Anu=Enki,Enlil. Enki ≠Enlil

[loki6]

Hello, brothers and sisters of Satanism.

I want to express my opinion, which is based on facts, and to better understand this topic, let's analyze the original Trinity.

As we know, the concept of the "Almighty God" was stolen from the idea of the World Ether, the Chaos of the Cosmos, and the Akasha.

We are also aware of the existence of the Trinity: Anu (World Ether), Enki (Satan, originating from An and Ki), and Enlil (Beelzebub, Satan's brother).

As I understand it, Satan is the manifestation of potential energy, meaning the embodiment of Anu, whereas Enlil is a more physical manifestation of Anu. In other words, both Satan and Beelzebub are realizations of the Ether but in different degrees, with Beelzebub being its more material embodiment.

I will provide another example based on sources that lead me to believe that Satan ≠ Beelzebub. On the official JoS website, it is stated that there is a god, Mammon, who represents the aspect of money and wealth of Zeus. It says that Mammon is not a separate god but rather a manifestation of Zeus.

But why is the same not said about Satan? Why do Satan and Beelzebub have different sigils and rituals? If Mammon is merely an aspect of Zeus, then why is there no separate ritual of Mammon’s power to attract money?

This only creates more misunderstandings and contradictions. I express this not as criticism but to resolve inconsistencies.


Hail Satan! Hail Beelzebub!

 

[loki6]

Same fact. The Gods in the Phanteons sometimes merge. Satan and Beelzebub are two separate Gods.

Ammon is another separate God. Ammon is not his real name, but a corruption, meaning money. Zeus Ammon is actually Zeus Ammonas, this is just a “title/adjective,” like Zeus the “chief” (title).

One can also find as meaning the merging of Amon Ra (deity of “wealth”) with Zeus, again with “Zeus Ammonas,” to indicate qualities in common to simplify things. But they still remain two distinct Deities.

Yes,I know it but I don't understand why many of Us start thinking that Satan = Baalzebul.
I read the themes About Zeus and etc and anyway I think They're not the same Gods but connected.

 

[OttoHart]

Anu, Enki and Enlil are most likely all Satan/Zeus, or aspects of Him.

It's similar to the tripartite nature of Zeus/Poseidon/Hades and the tripartite nature of Brahma/Shiva/Vishnu.

But in this case, it is Anu as an origin point (parasivanic, maybe), and a bipartite nature in Enki and Enlil.

 

[Egon]

Same fact. The Gods in the Phanteons sometimes merge. Satan and Beelzebub are two separate Gods.

Ammon is another separate God. Ammon is not his real name, but a corruption, meaning money. Zeus Ammon is actually Zeus Ammonas, this is just a “title/adjective,” like Zeus the “chief” (title).

One can also find as meaning the merging of Amon Ra (deity of “wealth”) with Zeus, again with “Zeus Ammonas,” to indicate qualities in common to simplify things. But they still remain two distinct Deities.

It's Mammon that means money, and not Amon. Amon is a very holy title. Satan is Zeus, they're the same.

 

[AFODO]

They are the same being yes, Baalzebul is the God of the manifested universe and Satan is the God of the unmanifested universe. These two (manifested and unmanifested) encompasses EVERYTHING. So GOD is the lord and God and ruler over EVERYTHING, manifested and unmanifested. Because he is GOD, GOD over EVERYTHING. He is one being, person, God, he is GOD. Cronus/Saturnus and Zeus/Jupiter is one being He is God, it's just that pantheons divide him in this two aspect.

There is no separate being ruling over these two universes, it's one God. It makes much more sense like this. Even in the Al-Jilwah Satan says this, that there is no God but himself, meaning that he is the absolute God over everything. (Not to be confused with the "one God" or the ether in some writings.)

 

[Hs666]

It's Mammon that means money, and not Amon. Amon is a very holy title. Satan is Zeus, they're the same.

That's right here is a typo, I should have written Mammon, thanks for noticing.

 

[Hs666]

Yes,I know it but I don't understand why many of Us start thinking that Satan = Baalzebul.
I read the themes About Zeus and etc and anyway I think They're not the same Gods but connected.

Read Here: Satan & Beelzebul - Two As One

 

[Hs666]

...

Same fact. The Gods in the Phanteons sometimes merge. Satan and Beelzebub are two separate Gods.

Mammon is another separate God. Mammon is not his real name, but a corruption, meaning money. Zeus Mammon is actually Zeus Ammonas, this is just a “title/adjective,” like Zeus the “chief” (title).

One can also find as meaning the merging of Amon Ra (deity of “wealth”) with Zeus, again with “Zeus Ammonas,” to indicate qualities in common to simplify things. But they still remain two distinct Deities.

 

[loki6]

Anu, Enki and Enlil are most likely all Satan/Zeus, or aspects of Him.

It's similar to the tripartite nature of Zeus/Poseidon/Hades and the tripartite nature of Brahma/Shiva/Vishnu.

But in this case, it is Anu as an origin point (parasivanic, maybe), and a bipartite nature in Enki and Enlil.

In some cases, I agree, and in my opinion, they are connected. They are architectures of Anu (energy, potential). For example, Lord Azazel—as we know, he is Apollo or one of Azazel's aspects. However, we don’t have other rituals, and to me, that seems a bit strange. HPS Maxine Dietrich didn’t mention this either. As I recall, she said that Satan and Baalzebul are connected like "brothers." I believe they are "brothers" in an allegorical sense: Anu is the father (potential energy), while Satan and Baalzebul are his sons (architectures of his energy). However, even in this case, they are not 100% the same.

