WhiteDragon666 said:
Shadowcat said:
Says the noob. There is literally no difference in homosexuals being together with or without some piece of paper but the latter has practical perks. Go back to church and stop trolling no one is buying your shit.
You don't know anything about me. I've been a SS for more than you most likely (if you have been a SS for less than a decade) and what I posted is similar to what Egon posted.
Homosexuals working together is different than a soul contract that is marriage. It's not merely a piece of paper, it's a spiritual bond between opposite energies found in opposite sex that requires a formal ceremony of affirming it. See, that's what happens when you trivialize a sacred thing. Everything in Ancient Paganism was sacred, including marriage.
Have you now? Where is your other account? You are telling me to prove to you that in ancient times this was not "allowed" yet you won't provide any sources where this says it does not. And even so, how can you be sure these aren't corrupted?
Fantastic that we are on the same page with the legal part.. I am well aware that this is more than a piece of paper I have always seen it as a bond between two souls. Nowadays the "legal" part is just something that takes precedence and is all most have to go off of in terms of "ceremony." I am well aware for example that two SS could organize a satanic wedding ceremony.
As far as a bond I am aware that the bond between homosexuals is not the same as hetero couples. But you seem to imply as well that this ISN'T somehow worthy of the God's blessings which again almost seems to state that this coupling in any form shouldn't occur in the first place yet you agree that it is natural. Would a union with homosexuals NOT have the Gods blessing but just be recognized as a different type of bonding? One might say "well yes it's not a marriage then!" Why can't it be just a different kind of marriage bond? Is this so wrong? If it is why does homosexuality occur in nature in the first place? I can't help thinking that other SS who aren't heterosexual might be inclined to think after reading some of the responses in this thread that they might even feel some sort of rejection for who they are. I can't help but challenge this and have a questioning attitude about this, therefore, and if someone doesn't like this that is too bad. I would actually like to see a sermon on it, or have one from the past posted that i may have missed.
I know that since physically homosexuals are the exact same it's not a bond that is equal to heterosexuals, so this is also something that makes it different. But most often homosexuals are attracted like heterosexuals to others who have the opposite energies to them. Ie, if one is more masculine or dominant they will often like someone who is the opposite and vice versa, or the ratios of the two whatever these will be will look for a ratio of these energies that will compliment them the best in someone else of the same sex. This actually occurs naturally, but many homosexuals that follow the degenerate LGBT fad also try to make a point to deviate from this to spite "oppressive heteronormative rules" (and most of these are not even naturally gay...they are just trying to be "leftist cool") But this is normal and natural. It is still in a sense masculine and feminine energies complimenting and the only level that would not have this is physical since they are the same sex. But even so, once again, why would it not have the God's blessing per se? To me, no, it is not the same as heterosexuals uniting but simply another type of union and bond. Why wouldn't it deserve its own ceremony and blessing, one that is different?
If anyone else wishes to chime in and give other perspectives I would like to see this as well..