Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Fossil fuel - The dark blood of the Earth?

Joined
Sep 20, 2021
Messages
421
I have heard that Fossil fuel is really the blood of the Earth.
Earth is a living Organism and has blood, like us.
Their official story of Fossil fuel sounds weird anyway, dinosaur bones that transformed to dark liquid over time?
I have never seen something dead transform into dark liquid over time, even after many years.
When they find Fossil fuel they literally call it a "vein".
It makes sense, jews are parasites, they use the human blood and earths blood as a resource.
They created artificial society in a way that we have to use it too and make us pay for it, when we could use alternatives.
What are your opinions?
 
SyrArisMarsMartin said:
I have heard that Fossil fuel is really the blood of the Earth.

Don´t think so, I mean what should it sustain?(Blood sustains body cells)



SyrArisMarsMartin said:
Earth is a living Organism and has blood, like us.


It is a living organism if looked at it in a greater picture.


SyrArisMarsMartin said:
Their official story of Fossil fuel sounds weird anyway, dinosaur bones that transformed to dark liquid over time?

Well it did need thousands of years with pressure, what they lye about, is how much off it is left, plenty, probably some percent of it gets regenerated with more carbon composites transforming through pressure/time every year.


SyrArisMarsMartin said:
I have never seen something dead transform into dark liquid over time, even after many years.

It needs pressure (probably without oxygen).


SyrArisMarsMartin said:
When they find Fossil fuel they literally call it a "vein".
Some peope call thear lovers honey, this does not mean they are honey (bees).


SyrArisMarsMartin said:
It makes sense, jews are parasites, they use the human blood and earths blood as a resource.
They created artificial society in a way that we have to use it too and make us pay for it, when we could use alternatives.

Besides Tesla free energy, any other possability, does also need earth resources/pollutes earth one way or another, we have to find the best solution depending on location, devices etc individually.
 
Fuchs said:
SyrArisMarsMartin said:
I have heard that Fossil fuel is really the blood of the Earth.

Don´t think so, I mean what should it sustain?(Blood sustains body cells)
...

Hello Fuchs,
something off topic if it is okay. I see you are familiar with runes, could you validate this site for me?
It deals with runes and i want to know if it is legitimate or misinformation.
https://zoopark63.ru/en/zashchitnye...-zashchity-ot-vragov-i-nedobrozhelatelei-kak/
Thanks
 
I believe fossil fuels are a reptilian technology and harmful to the earth and vibrations and environment of our planet. They also allow jews to make a lot of money off the backs of the world.

There really are much better things but of course the Jews prevent looking into it that much.

I don't know if electric cars really are that much better to be honest so not going to comment on that. I think in some ways they are but others they are worse.

We need other things. Low cost or cost free would be great. It even is possible to use water or various wastes as a fuel in a form of recycling as far as i am aware. Why are we still using this.

The Jews is the answer.
 
I have my own view on fossil fuels. Common sense and a bit of knowledge is enough to disprove the dinosaur bone theory. Neither am I fan or a believer of the “muh huh fossil fuels destroy the planet” theories

There was a very well written and credible website, that explained the phenomenom of fossil fuels, in the end, it was enough evidence to make me believe that “fossils fuels” are renewable to a degree and it’s a process that’s happening continuously, because of the enormous pressures and heat under the earths surface, but I never saw that website again, even after a deep search in the web.

The same thing was explained for natural gas sources like butane or propane, they’re not a “finite” or a fixed amount, they’re continuously being generated by the earth, at a rate that isn’t million of years, of course, to me this has a very good probability of being true.

But the point is, the fact Jews profit from oil doesn’t make them the harmful crap we’re forced to believe, neither are wars fought because of oil in the Middle East. We all know recent wars are caused by (((them))), crude oil is just a scapegoat and a fake ass reason why.

I’m not saying it’s the ultimate source of energy, but it does the job
 
V12-POWER said:
I have my own view on fossil fuels. Common sense and a bit of knowledge is enough to disprove the dinosaur bone theory. Neither am I fan or a believer of the “muh huh fossil fuels destroy the planet” theories

There was a very well written and credible website, that explained the phenomenom of fossil fuels, in the end, it was enough evidence to make me believe that “fossils fuels” are renewable to a degree and it’s a process that’s happening continuously, because of the enormous pressures and heat under the earths surface, but I never saw that website again, even after a deep search in the web.

The same thing was explained for natural gas sources like butane or propane, they’re not a “finite” or a fixed amount, they’re continuously being generated by the earth, at a rate that isn’t million of years, of course, to me this has a very good probability of being true.

But the point is, the fact Jews profit from oil doesn’t make them the harmful crap we’re forced to believe, neither are wars fought because of oil in the Middle East. We all know recent wars are caused by (((them))), crude oil is just a scapegoat and a fake ass reason why.

I’m not saying it’s the ultimate source of energy, but it does the job

smog-bj.jpg


Our planet makes a frowny face ☹ about fossil fuels.

Can you imagine what an actually clean nice environment outside would be like. People being more in tune with nature and development of technology that is in harmony with nature.

That would be super awesome.
 
