Luciferianism uses non-traditional tools from the Middle Ages.
Like the Kabala and the qlipot, in the Jewish context.
Practically, Luciferianism is pseudo-Satanism and most of its "sacred" symbols are Jewish representations of what the occult is.
Like the baphomet made by Levi
That's kind of basic knowledge, sir.What kind of nonsense is that?
That's kind of basic knowledge, sir.
Luciferianism is qlipot and operates in the Jewish context.
Luciferianism is an amalgam of very bad magic systems.
I'm sorry if you're offended because you like Luciferianism.
But I'd like to know what's traditional about it?
Absolutely nothing!
Haahahhhha You're crazy LoLIs this knowledge you got from Alex Jones and other people who dance with rabbis? Is Lucifer a Jewish name? Is Lucifer a hebrew deity? Who was Lucifer? One of the emblems of Rome, alongside Venus. What do the jews hate more than the Gods of edom, especially the God of Light of Edom? Do yourself a favor and stop spouting complete nonsense out of your ass.
Haahahhhha You're crazy LoL
I understood your comments perfectly.Yes I'm crazy, but that's not the point. Tell me where does it state that Luciferianism incorporates Qlippoth or any kind of Jewish nonsense. Edgelord authors like Michael Ford don't apply. Lucifer is a european god, whoever incorporates jewish crap into it is not practicing Luciferianism at all, it's just plain logic.
The point is that the overwhelming majority of the time their type of magic is geared towards Jewish things, even if there is still the knowledge of the Venusian God, they still take seriously many symbols desecrated by the Jews.
If you exclude Michael W. Ford (who is the most popular "Luciferian" author) the rest are even worse. They are "gnostic" Lucifer-is-Christ and Satan-is-Jehovah types who tell Spiritual Satanists to stop using the name "Satan" because we're unknowingly calling upon Yahweh if we do. You can't claim that they are Pagans as they operate entirely within the jewish/christian dualistic framework, even using a contradiction in their bible to prove Satan is jehova (the one in the old testament where in one book it says "god did this" and in another "Satan did this" as if supposedly proves that Satan is jehova and not being merely one of the hundreds of contradictions that exist there). They fail to see that the name Satan is used by the jews to slander the chief Pagan God and it predates the jews as it's in Ancient Sanskrit, they even use the jewish meaning of the word Satan and tell us "it means enemy, how do you worship the enemy of humanity?" without realizing that Gentiles don't speak Kike, so enemy in Kike merely means enemy of the Kikes, not of everyone.Edgelord authors like Michael Ford don't apply.
The difference is that Spiritual Satan[ism] is the most purest Satanism there it is , no doubt and question about it.Hi! What is the difference between Spiritual Satanism and Luciferianism?
"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan