Masculine women and feminine men

[Shadowcat]

It is definitely one of the sub agendas of the NWO, for whatever reasons, to distort males and females into the opposite genders. From this we can likely assume that it is bad for us. There are all kinds of chemicals as most of us know (like xenoestrogens in plastic) that are disrupting our natural feelings and thoughts and biology. Evil seems to like to invert things..

Transgenderism is bullshit, but there is a small minority of masculine women and feminine men. It isn't as simple as writing it off as a distortion or defect because it isn't, despite that there are things put in the water and food. yes, this plays a role and the left has been unnaturally brainwashing overt feminization of men in general especially which is for a very sinister purpose. With the unnatural factors aside, however, these minorities would still organically occur because many factors come into play especially as far as astrological makeup and elemental make up. Not everyone is the same. Leftist transgender crap is contradictory because it is making a statement that just because a man has more feminine energy or if a woman is more masculine then they are automatically in the wrong body which implies that there cannot be any women that are naturally more masculine or some men more feminine. jewish horseshit. The human soul itself has both male and female energies and there are times when the opposite energy will be prominent in the other sex....Because the body is the manifestation of the soul no matter what energy is dominant this does not justify transgenderism. It's really no more or less spectacular than being born left or right-handed, or in rare cases ambidextrous. One does not ask for it.

I can also admit that throughout my life I have sometimes been uncomfortable dealing with very masculine females.

Sorry not sorry. I couldn't be feminine even when I tried because I thought I was supposed to. I just humiliated myself and made myself look ugly. It isn't in the majority of my nature, and now that I stopped trying to amplify what was never there I am much better off for it. I have actually butted heads with men and boys like this for most of my life who treated me badly simply for the fact that this made them "uncomfortable". It only puts you off because it is too similar to you energetically which is fine, but it doesn't make it wrong. If it steps on your pee pee tough shit I guess :lol:. People are attracted to what they lack mostly especially in terms of a mate. I happen to like very feminine men and women both.

The whole rise of transgenderism was part of an Illuminati agenda, they'd been planning this for a long time. I can't prove it to you but I know it for a fact.

Well yea.

 

[Epiphany]

It is definitely one of the sub agendas of the NWO, for whatever reasons, to distort males and females into the opposite genders. From this we can likely assume that it is bad for us. There are all kinds of chemicals as most of us know (like xenoestrogens in plastic) that are disrupting our natural feelings and thoughts and biology. Evil seems to like to invert things..

Transgenderism is bullshit, but there is a small minority of masculine women and feminine men. It isn't as simple as writing it off as a distortion or defect because it isn't, despite that there are things put in the water and food. yes, this plays a role and the left has been unnaturally brainwashing overt feminization of men in general especially which is for a very sinister purpose. With the unnatural factors aside, however, these minorities would still organically occur because many factors come into play especially as far as astrological makeup and elemental make up. Not everyone is the same. Leftist transgender crap is contradictory because it is making a statement that just because a man has more feminine energy or if a woman is more masculine then they are automatically in the wrong body which implies that there cannot be any women that are naturally more masculine or some men more feminine. jewish horseshit. The human soul itself has both male and female energies and there are times when the opposite energy will be prominent in the other sex....Because the body is the manifestation of the soul no matter what energy is dominant this does not justify transgenderism. It's really no more or less spectacular than being born left or right-handed, or in rare cases ambidextrous. One does not ask for it.

I can also admit that throughout my life I have sometimes been uncomfortable dealing with very masculine females.

Sorry not sorry. I couldn't be feminine even when I tried because I thought I was supposed to. I just humiliated myself and made myself look ugly. It isn't in the majority of my nature, and now that I stopped trying to amplify what was never there I am much better off for it. I have actually butted heads with men and boys like this for most of my life who treated me badly simply for the fact that this made them "uncomfortable". It only puts you off because it is too similar to you energetically which is fine, but it doesn't make it wrong. If it steps on your pee pee tough shit I guess :lol:. People are attracted to what they lack mostly especially in terms of a mate. I happen to like very feminine men and women both.

The whole rise of transgenderism was part of an Illuminati agenda, they'd been planning this for a long time. I can't prove it to you but I know it for a fact.

Well yea.

A thought came to my mind that although there may be "feminine" men, or "masculine" women, this can present in 2 ways.

One would present as an embodiment of both archetypes of male and female, with a simple precedent or dominant streak of one or the other(mastering vs nurturing, for example). This is the true "feminine/masculine" man/woman.

The other presents as the absence of the opposite archetype. For example, men who are sissy cucks, deprived of masculinity, and women who act like bull dyke ogres, devoid of femininity.

