satanama666 said:
It does work. However, current implementations are poor. That is because certain interest groups are promoting not only fake Green energy which cannot sustain us, but also because other groups are fighting to suppress scientific discoveries.
The West is turning to Green Energy, and that is ecofriendly and a good turn. At the same time, feasibility and stability are issues that one cannot ignore, especially in a world where China is an emerging world power.
The transition to Green Energy as if we live in Hobbit Land is unrealistic, because we don't live in Hobbit Land. After decades, even Nuclear power and other similar powers like coal, have been tamed to a great extent.
In the future, Astarte and the Gods want everything to go into Green energy and so that we stop being a torment to our living selves and other beings on the planet. Our current level of knowledge does not allow a full transition without errors or without problems.
An example, while the US and EU try to implement Green energy, that might lead to electricity deficiencies and a series of other problems like supply chain breakdowns and so on, China is actually investing more on Nuclear energy.
Nuclear energy, if properly handled, can be made to have small toll on the environment. There is an elaborate science on how it can be utilized with closely zero drawbacks, and it can be extremely efficient. Another very interesting field is Nuclear Fusion, in which China is also quite advanced.
At the same time, countries that won't do this "Green Transition" will be in an unfair advantage, since Green energy is reliant on many factors that as the West implements, they might be weak. All China will have to do is drop a single electromagnetic pulse, and off goes all the "Green Grid". The same cannot be stated for Nuclear or other forms of energy.
The EU and US, are falling back on this, because falsely, the uneducated Jews and other fools are promoting constantly the rhetoric of "Climate Change" and falsely relate this reality that is occurring to specific practices, such as for example plastic straws or fossil fuels.
I have been really interested into this subject and reading to find the facts, or at least enough facts to have an opinion, and the sad reality is that we cannot change the larger changes that come from actual Climate Change. It is going to occur, and it's part of the earth's natural core cycle.
In that effect, this is why I have said before I am pro space travel. Because every so often [thousands and thousands of years], certain ecological events happen and can ruin a large segment of civilization.
Many of the energy sources and ecofriendly things that are being promoted are also false, in that they are not really "ecofriendly", but it's just marketing. For example, electric cars, which are promoted constantly, are like a smartphone. Made poorly, these break down and need replacing quickly, while previous generations of cars can last for 20 years plus that run on petrol.
They can be shut down remotely, and in any scenario of clash with China, they could be disabled or cyberattacked very easily. They spy on people that drive them, and the autonomy of cars can be a double edged sword. As for the batteries, their bio-disposability is questionable, and the only argument to this is "We will find a solution in the future".
Still, no solutions for the endless crap promoted by our smartphones and the endless pollution has been given.
Falsely, many new inventions are also promoted as "Green", such as Wi-Fi bread toasters and things like that. These are not ecofriendly in reality, but the reverse. The fact everything is built cheaply and needs constant change, is definitely not ecofriendly either.
The Chinese model of building things which cannot be serviced, are not upgradeable and are built on the certainty of instant replacement, is a biohazard for nature. Much of the Eco-Friendly energy and objects is just a marketing.
Tesla making free energy based on what I study, wasn't exactly free energy. Tesla was planning to use the electromagnetic currents of the earth through wireless transfer, which is not really "free energy", but rather electromagnetic energy from the earth. This would produce a general abundance of energy for the earth and most of it's needs, without necessarily putting any toll than what already is present on the earth.
It might not have been infinite energy, but it could be "free of cost", or maybe the sense of cost could be made into something else. Maybe electricity could be a given for everyone let's say if they worked or whatever in their life.
Certain systems cannot be hoped to be applied as history right now is going through a specific way. But in the future these might change for the better. Even the most inventive and smart people now would need authority that is financial and political to act.
Also, since many leaders and heads of States and so on are not enlightened, we are sinking in our lower perceptions that disallow this kind of massive progress.
That would involve however a complete redirection of the full path that humanity has chosen.
The least of our issues is actual "Climate Change", but many psychopaths and others who are occupying too many places [Jewish too] that try to use this as an excuse for mass genocide, instead of innovation, or other more fruitful endeavours. The "easy" solution for them is to create genocide, and that's what they have said they want to do, or make human life into a living nightmare.