SyrArisMarsMartin said:
Fuchs said:
SyrArisMarsMartin said:
I have heard that Fossil fuel is really the blood of the Earth.

Don´t think so, I mean what should it sustain?(Blood sustains body cells)
...

Hello Fuchs,
something off topic if it is okay. I see you are familiar with runes, could you validate this site for me?
It deals with runes and i want to know if it is legitimate or misinformation.
https://zoopark63.ru/en/zashchitnye...-zashchity-ot-vragov-i-nedobrozhelatelei-kak/
Thanks

You can get good info about the runes from The Runic Kabalah pdf, especially if you read the sources from which HPS Maxine took the info, keep in mind not all info in the books are perfect, read with a satanic eye, would not waste my time with other sites/sources :

[also you never know if the site does spread malicious software by clicking, one can use sandboxie to prevent this reaching your system: https://www.sandboxie.com/ ]


From here: https://satanslibrary.org/Pdf_Library.html


The Runic Kabalah.pdf

https://web.archive.org/web/20150330181914/http://webzoom.freewebs.com/spiritualwarfare666/The%20Runic%20Kabalah.pdf

References:

Teutonic Magic, the Magical and Spiritual Practices of the Germanic People by
Kveldulf Gundarsson ©1990

The Secret King: Karl Maria Wiligut: Himmler's Lord of the Runes by Karl Maria
Wiligut; translated edition by Stephen E Flowers; Michael Moynihan

The Secret of the Runes by Guido Von List; translated edition by Stephen E
Flowers

Futhark, a Handbook of Rune Magic by Edred Thorsson ©1984
 
slyscorpion said:
V12-POWER said:
I have my own view on fossil fuels. Common sense and a bit of knowledge is enough to disprove the dinosaur bone theory. Neither am I fan or a believer of the “muh huh fossil fuels destroy the planet” theories

There was a very well written and credible website, that explained the phenomenom of fossil fuels, in the end, it was enough evidence to make me believe that “fossils fuels” are renewable to a degree and it’s a process that’s happening continuously, because of the enormous pressures and heat under the earths surface, but I never saw that website again, even after a deep search in the web.

The same thing was explained for natural gas sources like butane or propane, they’re not a “finite” or a fixed amount, they’re continuously being generated by the earth, at a rate that isn’t million of years, of course, to me this has a very good probability of being true.

But the point is, the fact Jews profit from oil doesn’t make them the harmful crap we’re forced to believe, neither are wars fought because of oil in the Middle East. We all know recent wars are caused by (((them))), crude oil is just a scapegoat and a fake ass reason why.

I’m not saying it’s the ultimate source of energy, but it does the job

smog-bj.jpg


Our planet makes a frowny face ☹ about fossil fuels.

Can you imagine what an actually clean nice environment outside would be like. People being more in tune with nature and development of technology that is in harmony with nature.

That would be super awesome.
 
V12-POWER said:
slyscorpion said:
V12-POWER said:
I have my own view on fossil fuels. Common sense and a bit of knowledge is enough to disprove the dinosaur bone theory. Neither am I fan or a believer of the “muh huh fossil fuels destroy the planet” theories

There was a very well written and credible website, that explained the phenomenom of fossil fuels, in the end, it was enough evidence to make me believe that “fossils fuels” are renewable to a degree and it’s a process that’s happening continuously, because of the enormous pressures and heat under the earths surface, but I never saw that website again, even after a deep search in the web.

The same thing was explained for natural gas sources like butane or propane, they’re not a “finite” or a fixed amount, they’re continuously being generated by the earth, at a rate that isn’t million of years, of course, to me this has a very good probability of being true.

But the point is, the fact Jews profit from oil doesn’t make them the harmful crap we’re forced to believe, neither are wars fought because of oil in the Middle East. We all know recent wars are caused by (((them))), crude oil is just a scapegoat and a fake ass reason why.

I’m not saying it’s the ultimate source of energy, but it does the job

smog-bj.jpg


Our planet makes a frowny face ☹ about fossil fuels.

Can you imagine what an actually clean nice environment outside would be like. People being more in tune with nature and development of technology that is in harmony with nature.

That would be super awesome.

I heared a story of a university researcher who did have the blue print for a 1l /100km=62,5mi. They tryed to assasinate him twice. He couldn´t find a company willing to develop it. Also car charing or smaler cars/bikes, the possabilities are plenty, if you just fokus on one energy source (electric cars) you limit your possability to find the best eco friendly solution.
 
Fossil Fuels = Explosion-based technology.

Perhaps explosion is a bit too extreme for some people. Many ignorantly state bullets(projectiles) are explosion-based or more specifically they are chemically-driven. Bullets are funny in the sense many mistaken them to be explosively driven. They are more chemically driven which releases a loud-discharging sound/blast distinct release akin to the old pre-1970s backfire for exhaust systems. They in essence build up pressure and then there is a discharging effect but the sound is merely a non-explosive discharging sound. It SOUNDS like a explosion but is not the driving force for them rather the chemical buildup.

I think once higher anti-knock and anti-lead fuels were created backfires all have ceased except in as much damaged or about to be damaged engines or expulsion of used fuel i.e. exhaust issues.

The technology you guys keep referring to as clean or cleaner or outright clean.

