https://www.ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?p=375055#p375055
Just send your suggestions to the editorial check thread. There's not really a reason to be this upset (I'm condescending here), I get what you're saying but if the problem is one dialect really has a "lower vibration" than the other then we should all go back Shakespearean English or something, all Southern Europeans back to Latin, and all Greeks back to either Classical or Koine (Alexandrian) Greek - that sounds awesome and you have my vote but right now it's not appliable, and we need more
eloquence than which of your dialectism is more "advanced".
I've never had this level of complaint in the pt forum/emails, and the differences between Brazilian and European Portuguese are much more screaming, lets say compare this Irish guy with a Texan and you will know what I'm talking about:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luojLwpXL6k
My only criticism to the "style" of HP Hooded is in the repetition of certain words. For one the sermon about masculinity used "literally" about 20 times, while that is not "incorrect", and used a few times works for the intended effect of sarcasm, using some words too much does give a sense of cacophony and limitation of vocabulary. I had a hard time translating that sermon (though that was because there was a lot of memes that are hard to adapt and not necessarily the writting quality or this). I didn't feel though as it was worthy addressing and it could be just on me. Another one is repeating the same word after a break, for instance some breaks come like this:
"... that existed in the Temple of Inanna. Inanna's Temple was..."
One in the Ritual for Baalzebul, which I'm not sure if this was really intendend:
"In Egypt, you were known to Egypt as the Ruling Power"
I supposed he reutilized the model from Astarte's ritual and just forgot to adapt it, but I'm ignorant if that was intentional, if there's an occult meaning etc. or he was just ok as it was:
You were known to Egypt as Isis,
Either way, why do you think people (apparently) read your posts much less than HP HC who arguably writes more extensive texts? Because the texts of the HPs most of the time give the information they want to communicate, while you go on with 20 lines of roundabout building up for the 2 lines of the actual punchline somewhere. You play too much on the style of the language rather than communicating. If HP HC became more succinct in his writing, you can do that too.
"True eloquence consists in saying all that should be said, and only what should be said."
-François de la Rochefoucauld