"Phantom DNA Experiment" Proving the Ether is real

[hailourtruegod]

hailourtruegod wrote: I'll have to look into this more as this test scientifically proves our, The JoS, point even more.

It does

This proves the basis of the JoS or that spirituality in general with out a doubt and scientifically proven that it's real. So knowing that, the JoS is the best and ultimate place of spiritual practices that can be explained thru advanced science explanation.

I'll be posting two links. The first one is a nice summarization of the experiment and the second is the more detailed and more official explanation of how the experemimnet was done so feel free to scroll down if you'd like.

https://www.getholistichealth.com/33363/what-exactly-is-the-phantom-effect-of-dna/

What Exactly is The Phantom Effect of DNA?

By

 Garry Heilman



Let’s go back to 1984 because this is the year when worshiping DNA faced a serious breakthrough. It was discovered by a doctor named Peter Gariaev. This discovery of Gariaev gives us strong reasons to believe that the mythical emission – Energy Field of the Universe – may act in our DNA. Furthermore, this leads us to the idea that the full genetic code of an organism may not completely consist of the molecule of DNA – or at least not the only location.

When Gariaev puts one sample of DNA into a miniature quartz container equipped with a laser, observing it with sensitive equipment which can even catch single photons of light, he discovers that DNA acts like a sponge to the light. In some strange way, the molecule of DNA absorbs all photons of light in the area and literally stores them in the form of a curved spiral.

This is more than strange and it’s obvious that DNA creates something like turbulence, which can attract light in a way similar to the effects of a black hole, but on a much smaller scale.

Only a handful of scientists would be willing to admit that light may enter into the pineal gland – however, Gariaev proves that the molecule of DNA sucks photons from somewhere by some process unknown to us. Because of the enormous difficulties, connected with studying the living human brain, such experiments with the pineal gland haven’t been made – or at least not to the public.

The only technology we have and which could keep the light into a spiral, like the one Gariaev discovered in the molecule of DNA, is the fiber-optic cable – but even fiber-optic cables can’t absorb such quantities of light in such manner.

We’re not used to thinking about light as something, which can be stored – we only know that it travels through space at amazing speeds. If we do manage to capture it in one place, usually we expect it to be drained and lose its energy. Even in the case of photosynthesis, the only way where a plant could store light is when it transforms light’s energy into green chlorophyll.

But now we understand, even the light itself may be used as a food supply of DNA, almost like the squirrels collecting acorns for winter. This discovery gives rise to a whole new wave of questions. What exactly is that, which stores the light? How exactly it stores it? And why it stores it?

The real true magic happens after the end of Gariaev’s experiment. He grabs the quartz container with DNA and just puts it away from its place. Hereinafter nothing more should happen. Nonetheless, despite the fact that he removed all – DNA, container, and the whole equipment – the light continued to twist into a spiral at the same place. Whatever it’s that, which held the light in the same place, it definitely didn’t need the DNA molecule. Because it was something else, something invisible, something which is strong enough to store and control the visible light, maintaining it in a form like a DNA molecule.

The only rational scientific explanation would be that maybe some sort of energy field exists, which goes along with the DNA molecule – something like an energy duplicate of DNA. And this duplicate has the same form as the physical molecule, and even if we put away the molecule, the duplicate continues to flow at the place it was before. It doesn’t need the presence of DNA to continue doing its job – storing visible light. There is no doubt that some sort of force exists, similar to gravity, which can hold photons in one place.

The implications of this discovery are staggering. As we know, we deal with not only one molecule of DNA – there are trillions of such molecules, which are in very precise structural arrangement. We have bone DNA, blood DNA, muscle DNA, skin DNA, brain DNA, and etc. Anyway, having in mind doctor Gariaev’s experiment, we can suppose that our whole body should also have its own energy duplicate.

This fits perfectly with the observations and theories of some scientists – claiming that there is some sort of energy field, which tells our cells how and where to act. Adding this to Gariaev’s discovery, we find that probably the main function of DNA is to store light – both in our physical body and energy duplicate. It becomes clear that conventional science needs serious rethinking. There is a lot of information about biological life, which traditional science doesn’t know or refuses to acknowledge.

 The Phantom effect of DNA is undoubtedly one of the most significant breakthroughs in recent history

Gariaev proves that the molecule of DNA has some sort of strange connection with quantum mechanics, which traditional scientists haven’t discovered yet. There is already evidence that DNA reacts with some sort of invisible and yet undiscovered energy field, which has electromagnetic properties and obviously controls electromagnetic energy – in this case, by storing photons, even when there is no close physical molecule, which can hold them.