The human equivalent at our level is electric-technology hell I'll even give it to the hybrid technology. Unfortunately like one member replied a few months back fuels of ANY kind in current Earth is akin to a necessary evil. Either we take fossil fuels that are bad but not horrible or we go into electric which is bad but not horrible. Either we stay with fossil fuel or we go hybrid or full electric and get jew'd along the entire way cause it's just another machnicarium of the enemy. There is no one pulling the strings for the type of fuel that gets people killed even the most die-hard shabbos who cares about the environment for the hyrbid/electric properties would probably kill someone just for financial benefits of this. Both hybrid and electric produce very toxic products and byproducts in manufacture and maintenance of the vehicle.

The exact diametric opposite would be IMPLOSION-Based technology.

Much of this has to do with how nature and Vimanas work. Unfortunately the mercury engines of Vimanas aren't suitable as factors to do with car engines. Because it produces anti-gravity, not nice if your driving and all of a sudden hydroplane out of the road and crash into something.

But the Mercury or even Red Mercury is a battery source type. Mercury might be dirty i.e. toxic but for batteries is quite suitable for long term power requirements. Another battery that is far superior is Plasma batteries. I recall some JoS members who study various subjects mention they practically last forever once charged.

Once a plasma battery is charged it just stays charged. Unfortunately the issue comes do we charge and forget or do we keep the engine. For example I said mercury engine for Vimana but the engines cars would use would either be a Tesla Free-Energy Glovebox compartment vacuum tube generator or a Solid-State engine.

In essence a postulation pops up if a plasma battery lasts until it breaks down from entropy after some lifetime. Does that mean it needs an engine. In essence the engine produces power but the battery holds the power and the plasma battery doesn't drain rather it produces the same power output always. Then what use is the need for the engine. Unless of course there is a safety or the engine is used to re-generate power or the engine is used for higher power output. In essence it's the vimana issue, Astral projection wise in a engineering aspect the ultimate speed in the Universe is instantaneous transmission with no transmission time in between. But in the physical realm such speed for a vimana would prove non-existent even the Gods don't have that speed yet UNLESS the Universe is so massive that even this ultimate speed is just too slow to travel without spending a few decades traveling through.

As such if the Gods have been traveling to Earth for some time and it takes them a few decades. Then we can assume their Astral projection is instant as fast as fuck. But their vimanas are flying several hundred or several thousand or several tens of thousands of miles per second past the speed of light. Thus the plasma battery would be needed to hold the charge but if the vimana wishes to drive at faster speeds it needs to pump the energy into the battery to super-, turbo-charge the vimana.

Same theory applies to vehicle i.e. reflective engineering. What one branch of science does the other branch can have similar properties. In the words of Jessie from Breaking Bad "Yeah science, bitch".

So in essence if a plasma battery can make a car travel 100ish-200ish or so MPH does it require the solid-state free-energy engine. In essence what does the engine do if the battery takes care of the power for the foreseeable future. I'm not saying eliminate the engine nor make the engine a slave to the battery. But in essence it comes to an interesting aspect whereby if the battery is powerful enough then what use does the engine have if the speeds of higher levels aren't as necessary in achieving rather the baseline speed is perfectly fine for most people. A car should be in modern times fast enough to accelerate and dodge danger but slow enough it's still under control. I highly doubt most people have driven Autobahn raceway speeds where the slightest mistake causes an accident.

Nikolai Tesla in his 1925 New York article mentioned building a wooden box with some copper wires, some metals, about 12 vacuum tubes, and all in about the size of a glovebox hooking it up to a 1920s Pierce Arrow and the interviewer drove him around New York biways going upwards of 96 miles per hour better and more effectively than fossil fuels, gas, diesel, or kerosene or any other fuel back in the 1920s.

Tesla's glovebox generator seemed to output enough energy that only recently have modern motorcycles and cars have reached in the last decade or so especially with this hybrid/electric craze occurring.

In essence if such a small box can produce that much power several tens of horsepower or so making the electrically-modified vehicle hit 96MPH. Then an engine would produce great results.

Obviously efficiency increases overtime for example. Just because a S-S engine would generate high power and travel 150-200MPH effectively for normal every day doesn't mean we can't make it efficient. For example in the last 15 years microchip manufacturers have significantly invested in making things as efficient as possible because in the last 5 years it seems every chip hits a wall of power. For example AMD CPUs are many times more cooler and are known to hit target power envelopes in comparison to their Intel counterparts this is a very known thing in the PC building community.

Same for solid-state engines. Humans doing free-energy would mean that the target goal would be 100% efficiency. For example a full-on efficient chip would be a combination of not just using 100% of the energy to the point the chip remains 100% cool i.e. ambient temperature if something heats it up it's not the chip but the effect of the environment. So the chip is always cool but on top of that uses so little power that the power is microscopic i.e. nanowatts/picowatts etc.etc.

So the entire point of free-energy devices or implosion-energy or Zed-PM(Zero-Point modulator) is to give you enough time to make it 100% efficient.

