Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Who’s the patron Demon of the indigenous Native American peoples of Mexico?

Praeceptorem666 said:
Otto Rahn was a Kike who sexually harassed members of the SS and betrayed them, he was rightfully killed by the Gestapo, why tf would you quote someone like that in your signature?

The enemy is known for making up wild accusations about Nazis and anyone who were sympathetic to them. I think it would be best to share where you got this claim from and see if there is actual proof about it.
 
hailourtruegod said:
Praeceptorem666 said:
Otto Rahn was a Kike who sexually harassed members of the SS and betrayed them, he was rightfully killed by the Gestapo, why tf would you quote someone like that in your signature?

The enemy is known for making up wild accusations about Nazis and anyone who were sympathetic to them. I think it would be best to share where you got this claim from and see if there is actual proof about it.

Simple search would have resolved some of your misconception.

This is akin to blaming Dr. Mengela on horrible experimentation like the enemy has kvetched incessantly ad nausium for 80 years now, it gets old. Despite the fact the Doctor treated around 40,000 patients directly. And indirectly through his teachings affected around 400,000 other patients through other Doctors and other areas of the field.

In fact judging from Dr. Mengela he seems to be one of the most prolific Doctors of his time and even now I bet even other Doctors pale in comparison to his handiwork. Most of the time Mengela had no life whatsoever. If he wasn't being a Doctor for about 8-12 hours he would spend 3-4 hours studying and the rest was sleep, food, and whatever little entertainment he had.

I'm shocked people are so stupid funny Mengela's War Diary is mandatory read for USMC due to how detailed he is.

Anyways like any National Socialist as Hitler puts it. If your not being lambasted by enemy propaganda and rousing them to attack you in the press and history books. Your not a real National Socialists, I guess kosher logic = IF help fellow goy = attack and pervert cuz muh chosenism is superior. Y Knot help jews first and always 'n' sheit we be chosen 'n' sheit. Goyim eat sheit and shit 'n' be ebil, debil peples. We jew b gut 'n' sheit.

BTW @Praeceptorem666 the National Socialists were openly homosexual to a degree within close confidants and the SS itself the Germans had no issue with homosexuality. And in fact akin to the church attributed the hatred of people's sexuality to chosen knowledge of lying with man is a sin. Funny how much the people are so stupid from the NPC non-sense they get shoved up their ass and around the corner. Pink badges = anti-homosexual lulz kekeke. Actually Pink badges = special badge for people who are kid fuckers and other degenerates that were doing the same crimes the church has been doing on youths and people they take advantage of to promote judeo-bolshevism dreams of communist take over.

Sheer fact is Rahn was lambasted as a pre-, dur-, and post- war effort to stifle the revolution of National Socialism and it's religious ethos of embracing the conservative past of Paganism/Satanism whatever you want to call the polytheistic systems of the Ancient World. Everything has been hijacked and turned up side down. I suggest you look past misconceptions; keep them, but look past it and use the data you acquired to counter-man and rearrange your libraries to understand better the situation.

For example Nazi = ABC well it's actually XYZ which = I've been lied to.

Leniency and Tolerance on the Forums? - Ancient Forum Search

Otto Rahn - Ancient Forum Search

Otto Rahn Biography - Website
 
hailourtruegod said:
Praeceptorem666 said:
Otto Rahn was a Kike who sexually harassed members of the SS and betrayed them, he was rightfully killed by the Gestapo, why tf would you quote someone like that in your signature?

The enemy is known for making up wild accusations about Nazis and anyone who were sympathetic to them. I think it would be best to share where you got this claim from and see if there is actual proof about it.

The only proof I need is this dudes face, he has Jewish lips, Jewish eyes and a Jewish forehead, less prominent but still there are his other Jewish features, very obvious Kike.
 
Praeceptorem666 said:
hailourtruegod said:
Praeceptorem666 said:
Otto Rahn was a Kike who sexually harassed members of the SS and betrayed them, he was rightfully killed by the Gestapo, why tf would you quote someone like that in your signature?