 

[nema]

Yesterday, after doing Satanas Absolution Ritual i felt an Energy wich i always thought It was Baal (by "instinct", i never spoke to Him) and I was just wondering why.. i think it's possible that Satanas wants us to know he Is Baal/Zeus since we are all having this doubt.

 

[Hidden Warrior]

Yes,I know it but I don't understand why many of Us start thinking that Satan = Baalzebul.
I read the themes About Zeus and etc and anyway I think They're not the same Gods but connected.

Read the new information.
We are continuously evolving and discovering new information, as we connect more with the Gods.
Satan and Zeus are the same being, but these two names represent different aspects of the Universe.

 

[loki6]

In some cases, I agree, and in my opinion, they are connected. They are architectures of Anu (energy, potential). For example, Lord Azazel—as we know, he is Apollo or one of Azazel's aspects. However, we don’t have other rituals, and to me, that seems a bit strange. HPS Maxine Dietrich didn’t mention this either. As I recall, she said that Satan and Baalzebul are connected like "brothers." I believe they are "brothers" in an allegorical sense: Anu is the father (potential energy), while Satan and Baalzebul are his sons (architectures of his energy). However, even in this case, they are not 100% the same.

Also,HPS Maxine Dietrich said about her experience with Father Satan and Baalzebul,if they're "same" why here's different experience and different descriptions of Satan's and Baalzebul's looks and feelings ?
Because they're not the "same",but very similar and close connected.

Hail Satan! Hail Baalzebul!

 

[loki6]

Read the new information.
We are continuously evolving and discovering new information, as we connect more with the Gods.
Satan and Zeus are the same being, but these two names represent different aspects of the Universe.

I already did it a few times reread and I understand this idea but it's a little bit strange for me..
As I said,HPS Maxine Dietrich described Satan and Baalzebul different,not as "the same" Gods but connected with each other.
They are same in "Devil" concept,I mean when someone talking about the "Devil" The Devil can be Satan or a Baalzebul and They're both can be in the "Devil" case but not in all cases.
I mean it's not my "theories" or my personal opinion, it s a fact and that fact was said by High Priests.

 

[loki6]

I already did it a few times reread and I understand this idea but it's a little bit strange for me..
As I said,HPS Maxine Dietrich described Satan and Baalzebul different,not as "the same" Gods but connected with each other.
They are same in "Devil" concept,I mean when someone talking about the "Devil" The Devil can be Satan or a Baalzebul and They're both can be in the "Devil" case but not in all cases.
I mean it's not my "theories" or my personal opinion, it s a fact and that fact was said by High Priests.

"Satan traditionally was correlated with Kronus, while Beelzebul was correlated with Zeus and Baal-Zevul [the Lord of the Heavens]."

 

[Tethys333]

As I said,HPS Maxine Dietrich described Satan and Baalzebul different,not as "the same" Gods but connected with each other.

Although they are the same being you must understand that they represent two different aspects of this: Satya or Satanas the more “spiritual” side, the transcendental side, the uncreated universe; Zeus represents the physical side, the “manifested” universe but they are the same essence.

Also, Lady Maxine described them differently because the Gods continually take different forms.

 

[Tethys333]

Although they are the same being you must understand that they represent two different aspects of this: Satya or Satanas the more “spiritual” side, the transcendental side, the uncreated universe; Zeus represents the physical side, the “manifested” universe but they are the same essence.

Also, Lady Maxine described them differently because the Gods continually take different forms.

I hope it's clearer to you.
it's kind of like saying there is Suzy. Suzy is a doctor and in the hospital they call her “doctor” and she is also a mother and her children call her “mom.” She may have two different jobs and names but she is still Suzy

 

[Egon]

I already did it a few times reread and I understand this idea but it's a little bit strange for me..
As I said,HPS Maxine Dietrich described Satan and Baalzebul different,not as "the same" Gods but connected with each other.
They are same in "Devil" concept,I mean when someone talking about the "Devil" The Devil can be Satan or a Baalzebul and They're both can be in the "Devil" case but not in all cases.
I mean it's not my "theories" or my personal opinion, it s a fact and that fact was said by High Priests.

He is one Being, one Entity. His aspects are immense in the rulership of the known and unknown Universe. This nonsense of "Satan and Lucifer" or "Satan and Beelzebub" being different entities is goetic nonsense trying to literalize allegorical and holy concepts and dilute the energy of our God. "Brother" is an allegory for his different roles and "Personas":

Q&A: Temple of Zeus, by HP HC

Here are some interesting answers by HP HoodedCobra from the Temple in the Element app, which he asked to save and repost in the forums. Text outside quotes are his words: Advanced concepts into this are normal to not understand. There are many layers to these things. One is the basic layer...

ancient-forums.com

 

[Aratos666]

In Sumerian texts, these beings are seen as different. How do we explain this?

 

[Egon]

In Sumerian texts, these beings are seen as different. How do we explain this?

This is mythology, each of the 12 Olympians are different aspects of 3 main entities, Zeus, Astarte and Azazel. Read the Q&A I posted above.