Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Occult properties of our planet Earth/Terra?

Jrvan

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2020
Messages
2,006
I'm very curious about the occult nature of our planet, its energies, rulerships, etc... The other planets of our solar system rule parts of the human soul for example. So does our home planet of Earth rule any parts of the soul among other things? Or does it not affect us in the same way because it's not in the sky for us? If it doesn't affect us for that reason, then would it affect us if we lived on Mars for example?

These are the questions that go through my mind regarding it. Did the ancients have knowledge pertaining to this, and it has been lost?

I really want to know more about this. Does anyone know something about it?
 
Being it is EArth, and we are also the satanic seed, this planet is the basis of our manifested material body.

The whole earth is an ecosystem and it is fully alive, as much as we are inside as well, animated by life.

So I think that Earth rules the direct material body as a whole.
 
NakedPluto said:
Being it is EArth, and we are also the satanic seed, this planet is the basis of our manifested material body.

The whole earth is an ecosystem and it is fully alive, as much as we are inside as well, animated by life.

So I think that Earth rules the direct material body as a whole.

I know the earth element itself also deals with that which is interesting that they share the name. Do you think its this planet specifically that rules that part of the soul (I consider the body part of the soul), or would that be other life sustaining planets which rule it as well?
 
jrvan said:
I'm very curious about the occult nature of our planet, its energies, rulerships, etc... The other planets of our solar system rule parts of the human soul for example. So does our home planet of Earth rule any parts of the soul among other things? Or does it not affect us in the same way because it's not in the sky for us? If it doesn't affect us for that reason, then would it affect us if we lived on Mars for example?

These are the questions that go through my mind regarding it. Did the ancients have knowledge pertaining to this, and it has been lost?

I really want to know more about this. Does anyone know something about it?

The Gnostics had intimate knowledge of this. Much of it has been lost, destroyed or obfuscated, but I recommend the works of John Lamb Lash here. There is a free course available on his website called "Planetary Tantra" that I believe may be useful to your line of inquiry.

Planetary Tantra course: https://nemeta.org/course/16-planetary-tantra/

Essentially, it is my understanding that we are emanations/expressions of the Goddess herself (the Gnostics referred to her as Gaia-Sophia, Sophia and the Aeon Sophia), the Earth/Gaia being the physical incarnation of her soul. Gaia is a living, breathing animal just like us.

Of course it takes a Father and a Mother to produce a child. The Goddess is the Shakti component of our soul.

Many secrets of this can be revealed through meditation and contemplation on the Yoni, Womb and the powers contained therein.
 
AryanPriest666 said:
The Gnostics had intimate knowledge of this. Much of it has been lost, destroyed or obfuscated, but I recommend the works of John Lamb Lash here. There is a free course available on his website called "Planetary Tantra" that I believe may be useful to your line of inquiry.

Planetary Tantra course: https://nemeta.org/course/16-planetary-tantra/

Essentially, it is my understanding that we are emanations/expressions of the Goddess herself (the Gnostics referred to her as Gaia-Sophia, Sophia and the Aeon Sophia), the Earth/Gaia being the physical incarnation of her soul. Gaia is a living, breathing animal just like us.

Of course it takes a Father and a Mother to produce a child. The Goddess is the Shakti component of our soul.

Many secrets of this can be revealed through meditation and contemplation on the Yoni, Womb and the powers contained therein.

That's certainly interesting. I had assumed all of the planets were essentially alive like that since they have their own energies. For some (((reason))) this is the only one currently supporting life on its back abundantly in our own solar system that we are (to my knowledge) currently aware of. It's pretty much undisputed at this point that Mars at one time sustained life, and there are other life sustaining planets in the solar systems of the cosmos.

So if you lived on one of those other planets then the "earth" beneath your feet would be of Mars for example, and you would see this planet Terra that we live on now as a planetary star in the sky just like we see the other planets in the sky. Would it affect us with its energies and be read in an astrology chart as one of our planets if we lived on Mars and saw Terra in the sky? Would Mars cease being one of our astrological planets in our charts if we lived on Mars and couldn't see it in the sky?

Much to contemplate, much to discover.
 
jrvan said:
It's pretty much undisputed at this point that Mars at one time sustained life, and there are other life sustaining planets in the solar systems of the cosmos.

Undisputed according to who? (((NASA)))? Did you know that "Nasa" in Hebrew means "to deceive"? Any information or "evidence" coming from NASA should be considered highly suspect and subjected to critical scrutiny as they've been caught in several MASSIVE lies and deceptions. I don't want the thread to digress into a "was the moon landing real?!" since anyone with two brain cells can ascertain on their own through independent investigation that clearly it wasn't.
 
AryanPriest666 said:
I don't want the thread to digress into a "was the moon landing real?!"

Well I appreciate that, but now it's probably going to because you threw out bait that's hard for certain people to resist...

