Disclaimer:
If you are abusing with drugs, You have an average IQ of 60 and You cannot inform Yourself, please avoid comment below as can be useful for whoever want to search for the true regarding the original text of the Necronomicon .
The Necronomicon used here on JoS
https://joswiki.org/index.php/The_Necronomicon
https://satanisgod.org/www.angelfire.com/empire/serpentis666/necronomicon1586-dr-john-dee.pdf
Please read this article first https://magickandoccultism.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-necronomicon-history-and.html
- This book is an HOAX. First of all there is no Dr. Joseph Talbet, Ph.D., D. Litt, at Harvard University Just he never existed.
- The Initial page about the mad Arab are just identical to the Simon version. How would be possible that Dr.Talbet just decypher from Dee manuscript as exactly with the same word of the Simon Version? Of course it should just proof its fraudulent nature
- As we will see later, John Dee never translated the "Necronimicon" because another later work on the Necronomicon , another hoax , interpreted some magical squares on Dee's Book , the Liber Logaeth .
The Hay/Wilson/Turner Necronomicon
https://www.amazon.com/Necronomicon-George-Hay/dp/0859780260
According to the introduction, Wilson first became interested in the book’s possible existence when his friend L. Sprague de Camp “found” the Owlswick Press Necronomicon. Even though the manuscript could not be translated and was thought to be a hoax, Wilson was intrigued. Soon, he came into contact with two individuals: Robert Turner and George Hay. Turner was head of a group of magicians called the Order of the Cubic Stone and was looking into the possibility that Lovecraft received his inspiration from ancient grimoires. Hay was editing a collection of essays on the Necronomicon. Wilson did not believe that the Necronomicon was real, but he set out to find the answers for himself.
The break came when Wilson’s friend Carl Tausk mentioned to him that an occult scholar from Austria, Doctor Stanislaus Hinterstoisser, might have some information. Wilson wrote Hinterstoisser, who informed him that Lovecraft’s father, Winfield, had been an Egyptian Freemason. While most U.S. Masonic lodges are largely social clubs, Hinterstoisser maintained that the Egyptian Freemasons possessed secret knowledge passed down from the charlatan Cagliostro (1745–93, and, in the distant past, from the Greeks, Egyptians, and Sumerians. Winfield Lovecraft saw some of this material at
his lodge, and was taught to read (or decipher) it by a man named “Tall Cedar.” The doctor later told Wilson that one of the books Winfield saw was the Necronomicon, but he inconveniently passed away before he could give
any more information.
Encouraged, Wilson and his friends set out in search of the Necronomicon. Since Lovecraft mentioned the Elizabethan wizard
John Dee as a translator of the book, Robert Turner went to the British Museum to look through Dee’s papers. There, he found
Liber Logaeth (or Logaeath), a manuscript made up of squares filled with letters. Turner sent these to David Langford, a computer programmer and cryptographer, who deciphered the manuscript and discovered the text of the Necronomicon there. Hay changed the plans for his book, and The Necronomicon: The Book of Dead Names was published in 1978, with a paperback from Corgi Books emerging two years later.
At least, this is the story Wilson tells in the book. He admitted, in Fantasy Macabre for 1980, that the piece was a “spoof.” Later, in an article written in the Saint John’s Eve 1984 issue of the fanzine Crypt of Cthulhu, Wilson gave the full story. It began with Neville Armstrong, the founder of Neville Spearman Limited, a publishing company that reprinted
the fiction of such Lovecraft contemporaries as Robert E. Howard and Clark Ashton Smith. Armstrong asked his friend George Hay to compile stories to create an authentic-looking Necronomicon. After collecting some material, Hay turned to the literary critic and occultist Colin Wilson for help. Wilson was unimpressed with much of the volume, and asked Robert Turner to write the actual text of the Necronomicon. An explanation of the volume’s origins was still needed, but Wilson had his background in fiction to help him. He had a German friend write him a letter, addressing it from the fictional “Doctor Hinterstoisser.” This helped him give the background; he filled in the rest with his imagination. Armstrong liked the book, and published it.
