Other #76468 Cutting a dead animal on a biology lesson

[AskSatanOperator]

A weird question maybe.
Is cutting a dead animal on a biology lesson bad? A frog or a rat

 

[DarkPagan666]

No, it’s not inherently bad, as the animal is already deceased and is used for educational purposes. Dissections provide valuable hands-on learning about anatomy, biology, and physiology. I personally find them fascinating and appreciate the opportunity to study the intricacies of living organisms in a way that textbooks alone can't offer.

 

[SeguaceDiSatanas]

I would like to explain something important regardless of whether dissecting a frog that is now dead is good or bad. There is a scientific reality that might be useful to know for American school students who keep these laboratory animals in schools. It's not your case, but it's on topic and it's always good to know.

Releasing laboratory-used frogs (or other animals) into the natural environment can pose significant risks to local ecosystems. These amphibians, once in captivity, may be exposed to diseases or parasites not present in wild populations. By releasing them, there is the possibility of introducing pathogens that could threaten native species. Furthermore, laboratory-bred frogs may lack the skills needed to survive in their natural habitat, negatively affecting both their survival and ecological balance. For these reasons, it is generally not recommended to reintroduce frogs or other animals into the wild that have been in captivity for extended periods.