Many people ask this question and get confused as to this matter. Calling Satan "Satan" is not blasphemous and does not anger him at all. In fact, at this point in time, it is the best name to use. The reason for this is because of what the name represents.
As High Priestess Maxine Dietrich has stated many times, Satan means "enemy" or "adversary" in hebrew. The fact of the matter is that Satan IS the enemy and adversary of judaism, islam and xianity, and people must know that. Satan stands against them in every way. The name "Satan" at this time stands for opposition against our enemies. If we use it, people know exactly who we are and what we stand for. If we were to solely use the name Enki and drop Satan altogether, it would no longer be clear. As long as the war continues, the name Satan will stand for our opposition of our enemies, judaism, xianity and islam and will continue to strike fear into their hearts.
The jews make a conscious effort to avoid ever using the name Satan because of the sheer fear which it causes them. This is the reason they prefer to use the term "Devil" or "Lucifer". Therefore, we WILL use the name Satan and our enemies WILL know exactly what we stand for.
http://www.ageofsat an.co.cc/ frequently_ asked_questions. html
Hail Satan!!
-High Priestess Zildar Raasi
http://www.joyofsat an.org/
http://www.ageofsat an.co.cc/
Joy of Satan Ministries
--- In JoyofSatan666@ yahoogroups. com, Ancient Sumeria <ancientsumeria@ ... wrote:
You know what I dont get, is that if we know that satan was enki the sumerian god. Then why dont we worship him in that form? why do we still call him satan instead of enki? Is it because we would not understand that era? Or is it because it helps us understand him more in a sense of our time in age? If I never wanted to say satan and replaced it with Enki, Would that be wrong?