None of the above is justified on any CO2 consumption, or Climate Change. It's just their psychopathy speaking here. Since however the subject is very difficult [since these psychopaths are good at creating fabricated pseudo-evidence], I have went to Azazel with this. Azazel was rather clear to me.
Climate Change is indeed happening, is a natural process, but Azazel has also told me that I needed to do "More research on the subject" and that "We cannot make sense of this because we live very small lifetimes". These intervals of changes happen over thousands of years. They are hardly observable. They certainly don't happen in 10 years.
These changes do indeed wipe out whole segments of the earth, or civilization, bring droughts, or sink whole continents. This cycle repeats every thousands of years, and that's why some ancient civilizations had to be left behind and people had to move.
This might incur again in the future, and is a slow process that cannot easily be tracked in a single human lifetime. Also, what will sink and when, is difficult to predict by regular humans, let alone species with our current level of knowledge. For that reason, we have done major miscalculations.
Climate Change has nothing got to do with the modern dialectic of it, and how much small like vermin humanity goes around the planet with their little cars which supposedly cause too much CO2. Eliminating human beings, their lives, etc, is something those in "power" think will save anyone, but it won't.
These applications also, Azazel stated, will "Not help our world" overcome anything. It will be like a fly that can't really observe a meteor. In fact, we are wasting a lot of our time looking at this bogus nonsense, no different than a cave man focusing on a rock, instead of a mountain.
These is nonsense and has rose out of need for justification for political agendas of the Left Wing, but also, because the enemy wants to do major planetary changes that they need a big "globalized" hoax to justify these outrageous and anti-life measures.
Azazel told me a long time ago too that "Pollution is the problem", and that this affects how we humans are going to be living on earth, not the earth itself. It has no power to change the "Climate". But it can poison our lakes, our waters, our rivers, etc.
That is manageable. The broader "Climate Change", which affects the universe and the face of the earth, is NOT manageable by nonsense like trying to fake you are eco-friendly by fake paper straws instead of plastic ones.
We have in simple words, to manage pollution to a maximum, but also at the same time stop thinking that these stupid things affect the Sun's rotation or other nonsense that the idiotic blind fools are promoting to humanity.
For the political use of this stupidity, I urge everyone to look online how from the 1920's, idiot scientists and doomsday prophets would constantly write that the "Ice is melting! It's because we have cars! We need to limit emissions!" and other nonsensical theories.
No, the universe is not on fallout because little humans on this planet have things like this. We are only polluting our living space, but NOT changing the climate of the earth. Even if we reached maximum levels of pollution, the earth would also recover in due time, despite of what we did. But we would be dead in the process.
Transition has to be progressive and if we don't cover energetic needs, wars and other perils may ensue which set the Green Initiative into nothing. Civilization is also energy based, and without this, collapse of global civilization is likely, or segments of it.
Fake Green energy that will leave civilization depleted, will destroy and curb human life almost as certainly as death from overt pollution. In fact it might even turn brutal with territorial and other disputes causing global mayhem.
Fake promises of Green energy can be really dangerous, even more so dangerous than "Nuclear" and other things which we have known for years. Nuclear should at least exist as a fallback mechanism.
Many people think also that space travel or moving to other planets is a bad situation. Regardless, on the longer perspective, human beings or segments from this earth would be better off to move to other planets too.
Ancients also spoke that people had full colonies on the moon, which might look insane now, but apparently they mention [their words, not mine], the Moon was a perfectly habitable place a very long time ago, but later on certain events [in my opinion, a mix of enemy events and natural] turned it into a wasteland.
In closing, Climate Change as in the reshaping of the earth, is beyond us. We can only try our best to live through these cycles. Pollution, which is how things affect us, other animals, and our lifestyles, is something we can control to the maximum.
The line between the two has to be separated, and no, your toaster doesn't cause Global Warming, but it does cause pollution since we buy new cheap Chinese toasters every 2 months. And these then create wastelands, dead forests, and many other problems.
-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666
please look after yourself
![Voice of Enki [JG]](/data/avatars/m/0/84.jpg?1705131368){kind=avatar}
