Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Other #77138 About women, is this true?

AskSatanOperator

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 16, 2022
Messages
7,340
Location
[email protected]
It is just a quote I read, not my opinion.

"People who can't defend themselves physically (women and low T men) parse information through a consensus filter as a safety mechanism. They do not ask "is this true", they ask "will others be OK with me thinking this is true". Which makes them very malleable to brute force manufactured consensus. If every screen they look at says the same thing they will adopt that position because their brain interprets it as everyone in the tribe believing it. Only high T males and anuerotypical people are actually free to parse new information with an objective "is this true?" filter. This is why a Republic of high status males is best for decision making. Democratic, but a democracy only for those who are free to think".

Of course it's a huge generalisation, since HPS Maxine and others were literally the opposite of this. But I wanted to know is there a basis in the general nature of women which fascilitates this behaviour? Or is it something purely individual soul level?
 
One single chemical or hormone does not explain behavior to this degree, the matter is more complex.

To an extent, this can be true, unless other factors offset it. It is true that most people have this kind of mentality, but there are more reasons to it than "low testosterone". At the end of the day, genetics and your physical characteristics will reflect your repeated habit actions (right now, but also across generations or lifetimes), which started as thoughts, which started as energy.
The real issue with this statement is it does not touch upon core reasons why people act this way, which is at the thought level: having their thinking programmed. Instead, it uses a rather shoddy reason for this mentality, which as you pointed out, does not always apply.
 
But I wanted to know is there a basis in the general nature of women which fascilitates this behaviour? Or is it something purely individual soul level?

Basically, it is useless to quote something without reporting the source. You may have gotten it from a neuroscience textbook recommended by a UNADE professor as much as from an amazon book “50 things to read while bored.” Basically, many mental processes are the result of social constructs and it is very common for such cultures to decide and think for us, which is why asking “what I think” is often encouraged.

Maybe you can get the wrong idea. In fact, it is possible for you to think wrongly. Never mind, ask yourself what you think. It is okay if you think wrong, because opinions and studies are continually subject to methods of revision and updating. So even if your opinion is completely fallacious, that's great; it's a starting point on which to build. No one is born with perfect opinions. Otherwise we wouldn't have created Galilean methods or classified cognitive bias. And even the study would stop making sense.

In any case, the social conformity bias does exist, just as one often seeks proof from a membership group reputed to be an authoritative source of approval of an idea of collective dominance. We are human beings; it is normal for this to happen. And testosterone has some effects regarding assertive and dominant states. But no, there are too many factors to consider regarding critical thinking that are purely cultural and personal education/training. The Testosterone parameter is poor.
 
Greetings!

This is absolute low level unintelligent shit pushed by most insolent kikes who do not even care to conceal themselves, and those moslen-brain-leveled street animals parading before similar uneducated illiterate public who only can eat such a nonsense.

This shit simply does not work when you try to push it into intellectual educated public. Most geniuses who built our Civilization were not too athletic even if born strong simply because they were too busy with their profession. As well as their greatest feats were always made in their later age when everyone is frail. Also the fact that most people who actually rule the world - presidents, billionaires, high professionals - and those scientists making the most impact are not 17-25 year old males but elderly people, even if males, then anyway frailer elderly males.

Most of those who are students of the most advanced tech Universities that are considered highest IQ are usually thin and not warlike.

Traditional societies ruled by shamans and wizards, usually of both sexes, have elderly for the leaders. And these shamans are most powerful in their old age, while in the young age they only are students of older masters.

The truth and the exposure of the lie you quoted is as simple as this: the more frail you are the more high leveled reality check you need to survive and the more you are interested in the actual understanding what the truth really is, because knowledge of the real truth is the only thing that can protect. So in reality things are the exact opposite to what you quoted. When you are a strong young male you can afford some delusions - you will get into trouble but survive and maybe not get too much crippled. But if you are a helpless Lady in a wheelchair you have to pretty well understand how things really are, to shelter yourself and find yourself a right protector. You simply have no other choice but to be super wise.

It does not demand too much knowledge to understand that it is extreme danger and dire circumstances rather than all-might, that usually make us think twice and think critically, switch off emotional bias and get real. If a tribe think to burn a witch is a good thing to do, she is more probable to be the first one to awake to the fact that something went wrong, because the fire starts with her.

Even if you "lie before the tribe" to be safe, the very ability to lie and to secretly proceed needs critical strategic thinking to be developed.

Other natural powers around this is that Saturn and Uranus - planets of maturity and free thought - returns in 33 and 42 age respectively. This is not the war age. While in most scientific institutions of my country it is revealed that human brain is developing and evolving up to 30 human years. It means that people of the war age can't be in any way more equipped to be leaders by default.

The actual core of this lie you quote, is the FALSE undercurrent that "tribe is somehow hostile" to a person that's' why they have to conceal and fit in. This is a JEWISH LIE. The very tactic of yeshiva school. Kikes did everything in their might to make our societies hostile to our own people, but in reality our if the socium was naturally meant to be hostile it would have not existed. nature does not create things for no reason. Collectivity is the greatest achievement in both animal and human world and it exists exactly to protect the weak and the frail, to give children an ability to longer learn, the elderly - to longer survive and to share their wisdom with community, the pregnant and the sick - to get helped, relieved and cured. Basically what you quoted from some kike source obviously is kike yeshiva tactic to undermine and slander the very basement of our civilization.

Basically the tribe is exactly what gives frail women, children and elderly the opportunity to SPEAK OUT and to SPEAK TO TRUTH. To say their real opinion, to learn and to critically think instead of fitting in like in those in the enemy capture. We are not in the capture in our homes and communities and not meant to be. Our women here are protected by us ourselves and our man's power exists EXACTLY to give our women the opportunity to say the truth in the face and to stay safe and queens. This is man's hand that makes woman a queen, this is woman's love that makes man a king. We depend upon and belong to each other for a very good reason - because our life is better when backed by our own. And it is outer kike world that is hostile and that is busy shutting us up.
 
I don’t know why people act like voting rights were handed to women out of kindness. Women didn’t *ask*—they took it. Governments didn’t *give* them the vote; they were forced to surrender it. And if anyone tries to take that right away again, women will find a way to take it back. No country ‘allows’ equality—it’s taken, always.
 
I don’t know why people act like voting rights were handed to women out of kindness.

No, they were handed to them out of emotional manipulation. Many people forget that only people who were drafted were allowed to voted. Many men couldn't vote because they didn't allow themselves to get drafted, or they are incapable for it. So, for the first time in history women got voting rights without the draft. It's not equality to do that, as the voting right wasn't universal and for everyone, but only those who fight in the military. They handed them a right without its associated responsibility.

Tell a woman today this above. Then ask her if she will aceept to get drafted in the military as an exchange for the vote. Well you don't need to, they already did that years ago when the government was considering to draft women and women were like "No, I don't want equality like that!".

It's much like when they say men are more leaders and CEOs and want more women leaders and CEOs, but not a single of them wants more women coal miners or garbage collectors or other dangerous/disgusting jobs that mostly men do.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Shaitan

Back
Top