Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Mixed Race People, Arabs, And "White" Yezidis

Hp. Hoodedcobra666

Administrative High Priest
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
14,016
Website
joyofsatan.org
I wanted to clear up two or three very dysfunctional things that were put forth and confused a lot of people here. There are useless and disinformation, and have to put in their own place to avoid further issues.

For one, it has been said that "One should go with the race that they feel more attracted towards". Ignorance here has been used even by the instructors and finders of these useless solutions, in what is material reality, and not a matter of feeling or any liberal sentimentality. Larping about how one 'is all about race' and pseudospiritualizing these matters where denying the evident isn't going to cut the deal either. As such these have to be put in proper context.

Race is far from a subject of what one likes or what dislikes. Anyone who has all the features of a black person but a little hues up the skin, equal to bleaching, did not suddenly become "White". Likewise, people who are half or race mixed, should simply go not "Where they feel like", as of course, due to brainwashing, most will decide to go with someone who will eventually breed out their race, but go where they have been mixed and where their bloodline will be restored faster in full power.

For example, in the case of a person who is half black, half white, if they go mate with "Whites" whom of course everyone will choose based on brainwashing, the "White" person in this union merely goes extinct. So the bullshit that started from some corrosive individual on go 'where you feel is best' is a train that leads to the same conclusive result as race mixing in itself.

Alternatively, if the person who is 'half black half white' chooses a person from Spain, Brazil, or many other places, where people are in the hundreds of billions in their ancestry already part black or part white, or has children with the Black race, the next generation of children will be instantly restored.

Likewise, the meme that "Go where you feel is best" is only a yet another liberal concoction as part of a greater disinformation campaign that was going on in our midst to loosen out what Satan wants to be fixed as the earth's axis. Race hardly has to do with any 'feelings' and 'going where you feel is best'. Loose minded people can feel as if they were fish or mermaids, but they cannot go live permanently into an aquarium. Reality has to be respected, where nature is concerned, for our better well being.

In the case where one of the above example half white half black person, takes a "White" person as a partner, this will take and put in the gutter, progressively, 4 generations of white men or women, in the attempt to "Re-whiten" a line, a thing which will eventually not happen. This generates not only dead white people, but also, of course, one can be sure that their so called 'descendants' will marry Whites or will have the same objective for 're-whitening' a line.

Aka, it's all bullshit and MUH DICK and how one likes to have specific people to extinct them for personal prefference, and pretending as a bitch that this is done for some sort of spiritual or racial concern. One is eventually race-mixing in the name of stopping race mixing, which is just another dumb absurdity and retardation. And of course, this amount of hypocrisy does not sit well with beings who are superior and don't want humanity to delay and self destroy racially, or have their spiritual students turn into shit just because of MUH Dickism's.

This is a waste of time, wasted human material from both races, and incessant hypocrisy. It's better for one to go be a liberal and admit that they are a piece of dogshit, than to pretend the above in an attempt to bridge their pornified mentality, their need to engage in race mixing, and take gambling on life as if life was of lesser importance.

The bringing back of a line or continuing it as a person is can happen easily and efficiently in simply one generation. In the above example of a person being half black and half white, if they get a same person (such as many Latinas for example) the situation is fixed instantly in one generation. This also is great and unproblematic for the offspring, will not cause any identity dissonance, and they will be member of their respective tribe instantly.

The same thing is if one has a black partner, as the black will dominate instantly the genes and the children will return back to being black in one generation without any observable issues, and without harming the 'black people' in anyway. The ideal choice here would be however for someone to find someone the same as them.

This obsessive compulsive need to turn everything "White" is just nonsense, and many people who are not White have it simply because they have been drummed into racial self hate, but also hate for Whites, both of which are expressed by the need to race mix.

"Racial Order" does not have to be looked as the enemy instructs with a "Better" on the top and a "Worse" of the bottom of any people. Traditionally, all races looked at others in this way, and that is undeniable. Africans looked at Whites as inferiors, Asians believed they are better than all other races, Whites also have had the same. This is natural and it deals with one's confidence and sometimes "Nationalism".