It also shows you the power it produces because I've theorized in the World of higher civilizations besides small and or large vimanas transporting people to and from various cities and countries. Some people may drive their vehicle and drive a several hundred miles per hour. Obviously going supersonic would be a detriment so vehicles might have a regulator preventing supersonic driving speeds. But certainly a good 500-600MPH drive would be seen as choice for some people who prefer getting to a place with their own vehicle.

So in essence implosion-based technology i.e. spiral energy flow, or Zed-PM, or just in plain spirituality literalized. Was, is, and will always be the future. Fossil fuels should have never been used in any capacity whether to the use of fuels or the use of plastics. It's a polluting technology it's not in line with beings of higher power not even a commercial or industrial application is desired. In essence humanity has been duped into building technology and developing an infrastructure for shekelberging activities. Kill the people who want to help and berg and stein shekels and drain every ounce of product-able sustenance from a society by making everyone your victim of berging and steining shekels from.

In essence fossil fuels in our current society = just another communist duping event for enemy aliens who want to destroy and microchip everyone so that their alien offsprings the kikes extract every ounce of wealth from us while slowly killing us and making money from our suffering. A boxers one-two punch.

The exact opposite is implosion-based free energy devices. And they always were, are, and have been the future in the past. Funny many laugh at the Ancients and the Gods as pathetic things why care about the ancients and Gods when we are modern and have god. And yet these very laughed at concepts which modern man laughs at had all the points in place to take mankind to be SCARY technologically advanced in line with nature and the Gods.

In essence we created an entire industry of anti-God fuels for our detriment because it's good to do stupid shit with resources. In essence every person is just eating shit and wasting time, wasting their lives with non-sense living like an NPC.

Fossil fuel = NPC technology/fuel
Implosion-based/Free energy = Godific technologies
 
Gear88 said:
Fossil Fuels = Explosion-based technology.

Perhaps explosion is a bit too extreme for some people. Many ignorantly state bullets(projectiles) are explosion-based or more specifically they are chemically-driven. Bullets are funny in the sense many mistaken them to be explosively driven. They are more chemically driven which releases a loud-discharging sound/blast distinct release akin to the old pre-1970s backfire for exhaust systems. They in essence build up pressure and then there is a discharging effect but the sound is merely a non-explosive discharging sound. It SOUNDS like a explosion but is not the driving force for them rather the chemical buildup.

I think once higher anti-knock and anti-lead fuels were created backfires all have ceased except in as much damaged or about to be damaged engines or expulsion of used fuel i.e. exhaust issues.

The technology you guys keep referring to as clean or cleaner or outright clean.

The human equivalent at our level is electric-technology hell I'll even give it to the hybrid technology. Unfortunately like one member replied a few months back fuels of ANY kind in current Earth is akin to a necessary evil. Either we take fossil fuels that are bad but not horrible or we go into electric which is bad but not horrible. Either we stay with fossil fuel or we go hybrid or full electric and get jew'd along the entire way cause it's just another machnicarium of the enemy. There is no one pulling the strings for the type of fuel that gets people killed even the most die-hard shabbos who cares about the environment for the hyrbid/electric properties would probably kill someone just for financial benefits of this. Both hybrid and electric produce very toxic products and byproducts in manufacture and maintenance of the vehicle.

The exact diametric opposite would be IMPLOSION-Based technology.

Much of this has to do with how nature and Vimanas work. Unfortunately the mercury engines of Vimanas aren't suitable as factors to do with car engines. Because it produces anti-gravity, not nice if your driving and all of a sudden hydroplane out of the road and crash into something.

But the Mercury or even Red Mercury is a battery source type. Mercury might be dirty i.e. toxic but for batteries is quite suitable for long term power requirements. Another battery that is far superior is Plasma batteries. I recall some JoS members who study various subjects mention they practically last forever once charged.

Once a plasma battery is charged it just stays charged. Unfortunately the issue comes do we charge and forget or do we keep the engine. For example I said mercury engine for Vimana but the engines cars would use would either be a Tesla Free-Energy Glovebox compartment vacuum tube generator or a Solid-State engine.

In essence a postulation pops up if a plasma battery lasts until it breaks down from entropy after some lifetime. Does that mean it needs an engine. In essence the engine produces power but the battery holds the power and the plasma battery doesn't drain rather it produces the same power output always. Then what use is the need for the engine. Unless of course there is a safety or the engine is used to re-generate power or the engine is used for higher power output. In essence it's the vimana issue, Astral projection wise in a engineering aspect the ultimate speed in the Universe is instantaneous transmission with no transmission time in between. But in the physical realm such speed for a vimana would prove non-existent even the Gods don't have that speed yet UNLESS the Universe is so massive that even this ultimate speed is just too slow to travel without spending a few decades traveling through.

As such if the Gods have been traveling to Earth for some time and it takes them a few decades. Then we can assume their Astral projection is instant as fast as fuck. But their vimanas are flying several hundred or several thousand or several tens of thousands of miles per second past the speed of light. Thus the plasma battery would be needed to hold the charge but if the vimana wishes to drive at faster speeds it needs to pump the energy into the battery to super-, turbo-charge the vimana.

Same theory applies to vehicle i.e. reflective engineering. What one branch of science does the other branch can have similar properties. In the words of Jessie from Breaking Bad "Yeah science, bitch".

