Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Dictatorship?

Akitu

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2024
Messages
109
Hello brothers and sisters


We often hear that dictatorships mean there's no free speech, espression, print, thinking. Was it true that Hitler's germany didn't accept other ways of thinking other than national socialism? In my opinion , as Hitler sayed, it was temporary, to free germany from enemies such as jews marxists communism christians ecc, it was necessary to temporary remove freedom and guide the country properly. Ancient people did so as well, in times of instability and War, democracies were put apart and temporary a dictator ruled to make things right. Btw , I think there are lies about Hitler 's govern, today we read that Anyone who Went against the regime was killed, captured tortured by Gestapo ecc, or killed in concentration camps. I believe this is a lie, we know enemies were sent in concentration camps and had a fair treatment ,not killed. Am I correct? I believe if Someone died , he was indeed a criminal and was a threat to german Society , so that didn't happen To Anyone that didn't choose to accept national socialism . Many say hitler had all those votes Because they were threatned , I don't think that's the case, Hitler was loved. Fascists, they indeed were violent, I believe Many confuse fascists with nazis . What do you think?
 
Hello brothers and sisters


We often hear that dictatorships mean there's no free speech, espression, print, thinking. Was it true that Hitler's germany didn't accept other ways of thinking other than national socialism? In my opinion , as Hitler sayed, it was temporary, to free germany from enemies such as jews marxists communism christians ecc, it was necessary to temporary remove freedom and guide the country properly. Ancient people did so as well, in times of instability and War, democracies were put apart and temporary a dictator ruled to make things right. Btw , I think there are lies about Hitler 's govern, today we read that Anyone who Went against the regime was killed, captured tortured by Gestapo ecc, or killed in concentration camps. I believe this is a lie, we know enemies were sent in concentration camps and had a fair treatment ,not killed. Am I correct? I believe if Someone died , he was indeed a criminal and was a threat to german Society , so that didn't happen To Anyone that didn't choose to accept national socialism . Many say hitler had all those votes Because they were threatned , I don't think that's the case, Hitler was loved. Fascists, they indeed were violent, I believe Many confuse fascists with nazis . What do you think?
Italian Fascism defeated jews and organized crime inside Italy.

The entire criminal rabble, along with Al Capone and other mafiosi, fled to the United States, where they could hide behind highly paid lawyers, and Al Capone was only able to be imprisoned for tax evasion, even though everyone knew that he was a criminal.

In Fascist Italy, no one would have given him the opportunity to mock the judicial system, the country and its citizens.

In Italy, he and the other criminals would have been dealt with quickly.

Concentration camps were ordinary prisoner-of-war camps, and then the jews made up things out of them that didn't exist. Concentration camps were not death camps.

Modern democracies should learn a lot from Ancient Greek Democracy and the Roman Republic.

When the democratic republic was in danger (both internally and externally), the Roman Senate called for a dictator who could restore order both inside and outside the country.

In https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Servile_War such dictators were Marcus Licinius Crassus and
Pompey, who eventually suppressed Spartacus' rebellion and save Republic, which the first emperor Octavian Augustus reorganized into the Roman Empire in the future.

If modern european politicians (controlled by jews) had been in place of the Roman Senate, Spartacus would have destroyed Rome, but this did not happen thanks to the Roman Dictators who saved the Republic (the Roman Senate and their citizens).
 
One more thing I have been always curious for was the art concept of nazi germany , I was wongering why All modern art was considered 'degenerate' by the National Socialists. Expressionism was particularly singled out. In 1937, German museums were purged of modern art by the government, a total of some 15,550 works being removed. Any thoughts about this?
Modern "art" isn't art.
 
It's enough to google "modern art vs classical art" - I've done it myself and yeah... If one thinks glasses on the floor are a form of art, or a can of feces, or dancing among dismembered animals, or listening to the sounds of butter is a form of art, they're seriously sick.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Shaitan

Back
Top