The enemy is known for making up wild accusations about Nazis and anyone who were sympathetic to them. I think it would be best to share where you got this claim from and see if there is actual proof about it.

The only proof I need is this dudes face, he has Jewish lips, Jewish eyes and a Jewish forehead, less prominent but still there are his other Jewish features, very obvious Kike.

You made a wild accusation about something he allegedly did and when I asked for proof you now just say that you think he looks like it.

Not sure how you think these type of replies will help you get your point across to anyone here.

You're saying he has less prominent jewish features but at the same time saying they are obvious to see. Doesn't make much sense.

Lastly, jews have features of a lot of different Gentile races. That doesn't mean if a Gentile has these features that they are jewish.

I recommend relaxing a bit and continuing this discussion more civil as you're already making yourself look bad by saying things without proof and will only add to that if you start sperging out.
 
Gear88 said:
hailourtruegod said:
Praeceptorem666 said:
...
BTW @Praeceptorem666 the National Socialists were openly homosexual to a degree within close confidants and the SS itself the Germans had no issue with homosexuality. And in fact akin to the church attributed the hatred of people's sexuality to chosen knowledge of lying with man is a sin. Funny how much the people are so stupid from the NPC non-sense they get shoved up their ass and around the corner. Pink badges = anti-homosexual lulz kekeke. Actually Pink badges = special badge for people who are kid fuckers and other degenerates that were doing the same crimes the church has been doing on youths and people they take advantage of to promote judeo-bolshevism dreams of communist take over.

All the sources trying to refute the fact that the Nazis and Aryans of past hated homosexuals are written by Jews. Funny how you subconsciously equate homosexuality with sexual harassment.
 
hailourtruegod said:
Praeceptorem666 said:
hailourtruegod said:
The enemy is known for making up wild accusations about Nazis and anyone who were sympathetic to them. I think it would be best to share where you got this claim from and see if there is actual proof about it.

The only proof I need is this dudes face, he has Jewish lips, Jewish eyes and a Jewish forehead, less prominent but still there are his other Jewish features, very obvious Kike.

You made a wild accusation about something he allegedly did and when I asked for proof you now just say that you think he looks like it.

Not sure how you think these type of replies will help you get your point across to anyone here.

You're saying he has less prominent jewish features but at the same time saying they are obvious to see. Doesn't make much sense.

Lastly, jews have features of a lot of different Gentile races. That doesn't mean if a Gentile has these features that they are jewish.

I recommend relaxing a bit and continuing this discussion more civil as you're already making yourself look bad by saying things without proof and will only add to that if you start sperging out.

For point 1: Precisely, his Jewishness makes everything else correct.

For point 2: Fallacy.

For point 3: Not what I said, is English a second language for you?

For point 4: It makes them Jewish, bigger bottom lip, very receeded forehead, sunken in eyes and the rest are not Gentile qualities.

For point 5: More fallacies, the only person being uncivil here is you, please stop projecting.

He is definitely a Jew, the biography which Gear says is true says this aswell as saying he betrayed the Nazis. Heres a bit of what it said:
Rahn's Jewish status is irrefutable. Rahn's mother was Clara Margaret Hamburger and his grandfather was Simeon Hamburger, a name form frequently used by central European Jews. His maternal grandmother, Lea Cucer, was equally Jewish. Cucer comes from Cocer, a name of profession widely used by Jews of central Europe. For a source of my other claims here you go as apparently being Jewish doesn't incriminate him enough: https://allthatsinteresting.com/otto-rahn
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/starsandstories/3673575/The-original-Indiana-Jones-Otto-Rahn-and-the-temple-of-doom.html
 
Praeceptorem666 said:
hailourtruegod said:
Praeceptorem666 said:
Otto Rahn was a Kike who sexually harassed members of the SS and betrayed them, he was rightfully killed by the Gestapo, why tf would you quote someone like that in your signature?

The enemy is known for making up wild accusations about Nazis and anyone who were sympathetic to them. I think it would be best to share where you got this claim from and see if there is actual proof about it.

