ᚴᛅᚱᛚ
New member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2020
- Messages
- 33
History of a Race ...
Despite the fanaticism of the Reds and other hypocritical pseudo-humanists, the human races are a reality and evidence it would be foolish to deny. The human races constitute, moreover, all the richness of our ethnocultural diversity in this world, a diversity that disturbs the followers of mixism at all costs. Ethnocultural heritage is the very foundation of an identity, something everyone should be proud of. But it would seem that this pride is a shame for the traitors who have so much hatred for the question of identity. They would rather see all of humanity plunged into one formless magma with no past and no future, which, according to their logic, is understandable, given that such a humanity without identity would be so much more manipulable. Clans united and united with each other, proud of a thousand-year-old past, do not allow themselves to be manipulated like isolated individuals without identity. For us pagans proud of our roots, it is therefore important and urgent to claim and preserve what our ancestors gave us as a heritage.
This article is not a scientific study of the race question, but an etymological analysis of the same question. Fanatics who deny racial realities need only turn to archaeologists or the scientific police to verify how false and outdated their arguments are. We will continue to be motivated by love, not hate. Our love is that of our own, and contrary to what some sub-normals and other self-righteous fashion traitors say, this love of his does not automatically imply a hatred of others. But this is something their atrophied neurons cannot understand because their brainwashing is so deep and irremediable. After this necessary introduction, the subject is so controversial these days, let's get back to the subject of this article.
But what do words like Genes, Genetics, Genius, People, Gender, Genital, Son-in-law, Beget, Degenerate, Eugenics, Father and Generation have in common? The answer is simple and dense at the same time. All of these words are based on the root GEN, a root that dates back to our earliest linguistic heritage as it comes directly to us from Indo-Europeans. This origin gave several Indo-European words, the most important of which is that of * genos-, which means "the race", "the lineage", "the family". It is this Indo-European root that has given our modern versions for genes and genetics. This same root is found in other Indo-European languages such as Sanskrit (jánas), ancient Greek (genos), Latin (genus), and Armenian (cin). In the first three languages cited, the translation is also that of "Race", "Lineage", and "Family". In its Armenian version, the word means "Birth". In all cases, we can see the fundamental link that exists between the notion of Genes and that of Race.
Other Indo-European roots are therefore also based on this notion of race and blood line. Here are a few :
- "Progenitor" which comes from the Indo-European * genetor, which translates to "procreator". The progenitor is therefore the one who participates in the creation of a racial line. In Sanskrit it gives "janitár", in Greek "genétôr", and in Latin "genitor". The Indo-European female version is * genetri.
- *gnotos in Indo-European which means "relative [of the blood line]". The notion of kinship is therefore also closely linked to that of race and blood line. This term is found in Greek (gnôtós) which means parent, brother; in Latvian (znuots) translated as brother-in-law, son-in-law; in Welsh (gnawt) translated as parent; the same translation into Old High German (knuot), Gothic (knoths), and Sanskrit (jñatís).
- * gntis in Indo-European which means "kinship", root which gave in Sanskrit "jatis", in Latin "nati-o", and in Anglo-Saxon "cynd".
- “Eugenics” which comes from the same Indo-European root * gen- with the following translation nuance: Race, Origin, Birth. The prefix -eu gives another interesting nuance, that of "good race", that is, eugenics is "good reproduction of the race". And indeed, eugenics was present in many pagan traditions of antiquity. The objective was clear: by selection at birth an attempt was made to prevent the blood line from degenerating. And since we're talking about it ...
- “Degenerate”… comes from the same Indo-European root * GEN with the private prefix –de. Degeneration is therefore the deprivation of race, it is an element of bad lineage, of a loss of racial identity. The etymological dictionary leaves no room for doubt, because it defines this term as “losing the natural qualities of one's race”.
- "Genealogy" ... the reason for a race. Term which in this same linguistic context would translate as the sacred whole of a blood line.
- "People", "people" ... another term that comes from Indo-European * GEN. So people are beings of the same bloodline, of the same race.
- "Gentleman" ... a noble man, a man of good race.
- "Generation" ... a time series of the same race, the same bloodline.
- "Gender" ... which is the same type, the same race.
- “Genius”… this term deserves a special detour, because it is very rich in information. He too is related to the blood line in that he is a link in the chain of that line. In pagan Rome, the Genius (Genius) represented as the soul of a person, his protective spirit, what Christians call a guardian angel. In this it is somewhat comparable to the Fylgia of the German-Nordic tradition. Genius comes from the Latin Gigno / Geno, which is understood as "to beget, to be born [in a blood line]". The Genius is the one who "crumbles", that is to say who has the faculty to engender. The marital bed was also called "lectus genialis". But this does not mean that the Genius would have a symbolism linked to fertility. No. The symbolic aspect here is really limited to the principle of bloodline and race. This is confirmed by another etymology, that of "Ingenium" which is understood as "that which gives birth in ...". That's why the Genius party wasn't anything sexual, it was just his Dies Natalis, his birthday. The whole family participated in the worship of this Genius, because the latter had a religious dimension. We also wanted to make a connection between the Lares (the minor gods and tutelaries of the home) and the Genius.
- The Genius is the visible and invisible structure of man. He is the deified personality of a man, as he came into the world, from a series of other men, each of whom had their own Genius. This man is called to bring into the world, through the sons, another sequel, each term of which will also have its own Genius. It is the continuity of generations, and therefore that of the Genii.
This whole linguistic approach allows us in fact to understand the religious importance that the race and the blood line question had for our pagan ancestors. All the modern delusions of some pseudo-pagans will not change that. In contrast, pagans faithful to the vision of our ancestors will have understood that an ethnocultural heritage is respected and cultivated.
Hathuwolf Harson
Sources :
«Le vocabulaire indo-européen / Lexique étymologique thématique», X. Delamarre
«Diccionario etimológico indoeuropeo de la lengua española», Bárbara Pastor y Edward A. Roberts
«La religion romaine archaïque», George Dumézil
Étymologies :
Gène=> http://www.cnrtl.fr/definition/gène
Gens=> http://www.cnrtl.fr/etymologie/gens
Genre=> http://www.cnrtl.fr/etymologie/genre
Générer=> http://www.cnrtl.fr/etymologie/générer
Dégénérer=> http://www.cnrtl.fr/etymologie/dégénérer
https://www.symbolespaiensetinscriptionsruniques.fr/%C3%A9tymologie/g%C3%A8nes-gens-gendre-engendrer-g%C3%A9nie/