I'll now respond to the other things you wrote.
Jack said:
While Transgenderism passes this definition of causing detrimental effects to a species,
- Causes Gender Dysphoria, Depression, Suicidal tendencies, etc.
- Not related to sexuality.
- Not related to spirituality except for severe imbalances in the soul.
And by the way, there is also no such thing as a naturally occurring hermaphrodite (not transgender. )
Hermaphrodites are diseased having genetic conditions who are mostly unable to reproduce unless undertaking hormonal therapy and removal of the more ambiguous genitalia (especially at birth.)
There won't be any such diseased and mentally unwell individuals existing with practical Eugenics for atleast 2 generations or so.
Like you said, the closest thing to natural hermaphroditism in humans is some of the various intersex conditions that exist, which are naturally occurring medical conditions of which the symptoms are generally considered detrimental to the person who has it, as you mentioned already. There are cases of people whose parents opt to have surgery performed on them while they're still a baby to try and mitigate the problems, only to feel mutilated and like their body is wrong as they grow up, and cases of people who didn't get such surgeries at a young enough age and as a result have many difficulties sexually that can no longer be fixed using surgery. It is a horrible condition either way, and although I've met a few people with such conditions (such as someone with XX male syndrome who was born with a penis but no testicles, and a woman with MRKH syndrome who was born without ovaries and only a partial vagina), I've never met someone who was happy to be intersex.
As for eugenics, I don't know in what way eugenics could be used to avoid such conditions, since they seem to occur at random in extremely rare cases, and most people would probably not like to kill their children even if they had such a condition. So can you explain in what way eugenics could be utilised here?
Jack said:
Transgenderism, Alzheimers, Schizophrenia all such Gene's would be eliminated from the gene pool permanently after we recreate the world in our image. Then the only individuals existing will be male and female with various sexualities and lifestyles. And we will cull the diseased and unfortunates who are suffering.
While it's possible that a gene that makes someone more likely to become transgender exists (just like there's a gene that causes women who have it to have more children and causes males who have it to be more likely to be homosexual), it can also occur due to environmental influences. I don't think wiping out the condition is as simple as removing a gene, as it is largely psychological in almost all cases. If these individuals did proper meditation to deal with trauma or karma related to sexual discrimination or similar bad experiences that they blame on their sex before things get out of hand, a lot of cases could be prevented.
I'm not well-read on Alzheimer's syndrome, so I don't know if that's caused by genetics, environmental issues like diet, or a side effect of other health problems like hormonal imbalance, so I can't comment on that.
As for schizophrenia, isn't that just when astral perception gets out of hand and becomes detached from reality? I've heard there are genes that make someone more likely to become schizophrenic, but those genes could hypothetically also improve a person's astral senses, which could be considered a talent. Rather than removing it, I think it's better for people to learn to control and calm their mind and distinguish reality from delusion.
By culling, do you mean killing people with disorders? That seems wrong to me. Even people with those conditions want to live. In fact, I think that even most people who are depressed or suicidal want to live, even if they're not consciously aware of it. After all, if they really wanted to die, wouldn't they just find a way and try seriously to end their life? There's a few who do that, but most just complain to others about how bad they feel and even admit that they consider committing suicide. If they really wanted to do it, then admitting it would be extremely detrimental to their (misguided) objective because it could cause others to try and stop them, even with force in some cases. I think the fact they reach out to others proves that deep down they really want to live and find a different way to overcome their suffering.
Do you think it's right to murder humans against their will, just because they are suffering in some ways? Or did I misunderstand what you were implying?
Jack said:
This is just a very stupid mass psychosis type mind game being played here. It's very very clear why Homosexuality was earlier thought to be a disorder because it did not satisfy morality tests about sexuality in Christianity. If you remove the unscientific Christian morality argument, then Homosexuality is natural as it occurs spontaneously as well as no indication of any detrimental effects.
Also another myth to bust, there is no such GAY gene that was said by Mageson. Homosexuality is not a genetic condition or a separate genetic cause. Homosexuality is natural and the people who will be homosexuals, naturally develop into homosexuals at puberty. There is no genetic basis to it and to separate their group from natural humans.
With transgenderism evidence is there to suggest it might be a brain disorder like alzheimers. More comparative studies with feminine men (which they refuse to do) is required to see whether the brain scans are correct or they're faking it. And if it would be determined that such a probable cause exists that it be considered a physical deformity forming at birth ,it should be included in the Eugenics elimination list.
In any case it's a disorder that needs to be purged.
You're right. That's still one of the things I resent the church for the most, even if they had already lost their power by the time I was born. They're so disgusting and hypocritical.
Jack said:
Also another myth to bust, there is no such GAY gene that was said by Mageson. Homosexuality is not a genetic condition or a separate genetic cause. Homosexuality is natural and the people who will be homosexuals, naturally develop into homosexuals at puberty. There is no genetic basis to it and to separate their group from natural humans.
This article is from 2004 and I don't know if there have been any new findings since then, but this came up when I searched for the gene I mentioned earlier:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6519-survival-of-genetic-homosexual-traits-explained/
Are you implying that there being a genetic basis for it would make it unnatural? From my perspective it only makes it more natural, since it's that way from birth (meaning it's not just caused by environmental circumstances like transgenderism is), and it even implies that it evolved that way due to it being beneficial, meaning it's both naturally occurring and beneficial, the opposite of unnatural by your own definition.
Jack said:
With transgenderism evidence is there to suggest it might be a brain disorder like alzheimers. More comparative studies with feminine men (which they refuse to do) is required to see whether the brain scans are correct or they're faking it. And if it would be determined that such a probable cause exists that it be considered a physical deformity forming at birth ,it should be included in the Eugenics elimination list.
I think the study you're referring to when you say there's evidence that transgenderism is a brain disorder is the one where they showed that a specific part of the brain of male-to-female transgenders who are attracted to males is very similar to the corresponding part of the brain in heterosexual women, while female-born lesbians and male-to-female transgenders who are attracted to women are kind of in-between. Or maybe it was vice versa, or maybe both. It's been years since I found that study and I can't find it right now.
While it could be considered abnormal for someone to be neurologically similar to the opposite sex in specific parts of the brain, it is not at all comparable to a severely detrimental disorder like Alzheimer's. To begin with, it's unclear what exactly this part of the brain even affects. It could be something like personality or sexual instincts, in which it could be detrimental if that ends up causing someone to be bullied or feel sexually confused. However, the former is an issue with society not accepting feminine men or masculine women (although this has been getting better since the church lost its power), while the latter can surely be solved one way or another.
What causes that part of the brain to be that way also isn't clear yet. It could be from birth or it could be due to environmental factors or both. Even in the case that it is primarily determined prenatally, it could still be caused by other factors like the mother's hormones. Even if it really is caused by a gene (meaning eugenics can be applied), it would be hard to detect since the main people propagating it would be the ones that decided to not become transgender despite having the gene, as they're the main ones having children at all. This also proves that
if the neurological similarity to the opposite sex
is caused by a gene, that doesn't mean people with that gene will always try to transition, once again suggesting it's primarily environmental factors that cause people to do so.
Jack said:
In any case it's a disorder that needs to be purged.
Since it causes a lot of distress and unhappiness for the ones who have it, I agree that it would be great if people learn of successful ways to cure it.