I don't want to talk about the Moon landing or NASA. I guess I don't have two brain cells for believing contrary to what you believe, but whatever I'll ignore that too.

There are Gentile scholars who wrote books about Mars, psychics, and also our founder Maxine wrote about Mars and underground bunkers. None of this is even the point though.
 
Planet Earth:

Element - Earth
Zodiac sign - Taurus

If a person was born on Mars, the planet Earth in their natal chart would represent their physical body. It would be home in Taurus, most likely exalted in Virgo.

It makes sense that there could be more issues etc regarding the physical body, as Mars is not the ideal atmosphere for humans to live in and thrive, unlike this planet, which is ideal: all the air to breathe, food grows easily, water is abundant, everything is naturally present here for humans.

And for those born on Mars, the parts ruled by Mars would be a given, just like how the parts ruled by Earth (our physical body) here are a given. As in, a set state: we all have physical bodies, but not all of us have the appropriate baseline amount of Martian energy, unless Mars is well-placed in our charts.

So, those born on Mars would have a set baseline of Martian energy, but what about their physical body? Would it be deemed not possible to give birth on Mars, except for correct timing where the planets (including Earth) are able to compensate in the natal chart?

This could be very creepy, or fascinating. Would the physical body perhaps not be as "dense" as ours is? And extra Martial energy compensating, perhaps making for a new species?

Just some thoughts.
 
jrvan said:
AryanPriest666 said:
I don't want the thread to digress into a "was the moon landing real?!"

Well I appreciate that, but now it's probably going to because you threw out bait that's hard for certain people to resist...

I don't want to talk about the Moon landing or NASA. I guess I don't have two brain cells for believing contrary to what you believe, but whatever I'll ignore that too.

There are Gentile scholars who wrote books about Mars, psychics, and also our founder Maxine wrote about Mars and underground bunkers. None of this is even the point though.

It's okay. I didn't mean to insult you. You're free to believe what you will. I simply advocate for the critical examination of evidence and the application of logic with gratuitous amounts of discernment. I have little use for "belief" these days.

Just look at how much retarded shit the masses BELIEVE nowadays. How much good has their belief done for us? Xtianity, islam, 1000 genders and the cult of the spooky deadly virus for example. They're all BELIEVERS. But what do they KNOW? Most of them know very very little. They just hear what some "authority" figure says and go "oh wow, so true! I will now allow this information I just heard on the TV to influence my decision making process and affect my life!" This way of being is extraordinarily dangerous and those people are easy prey. Don't be easy prey. Be the impossible prey.

Belief is mostly childish and has limited usefulness... what can you prove? What do you KNOW? What can you PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt?
 
AryanPriest666 said:
jrvan said:
AryanPriest666 said:
I don't want the thread to digress into a "was the moon landing real?!"

Well I appreciate that, but now it's probably going to because you threw out bait that's hard for certain people to resist...

I don't want to talk about the Moon landing or NASA. I guess I don't have two brain cells for believing contrary to what you believe, but whatever I'll ignore that too.

There are Gentile scholars who wrote books about Mars, psychics, and also our founder Maxine wrote about Mars and underground bunkers. None of this is even the point though.

It's okay. I didn't mean to insult you. You're free to believe what you will. I simply advocate for the critical examination of evidence and the application of logic with gratuitous amounts of discernment. I have little use for "belief" these days.

Just look at how much retarded shit the masses BELIEVE nowadays. How much good has their belief done for us? Xtianity, islam, 1000 genders and the cult of the spooky deadly virus for example. They're all BELIEVERS. But what do they KNOW? Most of them know very very little. They just hear what some "authority" figure says and go "oh wow, so true! I will now allow this information I just heard on the TV to influence my decision making process and affect my life!" This way of being is extraordinarily dangerous and those people are easy prey. Don't be easy prey. Be the impossible prey.

Belief is mostly childish and has limited usefulness... what can you prove? What do you KNOW? What can you PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt?

I'm not a scientist, and I don't know as much about science as professional scientists. What I know is that someone has the right idea, and someone has the wrong idea. If I want any sort of axiom at all to start with in order to think about things then I have to believe someone, and that someone for me is Satan and his servants (as it says in the Al Jilwah IIRC about trusting in Him and His servants which would include clergy of the JoS). Others can make their cases with all of the hot air and conviction in the world, and they can even sound convincing to people who are ignorant and naive, and they may even say that they have proven their claims. Flat Earthers are like this, and I looked into the Flat Earth Society once upon a time. They're very sure of themselves and their data, as are their followers. But that doesn't mean their claims are true. Sometimes pure logic falls short of discovering the Truth. Sometimes you need more than just logic. I don't believe flat earthers, and they also rip on NASA and claim the Moon landing was fake. As I said before, I really don't care whether it happened or not, and it's not a big deal to me. It's not going to affect my life one way or the other if they landed on the Moon or not. It doesn't change other facts or hold implications that others would think it does. It doesn't magically make planets flat if no Moon landing happened, and I'm definitely not going back to church if they come out and say it was a hoax (like these idiots want me to).

