Shadowcat said:
It is definitely one of the sub agendas of the NWO, for whatever reasons, to distort males and females into the opposite genders. From this we can likely assume that it is bad for us. There are all kinds of chemicals as most of us know (like xenoestrogens in plastic) that are disrupting our natural feelings and thoughts and biology. Evil seems to like to invert things..
Transgenderism is bullshit, but there is a small minority of masculine women and feminine men. It isn't as simple as writing it off as a distortion or defect because it isn't, despite that there are things put in the water and food. yes, this plays a role and the left has been unnaturally brainwashing overt feminization of men in general especially which is for a very sinister purpose. With the unnatural factors aside, however, these minorities would still organically occur because many factors come into play especially as far as astrological makeup and elemental make up. Not everyone is the same. Leftist transgender crap is contradictory because it is making a statement that just because a man has more feminine energy or if a woman is more masculine then they are automatically in the wrong body which implies that there cannot be any women that are naturally more masculine or some men more feminine. jewish horseshit. The human soul itself has both male and female energies and there are times when the opposite energy will be prominent in the other sex....Because the body is the manifestation of the soul no matter what energy is dominant this does not justify transgenderism. It's really no more or less spectacular than being born left or right-handed, or in rare cases ambidextrous. One does not ask for it.
I can also admit that throughout my life I have sometimes been uncomfortable dealing with very masculine females.
Sorry not sorry. I couldn't be feminine even when I tried because I thought I was supposed to. I just humiliated myself and made myself look ugly. It isn't in the majority of my nature, and now that I stopped trying to amplify what was never there I am much better off for it. I have actually butted heads with men and boys like this for most of my life who treated me badly simply for the fact that this made them "uncomfortable". It only puts you off because it is too similar to you energetically which is fine, but it doesn't make it wrong. If it steps on your pee pee tough shit I guess :lol:. People are attracted to what they lack mostly especially in terms of a mate. I happen to like very feminine men and women both.
The whole rise of transgenderism was part of an Illuminati agenda, they'd been planning this for a long time. I can't prove it to you but I know it for a fact.
Well yea.
A thought came to my mind that although there may be "feminine" men, or "masculine" women, this can present in 2 ways.
One would present as an embodiment of both archetypes of male and female, with a simple precedent or dominant streak of one or the other(mastering vs nurturing, for example). This is the true "feminine/masculine" man/woman.
The other presents as the absence of the opposite archetype. For example, men who are sissy cucks, deprived of masculinity, and women who act like bull dyke ogres, devoid of femininity.
I think it's disrespectful to consider either of those a "feminine/masculine" man or woman, when they are embodying the traits of one polarity(if any) in the ugliest way, with no internal male/female counterpart for balance.
Following this line of thought, it's fairer and more accurate to say that men today are not
feminized, but
emasculated. To say that the modern soy latte sipping sissy cuck is
feminized, portrays femininity in a bad light and may not be true. They are simply lacking masculinity, in other words, they are
emasculated.
I don't know of any analogous word to emasculation for femininity. But there is definitely a war on traditional femininity, just as well as there is on masculinity.
Just a thought.