The only proof I need is this dudes face, he has Jewish lips, Jewish eyes and a Jewish forehead, less prominent but still there are his other Jewish features, very obvious Kike.

Truly. The SS, led by advanced spiritual adepts and the highest Aryan minds, would have allowed a jew to just walk in and sit on everyone's face.

Thank Satan we have such an excellent Apricity-certified phrenologist and Race Expert™ as yourself. Trump apparently brutally raped endless women by spanking their butts with a towel, the long schnozz on CNN and judge said so.

To new members: this is why judging jewishness on appearance alone, opposed to spiritual faculty, can be highly deceptive and can lead to erring conclusions and extremist paranoia like this guy. The majority of people like this dude would not be able to peg Bar Refaeli or something as a jewess, even though she is.
 
Praeceptorem666 said:

Homosexuality wasn't written about much by the NS, because they never saw it as something significant or special. They acknowledged that people have preferences and differences, and didn't make a big deal about it.

The so called "homosexuals" they hated were xian priests who sexually abused little boys (and girls) in xian churches.

They actively persecuted these disgusting creatures, however they did not equate these vile behaviors by deranged xians with homosexuality, and had no problems whatsoever with people having their own preferences.

Also, it is not the sexual preference of people which they had any issue with, but the behaviors of people that they would have judged regardless of sexuality.

If someone is homosexual in their private life and doesn't have strange harassing behaviors towards his fellow men, obviously there is no issue with it.

Most homosexual people of the time were just regular people, they were who they were and their sexuality did not define anything about their identity or personality, why would they be hated because they prefer a penis over a vagina?

The NS were some of the wisest and most understanding in their judgements, they wouldn't be concerned over something as insignificant as sexuality or someones sexual tendencies, unless these tendencies were criminal or harmful to people and society (like rape, pedophilia, abuse, etc), none of which homosexuality is in any way.

They also long stepped away from any xian identity. People had their freedom to live in accordance with their nature, within parameters set by the law, which there was never anything decided against homosexuality by any of the NS who presided over making such judgements.
 
Karnonnos said:
Praeceptorem666 said:
hailourtruegod said:
The enemy is known for making up wild accusations about Nazis and anyone who were sympathetic to them. I think it would be best to share where you got this claim from and see if there is actual proof about it.

The only proof I need is this dudes face, he has Jewish lips, Jewish eyes and a Jewish forehead, less prominent but still there are his other Jewish features, very obvious Kike.

Truly. The SS, led by advanced spiritual adepts and the highest Aryan minds, would have allowed a jew to just walk in and sit on everyone's face.

Thank Satan we have such an excellent Apricity-certified phrenologist and Race Expert™ as yourself. Trump apparently brutally raped endless women by spanking their butts with a towel, the long schnozz on CNN and judge said so.

To new members: this is why judging jewishness on appearance alone, opposed to spiritual faculty, can be highly deceptive and can lead to erring conclusions and extremist paranoia like this guy. The majority of people like this dude would not be able to peg Bar Refaeli or something as a jewess, even though she is.

Trump raped many women and young girls, you deny this shabbos did these things? You don't think he was on Epstein island? Yikes, ironic of you to make a bunch of immature fallacies at me yet you unironically like Trump, Jews want Trump in with 2024, it's part of their plan, everything with American politics is for the most part. Yes, the SS let him in for a short while and then killed him, if you think this makes them idiots you should take a look at yourself as you're no where near as smart as the SS.
 
VoiceofEnki said:
Praeceptorem666 said:

Homosexuality wasn't written about much by the NS, because they never saw it as something significant or special. They acknowledged that people have preferences and differences, and didn't make a big deal about it.

The so called "homosexuals" they hated were xian priests who sexually abused little boys (and girls) in xian churches.

They actively persecuted these disgusting creatures, however they did not equate these vile behaviors by deranged xians with homosexuality, and had no problems whatsoever with people having their own preferences.

