Question #3226: Alexander the Great

[AskSatanOperator]

According to the Mainstream,
Alexander the Great and his Army engaged in race-mixing with the locals all the way up to India.
Is this true or an exaggeration? And if so, why did they do it? Isn't it a low-level practice?
-
I see this notion being used by Greeks for example, consciously/unconsciously to justify race-mixing.
„If our national Hero did that, i can do that too!“ something like that.
And i am sure the Jews love to jump on that bandwagon and exploit it.
-
Also i believe he was too soft on the Jews, he should have dealt with them quickly like he did with others.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

This is a lie just like the usual lies that jews are always saying.

Also important to remember that this was long before the Arabic race was created. And in this time, these Arabic countries were all full of White people who were no different from the Greeks.

 

[phi3.14infinity]

This is a lie just like the usual lies that jews are always saying.

Also important to remember that this was long before the Arabic race was created. And in this time, these Arabic countries were all full of White people who were no different from the Greeks.

So it means the current race of Arabs ,North Indians ,Greeks are not that white because of race mixing ??

 

[Elite]

History has sometimes written in allegoric ways. Like Egyptian pharaohs marrying with their family members and so on.

And surely there are Jewish lies as well. Which, for example, Plato discriminating Aristotle because he was from Macedonia (a Greek kingdom by the time), Aristotle teaching Lord Alexander how to be a tyrant to the non-Greeks and then poisoning him because he was not being a tyrant to this ethnicity of his subjects, Pythagoras killing his own student because they discovered irrational numbers.

If we take it allegorically, "marriage" means linking, so what has achieved Lord Alexander? A Vedic-Hellenic culture and also restoring Persian Gentile roots in the region, which was earlier being suppressed by the Jews and their puppets.

 

[Isisd]

This is a lie just like the usual lies that jews are always saying.

Also important to remember that this was long before the Arabic race was created. And in this time, these Arabic countries were all full of White people who were no different from the Greeks.

It isn't a lie. A lot of great conquerors starting from Alexander to Caesar and so on used multiculturalism and "race-mixing" as a way to gain power and stability. This was well diffused mostly in Ancient Rome, that rapidly became a multicultural Empire (and this was one of the many reasons of it's fall) . A pacific relationship with the conquered people, introducing them into their Mos and the cult of their deities was seen a as a way to gain aequilibrium.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

So it means the current race of Arabs ,North Indians ,Greeks are not that white because of race mixing ??

The modern Arabic and Indian races were created by mixing of white, black, and asian races. This happened in the past several hundred years. Before this, the people living in these countries were purely white.

There was no race mixing between Alexander and these people, because all of them were the same race. They were all pure Nordic White. Just as if a Swedish and Norwegian breed together, there is no race mixing because they both are purely white.

 

[AskSatanOperator]

https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?p=474324#p474324
-

What's up with the "Pure Nordic White/Germanic White" thing everywhere?
I get it, the JoS is based on National Socialism and loves Hitler who was a German etc.

It's like anybody who is considered white/Caucasian or pale, the more so important figures,
somehow is or was from that region and belongs to that group?
And if someone white/Caucasian is not like that group, he is somehow "mixed" or "not pure".
Weirdly enough it's always "white people" outside of Northern Europe,
who achieved great things and built great Civilizations and everybody else tried to match that.

As far as i know Alexander the Great never claimed to be anything else than Greek/Hellenic.
He would have mentioned that he was "purely white Nordic/Germanic" in his texts or speeches,
that's not the case, as far as i know.
Also the culture and soul between these groups was and is distinctively different.
-
It's like saying anybody that is/was Black or Melanated in this World, was/is African from Nigeria.
Or as if Chinese claimed that every Asian was/is Chinese from China, including Japanese historical figures.
???

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

The truth is what the truth is. If you do not like the truth, or wish that it was something different, then there's nothing I could tell you.

There was absolutely no genetic difference between the Greek and the Middle Eastern people in the time of Alexander the Great. Because there was not any race mixing of these populations yet. All of these people were pure and unmixed white. So it is a lie to say that there was race mixing between Alexander and all the people he visited in various areas, because all of them were the same race with no differences between them. The people who are now living in these countries are extremely different from the people who used to live there, because there has been hundreds of years of race mixing to create the populations that are now existing.

There wasn't even a different culture between Alexander and most of the countries he visited because everybody knew the same gods. They would speak different languages or different dialects, but it was the same gods they were describing. And they all immediately recognized this. There was no conflict about race or religion because they were all the same race and the same religion.

The conflicts were about the leaders of local areas not wanting to relinquish their leadership to anybody else. But I think most of these leaders were allowed to keep their positions anyway as long as they promised to be allied with the rest of them. Many of the times, possibly most of the time, this happened peacefully and easily.

 

[GoldenxChild1]

The truth is what the truth is. If you do not like the truth, or wish that it was something different, then there's nothing I could tell you.

There was absolutely no genetic difference between the Greek and the Middle Eastern people in the time of Alexander the Great. Because there was not any race mixing of these populations yet. All of these people were pure and unmixed white. So it is a lie to say that there was race mixing between Alexander and all the people he visited in various areas, because all of them were the same race with no differences between them. The people who are now living in these countries are extremely different from the people who used to live there, because there has been hundreds of years of race mixing to create the populations that are now existing.

There wasn't even a different culture between Alexander and most of the countries he visited because everybody knew the same gods. They would speak different languages or different dialects, but it was the same gods they were describing. And they all immediately recognized this. There was no conflict about race or religion because they were all the same race and the same religion.

The conflicts were about the leaders of local areas not wanting to relinquish their leadership to anybody else. But I think most of these leaders were allowed to keep their positions anyway as long as they promised to be allied with the rest of them. Many of the times, possibly most of the time, this happened peacefully and easily.

It's so frustrating talking to people who can't consider alternative possibilities to mainstream science. I'm just venting here but I was talking to some NPC on FB and she couldn't fathom that there are different human races. The "One" race this, the "one" race that, and that the "Gods don't care about trivial matters such as race". Yuck.

I didn't know this about Greece and the Middle east, thanks Ol. Makes a lot of sense.