FancyMancy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2017
- Messages
- 7,029
Latest News
"No-one is forcing you to get the vaccination/s" - maybe except 'Harris for President', etc.
- Thread starter FancyMancy
- Start date
Dragonheart666
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
- Messages
- 1,821
Okay. Thank you for sharing this information.
DisillusionedCitizen
Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2022
- Messages
- 454
During the CONVID Scamdemic, people who supported vaccinations were so certain in their beliefs about vaccines helping people, had so much confidence that doubting/questioning it would be considered a heresy; given that the CONVID vaccination campaign was government-supported, anyone who who proved that vaccines caused health problems were considered people who posted "misleading information," or more accurately, heretics.
There's a bloody-minded logic surrounding this: As confident as vaccine supporters were, they were ignorant of the health problems happening until it was too late, and even then, they still believe they had CONVID. With this in mind, I've come to the conclusion that more certain a person is in an ignorant belief, the less likely they'll doubt and question the deceit; psychologically, confidence and certainty provide a mental and philosophical sense of comfort in their decisions and philosophies, leaving them woefully unprepared for the moment beliefs are proven wrong. With the CONVID Scamdemic, everyone, who opposed vaccination were considered to be what I would call "medical heretics," for lack of a better term. When I did some research and realized Dr. Fauci was a Jesuit (Of course, he's really a Jew using a Jesuit as a cover), I've come the realization that what is limited to religion has bled over to other aspects of civilization (Political, Legal, and the aforementioned medical affairs, to name a few.).
Another example of this phenomenon is with pacifists. A pacifist is someone who condemns all forms of violence (Wars, shootings, duels, and, if taken to a logical extreme, self-defense) under any circumstance, believing that all matters must be settle peacefully. Most of the pacifists successes are unsystematic, and these large amounts of successful moments feed the pacifist's certainty in their beliefs, and as a result, they won't doubt their beliefs very often. Sure, some pacifists/anti-war activists will hurt an aggressor in self-defense, but they certainly won't kill anyone, simply because they believe with utmost certainty that life is precious. Since pacifists/anti-war activists are certain they can settle things peacefully most of the time, they seem to be the most susceptible to deception and betrayal. The deceiver/scammer/betrayer don't have to enact their scheme immediately (especially if they present themselves as philanthropists), and thus the pacifist will see the deception/betrayal coming so easily due to trust and persuasion providing certainty into their belief. And once the trickery/treachery happens, they'll typically hold the trickster/double-dealer accountable, but will not doubt their beliefs one bit. This is reasonable, but the pacifist/anti-war activist/conscientious objector will be so confident in the immediate results of their actions they've never once questioned it even after the trickery/betrayal is done. A con-game is called a con-game for a reason; the full term is called confidence game. As it implies, the con-man, with very good and careful persuasion, exploits not just the trust their victim has in them, but their ignorance in tandem with the confidence the victim has in the scammer's ideas; persuasive communication can make a more effective bait for the con to be more successful.
The Jew does not fear a pacifist. The Jew, As they're increasingly hated around the world, is very much aware that they lasted as long as they did thanks to pacifists; they know that, since a pacifist believes with massive certainty that life is precious, that a pacifist won't allow anyone to be murdered or executed, regardless if they're a rapist/pedophile/child murderer, for the pacifist/anti-war activist/conscientious objector is vastly confident that their compassion, their actions, and their speeches would change the Jews mind. With pacifists being confident in their beliefs, the Jews knew they were protected and they, in turn, pretended to pacifists to lure people into a false sense of security.
It's not wrong to be confident or have confidence in oneself, but confidence has flaws very few people are willing to discuss.
There's a bloody-minded logic surrounding this: As confident as vaccine supporters were, they were ignorant of the health problems happening until it was too late, and even then, they still believe they had CONVID. With this in mind, I've come to the conclusion that more certain a person is in an ignorant belief, the less likely they'll doubt and question the deceit; psychologically, confidence and certainty provide a mental and philosophical sense of comfort in their decisions and philosophies, leaving them woefully unprepared for the moment beliefs are proven wrong. With the CONVID Scamdemic, everyone, who opposed vaccination were considered to be what I would call "medical heretics," for lack of a better term. When I did some research and realized Dr. Fauci was a Jesuit (Of course, he's really a Jew using a Jesuit as a cover), I've come the realization that what is limited to religion has bled over to other aspects of civilization (Political, Legal, and the aforementioned medical affairs, to name a few.).
Another example of this phenomenon is with pacifists. A pacifist is someone who condemns all forms of violence (Wars, shootings, duels, and, if taken to a logical extreme, self-defense) under any circumstance, believing that all matters must be settle peacefully. Most of the pacifists successes are unsystematic, and these large amounts of successful moments feed the pacifist's certainty in their beliefs, and as a result, they won't doubt their beliefs very often. Sure, some pacifists/anti-war activists will hurt an aggressor in self-defense, but they certainly won't kill anyone, simply because they believe with utmost certainty that life is precious. Since pacifists/anti-war activists are certain they can settle things peacefully most of the time, they seem to be the most susceptible to deception and betrayal. The deceiver/scammer/betrayer don't have to enact their scheme immediately (especially if they present themselves as philanthropists), and thus the pacifist will see the deception/betrayal coming so easily due to trust and persuasion providing certainty into their belief. And once the trickery/treachery happens, they'll typically hold the trickster/double-dealer accountable, but will not doubt their beliefs one bit. This is reasonable, but the pacifist/anti-war activist/conscientious objector will be so confident in the immediate results of their actions they've never once questioned it even after the trickery/betrayal is done. A con-game is called a con-game for a reason; the full term is called confidence game. As it implies, the con-man, with very good and careful persuasion, exploits not just the trust their victim has in them, but their ignorance in tandem with the confidence the victim has in the scammer's ideas; persuasive communication can make a more effective bait for the con to be more successful.
The Jew does not fear a pacifist. The Jew, As they're increasingly hated around the world, is very much aware that they lasted as long as they did thanks to pacifists; they know that, since a pacifist believes with massive certainty that life is precious, that a pacifist won't allow anyone to be murdered or executed, regardless if they're a rapist/pedophile/child murderer, for the pacifist/anti-war activist/conscientious objector is vastly confident that their compassion, their actions, and their speeches would change the Jews mind. With pacifists being confident in their beliefs, the Jews knew they were protected and they, in turn, pretended to pacifists to lure people into a false sense of security.
It's not wrong to be confident or have confidence in oneself, but confidence has flaws very few people are willing to discuss.
Similar threads