So in essence if a plasma battery can make a car travel 100ish-200ish or so MPH does it require the solid-state free-energy engine. In essence what does the engine do if the battery takes care of the power for the foreseeable future. I'm not saying eliminate the engine nor make the engine a slave to the battery. But in essence it comes to an interesting aspect whereby if the battery is powerful enough then what use does the engine have if the speeds of higher levels aren't as necessary in achieving rather the baseline speed is perfectly fine for most people. A car should be in modern times fast enough to accelerate and dodge danger but slow enough it's still under control. I highly doubt most people have driven Autobahn raceway speeds where the slightest mistake causes an accident.

Nikolai Tesla in his 1925 New York article mentioned building a wooden box with some copper wires, some metals, about 12 vacuum tubes, and all in about the size of a glovebox hooking it up to a 1920s Pierce Arrow and the interviewer drove him around New York biways going upwards of 96 miles per hour better and more effectively than fossil fuels, gas, diesel, or kerosene or any other fuel back in the 1920s.

Tesla's glovebox generator seemed to output enough energy that only recently have modern motorcycles and cars have reached in the last decade or so especially with this hybrid/electric craze occurring.

In essence if such a small box can produce that much power several tens of horsepower or so making the electrically-modified vehicle hit 96MPH. Then an engine would produce great results.

Obviously efficiency increases overtime for example. Just because a S-S engine would generate high power and travel 150-200MPH effectively for normal every day doesn't mean we can't make it efficient. For example in the last 15 years microchip manufacturers have significantly invested in making things as efficient as possible because in the last 5 years it seems every chip hits a wall of power. For example AMD CPUs are many times more cooler and are known to hit target power envelopes in comparison to their Intel counterparts this is a very known thing in the PC building community.

Same for solid-state engines. Humans doing free-energy would mean that the target goal would be 100% efficiency. For example a full-on efficient chip would be a combination of not just using 100% of the energy to the point the chip remains 100% cool i.e. ambient temperature if something heats it up it's not the chip but the effect of the environment. So the chip is always cool but on top of that uses so little power that the power is microscopic i.e. nanowatts/picowatts etc.etc.

So the entire point of free-energy devices or implosion-energy or Zed-PM(Zero-Point modulator) is to give you enough time to make it 100% efficient.

It also shows you the power it produces because I've theorized in the World of higher civilizations besides small and or large vimanas transporting people to and from various cities and countries. Some people may drive their vehicle and drive a several hundred miles per hour. Obviously going supersonic would be a detriment so vehicles might have a regulator preventing supersonic driving speeds. But certainly a good 500-600MPH drive would be seen as choice for some people who prefer getting to a place with their own vehicle.

So in essence implosion-based technology i.e. spiral energy flow, or Zed-PM, or just in plain spirituality literalized. Was, is, and will always be the future. Fossil fuels should have never been used in any capacity whether to the use of fuels or the use of plastics. It's a polluting technology it's not in line with beings of higher power not even a commercial or industrial application is desired. In essence humanity has been duped into building technology and developing an infrastructure for shekelberging activities. Kill the people who want to help and berg and stein shekels and drain every ounce of product-able sustenance from a society by making everyone your victim of berging and steining shekels from.

In essence fossil fuels in our current society = just another communist duping event for enemy aliens who want to destroy and microchip everyone so that their alien offsprings the kikes extract every ounce of wealth from us while slowly killing us and making money from our suffering. A boxers one-two punch.

The exact opposite is implosion-based free energy devices. And they always were, are, and have been the future in the past. Funny many laugh at the Ancients and the Gods as pathetic things why care about the ancients and Gods when we are modern and have god. And yet these very laughed at concepts which modern man laughs at had all the points in place to take mankind to be SCARY technologically advanced in line with nature and the Gods.

In essence we created an entire industry of anti-God fuels for our detriment because it's good to do stupid shit with resources. In essence every person is just eating shit and wasting time, wasting their lives with non-sense living like an NPC.

Fossil fuel = NPC technology/fuel
Implosion-based/Free energy = Godific technologies

Man I actually read through the whole thing, what the actual fuck are you talking about? I have no idea what your understanding of science is or where you got that information from but none of what your talking about makes any sense.
 
it means you haven't heard of Viktor Schauberger and his discoveries and inventions; he was an important contributor to NS Germany's ufos, today the internet archive has been restored, you can read books about him from there, i'm currently studying them a bit and have got the main idea.
 
while the hate for combustion engines is rampant, let’s remember all the electrogravitic devices and generators from that branch of physics will easily kill you if you’re not careful, even at a distance. In the US army I bet you my 2 balls most of these devices and aircraft’s are handled by the physicists/inventors themselves, not the next block’s mechanic.

just search for the B2 bomber giving shocks to nearby mechanics while on deck, and this a hybrid (uses a turbine engine + electrogravitic drive)

I still think if you’re a farmer or live on a small town/city an ICE is still superior, although not modern electronic controlled engines, as archaic as they are.

things that can be fixed in the field are still the best way to go in some areas. I’m sure once humanity itself advances these technologies will be used less and less, but we’re a long way to go…
 
The Earth is big, you should try to meditate on his nucleus, that is more near to the essence.

