" post_id=340875 time=1648921405 user_id=346]
Is this the page?
https://hungariancultistnazis.wordpress.com/2016/02/18/exposing-the-joy-of-satan-websites-exposing-the-joy-of-satan-websites-extensive-plagiarism-by-maxine-dietrich-aka-andrea-m-dietrich-aka-andrea-maxine-herrington-by-anonymous/
I remember that one had the most extensive criticism of any I had read.
Anyway, perhaps we can use some of your suggestions. But it sounds like you didn't read
the other page about HPS Maxine, in which she rebuts more about plagiarism. She linked the JoS Reading List, which covers "unsourced" pages.
Actually, that is a valuable suggestion you didn't intend to make: We should move some parts from the HPS Maxine page into the others to keep similar things together. (She wrote that page years ago, hence why it's disjointed from the rest of the site.)
She also partially addresses the issue of fair use. Perhaps we could expand that section to say more clearly why the JoS does qualify. From that article I linked, it claims that we don't qualify because if an entire page is mostly quotes, then we didn't add anything. However, the JoS is not single pages, but the whole site, which is an original work when taken all together.
The trick is to not waste time explaining the obvious, but I suppose if people have actually made some of these arguments, it doesn't hurt to spend a sentence or two rebutting them. This is the place to do it, after all.
Thank you for taking the time to make some good suggestions, whether or not we use them.
What do you think, Serbon?