Also, it is not the sexual preference of people which they had any issue with, but the behaviors of people that they would have judged regardless of sexuality.

If someone is homosexual in their private life and doesn't have strange harassing behaviors towards his fellow men, obviously there is no issue with it.

Most homosexual people of the time were just regular people, they were who they were and their sexuality did not define anything about their identity or personality, why would they be hated because they prefer a penis over a vagina?

The NS were some of the wisest and most understanding in their judgements, they wouldn't be concerned over something as insignificant as sexuality or someones sexual tendencies, unless these tendencies were criminal or harmful to people and society (like rape, pedophilia, abuse, etc), none of which homosexuality is in any way.

They also long stepped away from any xian identity. People had their freedom to live in accordance with their nature, within parameters set by the law, which there was never anything decided against homosexuality by any of the NS who presided over making such judgements.

Homosexuals have much higher rates of pedophilia and many other deranged things, the Nazis didn't like that stuff, using pattern recognition all of them should be stopped, doesn't matter if one is good, I have all the stats on my broken computer that I need to get fixed so I can't cite them at the moment but I'd be happy to in the next few days. Here is the law the Nazis kept and used to persecute homosexuals: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Paragraph-175
 
Praeceptorem666 said:

Otto Rahn is definitely not jewish. In fact, the features of his face which you point out aren't jewish to begin with.

He doesn't have a thicker lower lip, they are exactly the same and completely gentile. You need to look at some actual jewish faces to see what a jewish lip looks like if you duly think Otto Rahn's perfectly proportioned lip is jewish.

He has a perfectly straight nose (pretty much impossible for a jew), like it cannot be more straight and European than that.

His forehead is slanted back, but not unusually long, he just has balding which makes his forehead look longer. This is a trait seen in people with a lot of air.

His eyes are different from the jewish droopy eyes. They are slightly slanted, but not droopy, which is not the jewish eye. Not to mention, deep set eyes aren't an exclusively jewish trait, lots of gentiles of all races have them.


Most of these traits are related to the elements of one's soul being expressed through the face.

He is undoubtedly gentile.

As for those articles you send, the history written about Otto Rahn is some of the most twisted and least trustworthy. There is nothing in those links there to go off, and it may as well be complete fiction.
 
VoiceofEnki said:
Praeceptorem666 said:

Otto Rahn is definitely not jewish. In fact, the features of his face which you point out aren't jewish to begin with.

He doesn't have a thicker lower lip, they are exactly the same and completely gentile. You need to look at some actual jewish faces to see what a jewish lip looks like if you duly think Otto Rahn's perfectly proportioned lip is jewish.

He has a perfectly straight nose (pretty much impossible for a jew), like it cannot be more straight and European than that.

His forehead is slanted back, but not unusually long, he just has balding which makes his forehead look longer. This is a trait seen in people with a lot of air.

His eyes are different from the jewish droopy eyes. They are slightly slanted, but not droopy, which is not the jewish eye. Not to mention, deep set eyes aren't an exclusively jewish trait, lots of gentiles of all races have them.


Most of these traits are related to the elements of one's soul being expressed through the face.

He is undoubtedly gentile.

As for those articles you send, the history written about Otto Rahn is some of the most twisted and least trustworthy. There is nothing in those links there to go off, and it may as well be complete fiction.

Rahn's Jewish status is irrefutable. Rahn's mother was Clara Margaret Hamburger and his grandfather was Simeon Hamburger, a name form frequently used by central European Jews. His maternal grandmother, Lea Cucer, was equally Jewish. Cucer comes from Cocer, a name of profession widely used by Jews of central Europe. It's not just that he's balding, this dude does not look like a Gentile, also the Otto Rahn biography site says alot of what the links I sent say, that site has all the sources at the bottom amd they seem credible. Image of Rahn:
https://qu.ax/EcU.jpg *That DOES NOT look like a Gentile Lol*
 
Praeceptorem666 said:

There is no surviving source material that shows us exactly what the so called paragraph 175 had actually said.