But the above has nothing to do in regards to the natural axis of things. In that case, the races are put on a vertical line. When one asks "What race do they belong in", or evaluate themselves, one is not valuating themselves as an "INDIVIDUAL", who ranks "HIGHER OR LOWER" in regards to race, but rather, one seeks to find out where they fall into the natural order of things.

We do not seek to instate who is "BETTER", as the races are different, we just seek to put things in their place for the betterment and harmony for all. In plain, you do not value your value as a being when you valuate your race. You just see where you 'fall' into this vertical line. Are you closer here, or there. That's all there is to it.

The enemy made people scared of the above, but they practice it relentlessly. They do DNA testing from certified Israeli corps that won't lie to them, look for genetic factors of themselves, practice eugenics, and everything else. These practices are pretty normal and go with the times. These are made as abnormal only in the minds of the people who are brainwashed to self hate, and not understand how this goes.

Nobody has to become "White" or have in their mind "White" or any other race as the "Ideal standard". It is not the ideal standard for anyone but itself. Likewise, all other races, in their beauty and individuality, are their very own standard. Comparing people is bizarre, as in the end of the day, everyone is more attracted to their 'own' people. This is unconscious. The pornified brainwashing aside, this is also emotional, hormonal, and natural. Each race has to look after their own, and have their own ideal standards of what is ideal in beauty, taste, and everything else.

As another note, the "Yezidis" and many other people who have been talked to as "White" are in many cases below 15% White. A person who looks like a person from India, or who looks totally Chinese but has blue eyes, is not in anyway White. Likewise, an Albino from Africa is not White, to give a stupid example. There are people in India with lighter skin but this doesn't make them White. The same is for many people who are Arabic. In these cases, one can be "Very White" but they are not really "White" in their entirety.

People who have "Some" white blood in them aren't made White as a default. "White Skin" or lighter skin does not make you "Whiter" either. People in Africa are not that infrequently born with "Lighter" skin but that doesn't make them any less African. This is common especially in women, which in all races, do display a more pale skin. This can be inherited on the children, but only as a change of level, and not as a change of 'race'.

This was tied into the another lie mentioned above that where one will go mate is an aspect of "Go where you feel is best". This is the easy socialist liberal answer to answer a thing that is clearly biological. There is no sentimentality here, naturally, these things are solid. Likewise loose interpolations were made to prove something as something that which is NOT. This picture below was used to show that Yezidis were "White", but the reality is, this "Yezidi" child is only one in a thousand. The hair is clearly bleached or colored.

The existence of an "Arabian" race has been disputed, but yes, it exists, as a blanket term. Arabs are now for thousands of years their very own subgroup of people, who share common characteristics. You can see an Arab in the street and understand they are Arabic from miles away, even if dressed in another way, but the same doesn't happen when you see a Polish person and a German person. Arabs are a distinct sub-race for thousands of years now that has formed as a result. Emotional sentimentality and calling them of all things "White" does not change biology.

serveimage


The Yezidis in their majority look like this:

10d7a4e3-f1de-4498-8152-e1666167a9a7-2060x1236.jpeg


The above is not White. And guess what guys they do not NEED to be anything but what they are. We are supposed to be what we are. It doesn't have to be either, to prove nothing. In every tribe where at some time immemorial there is some sort of blood from some other race, some features may re-emerge, such as let's say a pair of blue eyes. The Yezidis are a race that has from some time immemorial some part of White blood, but that's it. They are not 'White'. They can be compared to some other Arabs and one can say they are a bit 'whiter' but that's it. They do not have Norse characteristics or anything related.

White and racial matters in general have to be stopped to look as some form of dumb competition to get a percent of something as if one is to go to heaven by gaining more points of x color. This practice is common in a lot of places and puts everyone in a state of competition in regards to race, which is something people cannot really alter. This makes people 'attracted' to others whom they consider subconsciously the 'ideal' of the human race, and leads to race mixing, ironically producing only the same results as the self-hatred and extinction of a species that practiced into this.