I don't think fossil fuel is the blood of the Earth, or anything like that.
 
I have heard that Fossil fuel is really the blood of the Earth.
Earth is a living Organism and has blood, like us.
Their official story of Fossil fuel sounds weird anyway, dinosaur bones that transformed to dark liquid over time?
I have never seen something dead transform into dark liquid over time, even after many years.
When they find Fossil fuel they literally call it a "vein".
It makes sense, jews are parasites, they use the human blood and earths blood as a resource.
They created artificial society in a way that we have to use it too and make us pay for it, when we could use alternatives.
What are your opinions?
Lots to unpack here. So I'll do the best I can. "Fossil fuels" is the end result of the breakdown of certain carbon based life once it has died. See that big field of trees behind you? if it all died off and was covered up with dirt it'd just be a certain amount of time before it's basically got oil. As long as things live, and die, on earth, there will still be oil. Indeed, in some locations previous to using oil we actually had a problem with oil. Some modern refineries don't even mine for oil anymore, they create fields of plankton, or mold, that they then let die off to create oil. We can go from empty location, to filled with oil in about 2 weeks now, then repeat it. The tech has advanced that much in just the last few years. Even if we don't advance tech there is enough oil reserves that have been found in just the U.S. alone to sustain the entire world at its projected capacity for the next 800 years. At a minimum. That's just the U.S. The jews own all of it, and will not let it be mined. Because of "the dangers of fossil fuel". They work both sides, don't forget.

Is it made from dinosaurs? I'm sure SOME of it was...but the vast majority of what is being used today is fields of plankton that died in the ocean, accumulated underground, and moved because of shifting tectonic plates.

Is it an alien technology that is throwing off our mojo? No. I can tell you with 100% certainty that other higher races out there have burned carbon based fuels at least for a period of time before they got to better tech. To not use it would be completely foolish. This would also eliminate things like alcohols.

The jews breath air, and drink water too. So if your going to go anti everything the jews do, feel free to start there.

Does that mean we need to go forward with oil? Well, yes, and no. Oil has made us change the way we look at technology. Because of it efficiency has increased drastically. Our knowledge of how to transform that possible energy into something useful has been tremendous. I think this is in part what Gearshift was getting at. I know the military has done experimentation as well when it comes to cooking with electricity vs cooking with gas. There is a significant benefit to cooking things with gas. Hence why they tried to ban gas stoves earlier this year in America. I don't have the papers on this one, its hearsay from military guys. I'm not talking about they get more muscular. I'm talking about spiritual changes. Same reason why there's a push for more well water. *wink* I'm pretty sure every person here has spent an evening in front of a burning fire and felt some measure of spiritual relaxation. There's reasons for that.

I posted the document earlier this year on the math behind free energy devices. Multiple schools have now posted their findings about it and the math has come out the same on every occasion. If your looking for information on free energy I can probably get you it. Its been released. People are running with it. It is being labeled as mis-information and banned almost universally. Just as we thought it would. The hit the industry took from converting to electric is what has loosened their strong grip on other tech getting out. At this point they can't stop it. And yes, most of what Gearshift is talking about would also be tech that could be used. However the energy generated by rotating charged mercury is too great for something on a personal level, see the Nazi Bell for reference. If I remember correctly they fired it up, and it disappeared.

DarkMonkey666 brought up electric vehicles. Also the picture shared is a bit misleading. There is so much in just that one picture that is problems, I can't even start there. There is a lot going on right now with electric vehicles. Its a double edged sword. Part of It was put into place to disrupt the automotive industry to bring them down long term. The Jews love it because it means you can't have a vehicle that goes more than about an hour in any direction. Less on mountain roads. Which gives them their 15 minute cities they can trap people in. Electric vehicles have their plus and minus, even if you have free energy devices for them. The Lithium Ion battery that powers most of them is the central problem, and a terrible idea, which is why its being pushed so heavily. It also relies heavily on rare earth elements which facilitates the need for more destruction in order to obtain. Hence why the jews push it so heavily. We used much better Salt based batteries at the beginning of the 1900s. I digress.

In short, V-12 power has it spot on. As we begin to educate the public and these devices become more prevalent we will move away from "Fossil fuels" (By the way we refer to them as carbon-based fuels not fossil fuels for a reason now) In some locations you simply can't go wrong with something that just works. It will never be a tech that will 100% disappear.
 
Lots to unpack here. So I'll do the best I can. "Fossil fuels" is the end result of the breakdown of certain carbon based life once it has died. See that big field of trees behind you? if it all died off and was covered up with dirt it'd just be a certain amount of time before it's basically got oil. As long as things live, and die, on earth, there will still be oil. Indeed, in some locations previous to using oil we actually had a problem with oil. Some modern refineries don't even mine for oil anymore, they create fields of plankton, or mold, that they then let die off to create oil. We can go from empty location, to filled with oil in about 2 weeks now, then repeat it. The tech has advanced that much in just the last few years. Even if we don't advance tech there is enough oil reserves that have been found in just the U.S. alone to sustain the entire world at its projected capacity for the next 800 years. At a minimum. That's just the U.S. The jews own all of it, and will not let it be mined. Because of "the dangers of fossil fuel". They work both sides, don't forget.

