Jack said:
You're right ,I apologize. I'm being dumb. It's becoming more and more cringe as I continue to get into pointless arguments with people who are clearly not worth my time and feel as if they're identity is being attacked when I say Totally False to a random comment. Not everything I say references you.
Says it's pointless to argue; continues to add irrelevances to reply in order to continue arguing.
Ol argedco luciftias said:
FancyMancy said:
You use your grammer nazi personality to purposefully misrepresent and ignore what people's actual intended messages are by taking every single word so completely literally and refusing to accept that it is possible for anybody to make a small mistake with a word, and that their intended message does not fit the exact robotic literal meaning of that one single word. Which this is something everybody does sometimes, it's called a small misunderstanding. But even after they write again to clarify what their intended message is, you purposefully ignore this because addressing their actual idea or opinion does not allow you to continue being mad or arguing. Because their actual opinion is agreeing with your own, so you don't get to argue. So ignore all clarification, ignore all further information, and pretend that it never happened. And keep yelling about the original misunderstanding. This will accomplish nothing.
In Jack's first comment, he was not perfectly careful or clear in what he meant. And it was this carelessness that he said was laziness. And it created some basic small misunderstanding. But he did completely clarify this, remove the misunderstanding, and state what he actually meant. Which is completely agreeing with all of us, and even completely agreeing with you. So you really have nothing to be mad about and it's just a mistake.
Jack said:
I don't think anyone would contend the fact that no kind of Sexual Orientation is opposed in Satanism. That is just dumb and stupid.
Wrong X2.
__________________
Likewise, you have two sentences there (actually, more than two, obviously); also likewise, I didn't specify what I was replying to; I simply quoted it all because I'm lazy and then said it's wrong. Instead of shitting, people should use the forum features properly; there is also the option of deleting one's post, so that could have been done and any confusion, etc., avoided, but instead "I'm lazy (except for the fact that I type big replies)" so "OK, Jack. No problem. Everyone else is at fault; you're perfect."
I don't use "my gRaMmAr NaZi personality". The reason I started saying that about myself was because in another post someone said about there not being grammar nazis here; I was not mentioned (it was not said, "FancyMancy is the grammar nazi; that's who I am referring to") so it was implied by them and also left open to interpretation; therefore, I took it to mean that it was myself who was being called it. Why? Because for Sanskrit, we're all grammar nazis. When someone come and says "'Satan' means "evil" and He is the devil", users jump on our grammar nazi horses, swords first, to correct them. Deny that, if you want. I also don't know what people's actual intended messages are. There is ample opportunity to explain what is meant and intended. The forum has a Preview button deliberately, so as to... get this ...preview replies. Saying "Totally False" to a quote, means that which is quoted is false in totality. Replying and saying "Totally False x 2", after being corrected, as part of a full paragraph/reply, is showing immaturity and trolling behaviour - and I'm at fault here?
In Jack's first comment, he was not perfectly careful or clear in what he meant.
Maybe I am stupid, confused, robotic - you say you think (first bold above), then you say Jack does (second bold above), now you say he was not (here)...
If one can type long (not lazy) replies, then they can quote things properly and directly. I tend to stay out of drama these days, but I did see someone a little while ago saying that everyone hates Jack because reas0nz. Maybe Jack is the perfect example and not merely a wannabe (online) alpha male, so everyone else - including the Girls - are jealous and want to hassle him. "Jack's the Man all the Women want to be with; Jack's the Man all the Men want to be." Alternatively, maybe that's not the case. Lazy, typing long replies, incorrect quoting, immature and troll chan-like replies, being defended; others being blamed. Yep.
If Jack's reply was left as-is, then others coming here would see Jack saying that Satan accepting non-heterosexuals is "totally false". That was in the quote which was replied to. These people seeing that would love that intensely, and leave, and join (((LGBT))), instead, no? As I have done before - in other threads about things, since people tend to not check the entire forum for similar posts nor use the search function - I added a bit of a reply which had been mentioned numerous times before in other threads. In other words, repeating the same replies in multiple threads. Someone skimming the JoS666 area would see "What does Satan think of queer ppl?", open it, read it, and see Jack's reply to
Satan Likes Gays as "Totally False" (yes, with capital initials in the immature, troll, chan 2nd reply). "So what - some Satanists say Satan is OK with gays, but others say Satan is not? I'd might as well go back to being a christian again". It was necessary to say that it is not totally false, but Jack Knows All, of course. Instead of clarifying originally, or deleting the post and posting it correctly, or posting it correcting originally, all what was replied was "Totally false" and "Totally False x 2". It was only after I pressed it that it was supposedly "clarified". I also asked about the immature and trolling "Totally False x 2" in a previous reply, but of course that was ignored because loving Jack so much and defend him so vehemently is more important.