In race mixed regions in the past, this comes either from rape, abduction of white women, or race traitors, or dumb socialistic individuals who treated their blood as if it were nothing and went to 'mate' with anything they found as if giving free welfare for the oppressed or something. The last category only matters lately, and in most cases, the 'mixing' was not at all voluntary.

The same notion was projected of "For All" with gradual corrosion of all the boundaries that make Satan, SATAN and the Gods in general, as being "givers to all without borders", and this was later projected as some sort of "White blood everywhere where everyone must compete to have some White blood", since it's "holy", and yadda yadda, bullshit. These people who made this exaggeration are clearly dumb.

Race mixing, which is the pariah of the ancient religion that Satan instated based on truth and nature, is a pariah low level practice, chandala level of consciousness, and a practice that is detestable and destructive to everyone involved. The existence of said 'proofs' of blood of one people into another is not some sort of 'celebration', let alone any that any True Satanist would like to see into this world. A true Satanist would understand that races need to reach the highest point of perfection in their own way, and not 'celebrate' the above.

One opens a history book and htey understand that people never really mix without brainwashing or by the sword, into a percent as to disappear, because this is unnatural. The more this practice happens, the more 'we' as a civilization have to look at to what is going wrong, aka, the jews in our present case.

On the other hand, they are also frivolous liars and hypocrites who had the nerve to come here and preach from a podium all these above memes, as they pretend to at the same time, pretend to support some murky versions of 'racial hygiene' where everything non White was to be called White, and everything 'in the middle' was to be called 'right or left' so they are not unmasked and destroyed as blatant incapables with their very own disinfo agenda, or in plain slang, infiltrators.

"I don't condone race mixing, but hey I do, do as you see fit". In many things in life there are no middle lines, either one is with, or one is against.

Many of these racial mixtures happened in wars, and the Ancient Aryan culture was about racial hygiene or in simple words racial health and to mate with one's race, and not some sort of alien statement of a "Passing Aryan Race" that was going around and giving genetics as if they were a socialistic gift for 'mankind' as some sort of some 'great plan'. These were the pariahs and the lowlifes who engaged in this practice, the outcasts, and those who have not understood what it means to retain one's self to a proper standard. Then the rapists, abudcters, and other said types.

If the so called "Breeding" was that systematic in any acceptable manner, the majority of people in the Middle East and in many other races would now be "White" at a stunning percent, and you wouldn't have to dig in tens of thousands of people to find just one or two "Kind of white" people in the Middle East. But it were not. It was a criminal offense. Even in the Roman times, it was a brutal criminal offense to engage in this practice, even if abroad, and even if one 'never brought any kids' back to Rome.

The end result is the same from all points of outlook.These are unnatural choices leading to unnatural and problematic situations, especially on the progeny. Of course, these people couldn't be more careless, as is usual of many of these 'muh dick' or 'muh vegana' types.

This is also why the majority of people in the regions where White people 'passed', only have miniscule of White blood, to the point of closely non existant, and at this point and aren't looking like second Europe. Regardless, many of these people made their own choices later, to maintain and keep somehow their own racial integrity, which has some people having to a minor extent some White blood. This was part of their own eugenic program or outlook.

Much of this mixing on the world is also quite 'recent', and does not extend as many as tens of thousands of years back in time. For one, this defiles the doers, for two, this extincts the victims. It was never the intention of Whites to do either to anyone else, in contrast to how many others see the matter today where they try to "breed dis queef" to make another go extinct during what is allegedly peace time. Peace time with demographic extinction does not really coincide. From the scope of the traditional Aryan culture, this is an abomination practice, and only delays the evolution of everyone involved, and creates an irreversible situation where people that could create more of their people are permanently lost.

