EasternFireLion666 said:
From what I see on different medical pages and forums the possibility of stomach ulcers is valid only of the dosage is big. That is why the book and other sources point out to dilluting it 6 to 8 ounches (around 200 grams) and starting with 3 drops to adapt gradually. Some even say to stard with one drop. The unpleasant reactions can be avoided if you take it on an empty stomach as Pperoxide reacts with food. IDK for sure what could be the effect on an overly acid stomach.
Please correct me if I'm wrong
You have to listen to your own body. Everything is toxic in a high enough dosage.
Personally, I'm not fond of using it orally. I only apply it externally in small concentrations for bacterial infections.
T.A.O.L. said:
EasternFireLion666 said:
Some sources though seem to say that cancer cells also produce hydrogen peroxide... idk what to say.
Those would be odd cells that would be working against themselves, as in a cancer cell the mytochondria isn't working properly and using glucose without the oxygen which creates a lot of negative waste products.
Hydrogen peroxide is created directly ( or indirectly via superoxide dismutase ) as a side product by a sub-class of oxidoreductases. They constitute a class of enzymes that catalyze redox reactions.
Concordantly, if a cell is dividing fast, there could be a correlation between the occurrence of hydrogen peroxide inside malignant cells.
Every cell does this. Since it's also oxidizing, ergo disruptive to the cellular redox system, katalase is used to disproportionate the nascent hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen.
If this does not happen, hydrogen peroxide dissociates to hydroxyl radicals, which is even more dangerous.
Leukocytes ( e.g. granulocytes ) create hydrogen peroxide deliberately in order to use its oxidizing effects against pathogens.
Anaerobic glycolysis itself does not create 'negative' waste products, otherwise your skeletal muscles would be constantly poisoning you.
T.A.O.L. said:
There have been tests done in which they tried to make cancer cells, which didn't work but the cell always turned into a cancer cell if the mitochondria was changed to only process glucose without oxygen
I would be careful with these "tests". You cannot compare in vitro tests of isolated cell cultures with living cells that are organized in a larger parenchyma inside a human body.
Take stem cells as an example. Raw, technically immortal cells, and still undifferentiated ( they have no specialized function ). Put them inside a Petri dish, though, and they quickly differentiate into whatever they so "desire".
Epithelial cells, whose malignancies are called carcinomata, comprise the majority of all neoplasias due to their high rate of mitoses. Not all cells, but quite a large number of epithelial cells are integrated
into a collagen-based basal lamina by means of specialized proteins, with some of those apoproteins containing calcium as a prosthetic group. This is important, because loss of integration results in metastases in the case of cancer. A Petri dish of cells solved in sodium chloride is therefore not sufficient to explain a pathophysiological process. Apropos, a lot of cells lined up in tissue can also influence one another by means of hormones or other signal mediators, such as calcium, adenosine, fatty acids, ATP, etc.
T.A.O.L. said:
The extra amount of oxygen could force such cells and the other cells to process glucose normally, thus reversing the effect of the cancer cells and assisting the body in cleaning it up.
A malignancy itself is defined by three characteristics: Loss of tumor suppressor genes ( mutations of two alleles necessary ), mutation inside a proto-oncogene ( mutation of only one allele necessary ), and gain of immortality by activating telomerase. Mutations can occur by means of UV-triggered thymine base dimerization, spontaneous loss of purine bases, demethylation or erroneous methylation / acetylation, covalent bonds with hepatically oxidized substances, intercalators etc.
Unless you somehow reinserted the missing corresponding genes, there would be no way to reverse cancer. You can either try to attack it, or let it starve.