Who is the most advanced race? Places like India, Afghanistan, Pakistan are undeveloped places, wouldn't it be good if the Greeks or the Nordics conquered those places to develop them? The development of the blacks happened when the whites went to Africa. Can't the same happen for undeveloped regions and races?
The White Race is directly descended from Father Satanas.
If you look at the history of the Scandinavians, Slavs, and Anglo-Saxons, you will find that throughout history they were primarily merchants and explorers (travelers) who, before traveling, achieved tremendous technological development for their era, for example:
The Vikings built powerful ships, Drakkars, on which they successfully discovered new lands (for example, America) and traded with all of Europe, Asia and Africa (established historical trade routes), as well as founded entire cities in Europe.
If we take Ancient Rome, the Ancient Romans also built entire cities in Greece, Italy and Africa, the Ancient Romans also built trade routes in the form of roads (on earth), which are still used in Asia and Africa.
It is also important not to forget about the writing, grammar, aesthetics and culture of the White Man, the Culture of the White Race, the benefits of which are now enjoyed by representatives of other races, thanking the White Man for these achievements (for example, in Japan and South Korea).
If we talk about conquests and wars, then in harsh and not so good times, everyone fought.
In order to live and prosper, states built by white people demonstrated strength and were not afraid to use it.
No one wants to be under the power of the weak, for example, women always want to see a strong man next to them and are under the power of a strong man (in a certain context) who can provide a bright future for their children. If the state is weak, it will perish.
If a state is strong and ethical, has a high culture and technological development (within the framework of its era), such a state will successfully compete with others and develop.
Conquest does not always mean the death of the one being conquered, for example, a strong state can conquer a weak one and someone who needs protection for his own good (if we mean a strong and ethical state), here we can draw an analogy with women, for example, if in Ancient Greece, for example, an Athenian husband or a Spartan could not protect he lost his wife and died in battle, and a brutal, stronger Spartan or Athenian (guided by the ethics of ancient Greek philosophers) wants to marry this woman, he can claim her. Yes, she can refuse, run away, and so on, but then the question arises of who will protect her if her defenders was died?