The Aryans had a racial code of conduct out of respect for the very biology of other people and not seeking to destroy or ruin them. At least this was the common line. Compare this to the jews who want everyone mixed until they have three livers and four kidneys, and you will understand how each respective group of people sees this planet.

Of course, this does not affect the people who are born out of this, ie the offspring of this practice, and that is perfectly logical that this is not the case that the offspring is 'bad'. What one is solely responsible for is how they will act by their own choice and decision. One has done nothing wrong simply because they were born. However what we do with this very birth and how we conduct ourselves to the advancement or destruction, drawing back, or advancing this world really matters. It also matters from a biological standpoint.

Everyone can develop, and everyone can eventually evolve, become a master, have advanced progeny, and everything else imaginable. However the consensus is that people should do the CLEVER decisions, and especially, the spiritual people, in racial matters, to ACCELERATE our evolutionary way and HARMONIZE it. People who are great are to take clever decisions based on clever knowledge they possess.

Now, before people ask, "How many people did engage into this?". Very few. A very few people who have said relationships, in the passing of time, can generate different races of people. Even one hundred people in the old times engaging in said relationships would be enough today, a many generations later, to create possibly tens or more thousands of people. This is how many newer subraces were created. And that is fine at this point as these races have 'solidified'. This is why Arabs and many other larger ethnic groups are now 'distinct' and prominent, and have solidified as their own types of people. Not all arabs are the same, but they are a same categorization with very similar traits in all ways.

The same goes for Europeans, people in the continent are White European, with certain deviancy of some people who are strained, but that's it. Even Africans have went through a similar process. Contrary to popular belief, not all Africans are all the 'same'. Different tribes have different emotional, physiological, mental and general traits. They all classify as African people, but they have a lot of differences. For example, Kenyan women are still regarded as some of the most 'beautiful' women in Africa, and they are not the same as the people from Congo. Yet, all constitute a greater 'African race'.

The Gods have helped everyone who was true to them, befriended and guided Gentiles for centuries, and gave us the spiritual and material science to understand how we are to handle ourselves as species to prosper and advance.

A lot of people who are considered gods and goddesses or extremely beautiful or charismatic even today, in all races in regards to their beauty, attractiveness, or other superior abilities (we do not formally call them that way anymore) are products of the application of conscious or unconscious eugenics, development, and beautifully stacking life to where it manifests better. To make this conscious is to practice eugenics.

Lastly, trying to 'metaphysicalize' everything is as jewish as jewish hyper-materialism. One cannot, and does NOT need to try to have hopeless dreams of 'changing' their race, self hating their features, and damning themselves because they have a mind out of control that takes weird things as standards and self damns. One does not need to "whiten" or "blacken" from meditation.

Self hatred is a mental problem that anyone can have, despite of race or whatever. Depending on what 'reasoning' is put in front of self hatred, a lot of people heap this tendency into just about anything, from finances, to ironically truths about race. Self hatred is not really related to what one is, but just a random problem. In other words, if one self hates, anything from race to features to themselves will seem as an excuse. Meditation evens things out here and heals the soul and mind.

At best, meditation will only better what one is, and that is the whole point, and not 'change' someone as if someone was born a wolf and turn them into a lion. Likewise, part jewish slugs cannot be turned into Gentiles. Do nose jobs, edit genes, jump from cliffs to make your legs better, pluck eyeballs out, you will never be 'Aryan', 'Black' or 'Asian'.

The irony is the jews walk literally unhinged in being the most hideous beings this planet has created, even 'proudly' of their jewishness, and Gentiles who all have valuable natural beauty, a strong soul, and generally every trait that the jews were always jealous for, are constantly guilt tripped to want something else. When you radiate with a powerful self-acceptance, you will understand we are blessed to be created by the Gods in our differences, and understand the importance for each to drag their own way.

Now that these jewish interpolations that were put to an end from their attempts to be embed strongly into a lot of material here are cleared up, everyone can have a clear perspective, finally relax, let go, and see matters as they are without tainting or self created drama.

