GoldenxChild1
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2021
- Messages
- 1,656
I was inspired to write this based on Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche’s “The Anti Christ”, which can be found in the public domain.
This isn’t anything that most members don’t already know; however, it is to the amusement and/or benefit of those that wish to read it.
I will paste below page 47, 48, and 49 of this work.
“Christianity is called the religion of pity.—Pity stands in opposition to all the tonic passions that augment the energy of the feeling of aliveness: it is a depressant. A man loses power when he pities. Through pity that drain upon strength which suffering works is multiplied a thousandfold. Suffering is made contagious by pity; under certain circumstances it may lead to a total sacrifice of life and living energy—a loss out of all proportion to the magnitude of the cause (—the case of the death of the Nazarene). This is the first view of it; there is, however, a still more important one. If one measures the effects of pity by the gravity of the reactions it sets up, its character as a menace to life appears in a much clearer light. Pity thwarts the whole law of evolution, which is the law of natural selection. It preserves whatever is ripe for destruction; it fights on the side of those disinherited and condemned by life; by maintaining life in so many of the botched of all kinds, it gives life itself a gloomy and dubious aspect. Mankind has ventured to call pity a virtue (—in every superior moral system it appears as a weakness—); going still further, it has been called the virtue, the source and foundation of all other virtues—but let us always bear in mind that this was from the standpoint of a philosophy that was nihilistic, and upon whose shield the denial of life was inscribed. Schopenhauer was right in this: that by means of pity life is denied, and made worthy of denial—pity is the technic of nihilism. Let me repeat: this depressing and contagious instinct stands against all those instincts which work for the preservation and enhancement of life: in the rôle of protector of the miserable, it is a prime agent in the promotion of décadence—pity persuades to extinction.... Of course, one doesn’t say “extinction”: one says “the other world,” or “God,” or “the true life,” or Nirvana, salvation, blessedness.... This innocent rhetoric, from the realm of religious-ethical balderdash, appears a good deal less innocent when one reflects upon the tendency that it conceals beneath sublime words: the tendency to destroy life. Schopenhauer was hostile to life: that is why pity appeared to him as a virtue.... Aristotle, as every one knows, saw in pity a sickly and dangerous state of mind, the remedy for which was an occasional purgative: he regarded tragedy as that purgative. The instinct of life should prompt us to seek some means of puncturing any such pathological and dangerous accumulation of pity as that appearing in Schopenhauer’s case (and also, alack, in that of our whole literary décadence, from St. Petersburg to Paris, from Tolstoi to Wagner), that it may burst and be discharged.... Nothing is more unhealthy, amid all our unhealthy modernism, than Christian pity. To be the doctors here, to be unmerciful here, to wield the knife here—all this is our business, all this is our sort of humanity, by this sign we are philosophers, we Hyperboreans!—"
Now, is it not true that pity stands in direct opposition to self preservation?
There is a difference between things like compassion, empathy, and sympathy, to pity. Pity is lowering yourself to those who “appear” to be beneath you to internally raise your false sense of virtue. It borders on Martyrdom, in which seems holy and noble, yet is a complete lack of life and living.
Most people take true sacrifice out of context, for example, people see someone disabled, or see starving children, and they say, “Oh how lucky I am!” and “I would take your place if I could!”. What does this accomplish except feelings of guilt. Instead, precise action should be taken, if possible, not fake monologue.
Feeling sorry for others will make you feel sorry for yourself, and there is nothing constructive about this, no solution or antidote to the original problem.
We must be ruthlessly resolute to those who others “Pity”, not only for our sake but for their sake. For if we offer less than a solution then we are a part of the problem, adding to their already depressive state. “Your poor thing”, this is not helping, this is nothing.
All is power. We must be power, not weakness, to ourselves and those around us.
This is more to the general masses, not any SS.
HAIL SATAN
This isn’t anything that most members don’t already know; however, it is to the amusement and/or benefit of those that wish to read it.
I will paste below page 47, 48, and 49 of this work.
“Christianity is called the religion of pity.—Pity stands in opposition to all the tonic passions that augment the energy of the feeling of aliveness: it is a depressant. A man loses power when he pities. Through pity that drain upon strength which suffering works is multiplied a thousandfold. Suffering is made contagious by pity; under certain circumstances it may lead to a total sacrifice of life and living energy—a loss out of all proportion to the magnitude of the cause (—the case of the death of the Nazarene). This is the first view of it; there is, however, a still more important one. If one measures the effects of pity by the gravity of the reactions it sets up, its character as a menace to life appears in a much clearer light. Pity thwarts the whole law of evolution, which is the law of natural selection. It preserves whatever is ripe for destruction; it fights on the side of those disinherited and condemned by life; by maintaining life in so many of the botched of all kinds, it gives life itself a gloomy and dubious aspect. Mankind has ventured to call pity a virtue (—in every superior moral system it appears as a weakness—); going still further, it has been called the virtue, the source and foundation of all other virtues—but let us always bear in mind that this was from the standpoint of a philosophy that was nihilistic, and upon whose shield the denial of life was inscribed. Schopenhauer was right in this: that by means of pity life is denied, and made worthy of denial—pity is the technic of nihilism. Let me repeat: this depressing and contagious instinct stands against all those instincts which work for the preservation and enhancement of life: in the rôle of protector of the miserable, it is a prime agent in the promotion of décadence—pity persuades to extinction.... Of course, one doesn’t say “extinction”: one says “the other world,” or “God,” or “the true life,” or Nirvana, salvation, blessedness.... This innocent rhetoric, from the realm of religious-ethical balderdash, appears a good deal less innocent when one reflects upon the tendency that it conceals beneath sublime words: the tendency to destroy life. Schopenhauer was hostile to life: that is why pity appeared to him as a virtue.... Aristotle, as every one knows, saw in pity a sickly and dangerous state of mind, the remedy for which was an occasional purgative: he regarded tragedy as that purgative. The instinct of life should prompt us to seek some means of puncturing any such pathological and dangerous accumulation of pity as that appearing in Schopenhauer’s case (and also, alack, in that of our whole literary décadence, from St. Petersburg to Paris, from Tolstoi to Wagner), that it may burst and be discharged.... Nothing is more unhealthy, amid all our unhealthy modernism, than Christian pity. To be the doctors here, to be unmerciful here, to wield the knife here—all this is our business, all this is our sort of humanity, by this sign we are philosophers, we Hyperboreans!—"
Now, is it not true that pity stands in direct opposition to self preservation?
There is a difference between things like compassion, empathy, and sympathy, to pity. Pity is lowering yourself to those who “appear” to be beneath you to internally raise your false sense of virtue. It borders on Martyrdom, in which seems holy and noble, yet is a complete lack of life and living.
Most people take true sacrifice out of context, for example, people see someone disabled, or see starving children, and they say, “Oh how lucky I am!” and “I would take your place if I could!”. What does this accomplish except feelings of guilt. Instead, precise action should be taken, if possible, not fake monologue.
Feeling sorry for others will make you feel sorry for yourself, and there is nothing constructive about this, no solution or antidote to the original problem.
We must be ruthlessly resolute to those who others “Pity”, not only for our sake but for their sake. For if we offer less than a solution then we are a part of the problem, adding to their already depressive state. “Your poor thing”, this is not helping, this is nothing.
All is power. We must be power, not weakness, to ourselves and those around us.
This is more to the general masses, not any SS.
HAIL SATAN