Is it made from dinosaurs? I'm sure SOME of it was...but the vast majority of what is being used today is fields of plankton that died in the ocean, accumulated underground, and moved because of shifting tectonic plates.

Is it an alien technology that is throwing off our mojo? No. I can tell you with 100% certainty that other higher races out there have burned carbon based fuels at least for a period of time before they got to better tech. To not use it would be completely foolish. This would also eliminate things like alcohols.

The jews breath air, and drink water too. So if your going to go anti everything the jews do, feel free to start there.

Does that mean we need to go forward with oil? Well, yes, and no. Oil has made us change the way we look at technology. Because of it efficiency has increased drastically. Our knowledge of how to transform that possible energy into something useful has been tremendous. I think this is in part what Gearshift was getting at. I know the military has done experimentation as well when it comes to cooking with electricity vs cooking with gas. There is a significant benefit to cooking things with gas. Hence why they tried to ban gas stoves earlier this year in America. I don't have the papers on this one, its hearsay from military guys. I'm not talking about they get more muscular. I'm talking about spiritual changes. Same reason why there's a push for more well water. *wink* I'm pretty sure every person here has spent an evening in front of a burning fire and felt some measure of spiritual relaxation. There's reasons for that.

I posted the document earlier this year on the math behind free energy devices. Multiple schools have now posted their findings about it and the math has come out the same on every occasion. If your looking for information on free energy I can probably get you it. Its been released. People are running with it. It is being labeled as mis-information and banned almost universally. Just as we thought it would. The hit the industry took from converting to electric is what has loosened their strong grip on other tech getting out. At this point they can't stop it. And yes, most of what Gearshift is talking about would also be tech that could be used. However the energy generated by rotating charged mercury is too great for something on a personal level, see the Nazi Bell for reference. If I remember correctly they fired it up, and it disappeared.

DarkMonkey666 brought up electric vehicles. Also the picture shared is a bit misleading. There is so much in just that one picture that is problems, I can't even start there. There is a lot going on right now with electric vehicles. Its a double edged sword. Part of It was put into place to disrupt the automotive industry to bring them down long term. The Jews love it because it means you can't have a vehicle that goes more than about an hour in any direction. Less on mountain roads. Which gives them their 15 minute cities they can trap people in. Electric vehicles have their plus and minus, even if you have free energy devices for them. The Lithium Ion battery that powers most of them is the central problem, and a terrible idea, which is why its being pushed so heavily. It also relies heavily on rare earth elements which facilitates the need for more destruction in order to obtain. Hence why the jews push it so heavily. We used much better Salt based batteries at the beginning of the 1900s. I digress.

In short, V-12 power has it spot on. As we begin to educate the public and these devices become more prevalent we will move away from "Fossil fuels" (By the way we refer to them as carbon-based fuels not fossil fuels for a reason now) In some locations you simply can't go wrong with something that just works. It will never be a tech that will 100% disappear.

there is no way crude oil is of biological origin. how many dinosaurs do you think there were? We have been extracting oil for over 200 years now. the lie of them being biological origin was invented by Rockefeller and Rothschild themselves around late 19th century/early 20th century for obvious market manipulation.

the lie starts with the word carbon, while it is true that all biological beings “have” carbon (the element) it is not true that everything that has carbon is of biological origin. This is where the seed of the lie comes from. you can read all about it, this was the craze back in 1910/1920


crude oil is a by product of the many undergoing reactions inside the earth, there’s a reason why it was observed that oil would come up to the surface. It’s being pushed from inside out.

If oil was just a “reserve” hiding underneath it would sit idly
 
there is no way crude oil is of biological origin. how many dinosaurs do you think there were? We have been extracting oil for over 200 years now. the lie of them being biological origin was invented by Rockefeller and Rothschild themselves around late 19th century/early 20th century for obvious market manipulation.

the lie starts with the word carbon, while it is true that all biological beings “have” carbon (the element) it is not true that everything that has carbon is of biological origin. This is where the seed of the lie comes from. you can read all about it, this was the craze back in 1910/1920


crude oil is a by product of the many undergoing reactions inside the earth, there’s a reason why it was observed that oil would come up to the surface. It’s being pushed from inside out.

If oil was just a “reserve” hiding underneath it would sit idly
Many of the oil refineries in the U.S. are actually converting over to using "recycled" bio-fuels such as cooking oils. Again, which come from plant materials. So we know of "a" process that can be used to make these fluids. Even the refineries say its a bad idea, but when you pass legislation you have to follow it. I am sure there is much carbon inside the earth in many places, the problem is the combination of carbon and hydrogen to make the hydro-carbon atoms that is used by most of society today. Which is why most of the theories suggest a photosynthesis process that combines the hydrogen and carbon combination, then the plant matter dies and produces hydro-carbons over time. This would be happening pretty much all over the earths surface all the time as more and more plant material dies.

Even the news has given up on the lie that it is from dinosaurs. Wikipedia also has given up on this lie and gone to the idea of mass phytoplankton fields.

While some wells do seem to gather more and more oil over time there have been many examples of wells that have ran dry. I would assume that would be from the loss of dying plant material nearby.