And that is not all. When Gariaev sprayed this phantom with liquid nitrogen, the light spiral disappeared – but after 5 minutes it appeared again. This perseverance of phantom DNA, even in the face of its own destruction, is stranger than its creation. Even if we destroy the integrity of the area, where the phantom of DNA was, by a sudden rush of cold it appears again and restores completely its integrity.

The ambient light was again organized in a unique spiral model of DNA, which existed before. The traditional science could not offer us anything, which can explain this phenomenon and despite that fact – it happens!

How long do you think this Phantom held? As much as it’s unbelievable, the phantom DNA stayed visible for 30 days after its first appearance. During that time, Gariaev shot it with liquid nitrogen, but it kept coming back again. As you have probably guessed, this contradicts all modern biology and physics – but is a fact! This information exists for more than twenty-seven years.

Our DNA somehow interacts with the energy field, which is unknown at this very moment to western and eastern scientists and leaves behind a phantom with the ability to be monitored. This means that our duplicate continues doing its job of capturing light, even when we aren’t there already. If at this time you sit on the chair reading this article, and then get up and move to another location, your energy duplicate will continue swirling light into tiny spirals right at the place where you were before. Every single molecule of DNA will stay for at least thirty days, after the time that you got off your chair.

Since the dimensions mentioned, are microscopic, this effect could not be seen with naked eyes; however, Gariaev was able to measure it in its lab. It appears that our energy duplicate is like a hologram of our physical bodies and exactly the same as every cell!

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_genetica04.htm

INTRODUCTION


In this contribution I am going to describe some observations and interpretations of a recently discovered anomalous phenomenon which we are calling the DNA Phantom Effect in Vitro or the DNA Phantom for short.

 

We believe this discovery has tremendous significance for the explanation and deeper understandings of the mechanisms underlying subtle energy phenomena including many of the observed alternative healing phenomena [1,2]. This data also supports the heart intelligence concept and model developed by Doc Lew Childre [3,4] (see also contributions by Rollin McCraty and Glen Rein in this volume).


This new phenomenon - the DNA phantom effect - was first observed in Moscow at the Russian Academy of Sciences as a surprise effect during experiments measuring the vibrational modes of DNA in solution using a sophisticated and expensive "MALVERN" laser photon correlation spectrometer (LPCS) [5].

 

These effects were analyzed and interpreted by Gariaev and Poponin [6].

The new feature that makes this discovery distinctly different from many other previously undertaken attempts to measure and identify subtle energy fields [1] is that the field of the DNA phantom has the ability to be coupled to conventional electromagnetic fields of laser radiation and as a consequence, it can be reliably detected and positively identified using standard optical techniques.

Furthermore, it seems very plausible that the DNA phantom effect is an example of subtle energy manifestation in which direct human influence is not involved.

 

These experimental data provide us not only quantitative data concerning the coupling constant between the DNA phantom field and the electromagnetic field of the laser light but also provides qualitative and quantitative information about the nonlinear dynamics of the phantom DNA fields.

 

Note that both types of data are crucial for the development of a new unified nonlinear quantum field theory which must include the physical theory of consciousness and should be based on a precise quantitative background.
 

 

 


RESULTS


The background leading to the discovery of the DNA phantom and a description of the experimental set up and conditions will be helpful.

 

A block diagram of the laser photon correlation spectrometer used in these experiments is presented in Figure 1 below.

 

 
(See link for pictures)


 

 

In each set of experimental measurements with DNA samples, several double control measurements are performed.

 

These measurements are performed prior to the DNA being placed in the scattering chamber. When the scattering chamber of the LPCS is void of physical DNA, and neither are there are any phantom DNA fields present, the autocorrelation function of scattered light looks like the one shown in Figure 2a.

 

This typical control plot represents only background random noise counts of the photomultiplier. Note that the intensity of the background noise counts is very small and the distribution of the number of counts per channel is close to random.

 

Figure 2b demonstrates a typical time autocorrelation function when a physical DNA sample is placed in the scattering chamber, and typically has the shape of an oscillatory and slowly exponentially decaying function.

 

When the DNA is removed from the scattering chamber, one anticipates that the autocorrelation function will be the same as before the DNA was placed in the scattering chamber.

 

Surprisingly and counter-intuitively it turns out that the autocorrelation function measured just after the removal of the DNA from the scattering chamber looks distinctly different from the one obtained before the DNA was placed in the chamber.

 

Two examples of the autocorrelation functions measured just after the removal of the physical DNA are shown in Figures 2c and d.



After duplicating this many times and checking the equipment in every conceivable way, we were forced to accept the working hypothesis that some new field structure is being excited from the physical vacuums.


