. I can only wonder how their spouses didn’t know about their views on these issues. My chart desires deep soul to soul connections. I could never be in a relationship with someone based on convenience or an obligation/societal pressure which is what I think happens with most people. There has to be a foundation and baseline connection to go off of.Whether dominant or submissive or whatever, finding people who are compatible sexually and energetically is a huge benefit because sex and sexual bonding is such a huge part of a relationship. People definitely should talk more about what they like and what their preferences, turn ons, turn offs, hangups, and whatever else while still in the dating phase. The dating phase is when the people get to know each other. I think people would be a lot happier and successful in relationships if they made actual use of the dating phase, and really got to know each other instead of trying to put on a disguise to present themselves in a way that they think people will like them for and be attracted to. If they put that much work into not being themselves in order to get someone who is incompatible with them but just looks pretty or something, then they could just as easily put effort into being themselves and seeking someone who likes them for the way they are without any pretense. If they ditch the disguise then the right people will be attracted to who they are because who they are is on display. And then the partners once matched can help each other to improve their lives and build something together. In the case of a male seeking a female, they find someone great on the inside and they love the person inside the skin, but maybe they aren't totally happy with the shell. So they work together to exercise and become healthier together, and build themselves up. Then later on both have an awesome desirable appearance, and both partners are pleased to know that they belong with each other and they helped each other sculpt into something better. They become each others work of art that no one else can have. Doesn't that sound much better than trying to pretend to be something you're not in order to go after something that you feel you can't have (and therefore need to have in order to prove something) because everyone is after it? Everyone is after the pretty girls with the trim figures and the nice hair. Be a sculptor and make your own pretty girl from someone who isn't initially as attractive, and then be proud knowing she's chosen to be all yours because you put the work into your relationship with her, and she loves you and wants you for who you are and what you bring to her life. Or if you land a girl who is attractive from the get go, but her personality and substance is lacking, sculpt her on the inside. Teach her things, guide her, show her the beautiful side of life and spirituality.
This is just a product of the enemy absolutely destroying and making any discussion about gender relations impossible with their woke feminist shit, which caused men to rightfully become reactionary towards it in response which is why the mgtow and other movements have spawned recently.This can also be done by women, but the sad thing is that a lot of men in society don't care about learning anything from women. I think most men as a result of culture feel like they have to have all the answers themselves, do everything themselves, and be an unmovable stone. I find that I can usually learn something from most people regardless of their gender. I prefer to be the eternal learner, and I try not to discriminate on the source unless it's from jews or their minions.
I agree the same point above applies.And I remember your argument about this on the other thread which was a good point, but I also would like to suggest as something to consider that regardless of a person's sex, a human can either be low quality or high quality. What you said about not listening to a woman telling the rest of the family to get vaccinated is totally valid, and the same can be said for any example of low quality people. We should resist anyone who is low level, crazy, or just plain wrong. But we should also consider that we might also be wrong when speaking to people of high quality, and that perhaps we don't see everything in the full spectrum of color, not enough data, or we just aren't considering a particular angle for looking at something perhaps. We can find useful information in so many different places and in different ways that it's limiting to totally exclude certain sources of learning, like for example writing off the entire female sex as crazy, overly emotional, illogical, etc... So much can be learned from women, and they have certain qualities that men don't have. It's unfair to dismiss them entirely when they are high quality.
I don’t know what exactly you are referring to here but it shows what damage has been done. If I saw this randomly online I would assume you were some wokester looking for something to complain about, but since you are part of this community I know that you do not have the same hostile intentions as these people (destroying masculinity) so we can have a real discussion about it.I cringe and feel the pain of it a bit when I imagine what it has been like for female scientists and females in many historically "male" fields in society past and present, but getting ignored just because of their biological differences (or in some cases killed or burned alive a few centuries ago). Good ideas can come from almost anyone (except jews). It must have really sucked getting written off just because of popular perceptions of their sex as a whole mostly due to the bible, and also getting compared to average women of society. The same sort of perceptions could have been applied to average men of society, the laymen who weren't scientists, intellectual pioneers, philosophers, leaders, etc... but it wasn't. Because of jews and the bible, the collective male sex got the glory stick of popular perception, and thus all men were seen as great even if they were trash. Whereas by contrast, all women were seen as trash even if they were great. Many great women have existed, but they got ignored. And so many men who were totally trash reaped the benefits of popular perception due to all the great men of society who gained the spotlight, and because of the bible.
Once society reaches a certain size and population viewing things broadly and as a collective becomes necessary, but when speaking to individuals we should treat them as such and not the data group that they are a part of.It's my belief that humans should be judged by their individual achievement rather than clinging to the glory of their peers and using it to their benefit. It's kind of like if humans started thinking of themselves as Gods just because they were created by Gods, and even though they never did anything with spirituality. The same is with men reaping the glory of being the same sex as great men in society past and present even when they haven't done anything glorious themselves. We shouldn't judge the collective sex by the current average in a spiritually degenerated society, nor should we judge the collective sex by its highest achievers. It's just the collective sex, nothing more - it's neutral in this regard. Society right now seems to base perceptions largely on patterns, but these patterns are artificially created by jews infecting society and programming it their way. We see the same patterns in peoples' psychology across the board a lot of the time, the same mindsets, and the very same thoughtforms. This is because people were all collectively brainwashed for hundreds of years through multiple lifetimes in churches, and after that it was marxist schooling made uniform by federal education plans overruling state's rights, and then it was everyone being programmed by the same picture presentations and memes sold to them on the ubiquitous black box televisions showing everyone the same things which they then go and talk to each other about in coffee shops or whatever as if the TV show is an actual facet of their culture. That's how lost, how bored, and how systematically brainwashed people are. It's madness. This is why large groups of people can be predicted by observable patterns, statistics, weird theories and what have you. I don't believe it is reflective at all of humanity and true human nature - instead I think it's all incredibly artificial. In an organic society without jews, there is much more individuality and unique expression, and hardly anyone would be able to be lumped into statistical studies and behavioral analysis. It's a key part of the jewish agenda to turn everyone into artificial clones like the greys without individuality. People aren't supposed to be able to be analyzed collectively like this, and this will come to an end eventually. I think the only basis for analysis of a group of people in the future will be their particular culture, like how different groups of Aryans used to have different cultures in different lands. They were the same race, but their behavior, values, and a lot more were all so individualized. Not even the people of the different Greek city states were the same despite all making up larger Greece. Mapping a whole race, or a whole sex, would have been impossible back then because you would go to one part of the land and find people who are so much different from other parts of the land. It's the same root Pagan culture, but different expressions, and that affects a lot. The culture is the analysis point, not the "human behavior" as if all of humanity could be bar coded and wrapped into the same candy package with the same label. I see attempts to generalize human behavior as being on the same level as trying to make generalized statements about all arachnids even though spiders are completely different from scorpions in many ways. People are different, and they exist on different levels.
A long rant I suppose, but I hope this reply is helpful and insightful. I've spent quite some time on it today, and now I need to get started with the RTR's and other things.