Dictatorship?

[Akitu]

Hello brothers and sisters


We often hear that dictatorships mean there's no free speech, espression, print, thinking. Was it true that Hitler's germany didn't accept other ways of thinking other than national socialism? In my opinion , as Hitler sayed, it was temporary, to free germany from enemies such as jews marxists communism christians ecc, it was necessary to temporary remove freedom and guide the country properly. Ancient people did so as well, in times of instability and War, democracies were put apart and temporary a dictator ruled to make things right. Btw , I think there are lies about Hitler 's govern, today we read that Anyone who Went against the regime was killed, captured tortured by Gestapo ecc, or killed in concentration camps. I believe this is a lie, we know enemies were sent in concentration camps and had a fair treatment ,not killed. Am I correct? I believe if Someone died , he was indeed a criminal and was a threat to german Society , so that didn't happen To Anyone that didn't choose to accept national socialism . Many say hitler had all those votes Because they were threatned , I don't think that's the case, Hitler was loved. Fascists, they indeed were violent, I believe Many confuse fascists with nazis . What do you think?

 

[Helleniser]

Study these:

The Black Sun 666

The Third Reich and Satanism

The Real Holocaust

 

[AristocraticDragon666]

Hello brothers and sisters


We often hear that dictatorships mean there's no free speech, espression, print, thinking. Was it true that Hitler's germany didn't accept other ways of thinking other than national socialism? In my opinion , as Hitler sayed, it was temporary, to free germany from enemies such as jews marxists communism christians ecc, it was necessary to temporary remove freedom and guide the country properly. Ancient people did so as well, in times of instability and War, democracies were put apart and temporary a dictator ruled to make things right. Btw , I think there are lies about Hitler 's govern, today we read that Anyone who Went against the regime was killed, captured tortured by Gestapo ecc, or killed in concentration camps. I believe this is a lie, we know enemies were sent in concentration camps and had a fair treatment ,not killed. Am I correct? I believe if Someone died , he was indeed a criminal and was a threat to german Society , so that didn't happen To Anyone that didn't choose to accept national socialism . Many say hitler had all those votes Because they were threatned , I don't think that's the case, Hitler was loved. Fascists, they indeed were violent, I believe Many confuse fascists with nazis . What do you think?

Italian Fascism defeated jews and organized crime inside Italy.

The entire criminal rabble, along with Al Capone and other mafiosi, fled to the United States, where they could hide behind highly paid lawyers, and Al Capone was only able to be imprisoned for tax evasion, even though everyone knew that he was a criminal.

In Fascist Italy, no one would have given him the opportunity to mock the judicial system, the country and its citizens.

In Italy, he and the other criminals would have been dealt with quickly.

Concentration camps were ordinary prisoner-of-war camps, and then the jews made up things out of them that didn't exist. Concentration camps were not death camps.

Modern democracies should learn a lot from Ancient Greek Democracy and the Roman Republic.

When the democratic republic was in danger (both internally and externally), the Roman Senate called for a dictator who could restore order both inside and outside the country.

In https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Servile_War such dictators were Marcus Licinius Crassus and
Pompey, who eventually suppressed Spartacus' rebellion and save Republic, which the first emperor Octavian Augustus reorganized into the Roman Empire in the future.

If modern european politicians (controlled by jews) had been in place of the Roman Senate, Spartacus would have destroyed Rome, but this did not happen thanks to the Roman Dictators who saved the Republic (the Roman Senate and their citizens).

 

[Akitu]

Study these:

The Black Sun 666

The Third Reich and Satanism

The Real Holocaust

One more thing I have been always curious for was the art concept of nazi germany , I was wongering why All modern art was considered 'degenerate' by the National Socialists. Expressionism was particularly singled out. In 1937, German museums were purged of modern art by the government, a total of some 15,550 works being removed. Any thoughts about this?

 

[Helleniser]

One more thing I have been always curious for was the art concept of nazi germany , I was wongering why All modern art was considered 'degenerate' by the National Socialists. Expressionism was particularly singled out. In 1937, German museums were purged of modern art by the government, a total of some 15,550 works being removed. Any thoughts about this?

Modern "art" isn't art.

 

[Akitu]

Modern "art" isn't art.

Could you explain me why? I'm curious.

 

[616Taysha]

It's enough to google "modern art vs classical art" - I've done it myself and yeah... If one thinks glasses on the floor are a form of art, or a can of feces, or dancing among dismembered animals, or listening to the sounds of butter is a form of art, they're seriously sick.

 

[SahelianWarrior]

This should be in the main forum, I don't know why these are being posted in the internet activism forums?

Temple of Zeus Main

For those who wish to establish a relationship with Our Gods. Topics of discussion include: The Gods, Magick, and much more! https://templeofzeus.com / https://zeusisgod.org

ancient-forums.com

 

[xXBlackLightXx]

I think there's a lot we don't know about the inner workings of NatSoc Germany. Really, it was such a flash in the pan. It lasted for 12 years and six of those were spent trying to not get overrun by the enemy. Then after the war so much propaganda has been injected by the Allies along with people who were there trying to minimize their roles or not contradict Allied lies in order to protect themselves. There seems to have been a wide diversity of opinion within the higher ranks in Hitler's circle and they were free to argue with each other over points of ideology. Hitler didn't micromanaga that, he seemed to have been focused on fixing Germany and winning the war.
Alfred Rosenberg's memoir is really enjoyable to get some insight. He talks about his open butting heads with Goebbells and Himmler, and his disagreement with what he saw as a cult of personality forming around Hitler. Not that I agree with him, but it seems he was able to express his opinions without worry. Hitler never set a successor, or if he did his opinions would sway and change about them and Rosenberg believed after Hitler died, the Reich would revert back to some level of democracy and become a business-as-usual state again. I think we've seen other instances in the past of strongman dictatorships forming out of necessity in response to a threat and then the country giving way to a more democratic mode after the leader dies. Long-term dictatorships like in the communist countries seem to be the exception, because communism necessitates absolute control over the people, but normally places like Spain, Turkey, South Korea, etc. just needed authoritarianism for a little while to address specific issues. The same way Rome would only appoint dictators when necessary like when Hannibal invaded Italy.

Alfred Rosenberg Memoirs and Nuremberg Trial : Hagur : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

Alfred Rosenberg (January 12, 1893 â October 16, 1946) was an early and intellectually influential member of the Nazi party, who later held several important...

archive.org