The source that can be found online is from "pink triangle pages", which is a gay rights movement that picked up after the second world war, and has literally 0 quoted source material regarding the subject matters they speak of, neither the supposed persecution of homosexuals in NS Germany, nor any of the things they mention such as "paragraph 175".

They state things as facts, and expect all readers to just believe it, with 0 source material to go around.

There are no records publicly viewable to see if NS Germany actually persecuted homosexuals purely for being homosexual, there is in fact no evidence on this anywhere in the world.

If it was so, and was so prolific, where are the sources? Where are the original documents regarding this?

Where is the record of the official ruling on paragraph 175 as supposedly reinstated by Adolf Hitler on May 6 1933?

They say he had reinstated it on that day, and had amended it to what those "pink triangle pages" write it had been, but there are no verifiable sources on this at all. Neither there are no sources on the amended paragraph 175, to verify if indeed it was written as such as spoken about on the "pink triangle pages".


The whole idea of the pink triangle is the same as the lies about the jewish star of david supposedly worn in prison uniforms of jews in concentration camps as a mockery and a label.

These are lies with no basis, no proof, and no source. Made up as slander, and even purposely fabricated to slander the NS for all time to come after WW2.


If you want to price your point here, you need to show us original sources, in German, from the NS of NS Germany, which provide undeniable proof beyond any reasonable doubt that NS Germany and Adolf Hitler had indeed ordered such things and persecuted people merely for being homosexual.

If you provide these sources, which jews had desperately been wishing they had so they could get away with their slander and lies, then your argument has some merit and we can talk further.


This sort of thing which states "It was real in my mind, so I believed it!" Is complete nonsense and has no place here.

Only cold hard facts, that can be verified to be true beyond any reasonable doubt will ever be accepted on this subject matter.

Which as I said, doesn't exist, because it is abundantly clear all of this are false post war fabrications with no basis in reality whatsoever.
 
Praeceptorem666 said:
Rahn's Jewish status is irrefutable. Rahn's mother was Clara Margaret Hamburger and his grandfather was Simeon Hamburger, a name form frequently used by central European Jews. His maternal grandmother, Lea Cucer, was equally Jewish. Cucer comes from Cocer, a name of profession widely used by Jews of central Europe. It's not just that he's balding, this dude does not look like a Gentile, also the Otto Rahn biography site says alot of what the links I sent say, that site has all the sources at the bottom amd they seem credible. Image of Rahn:
https://qu.ax/EcU.jpg *That DOES NOT look like a Gentile Lol*

I have just refuted you have I not? Therefore, your claim is indeed quite refutable.

He certainly doesn't look jewish in that photograph. I am certain of that, neither in any photograph of himself.

You think he is jewish because of his eyes. There are many gentiles with such eyes. None of his other features are anywhere close to jewish from that photograph.

He is in fact completely gentile, and that photograph proves it enough.

Recognizing a jew is more than comparing a few traits to what you think are jewish traits and then affirming what you believe in your mind based on personal perception.


His family name, hamburger, is a name that came from people who lived in Hamburg. That is a name of gentile origin.


The only thing I can find on Cucer in a quick search is that it has the Spanish meaning "to boil", whereas Cocer has the meaning "To cook".

It does not appear common in Central Europe at all, neither I can find evidence that Cocer is a jewish profession, however I haven't done extensive research so I am not saying that is impossible.


The text you quote simply affirms that "Cocer" is a name of a jewish profession common in Central Europe, and that the name Cucer comes from Cocer.

Am I supposed to just take the word of the writing for that? The random dude who wrote this must be right surely? How does he "know", or where did he come up with this?

I will believe him if I can be pointed what a Cocer is supposed to be, that it is indeed a common exclusively jewish profession of Central Europe from those times, and that Cucer indeed does come from Cocer.

So far, the evidence is nonexistent... This is nothing more than speciation and conjecture.
 
VoiceofEnki said:
Praeceptorem666 said:

There is no surviving source material that shows us exactly what the so called paragraph 175 had actually said.