A greater era awaits when humanity moves past the jewish mental viruses, which only create pain, lack of fun, and suffering for everyone involved.

-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666
 
People also have asked what if they have "Children" with other races or said things, family members, etc. What is done is done. One needs not alienate or damage anything or blow things out of proportion. This is a situation for too many people. Mistakes are done when we seldom have knowledge.

An example here is someone who lives in a family where everyone else is race mixed, even worse, jew mixed by Gentile relatives marrying a jew or other weird shit like that.

The technical simple advice is as thus: Well, screw them, and look after your own and to do your own proper decisions. One man surviving in the heap of this garbage and making proper decisions such as a proper racial or marriage decision is worth 100 people who make the wrong decisions. It doesn't matter what they do, what matters is what YOU do.

The future in the end will be ours, as the dawn of new knowledge will invalidate the wrong decisions of many, the scythe will come and demand it's payment for people who have been fucking up for so long and just going 'unpunished'. This doesn't have to be 'you' however.

If one has influence for example they can make a spell to break up the fruits of decay, or advise people in their decisions. They don't want to change? Then let them drown. Everyone in the end pays their own dues.

When one KNOWS, they have to move past these, or ensure these are not done by others in the future in some way of contribution. An act of sensibility here is to relate these, look in these matters on the eye, and move on to advocate or understand something better.

Due to enemy restrains on knowledge and understanding, many have done decisions that have no going back. There is no point to feel guilt or beat one's self over these, and one simply has to move on, as this is life. Wrong information leads to decisions that are dubious. What one can do is try to make sure the outcome of these decisions turn out for the best, and make better decisions in the future, or help others make better decisions.
 
with knowledge of bloodlines a race can be perfected in like 3 generations what would usually, without knowledge and intermingling take 50. p.s I am not a mathematician or genealogist but I have done the study's to make such claims
 
occultumlapidem said:
with knowledge of bloodlines a race can be perfected in like 3 generations what would usually, without knowledge and intermingling take 50. p.s I am not a mathematician or genealogist but I have done the study's to make such claims

If a meditating half white half black person marries a brazillian or to be exact Latino/Latina person or a person who has similar ancestry to them, in one generation, the kid will be more than likely healthy, beautiful, and in all ways 'brazillian', and there will be few to none complications in regards to any bi-racial issues and mentalities, and also, yes, in one generation, later or two, everything would be perfect again, with the progeny being distinctive and their own race without a lot of fuss and weird implications.
 
Racial duty is more important than "muh feels".

Nature does not give one crap about personal feelings or special snowflake-ism. Going against nature ultimately leads to suicide, in the long term.

Know who you are, flow with it, advance it. For those who are pure-race, keep your bloodline pure.
 
Zammel said:
The indians are white, or asian or black?
There was a white civilisation once, long time ago.
Nowadays, I never seen a white indian in person, only mulattos with dark skin. They have their own facial features, they aren't looking like blacks or whites.There might be still a small number of White indians.
 
Zammel said:
The indians are white, or asian or black?

"There is no India race, Indian traditionally has been large that encompassed different racial and ethnic groups. The concept of Indian as national is very new and it still has all kinds of problems its more of the result of the British Empire. You have White Indians, Asian, Negro, Indian's in the different regions and mixtures in-between. If you go to the South you will find the Negroid racial types if you go North you will find more Asian and White types."
- HP Mageson

https://www.ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=18152#p69718

Not everything should be categorized under the three main races as there is more variations. The genetic distance between White Indians and Europeans is huge: Indians should prefer other Indians who are similar to them in race instead of trying to get closer to the three main races.
 
Zammel said:
The indians are white, or asian or black?

Except of the three main races, sub-races have formed with recognizable traits, that you can clearly see in people. This has been the case for many thousands of years. Arabs are an example here. Indians are another one.