When I tried asking Satan if the Earth was flat years ago, I was told otherwise. Do with that what you want, and you certainly don't need to take my word for it. I never asked Him about the Moon landing because I don't care. It has no bearing on whether or not Mars once supported life, and I, for my own reasons independent of NASA, personally believe that Mars did support life. I'm not going to just write off what Maxine said about Mars being nuked just because she didn't waste her time trying to prove it. She said she received this information from our Gods, and I trust her experience as a psychic and as a student of the Gods. I believe her, and that's my choice. Everyone else can do what they want. I don't want to stay stuck at point zero knowing nothing just because I wait around for evidence that the jews will never allow to see the light of day, so I'm fine with leaps of faith when it comes to beings I trust. The Pyramids point to the Orion constellation as the home of the Gods, and I believe the Gods live there. I don't believe my ancient ancestors were crazy silly lunatics who built great structures and revered specific stars for no reason. I believe in what they tried to pass down to me.
 
Lydia [JG said:
" post_id=405834 time=1670935972 user_id=57]
Planet Earth:

Element - Earth
Zodiac sign - Taurus

If a person was born on Mars, the planet Earth in their natal chart would represent their physical body. It would be home in Taurus, most likely exalted in Virgo.

It makes sense that there could be more issues etc regarding the physical body, as Mars is not the ideal atmosphere for humans to live in and thrive, unlike this planet, which is ideal: all the air to breathe, food grows easily, water is abundant, everything is naturally present here for humans.

And for those born on Mars, the parts ruled by Mars would be a given, just like how the parts ruled by Earth (our physical body) here are a given. As in, a set state: we all have physical bodies, but not all of us have the appropriate baseline amount of Martian energy, unless Mars is well-placed in our charts.

So, those born on Mars would have a set baseline of Martian energy, but what about their physical body? Would it be deemed not possible to give birth on Mars, except for correct timing where the planets (including Earth) are able to compensate in the natal chart?

This could be very creepy, or fascinating. Would the physical body perhaps not be as "dense" as ours is? And extra Martial energy compensating, perhaps making for a new species?

Just some thoughts.

Very thought provoking. I'm even more curious and thirsty for answers now.
 
jrvan said:
NakedPluto said:
Being it is EArth, and we are also the satanic seed, this planet is the basis of our manifested material body.

The whole earth is an ecosystem and it is fully alive, as much as we are inside as well, animated by life.

So I think that Earth rules the direct material body as a whole.

I know the earth element itself also deals with that which is interesting that they share the name. Do you think its this planet specifically that rules that part of the soul (I consider the body part of the soul), or would that be other life sustaining planets which rule it as well?

I think there's a specific type of planet for our kind of souls and bodies, more than this would be to guess.

Earth is like the home for the other planets to inhabit their manifestations, yet the home is the compass and the center point of all of it.
 
Lydia [JG said:
" post_id=405834 time=1670935972 user_id=57]
Planet Earth:

Element - Earth
Zodiac sign - Taurus

If a person was born on Mars, the planet Earth in their natal chart would represent their physical body. It would be home in Taurus, most likely exalted in Virgo.

It makes sense that there could be more issues etc regarding the physical body, as Mars is not the ideal atmosphere for humans to live in and thrive, unlike this planet, which is ideal: all the air to breathe, food grows easily, water is abundant, everything is naturally present here for humans.

And for those born on Mars, the parts ruled by Mars would be a given, just like how the parts ruled by Earth (our physical body) here are a given. As in, a set state: we all have physical bodies, but not all of us have the appropriate baseline amount of Martian energy, unless Mars is well-placed in our charts.

So, those born on Mars would have a set baseline of Martian energy, but what about their physical body? Would it be deemed not possible to give birth on Mars, except for correct timing where the planets (including Earth) are able to compensate in the natal chart?

This could be very creepy, or fascinating. Would the physical body perhaps not be as "dense" as ours is? And extra Martial energy compensating, perhaps making for a new species?

Just some thoughts.

That's very interesting
 
NakedPluto said:
Lydia [JG said:
" post_id=405834 time=1670935972 user_id=57]
...
...

I enjoyed reading that, and I believe it makes sense.

I have found it interesting that Earth is found between Mars and Venus within the solar system, suggesting a place where life would be created.

Without Taurus energy, this would mean it is harder for the patterns of life to manifest. Everything would be more erratic and harder to manifest in a stable manner. Beyond obvious physical substance, this would also manifest socially, such as cultures or philosophy having a harder time keeping to traditions.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top