The source that can be found online is from "pink triangle pages", which is a gay rights movement that picked up after the second world war, and has literally 0 quoted source material regarding the subject matters they speak of, neither the supposed persecution of homosexuals in NS Germany, nor any of the things they mention such as "paragraph 175".

They state things as facts, and expect all readers to just believe it, with 0 source material to go around.

There are no records publicly viewable to see if NS Germany actually persecuted homosexuals purely for being homosexual, there is in fact no evidence on this anywhere in the world.

If it was so, and was so prolific, where are the sources? Where are the original documents regarding this?

Where is the record of the official ruling on paragraph 175 as supposedly reinstated by Adolf Hitler on May 6 1933?

They say he had reinstated it on that day, and had amended it to what those "pink triangle pages" write it had been, but there are no verifiable sources on this at all. Neither there are no sources on the amended paragraph 175, to verify if indeed it was written as such as spoken about on the "pink triangle pages".


The whole idea of the pink triangle is the same as the lies about the jewish star of david supposedly worn in prison uniforms of jews in concentration camps as a mockery and a label.

These are lies with no basis, no proof, and no source. Made up as slander, and even purposely fabricated to slander the NS for all time to come after WW2.


If you want to price your point here, you need to show us original sources, in German, from the NS of NS Germany, which provide undeniable proof beyond any reasonable doubt that NS Germany and Adolf Hitler had indeed ordered such things and persecuted people merely for being homosexual.

If you provide these sources, which jews had desperately been wishing they had so they could get away with their slander and lies, then your argument has some merit and we can talk further.


This sort of thing which states "It was real in my mind, so I believed it!" Is complete nonsense and has no place here.

Only cold hard facts, that can be verified to be true beyond any reasonable doubt will ever be accepted on this subject matter.

Which as I said, doesn't exist, because it is abundantly clear all of this are false post war fabrications with no basis in reality whatsoever.

"Anyone who thinks of homosexual *love* is our enemy. We reject anything which emasculates our people and makes it a plaything for our enemies, for we know that life is fight, and it is madness to think that men will ever embrace fraternally"

Heinrich Himmler, 14 May 1928

"I wish to explore a few ideas on the subject of homosexuality. Amongst certain homosexuals there exists the following point of view: "what I do is of no importance to anyone else, it is a personal and private matter". Everything which touches upon sexual matters ceases to be private when the life or death of a nation depends on it. It is the difference between world domination or annihilation.

A nation with many children can gain supremacy and mastery of the wordl. A pure race with few children already as one foot in the grave; in fifty or a hundred years it will be of no significance; in two hundred years it will be extinct. It is essential to realise that if we allow this infection to continue in Germany without being able to fight it, it will be the end of Germany, of the Germanic world. Unfortunately this is not the simple matter it was for our forefathers. For them, the few isolated cases were simply abnormalities; they drowned them in bogs. Those who found bodies in the mire did not know that in 90% of the cases they found themselves face to face with a homosexual who had been drowned with all his belongings. This was not punishment, more the simple elimination of this particular abnormality. It is vital we rid ourselves of them; like weed we must pull them up, throw them on the fire and burn them. This is not out of a spirit of vengeance, but of necessity; these creatures must be exterminated.

Heinrich Himmler, 18 Feb 1937

"I found the habits and mentality of the various kinds of homosexuala and the study of their psyches under prison conditions, extemely instructive."

Rudolf Hoess, Commandant of Auschwitz.

"He lectured me on the role of homosexuality in history and politics. It had destroyed ancient Greece he said. Once rife, it extended its contagious effects like an ineluctable law of nature to the best and most manly of characters, elimination from the reproductive process those very men on whose offspring a nation depended. The immediate result of the vice, however, was that unnatural passion swiftly became dominant in public affairs if it were allowed to spread unchecked".

Rudolh Diels, first chief of the Gestapo, reporting a conversation with Hitler.

P175 is verifiable by looking at how very high ranks felt on homosexuality.