Another Necronomicon , another
HOAX, including the fact that Dee possibly had it, or translated it. This add an additional disgrace to the text proposed by JoS .
The SIMON Necronomicon
https://archive.org/details/necronomicon0000alha
The next Necronomicon to appear became the most popular and is still seen in many bookstores today. The book was translated and edited (or written, depending on who you ask) by a group associated with the Magickal Childe bookshop, then known as the Warlock Shop. Though now closed, this store was for many years the center of New York City’s occult
community. The shop’s owner was Herman Slater, a showman-occultist of the old school. The book’s translator—if he can be referred to as such—was a man known only as “Simon.” Simon wrote a number of books for Magickal Childe, including the Necronomicon Report (later rereleased as the Necronomicon Spellbook), a guide to the use of the Necronomicon‘s
chapter on the names of Marduk.
Two of his other books, The Gates of the Necronomicon and a translation of the French grimoire The Red Dragon, were scheduled for publication in 1992, but the death of Herman Slater seems to have put these plans on hold. The origins of the
Simon Necronomicon remain a mystery, since those responsible for it have given two different versions of events. The introduction to the book itself relates how a monk of unknown origin, called a "wandering bishop", provided the original manuscript to Simon, an individual involved in both the translation of rare manuscripts and international espionage.
Someone gave Simon and Magickal Childe the manuscript to translate and publish,
but would not allow them to show the original to others. Little else about Simon is explained in the book.
For those who are unsatisfied with this explanation, The Necronomicon Spellbook gives a different version of events. The author (who is presumably Simon, yet refers to himself in the third person) tells us that Simon was no spy, but a bishop with a great command of languages who ministered to the poor of New York. In the spring of 1972, two of his fellow monks brought him a 9th-century Greek manuscript of the Necronomicon that they had acquired through their thefts of documents from libraries and collections across the nation. The monks were captured shortly thereafter.
This part of Simon’s story checks out—to a point. Two monks from the Autocephalous Slavonic Orthodox Catholic Church were captured in March 1973 after having stolen books from college libraries across the country, including
those of Harvard, Yale, Chicago, and Notre Dame.
But why at this point not to show the original version, after many people asked about it??
Maybe they are afraid to show it since has been stolen? It is a possibility, remote after more than 30 years, but ok.
At least can explain some passages of this book when they translated as
"the mark of the Beast" etc in various points. Looks like there is a sort of Truth here and I need to say that after reading it all it totally absorbed me. It's very well made nothing to say.
Probably another
HOAX, but at least valuable.
A must read for who is interest in the Necronomicon.
Pietro Pizzari's Necronomicon
https://www.amazon.com/Necronomicon-Pietro-Pizzari/dp/8871691504
The next such book to appear was Pietro Pizzari’s Necronomicon (1993). It is supposedly taken from a manuscript in the Vatican Library. Following a series of brief introductions, Pizzari gives us six sections of the “Book of the Names of the Dead.” Given a quick scan of the text, the material does look original and more faithful to Lovecraft than most of others.
I ordered this book because I want to understand where are the real referral to this "Greek version" found only recently inside the Vatican Library .
These are facts. I would consider for JoS to really modify all its Necronomicon Meditations , references published previously here as the text suggested is the most Hoaxed and debunked of all "Necronomicon" ones.
The seals with computer graphic used with programs like "Paint" are just ridiculous .
The fact that Seals and Gates needs an appropriate ritual and defensive magic also add another level of danger , expressed in meditations based on a Hoax , more than let them become useless for the practitioner .
But of course, here we are entering inside the
realm of personal experiences , and everything should be made on the behalf of the single , admitting at least that he or she is practicing on a hoax or not call it as
Necronomicon!