Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

The Gods #76824 BAALZEBUL It turns out that this Zeus is Satan and it turns out that his sigil also works as one and the same God?

This question pertains to the Gods

AskSatanOperator

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 16, 2022
Messages
7,278
Location
[email protected]
I understand everything and I want to understand even more: why do we need two rituals in this case, if God Zeus, Satan and Baal are one and the same? And I am also concerned about sermons that say that we do not need those who are afraid of the name SATANISM and the joy of Satan does not intend to change for the public, and at the same time today we have a temple of Zeus instead of the previous name, what is it called?How are such double standards possible?
 
I understand everything and I want to understand even more: why do we need two rituals in this case, if God Zeus, Satan and Baal are one and the same? And I am also concerned about sermons that say that we do not need those who are afraid of the name SATANISM and the joy of Satan does not intend to change for the public, and at the same time today we have a temple of Zeus instead of the previous name, what is it called?How are such double standards possible?
The rituals for Satan is an absolution ritual,the title for Zeus/Baalzebul is a power ritual so it might be both rituals serve different purposes.
In the case of Sigils even Azazel,king Paimon and other Gods have more than one sigil,
Maybe each sigil has its own distinct purpose partaining to the God and their different aspects,
 
I understand everything and I want to understand even more: why do we need two rituals in this case, if God Zeus, Satan and Baal are one and the same? And I am also concerned about sermons that say that we do not need those who are afraid of the name SATANISM and the joy of Satan does not intend to change for the public, and at the same time today we have a temple of Zeus instead of the previous name, what is it called?How are such double standards possible?

Both rituals are two aspects of Zeus and are two valid rituals. The new name is not a disguise; it is our original name. Now that the Jews are ruined there is no point in seeing who is brave enough to challenge the Jewish religions, there is nothing to challenge now, we can go back to when the Jewish religions didn't matter.
 
Both ritual and both sigil is for the same God.
Look at this change as a new era, the previous era was the previous era, what applied to that era might not apply to this new era.
 
A sigil is not a picture of a God, it is an alchemical symbol that has far more roles than that.
Zeus has two, and that is fine. One deals with the pure parasivanic nature, while one deals with his material authority, on a very surface level.
There are still four pillars of the Soul, with Zeus ruling over two of them, and the four Rituals to the Crowns connect to and empower each one, with connection to Zeus empowering 2/4.
 
I understand everything and I want to understand even more: why do we need two rituals in this case, if God Zeus, Satan and Baal are one and the same? And I am also concerned about sermons that say that we do not need those who are afraid of the name SATANISM and the joy of Satan does not intend to change for the public, and at the same time today we have a temple of Zeus instead of the previous name, what is it called?How are such double standards possible?

Each sigil represents a form of power. The Sigil of Lucifer or Satan has to do with sight and understanding; the Sigil of Beelzebul has to do with the concept of power.

We still mention the truth about this topic, it has not disappeared. It is in the site. It was put in a bigger context of why it is as it is.

This decision does not have first and foremost to do with the public, but about the Gods themselves and how to properly express them. The public understanding is a consequence of restoring the culture; so it happens because of this, not because of conformity.

There was a time not that long ago before it was called "Satanism" and it's incosistent with the flow of time to stay stuck and only approve of 70 year mentality of the LHP and the timeline of the enemy to describe ourselves. We predate them by 40,000 years. We predate all their views and opinions, objectively speaking. So to stay on the limited context, is not helping anywhere.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Shaitan

Back
Top