>If you provide these sources, which jews had desperately been wishing they had so they could get away with their slander and lies, then your argument has some merit and we can talk further.

Jews make the source harder to find so peddlers of homosexuality in NS movements have an easier time.
 
VoiceofEnki said:
Praeceptorem666 said:
Rahn's Jewish status is irrefutable. Rahn's mother was Clara Margaret Hamburger and his grandfather was Simeon Hamburger, a name form frequently used by central European Jews. His maternal grandmother, Lea Cucer, was equally Jewish. Cucer comes from Cocer, a name of profession widely used by Jews of central Europe. It's not just that he's balding, this dude does not look like a Gentile, also the Otto Rahn biography site says alot of what the links I sent say, that site has all the sources at the bottom amd they seem credible. Image of Rahn:
https://qu.ax/EcU.jpg *That DOES NOT look like a Gentile Lol*

I have just refuted you have I not? Therefore, your claim is indeed quite refutable.

He certainly doesn't look jewish in that photograph. I am certain of that, neither in any photograph of himself.

You think he is jewish because of his eyes. There are many gentiles with such eyes. None of his other features are anywhere close to jewish from that photograph.

He is in fact completely gentile, and that photograph proves it enough.

Recognizing a jew is more than comparing a few traits to what you think are jewish traits and then affirming what you believe in your mind based on personal perception.


His family name, hamburger, is a name that came from people who lived in Hamburg. That is a name of gentile origin.


The only thing I can find on Cucer in a quick search is that it has the Spanish meaning "to boil", whereas Cocer has the meaning "To cook".

It does not appear common in Central Europe at all, neither I can find evidence that Cocer is a jewish profession, however I haven't done extensive research so I am not saying that is impossible.


The text you quote simply affirms that "Cocer" is a name of a jewish profession common in Central Europe, and that the name Cucer comes from Cocer.

Am I supposed to just take the word of the writing for that? The random dude who wrote this must be right surely? How does he "know", or where did he come up with this?

I will believe him if I can be pointed what a Cocer is supposed to be, that it is indeed a common exclusively jewish profession of Central Europe from those times, and that Cucer indeed does come from Cocer.

So far, the evidence is nonexistent... This is nothing more than speciation and conjecture.

We can agree to disagree, neither of us shall move on our positions, we're both very hardened there. Would you be able to show me a Gentile who looks like Rahn?
 
Praeceptorem666 said:
"He lectured me on the role of homosexuality in history and politics. It had destroyed ancient Greece he said. Once rife, it extended its contagious effects like an ineluctable law of nature to the best and most manly of characters, elimination from the reproductive process those very men on whose offspring a nation depended. The immediate result of the vice, however, was that unnatural passion swiftly became dominant in public affairs if it were allowed to spread unchecked".

Rudolh Diels, first chief of the Gestapo, reporting a conversation with Hitler.

P175 is verifiable by looking at how very high ranks felt on homosexuality.

>If you provide these sources, which jews had desperately been wishing they had so they could get away with their slander and lies, then your argument has some merit and we can talk further.

Jews make the source harder to find so peddlers of homosexuality in NS movements have an easier time.

Everyone has personal flaws based on their character and natal chart. Homosexuality is not the only thing which can promote bad behavior. Claiming that homosexuality is what destroyed ancient Greece is silly because it avoids the spiritual state of the population.

Instead, we should focus on our spiritual advancement, which is the key to solving all of these social problems, rather than just getting so hung up on one of them.

If homosexuality is something that is unnatural and pathological, then it will be solved through work on the soul, as would other issues. If it turns out to be natural, then any degeneracy associated with it will be resolved. This is no different from the degeneracy which is stereotyped as coming from other social groups, like men or women. Instead of destroying people, we apply the spiritual solutions.
 
It's 2023; over 2,000 years since God came to existence. Like FancyMancy's meme post: Impregnates a virgin, to give birth to himself, to sacrifice himself to himself, to save you from himself.