Apparently, he clarified what he meant by simply replying "Totally False x 2"... until I replied again, then he "clarified" it after. Repeating that behaviour of nonsense and unhelpful replies about a serious and important topic, like an immature troll, is not clarifying, nor should it be defended. Maybe a demonstration should be in order. If everyone seems to have a problem with Jack, and Jack is in the middle of it many times (and by his own admittance, however sarcastically), and also Jack is defended so vehemently
despite this, then maybe Jack loves it; he gets off on the attention, he thrives on it, he has agents, cronies. Jack right, Jack defended; therefore, everyone else wrong.
Jack said:
Bunny said:
Ex HP jake carlson once said Satan is bi.
But regardless of Satan's orientation its known that Satanism accepts Gay people.
Totally false
Everything which was quoted is, according to Jack, "totally false".
Jack said:
FancyMancy said:
Not totally false. Non-heterosexuality is as OK as heterosexuality. You deliberately included that part of the quote, to say it is "totally false", when it is not. Your hatred for what you agree with "jesus" about - i.e. your hatred for non-heterosexuality and your hatred of love, that love is just chemicals in the Brain - does not make non-heterosexuality the only accepted sexuality, does not make love be only chemicals in the Brain like in the the Big Bang Theory quote I gave, and does not make Satan agree with you, either. Stop being a dick and stop being a troll. You need to get that stick from up your arse, and get something else up there instead - yeah, that was direct and deliberate.
Totally False x 2
Everything which was quoted is, according to Jack, "totally false" doubly so. No clarity, no lucidity, no help, no imparting personal opinion... just immature, troll, chan-board behaviour -
again. How can this immaturity and troll behaviour be defended - and especially so on such a serious and important topic as this?
WiseDragon said:
Ol argedco luciftias said:
FancyMancy said:
You use your grammer nazi personality to purposefully misrepresent and ignore what people's actual intended messages are by taking every single word so completely literally and refusing to accept that it is possible for anybody to make a small mistake with a word, and that their intended message does not fit the exact robotic literal meaning of that one single word...
He's just a guy that tries really hard to look smart.
Yeah, I call myself "Wise" in my username. I'm such a majestic mage. What, exactly, have I said to try really hard to look anything? Jack said "Totally false" to an entire quote, I countered what he said and he replied "Totally False x 2" so immaturely and troll-like as if he's on a shit-posting, piss-about forum - and I'm "trying really hard" when I am saying it's not false that non-heterosexuality is OK? Yeah, alright, then.
Bunny said being gay is OK. Jack said, quoting all of what Bunny said, that it's totally false; totally meaning all; all of what Bunny said, Jack said is false. I said it's not totally false in reply to Jack. Jack replied back to me, saying it's totally false x 2. Then Jack "clarified" that after I replied again, and he was defended by another member... despite having had many problems with many members here... many times (and by his own admittance, however sarcastically (and remember - a JoS Guardian also said recently that people don't know if Jack is being serious or not))... Oh, but yeah, it is
me who is trying really hard.
I don't try really hard, nor hard at all, to look anything. Re-read this thread. Also again I will say -
FancyMancy said:
Check all of my posts on this forum, and check all of my tweets, and see the very low percentage of likes and re-tweets/praise/support/encouragement that I receive.
I don't expect to receive praise/support/encouragement for what I do online. In fact, I expect the opposite; I expect to not be praised/supported/encouraged; rather, that I'll be ignored; I have learnt that this is how it is. Very rarely do I get good feedback for my posts (
e.g. - the post above; I link to this one because the entire, long OP was quoted; the only other one which comes to mind immediately is
this one) and I am not used to it - but Jack is permitted to be an immature, chan-board troll and he and his replies are defended so passionately... and I am blamed for correcting him and pressing it so that he would... attempt to... reply properly.
-Gay OK
-Totally false
-Not false
-Totally false x 2
-You're such a troll and shit-poster
-He is good; he is fine; you're the troll.
-I clarify what I meant
Instead of clarifying, after being immature and trolling and shitting; saying it's all false; pretending to be lazy while making long replies... try harder to avoid drama instead of getting in the middle of drama all of the time. Please share where I have been trying really hard. Thanks.
Why is immature, troll, chan-board Jack being defended so much? It is not false that being non-straight is OK, no matter how much saying that it is false is defended and no matter how much the user typing such is defended. It still is not false that being non-straight is OK.
Notice how these things always resort to personal attacks. I am awaiting replies, e.g. "FancyMancy, this is not all about you, so stop making it be all about you". I am not. I merely replied saying it's not false, then an immature, troll, chan-board reply was replied back to me; which, both the reply and replier, were defended; then someone else said I try really hard. I did not make this about me; I said being-non-straight-is-OK is not false, to which "Totally False x 2" was the reply; the most mature, humane, reputable, respectable and diligent, knowledge-imparting, wisdom-injecting reply I have both ever seen and ever received. Yeah, I can be sarcastic.
This is going to keep on going round and round in circles forever, or until something else happens. So meh. Laters.