The Indians if you mean the Natives they are Asiatic, or at least have a lot of Asiatic blood. If I were more specific I would say they are since time immemorial rooted in Mongolians, but more on the Asiatic side. They seem to have broken apart from Asia a very long time ago, and therefore they became "Natives" where they have their own stock at this point.

If you talk about India, in India, despite of what anyone says, a "Race" of Hindu people exists, ranging from "Very White" (but still Hindus) to people who are closely Black. This is a line with two ends, but in both types, there is a common middle line that is racially undeniable.

For one, Hindus tend to have similar noses, similar features, lightly kinky or straight hair, and more 'straight' facial features than others who have the same skin color etc. If you have a sharp eye, you can recognize a man who is a 'hindu'. India is also huge, but there is this middle connecting line which shows they are closely related. They count as a sub race, and if you asked them, they would say the same. They sure as hell aren't "Black people", and they are not "White people" either.

People from India have a far nobler quality that was more than likely passed down to their own blood from their own spiritual practices. This also has given them a lot of 'harmony' in the face, and in other features. Any "White blood" that came in India, they chose to keep into their higher castes and decided to preserve it.

Some people especially those who analyze "Races" are saying BS that people from India have a lot of common with Arabs or others of this nature. If you pay some attention and you know, you can really tell them apart, even from the voice, facial features etc. Hindus on the North can have some Asiatic influence, and on the South can have more people who have at some point had more Black blood. This is geographical. There is also some influence in the North that in a sense resembles people like the Aborigines in Australia.

Some also have decided to keep "White" traits, coming from some Whites in the region, and tie these into their racial customs, which eventually has created the hindu ruling caste which in all matters is racially Hindu, but has let's say a large deviancy from the rest of the people, to whom it belongs. Brahmanas or specific examples here like Kangana Ranaut are an example. Kangana is not "White", nor "European".

Kangana is Hindu 'racially', but she has these maintained "White" characteristics. She is probably one of the highest limits of how much any "white percent" in the high can go in India, but she is an exception, and not a rule. Dravidian people on the antipode is where the "Hindu" people start to also have noticeable black traits beyond any doubt.

In memorial from the time where Whites were in the region, this was maintained as belief that aspects of people who had some White blood were desirable, and that it is holy or at least appealing, and since Hindus have made sure to preserve a lot of these traits on their own and individuate them into their race. This now has generated after thousands of years a distinctive people.

Alexander the Great in many places where they campaigned, they did not kill or slay or try to demographically change anyone on purpose. However when you have hundreds of thousands of men in your army, and you are in these times, someone is going to do something as people did in Vietnam or as Genghis Khan did in Europe.

This created a lot of people who were mixed, and whom the native people found appealing and absorbed into their own tribe, or even had them to rule them. After these practices these people after many generations consolidated into greater shades of the same core race, and they created situation such as the one described above.

Also, race mixing aside, by people being more attracted to certain traits (For example, curly hair) and genetic mutations which can happen, and if people breed or prolong these lines, changes can be passed down as default without the necessity of intervention of race mixing. This is in other words called Eugenics and Hindus have practiced the craft for centuries. This was also coupled with spiritual efforts.

As such they were never completely 'dominated' by others and were able to instate a rule upon themselves. They have been at war with the Communists of their own jewish root over there, such as Vivekananda who told people of the castes to "mix" their brains out, but people seldom listened as there is still consciousness into eugenics.

I think Jack is more well versed to answer you on the above matter.
 
The advice for racemixed people to find a partner who is the same race as the mother is still valid ?

"Of course you can. However, bear in mind, that if you go with Asian as the predominant[mother asian] of your type, it will be better.

This is because your children, will be then Asian, and there will be no delays, everything will be more than likely back to normal. This saves time, and increases your chances to have better offspring. In accordance to nature that is more proper, and this thins out the chances of any potential issues." HP. Hoodedcobra666

https://www.ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=16438

I just ask because you did not mention it. Thx for the sermon HP.Hoodedcobra666 .
 