I have never heard of a theory where the earth has a process internally that creates hydro-carbons. I will look into this, I am not one to squelch an idea after all. However, I am curious how the earth does this process. Does it breath, or have some kind of photosynthesis independent of plant matter? Everyone keeps saying the earth is alive, but I have always assumed its one of those nuanced messages kind of like how New Agers keep saying to rise to a higher vibration without explaining what that means, or how to do it. Do you know how the earth does these processes?

The reason I've been told it is called a reserve, and not a natural asset is because these "fields" or "veins" of oil are still being filled through dying plant matter. The "reserve" is what has built up and will be replenished over time.
 
Many of the oil refineries in the U.S. are actually converting over to using "recycled" bio-fuels such as cooking oils. Again, which come from plant materials. So we know of "a" process that can be used to make these fluids. Even the refineries say its a bad idea, but when you pass legislation you have to follow it. I am sure there is much carbon inside the earth in many places, the problem is the combination of carbon and hydrogen to make the hydro-carbon atoms that is used by most of society today. Which is why most of the theories suggest a photosynthesis process that combines the hydrogen and carbon combination, then the plant matter dies and produces hydro-carbons over time. This would be happening pretty much all over the earths surface all the time as more and more plant material dies.

Even the news has given up on the lie that it is from dinosaurs. Wikipedia also has given up on this lie and gone to the idea of mass phytoplankton fields.

While some wells do seem to gather more and more oil over time there have been many examples of wells that have ran dry. I would assume that would be from the loss of dying plant material nearby.

I have never heard of a theory where the earth has a process internally that creates hydro-carbons. I will look into this, I am not one to squelch an idea after all. However, I am curious how the earth does this process. Does it breath, or have some kind of photosynthesis independent of plant matter? Everyone keeps saying the earth is alive, but I have always assumed its one of those nuanced messages kind of like how New Agers keep saying to rise to a higher vibration without explaining what that means, or how to do it. Do you know how the earth does these processes?

The reason I've been told it is called a reserve, and not a natural asset is because these "fields" or "veins" of oil are still being filled through dying plant matter. The "reserve" is what has built up and will be replenished over time.


you need to forget about the idea that fuels are of biological origin. the reality is that yes you can create “fuel” from algae and biological things, but if you happen to know about the quality of these fuels you’ll know it’s crap and you also know we would have ended those reserves long time ago

I highly doubt that synthetic fuels/bio-based fuels will some day overtake crude oil.

aside from those PR headlines, some articles exist about this; I don’t remember exactly how it formed but I remember it was related to the diamonds (carbon) in the mantle of the earth
 
I have never heard of a theory where the earth has a process internally that creates hydro-carbons. I will look into this, I am not one to squelch an idea after all. However, I am curious how the earth does this process. Does it breath, or have some kind of photosynthesis independent of plant matter? Everyone keeps saying the earth is alive, but I have always assumed its one of those nuanced messages kind of like how New Agers keep saying to rise to a higher vibration without explaining what that means, or how to do it. Do you know how the earth does these processes?

The reason I've been told it is called a reserve, and not a natural asset is because these "fields" or "veins" of oil are still being filled through dying plant matter. The "reserve" is what has built up and will be replenished over time.

I have also seen on the forums from other people saying that oil comes from the Earth's core as a product of a reaction, I think this is also what OP is referring to. When the search works again you can search the forums maybe you find a source.
 
you need to forget about the idea that fuels are of biological origin. the reality is that yes you can create “fuel” from algae and biological things, but if you happen to know about the quality of these fuels you’ll know it’s crap and you also know we would have ended those reserves long time ago

I highly doubt that synthetic fuels/bio-based fuels will some day overtake crude oil.

aside from those PR headlines, some articles exist about this; I don’t remember exactly how it formed but I remember it was related to the diamonds (carbon) in the mantle of the earth

I have also seen on the forums from other people saying that oil comes from the Earth's core as a product of a reaction, I think this is also what OP is referring to. When the search works again you can search the forums maybe you find a source.

Fascinating I look forward to learning more. I knew of the idea of abiotic earth, which does say that oil is created further underground and "bubbles" up. This idea still stems from the idea that dying plant matter works its way down through sediment until coming in contact with the mantle. I've never heard of anything coming from diamonds underground. I'll check it out further, thank you!

And your correct V12-POWER this oil is very crude and not anywhere near what drilled oil is capable of. I knew that. Either way we can pretty much say that oil is not an alien technology that is here to harm us, but something the earth does on its own. Like much technology its not really good or evil.
 
Fascinating I look forward to learning more. I knew of the idea of abiotic earth, which does say that oil is created further underground and "bubbles" up. This idea still stems from the idea that dying plant matter works its way down through sediment until coming in contact with the mantle. I've never heard of anything coming from diamonds underground. I'll check it out further, thank you!

And your correct V12-POWER this oil is very crude and not anywhere near what drilled oil is capable of. I knew that. Either way we can pretty much say that oil is not an alien technology that is here to harm us, but something the earth does on its own. Like much technology its not really good or evil.

here is one

https://phys.org/news/2009-07-hydrocarbons-deep-earth.amp
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top