I think it's disrespectful to consider either of those a "feminine/masculine" man or woman, when they are embodying the traits of one polarity(if any) in the ugliest way, with no internal male/female counterpart for balance.

Following this line of thought, it's fairer and more accurate to say that men today are not feminized, but emasculated. To say that the modern soy latte sipping sissy cuck is feminized, portrays femininity in a bad light and may not be true. They are simply lacking masculinity, in other words, they are emasculated.

I don't know of any analogous word to emasculation for femininity. But there is definitely a war on traditional femininity, just as well as there is on masculinity.

Just a thought.

 

[HPS Lydia]

A thought came to my mind that although there may be "feminine" men, or "masculine" women, this can present in 2 ways.

One would present as an embodiment of both archetypes of male and female, with a simple precedent or dominant streak of one or the other(mastering vs nurturing, for example). This is the true "feminine/masculine" man/woman.

The other presents as the absence of the opposite archetype. For example, men who are sissy cucks, deprived of masculinity, and women who act like bull dyke ogres, devoid of femininity.

I think it's disrespectful to consider either of those a "feminine/masculine" man or woman, when they are embodying the traits of one polarity(if any) in the ugliest way, with no internal male/female counterpart for balance.

Following this line of thought, it's fairer and more accurate to say that men today are not feminized, but emasculated. To say that the modern soy latte sipping sissy cuck is feminized, portrays femininity in a bad light and may not be true. They are simply lacking masculinity, in other words, they are emasculated.

I don't know of any analogous word to emasculation for femininity. But there is definitely a war on traditional femininity, just as well as there is on masculinity.

Just a thought.

I agree. A lot of people don't even know what actual femininity is, and emasculated men certainly are not it. Real femininity is not being weak and simpering. So as you said, it does portray femininity in a bad light.

 

[Shadowcat]

It is definitely one of the sub agendas of the NWO, for whatever reasons, to distort males and females into the opposite genders. From this we can likely assume that it is bad for us. There are all kinds of chemicals as most of us know (like xenoestrogens in plastic) that are disrupting our natural feelings and thoughts and biology. Evil seems to like to invert things..

Transgenderism is bullshit, but there is a small minority of masculine women and feminine men. It isn't as simple as writing it off as a distortion or defect because it isn't, despite that there are things put in the water and food. yes, this plays a role and the left has been unnaturally brainwashing overt feminization of men in general especially which is for a very sinister purpose. With the unnatural factors aside, however, these minorities would still organically occur because many factors come into play especially as far as astrological makeup and elemental make up. Not everyone is the same. Leftist transgender crap is contradictory because it is making a statement that just because a man has more feminine energy or if a woman is more masculine then they are automatically in the wrong body which implies that there cannot be any women that are naturally more masculine or some men more feminine. jewish horseshit. The human soul itself has both male and female energies and there are times when the opposite energy will be prominent in the other sex....Because the body is the manifestation of the soul no matter what energy is dominant this does not justify transgenderism. It's really no more or less spectacular than being born left or right-handed, or in rare cases ambidextrous. One does not ask for it.

I can also admit that throughout my life I have sometimes been uncomfortable dealing with very masculine females.

Sorry not sorry. I couldn't be feminine even when I tried because I thought I was supposed to. I just humiliated myself and made myself look ugly. It isn't in the majority of my nature, and now that I stopped trying to amplify what was never there I am much better off for it. I have actually butted heads with men and boys like this for most of my life who treated me badly simply for the fact that this made them "uncomfortable". It only puts you off because it is too similar to you energetically which is fine, but it doesn't make it wrong. If it steps on your pee pee tough shit I guess :lol:. People are attracted to what they lack mostly especially in terms of a mate. I happen to like very feminine men and women both.

The whole rise of transgenderism was part of an Illuminati agenda, they'd been planning this for a long time. I can't prove it to you but I know it for a fact.

Well yea.

A thought came to my mind that although there may be "feminine" men, or "masculine" women, this can present in 2 ways.

One would present as an embodiment of both archetypes of male and female, with a simple precedent or dominant streak of one or the other(mastering vs nurturing, for example). This is the true "feminine/masculine" man/woman.

The other presents as the absence of the opposite archetype. For example, men who are sissy cucks, deprived of masculinity, and women who act like bull dyke ogres, devoid of femininity.

I think it's disrespectful to consider either of those a "feminine/masculine" man or woman, when they are embodying the traits of one polarity(if any) in the ugliest way, with no internal male/female counterpart for balance.

Following this line of thought, it's fairer and more accurate to say that men today are not feminized, but emasculated. To say that the modern soy latte sipping sissy cuck is feminized, portrays femininity in a bad light and may not be true. They are simply lacking masculinity, in other words, they are emasculated.

