National Socialists were not fascists. National Socialism is far more related to the concept and the existence of the Race, while Fascism is mostly focused on what we call as "Ultranationalism", and disregards many important aspects of National Socialism. Fundamentally, these are very close, but there are defining lines which make National Socialism higher.
In National Socialist thought even the "State" is just a manifestation of the collective of the people based on race, and that's why it has any importance. The state on it's own end means nothing if it doesn't take care of the people or help them survive on the racial basis. Fascism can be applied in any "Ultranationalist" ideal, where the main objective is to promote what people call the State.
Social policy in the National Socialist party had to do with the race and taking care of your own people for improvement, not just creating idle and disabled open mouths that feed from the State, and not idle ideological grounds of merely doing it to "Follow an ideology". It was based on the realism of taking care of your race. Instead of bolstering weakness and disability as "Socialism" intends to do today, and in complete opposition to the racial blindness factor, it did the exact reverse. NS to Socialism is what proper Satanic charity is to Jewish charity. They are totally antithetic in their essence, aims, ways of execution, and the title is only a random overlap.
I understand what you mean by the statement but it requires less observation through the glasses and more through the microscope, there are many similarities, but also very important differences.
Regardless the Duce had a good ideology for the time and it would be more than enough to help Italy and restore it to glory, and the wave of the racial improvement and human improvement aspect was only getting born back then, with few countries applying these principles by "name". There weren't like tens of millions of non Italians in Italy back then, so "Statism" made sense even from a racial perspective. Most applied these without naming these as racial principles. Mussolini did not in particular take much interest in racial aspects fundamentally however.
Fascism is a word that has now lost content due to poor understanding of the term, and is mostly related to just far right stuff and other related poorly understood ideals.
In regards to your feedback, even if it had a point, it was miscommunication. This created what you saw. Also, Mercury Retrograde helps in misunderstandings.
Fascist Pagan said:
Ol argedco luciftias said:
And who are you? Shannon has been here for years, you've been here for only a few days, so who's the one who really has to learn their place? It's not Shannon.
What do those links go to in his signiture? I'm not going to click them because they might go somewhere bad, but I have seen links looking very similar to those in comments written by russian-language bot accounts.
And "fascist pagan" for a name, like a projection of what you think we are and what you think would help you blend in. Very sterile and robotic sounding name. The leftists always accuse everybody to be fascists, but it is the left themselves who are the true fascists. Antifa is the perfect example, stands for anti-fascist, but Antifa are actually the worst ones themselves, antifa are the ones using mob riots and intimidation to try to shut down all opposing opinions. We are not about fascism here in any form, Mussolini was dumb and did a lot of mistakes.
Nazis were clerical fascists. The used the name national Socialism to appeal to the working class because of the in indoctrination wide spread by Karl Marx. Yes they had a lot of socialized features, but they were fascist. That’s just the way it is.. I’ve been with the Joy of Satan for years. This account is just a new. Come out guns blazing rather than in a mature place of inquiry. Relax