What to do when confronted with a mandatory vaccination

[Shadowcat]

source: from Keenan on gab.
Found this interesting.

What to do when confronted with a mandatory
vaccination

Did this same doctor wear a mask or suggest you or the children he sees wear one? I bet he did because they all did, and they knew that they were lying, but they all kept lying anyway. I'd be skeptical that he's actually received anything. He's just showing its safe, so you'll take it.

Let me give you a little advice on how to handle anything the government says is required of you. Instead of saying no. Say yes but then provide the conditions you require as is your right. What you require is informed consent. Tell them you're concerned about the vaccines safety so you would like to see long term studies and animal tests. Ask them to explain "pathogenic priming" or whether ADE can really cause your own cells to produce viruses as they die? Ask to see the studies that prove that they've overcome this problem because all the trials for SARS-CoV-1 failed miserably and were deemed unsafe for humans.

Ask them for proof that they isolated the virus. Tell them you want to see the animal study where they were able to replicate the human symptoms in an infected animal. That's a prerequisite for them to be able to claim that virus A is responsible for the new cluster of symptoms B. If they've not done that (And I know they have not) then they can't even prove there's a Covid-19 virus at all.

As soon as they can't answer a single question all you have to say is "If you can't answer my question than this is not informed consent. Medical treatment without informed consent is a violation of the Nuremberg Laws and is a Crime Against Humanity"

So are you knowingly going to violate the Nuremberg Laws or are you going to put that frankenvax away and leave me alone?

Some of these people have drank the Kool-Aid and don't understand what they're doing is wrong. When you point out to them that they would be knowingly doing something that can land them with a life sentence, they'll back off. It's one thing to do something that causes harm to you, but they can't handle anything putting themselves in legal jeopardy.

I hope this knowledge empowers you to know how to resist and actually win.

 

[Fuchs]

source: from Keenan on gab.
Found this interesting.

What to do when confronted with a mandatory
vaccination

Did this same doctor wear a mask or suggest you or the children he sees wear one? I bet he did because they all did, and they knew that they were lying, but they all kept lying anyway. I'd be skeptical that he's actually received anything. He's just showing its safe, so you'll take it.

Let me give you a little advice on how to handle anything the government says is required of you. Instead of saying no. Say yes but then provide the conditions you require as is your right. What you require is informed consent. Tell them you're concerned about the vaccines safety so you would like to see long term studies and animal tests. Ask them to explain "pathogenic priming" or whether ADE can really cause your own cells to produce viruses as they die? Ask to see the studies that prove that they've overcome this problem because all the trials for SARS-CoV-1 failed miserably and were deemed unsafe for humans.

Ask them for proof that they isolated the virus. Tell them you want to see the animal study where they were able to replicate the human symptoms in an infected animal. That's a prerequisite for them to be able to claim that virus A is responsible for the new cluster of symptoms B. If they've not done that (And I know they have not) then they can't even prove there's a Covid-19 virus at all.

As soon as they can't answer a single question all you have to say is "If you can't answer my question than this is not informed consent. Medical treatment without informed consent is a violation of the Nuremberg Laws and is a Crime Against Humanity"

So are you knowingly going to violate the Nuremberg Laws or are you going to put that frankenvax away and leave me alone?

Some of these people have drank the Kool-Aid and don't understand what they're doing is wrong. When you point out to them that they would be knowingly doing something that can land them with a life sentence, they'll back off. It's one thing to do something that causes harm to you, but they can't handle anything putting themselves in legal jeopardy.

I hope this knowledge empowers you to know how to resist and actually win.

I would not try this strategy because most people are not enouth educated on the subject, then the doctor can lie point out on a rong study etc and then the person is defenceless.

On a fact check site about Nuremberg Laws, one "alleged human rights expert" did state:
"no the vaccines have nothing to do with the Nurmberg Laws, the Nurmberg Laws are about Human experimentation."

This statemend did remind me of the statement in the tora: Only jews are humans.


Maybe we will see with further corruption in the legal system that they will deny because of the above reason. We are not there. But maybe some day.


I still think it is better so say no without arguing.


Found this written by some jew (there are severe side effects fromt the vaccine):

"Why the COVID Vaccine Should Not Be Mandatory (Yet)

So given my very pro-vaccine stance, why shouldn't the COVID vaccine be mandatory? Because there are several factors to consider when deciding which vaccines should be required for public school attendance (or participation in society).

(1) Efficacy. Before we force someone to take a vaccine, we need to make sure it works, not just in the short-term but the long-term as well. Jabs like MMR and DTaP confer protection for a long time, often a lifetime. But we don't know yet if the COVID vaccines will protect people long-term.

(2) Safety. Clinical trials and the millions of doses already administered show that the COVID vaccine is safe. (It's certainly orders of magnitude safer than getting COVID.) However, there are always rare side effects. We want to know what all of those could be before mandating that millions of people receive the vaccine. We probably won't have that information for several years.

(3) Severity (virulence). Diseases that are nasty or have a high infection-fatality rate are good candidates for mandatory vaccination. Tetanus causes excruciating pain and muscle spasms that lead to respiratory failure and a gruesome death. Tetanus spores are ubiquitous in the soil, so why risk it when there's a vaccine that can prevent it?

(4) Likelihood of infection. Some infectious diseases are horrible and deadly -- smallpox and rabies comes to mind. However, the likelihood of being infected is essentially zero for both. (There is a small, non-zero risk that smallpox could be used as a biological weapon.) The average person is never likely to encounter either virus, so vaccination makes no sense, let alone mandatory vaccination.

(5) Contagiousness and method of transmission. Vaccines against diseases that are easy to catch, for instance by walking into a room with another infected person, are good candidates for being mandatory. Measles is perhaps the most infectious microbe known, which is one reason why MMR vaccines are required for school. On the flip side, human papillomavirus (HPV), which causes cervical cancer, can only be acquired from sexual contact. In this case, there isn't a strong case for mandatory vaccination.

When assessing these five criteria, COVID vaccines so far only satisfy #4 and #5. That's why it doesn't make sense to make them mandatory." https://www.acsh.org/news/2021/02/05/should-covid-vaccines-be-mandatory-15324


"Some vaccines are essentially mandatory. If you want your kid to go to public school, then he or she needs to get various jabs. Should the COVID vaccine be one of them?

Probably not. While your child should get the COVID vaccine when enough become available, I do not think this one should be mandatory. Why?

Before I explain, I'd like to point out that nobody is more pro-vaccine than me. I'm the guy who wrote a USA Today column about putting parents who refuse to vaccinate their kids in jail. The Alex Jones/InfoWars crowd didn't like that very much, and they sent me some interesting tweets at the time (including a veiled death threat or two).

I've since softened my rhetoric. In Scientific American, Ethan Siegel and I proposed shunning anti-vaxxers from society. Alternatively, we could hold anti-vaxxers who infect others liable for medical costs. The point is there must be consequences for those who refuse to participate as responsible members of society and whose actions inflict harm on innocent bystanders. "