I don't know of any analogous word to emasculation for femininity. But there is definitely a war on traditional femininity, just as well as there is on masculinity.

Just a thought.

The other presents as the absence of the opposite archetype. For example, men who are sissy cucks, deprived of masculinity, and women who act like bull dyke ogres, devoid of femininity.

I think it's disrespectful to consider either of those a "feminine/masculine" man or woman, when they are embodying the traits of one polarity(if any) in the ugliest way, with no internal male/female counterpart for balance.

I agree that one should not be completely devoid of the other and manifest in the best way. Believe it or not funnily enough my feminine energy comes out a lot at work and with people I feel relaxed with. My nurturing side comes out more.

As for your derogatory reference towards butch lesbians we aren't all orcs thanks :lol: , although I'm sure you have seen these. One that I know I look at with ridicule and she is also a Marxist. Although I don't act like an orc and am not fat and ugly I'm assertive with a strong will, and speak my mind and take initiative which are positive masculine traits and that grates with people none the less and when it does I just say too bad :|. I can be boisterous but often in a playful way which is something that one doesn't seem often in women and some can find it annoying.

As for your wording, yes emasculated is the better term. To be honest "feminization" implys other negative things as well about femininity that I didn't think of which makes the wording of mine actually further inaccurate

 

[Stormblood]

Lydia" post_id=477464 time=1702620629 user_id=57]

A thought came to my mind that although there may be "feminine" men, or "masculine" women, this can present in 2 ways.

One would present as an embodiment of both archetypes of male and female, with a simple precedent or dominant streak of one or the other(mastering vs nurturing, for example). This is the true "feminine/masculine" man/woman.

The other presents as the absence of the opposite archetype. For example, men who are sissy cucks, deprived of masculinity, and women who act like bull dyke ogres, devoid of femininity.

I think it's disrespectful to consider either of those a "feminine/masculine" man or woman, when they are embodying the traits of one polarity(if any) in the ugliest way, with no internal male/female counterpart for balance.

Following this line of thought, it's fairer and more accurate to say that men today are not feminized, but emasculated. To say that the modern soy latte sipping sissy cuck is feminized, portrays femininity in a bad light and may not be true. They are simply lacking masculinity, in other words, they are emasculated.

I don't know of any analogous word to emasculation for femininity. But there is definitely a war on traditional femininity, just as well as there is on masculinity.

Just a thought.

I agree. A lot of people don't even know what actual femininity is, and emasculated men certainly are not it. Real femininity is not being weak and simpering. So as you said, it does portray femininity in a bad light.

I think it comes from the enemy introducing masculinity and femininity as polar opposites in the same spectrum when, in truth, they are 2 different spectrums. The opposite of masculine is "not masculine"; the opposite of feminine is "not feminine". Like you say, weak or non-existent masculinity doesn't make one feminine as their femininity can be just as week. Also, the femininity of a man is never going to be the same as being a woman, just like the masculinity of a woman is not the same as being a man.

All the enemy does is confuse, twist and corrupt things.

 

[Epiphany]

Lydia" post_id=477464 time=1702620629 user_id=57]

A thought came to my mind that although there may be "feminine" men, or "masculine" women, this can present in 2 ways.

One would present as an embodiment of both archetypes of male and female, with a simple precedent or dominant streak of one or the other(mastering vs nurturing, for example). This is the true "feminine/masculine" man/woman.

The other presents as the absence of the opposite archetype. For example, men who are sissy cucks, deprived of masculinity, and women who act like bull dyke ogres, devoid of femininity.

I think it's disrespectful to consider either of those a "feminine/masculine" man or woman, when they are embodying the traits of one polarity(if any) in the ugliest way, with no internal male/female counterpart for balance.

Following this line of thought, it's fairer and more accurate to say that men today are not feminized, but emasculated. To say that the modern soy latte sipping sissy cuck is feminized, portrays femininity in a bad light and may not be true. They are simply lacking masculinity, in other words, they are emasculated.

I don't know of any analogous word to emasculation for femininity. But there is definitely a war on traditional femininity, just as well as there is on masculinity.

Just a thought.

I agree. A lot of people don't even know what actual femininity is, and emasculated men certainly are not it. Real femininity is not being weak and simpering. So as you said, it does portray femininity in a bad light.

I think it comes from the enemy introducing masculinity and femininity as polar opposites in the same spectrum when, in truth, they are 2 different spectrums. The opposite of masculine is "not masculine"; the opposite of feminine is "not feminine". Like you say, weak or non-existent masculinity doesn't make one feminine as their femininity can be just as week. Also, the femininity of a man is never going to be the same as being a woman, just like the masculinity of a woman is not the same as being a man.

