I've been considering collaborating with another member on a few posts, like those regarding cyber security and virtualization, I will look into seeing what would be best for my tackle first. I typically use Linux with a very efficient window manager I've tailored towards simplicity and just quick bindings and launching for various programs, I may make my next post going over this, or perhaps something beginner friendly at first.
We can collaborate for sure, either just apply "divide and conquer" so we don't end up producing essentially duplicate articles.
When you make the posts, it can delve very quickly into obtuse technical jargon that non-computer people will have difficulty following. Technology is extremely deep, and so is Linux and cybersecurity.
It is worth doing, but do not expect a huge turnout just due to the nature of the post. You can also ask me any questions since I have worked professionally in these fields.
Thank you for your input. This is exactly my biggest concern. I am currently working in IT and I work as much with tech as I work with people (think one-man-army IT department). I learned how the general public / average person treats tech / IT.
The language must be kept simple and digestible.
For example, if I end up including "kernel" in a post, I need to pause and reconsider.
The depth must be kept shallow and easy to grasp.
For example, nobody cares about how or what the drivers are their your computer. All they care about is the drivers being up-to-date and functional.
I have colleagues which you would expect to be highly tech literate but are absolutely not. I thought I would never hear a software developer (with experience and which knows complex mathematics) say Linux is scary, but I did. Not to mention the colleagues which are expected to be tech illiterate, they are incredibly so.
Would it be possible, to send these posts as drafts to you for a review and then have them posted?
I want to be completely respectful of your time and your work here, but I think a label like "Sanctioned by JG ApolloAbove" would be a good indicator for members to know that what they are reading is not garbage.
I appreciate the advice, thank you. Some more obtuse things like Xmonad, VFIO passthrough, guides for OS Development, and the BSD Distros like FreeBSD, OpenBSD and DragonflyBSD are things I am weighing on if it would be worth posting on, as I don't know the extent of if some of this would be useful.
I transitioned to using Xmonad on all of my Linux machines recently once I finished configuring everything to where it's very efficent, but just the general headache of using haskell I may just spare people from... Lol.
With all due respect, that is impressive but I don't think it will have any traction here.
Just make sure that whatever you post is original in one way or another. I am sure that topics you have listed have at least some tutorials and information out there and it wouls not serve a good purpose to repeat the same here. You can also make reports out of what already exists out there by simplifying some complicated concepts for newbies. In any case, I hope you find an approach that best serves you and the readership.
Thank you for your input.
I am interested in anything you have to teach regarding. If it helps even 1 person out there it's worth it.
Thank you for your interest.
Exposing Microsoft and providing instructions of installing similar alternatives such as Linux Mint would be interesting articles. The idea of a major tech company running their operating system in some 70%+ of the global computers is not something negative in itself but what is very negative is Microsoft's efforts to collect personal information and probably creating "profiles" of all their users.
Agreed. We should at least inform people that there are alternatives to Windows and present honest pluses and minuses about them. If they are interested, they will go and research a bit more and may end up installing some flavor of Linux.