Lord Gawd sacrificed and died to cleanse the sins.

And yet funny enough it's been over 2,000 years since xtianity. And it's been nearly 3,000 maybe 4,000 years since the kvetching on lying with mankind. And it's 2023 and we still have people who are shocked, appalled, and wanting to change people who stick their virile member in the wrong hole.

It's 2023 and we still have people completely wanting to dictate people's sex life and how there is a right way of sex and a wrong sex. And then people wonder why the enemy created an entire legion of NPCs that are against and an entire legion of NPCs that are for certain things and use both sides against the middle and each other while grabbing at every power point and every goddamn point of positive, neutrality, and negativity to twist it up and shit on humanity.

All I'm gonna say is even IF the NS were against homosexuals. Even if the NS were against people for putting their dick inside the wrong hole.

That was a different time. It be akin to having Aleister Crowley paint a grey alien and people in modern times goes that is a fucking ayylmao grey. Back in his time people probably thought Crowley was smoking some good shit.

I'm surprised these threads and these statements continue. And then people wonder why society is being destroyed. I hate this person for sticking his dick in an asshole of a man. Or I hate this cuckservative christian person for not letting me stick my dick in another mans asshole.

sub-1945 was a different time. People held different opinions. Even Hitler had to change his opinion. And many NS grew out of different stuff. It almost seems like some people want historical originalism like the constitution of the U.S. and the legal justice system.

We hate and want to banish homos cuz muh subversive destruction. And it's like there was before judeo-bolshevism homos and Pagans. Most gave two shits, some people are hardcore hetero and don't want homos I would not be surprised if some Pagans detested homosexuality out of ignorance and were like I don't want that for me. But if you do it okay.

The xtians are a bunch of NIMBYest, not in my backyard. And then the funny part they self-destroy or they collapse into homosexuality or look at homo pornography.

It's 2023 and there are still people trying to dictate sexuality.

1900s was a long time ago. Things change, society changes.

JOS is not observant of xtianity. We are not historical revisionists or originalists or siding with an anti-. Rather we see the forest and the trees and go a long time ago and an even longer time ago we had Gods around. Things occurred for many centuries people were cucks. That era is over.

I think it's best if we just end these silly anti-homo properties. This is kinda like rock music, it's ebil-debil music. Frank Zappa annihilated all the cuckservative people.

Sex is ebil and debil. No Sex is important.

Sheer fact is like HP.Cobra said, In the future abrahmism is to be punished with pure brutality.

I believe the people who keep up with homo is sin and bad and debil and shit. Are hemenutical ignorant, they are willfully ignorant and defend their ignorance.

It's the same thing with the gun argument. Guns are bad m'kay. Guns kill people m'kay. I've heard stories of cats jumping on people's neck and biting into their jugular or carotid artery and killing people or injuring them severely if surviving the bite.

What's next looking at sexy women causes eye rape and adultery. Oh wait that already exists.

It almost seems like all these people either want to experiment like a member said, most people are repressed heterosexuals. There's many people who want to experiment or be bi-sexual or a spectrum of sexuality.

It's 2023...it gets old.

Society times everything changes. This is not 1933-1945, NS died a long time ago. And even our own Paganism is a swiss cheese of people destroying things. We still got people in the Middle East blowing up Ancient temples and sites.

I think it's time people opened up their eyes and look a the real enemy of Mankind. But alas duh dong goes in the vagena.

Hell with xtians is the dong is vagena and not mouth nor anal cuz sodomy is sin debil ebil.

Ebil, debil on everything. Might as well tell xtians to commit suicide cuz heaben be better than Earth. Oh wait sucide ist zin 'n' sheit.

Everything is a sin. Basically it seems like even just existing is a sin. I have no idea how xtians even live. Pick and choose sins roll your own christianity.

I like sex but wish not to sin so I'll choose not to sin by picking this sin and use this sin but not that one.

Xtians are utter retards.

And it's retarded these things. People were different back then. We've changed, evolved, revolutionized.

It's 2023 not 1923.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top