All the enemy does is confuse, twist and corrupt things.

I like your way of putting it.

 

[General Yeager]

Lydia" post_id=477464 time=1702620629 user_id=57]

A thought came to my mind that although there may be "feminine" men, or "masculine" women, this can present in 2 ways.

One would present as an embodiment of both archetypes of male and female, with a simple precedent or dominant streak of one or the other(mastering vs nurturing, for example). This is the true "feminine/masculine" man/woman.

The other presents as the absence of the opposite archetype. For example, men who are sissy cucks, deprived of masculinity, and women who act like bull dyke ogres, devoid of femininity.

I think it's disrespectful to consider either of those a "feminine/masculine" man or woman, when they are embodying the traits of one polarity(if any) in the ugliest way, with no internal male/female counterpart for balance.

Following this line of thought, it's fairer and more accurate to say that men today are not feminized, but emasculated. To say that the modern soy latte sipping sissy cuck is feminized, portrays femininity in a bad light and may not be true. They are simply lacking masculinity, in other words, they are emasculated.

I don't know of any analogous word to emasculation for femininity. But there is definitely a war on traditional femininity, just as well as there is on masculinity.

Just a thought.

I agree. A lot of people don't even know what actual femininity is, and emasculated men certainly are not it. Real femininity is not being weak and simpering. So as you said, it does portray femininity in a bad light.

I think it comes from the enemy introducing masculinity and femininity as polar opposites in the same spectrum when, in truth, they are 2 different spectrums. The opposite of masculine is "not masculine"; the opposite of feminine is "not feminine". Like you say, weak or non-existent masculinity doesn't make one feminine as their femininity can be just as week. Also, the femininity of a man is never going to be the same as being a woman, just like the masculinity of a woman is not the same as being a man.

All the enemy does is confuse, twist and corrupt things.

Femininity (Emotion) and Masculine (Will/Direction) always go hand in hand. One cannot become actualized to his true potential when being devoid of an integral element of himself.

If you look at the best Orator's like Hitler or Trump , they are always Animated and Emotional. Boxers like Mike Tyson, or Tennis Players like Novak Djokovic. All of the men that are extremely high performing and exceptional are extremely emotional and their Emotions are charging their spirit and body. And you can see it when they are playing their sport. Like a sword burning in fire. The emotion shrouds the Will.

The only thing to note is people dwell on the Negative Parts of themselves instead of trying to integrate these Parts positively into themselves to become Better as a whole.

This is called Integrating the Shadow and is a part of Jungian Philosophy. Addicts, Criminals and crooks. They all have some potential which has been turned negatively unto themselves. While the people who are exceptional externalize these qualities onto the physical world and integrate them into their psyche.

 

[xlnt]

Nice to see so much response here with all the posts.

Related to what I wrote earlier;
I think there is an aspect of homophobia which has to do with the false notion of feminine nature being only of weak character and woman thus being the weaker gender - rooted in the false teachings of xianity and islam.

This notion is very far from true, since there is both weakness and strength in the feminine, as well as the masculine.
For example; many men who are feminine or gay/bi often times have great strengths in music, art, psychology, spirituality etc.

Considering that Yang is of the outside and Yin is of the inside, it's logical to conclude that feminine strength has to do with the inside (being in touch with ones soul and having a strong psyche).

This type of strength is very crucial also for men, and that is why we meditate over here, while Pisslam and Shitianity shits on the feminine - resulting in weakness of the inner in all people.

 

[Stormblood]

Femininity (Emotion) and Masculine (Will/Direction) always go hand in hand. One cannot become actualized to his true potential when being devoid of an integral element of himself.

If you look at the best Orator's like Hitler or Trump , they are always Animated and Emotional. Boxers like Mike Tyson, or Tennis Players like Novak Djokovic. All of the men that are extremely high performing and exceptional are extremely emotional and their Emotions are charging their spirit and body. And you can see it when they are playing their sport. Like a sword burning in fire. The emotion shrouds the Will.

The only thing to note is people dwell on the Negative Parts of themselves instead of trying to integrate these Parts positively into themselves to become Better as a whole.

This is called Integrating the Shadow and is a part of Jungian Philosophy. Addicts, Criminals and crooks. They all have some potential which has been turned negatively unto themselves. While the people who are exceptional externalize these qualities onto the physical world and integrate them into their psyche.

Indeed

 

[Viego]

I have came across with great discoveries in Elliot Rodger's natal birth chart and his actual transits that he had when he died, how ,why.

I can start a topic or write here just let me know if anyone would be interested.

I can explain the natal chart and combine with what he had transits even the degrees ,mostly the degrees.

Astrology is great and I thank to the God's for giving it to me.