We termed this the DNA phantom in order to emphasize that its origin is related with the physical DNA. We have not yet observed this effect with other substances in the chamber.

 

After the discovery of this effect we began a more rigorous and continuous study of this phenomena. We have found that, as long as the space in the scattering chamber is not disturbed, we are able to measure this effect for long periods of time. In several cases we have observed it for up to a month. It is important to emphasize that two conditions are necessary in order to observe the DNA phantoms.

 

The first is the presence of the DNA molecule and the second is the exposure of the DNA to weak coherent laser radiation. This last condition has been shown to work with two different frequencies of laser radiation.

Perhaps the most important finding of these experiments is that they provide an opportunity to study the vacuum substructure on strictly scientific and quantitative grounds. This is possible due to the phantom field's intrinsic ability to couple with conventional electromagnetic fields. The value of the coupling constant between the DNA phantom field and the electromagnetic field of the laser radiation can be estimated from the intensity of scattered light.

 

The first preliminary set of experiments carried out in Moscow and Stanford have allowed us to reliably detect the phantom effect

 

However, more measurements of the light scattering from the DNA phantom fields are necessary for a more precise determination of the value of the EMF-DNA phantom field coupling constant.
 

 

 


THEORY


It is fortunate that the experimental data provides us with qualitative and quantitative information about the nonlinear dynamical properties of the phantom DNA fields.

 

Namely, these experimental data suggest that localized excitations of DNA phantom fields are long living and can exist in non-moving and slowly propagating states. This type of behavior is distinctly different from the behavior demonstrated by other well known nonlinear localized excitations such as solitons which are currently considered to be the best explanation of how vibrational energy propagates through the DNA.

It is a remarkable and striking coincidence that a new class of localized solutions to anharmonic Fermi-Pasta-Ulam lattice (FPU) - nonlinear localized excitations (NLE), which have been recently obtained [7], demonstrate very similar dynamical features to those of the DNA phantom. Nonlinear localized excitations predicted by the FPU model also have unusually long life-times.

 

Furthermore, they can exist in both stationary or slowly propagating forms. In Figure 3, one example of a NLE is shown which illustrates three stationary localized excitations generated by numerical simulation using the FPU model [7]. It is worthy to note that this NLE has a surprisingly long life-time.

 

Here, we present only one of the many possible examples of the patterns for stationary excitations which are theoretically predicted.

 

Slowly propagating and long lived NLE are also predicted by this theory. Note that the FPU model can successfully explain the diversity and main features of the DNA phantom dynamical patterns. This model is suggested as the basis for a more general nonlinear quantum theory which may explain many of the observed subtle energy phenomena and eventually could provide a physical theory of consciousness.

According to our current hypothesis, the DNA phantom effect may be interpreted as a manifestation of a new physical vacuum substructure which has been previously overlooked. It appears that this substructure can be excited from the physical vacuum in a range of energies close to zero energy provided certain specific conditions are fulfilled which are specified above.

Furthermore, one can suggest that the DNA phantom effect is a specific example of a more general category of electromagnetic phantom effects [8].


This suggests that the electromagnetic phantom effect is a more fundamental phenomenon which can be used to explain other observed phantom effects including the phantom leaf effect and the phantom limb [9].

 



References

1. W.A. Tiller. What Are Subtle Energies? Journal of Scientific Exploration. Vol.7, p.293-304 (1993).
2. G. Rein and R. McCraty. Structural Changes in Water and DNA Associated with New Physiologically Measured States. Journal of Scientific Exploration. Vol.8, 3 p.438 (1994).
3. D.L. Childre. Self Empowerment. Boulder Creek: Planetary Publications, 1992.
4. S. Paddison. The Hidden Power of the Heart. Boulder Creek: Planetary Publications, 1992.
5. P.P. Gariaev, K.V. Grigor'ev, A.A. Vasil'ev, V.P. Poponin and V.A. Shcheglov. Investigation of the Fluctuation Dynamics of DNA Solutions by Laser Correlation Spectroscopy. Bulletin of the Lebedev Physics Institute, n. 11-12, p. 23-30 (1992).
6. P.P. Gariaev and V.P. Poponin. Vacuum DNA phantom effect in vitro and its possible rational explanation. Nanobiology 1995 (in press).
7. V.P. Poponin. Modeling of NLE dynamics in one dimensional anharmonic FPU-lattice. Physics Letters A. (in press).

8. V. Tatur. The secrets of new thinking. Progress Publisher, Moscow, 1990, 200 p. (Russian).
9. J. K. Chouldhury et al., J. Inst. Eng. (India). 1979, v. 60, Pt EL3, p. 61-73.

 

[Alexandros Iowno [JG]]

Please stick this to announcements