I remember this in one pdf: the humanity born in india/middle east,is true? Because in the past indian are white?
 
Fuchs said:
The advice for racemixed people to find a partner who is the same race as the mother is still valid ?

"Of course you can. However, bear in mind, that if you go with Asian as the predominant[mother asian] of your type, it will be better.

This is because your children, will be then Asian, and there will be no delays, everything will be more than likely back to normal. This saves time, and increases your chances to have better offspring. In accordance to nature that is more proper, and this thins out the chances of any potential issues." HP. Hoodedcobra666

https://www.ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=16438

I just ask because you did not mention it. Thx for the sermon HP.Hoodedcobra666 .

No it is not valid and as with all these matters is unsubstantial.

I did not write anything about any mother though. It is beyond mother and father, this does not matter. If one is mixed with a non white person, they look like the second non white race and they are basically that race with a slight discrepancy no matter what.

Therefore there is no feeling here or a matter of anything, one must simply go on the other race or with someone who is the non white race as it always "dominates" blood wise, or someone who is in the same situation as them in order to speed up the progeny and improvement process.
 
Zammel said:
I remember this in one pdf: the humanity born in india/middle east,is true? Because in the past indian are white?

This the bullshit I have been trying to correct as these are BS. How can a people who follow a RACIAL CULTURE predominantly, turn all brown and disappear from a region leaving only temples and other things behind, and everyone else being in the end literally another race? The Hindu people of today were not "White".

What is clear is that these infamous White of the east passed from the region over a very long period of time, instated some things, and moved away. A few defectors for whatever reason or those who decided to stay were forcibly or otherwise assimilated by natives. Then these natives who were instructed in the religious rites kept them and became their own people and religious culture, rooted in the previous one instructed.

Another BS lie is that the "White" (but in reality brown) Yezidis, who YES, do in reality have a lot of the first religion of mankind, somehow were magically white and then became like totally brown, but they followed a religion to not mix.

The Yezidis only carried the religion of others who were in the region and left, as Hindus did. This is because this "religion" and spiritual insight was the root of things.

They preserved it the best they could. As for their racial emergence, they are not White, not even mediterranean white, and not even close in many cases, or they mixed. Some of them have some sprinkles of white blood and that's it.

One can leave a culture behind but it is not quite the same with the "blood" if you follow a racial centered religion. Which is what the Veda which is the closest to these themes is all about.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Fuchs said:
The advice for racemixed people to find a partner who is the same race as the mother is still valid ?

"Of course you can. However, bear in mind, that if you go with Asian as the predominant[mother asian] of your type, it will be better.

This is because your children, will be then Asian, and there will be no delays, everything will be more than likely back to normal. This saves time, and increases your chances to have better offspring. In accordance to nature that is more proper, and this thins out the chances of any potential issues." HP. Hoodedcobra666

https://www.ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=16438

I just ask because you did not mention it. Thx for the sermon HP.Hoodedcobra666 .

No it is not valid and as with all these matters is unsubstantial.

I did not write anything about any mother though. It is beyond mother and father, this does not matter. If one is mixed with a non white person, they look like the second non white race and they are basically that race with a slight discrepancy no matter what.

Therefore there is no feeling here or a matter of anything, one must simply go on the other race or with someone who is the non white race as it always "dominates" blood wise, or someone who is in the same situation as them in order to speed up the progeny and improvement process.

Sry I did misunderstood this. Thx for the reply. HP. Hoodedcobra666
 
Lol, this is one of the few racial topics I have commented on for years now because it states the true reality of racial matters. People would think that race mixed individuals of black and white descents can belong to either of the races but when you place this individual with a true sample of both races you will see that this race mixed individual belongs somewhere else.

If you decide to match them with partners from either of the races. It's either their race-mixed genes gets lost forever as is the case with African genes or they keep producing confused genes with the Aryan stock. There is no genuine place for confused genes other than race mixed people.

The best scenario for Aryans is to reject any and all race-mixed person no matter how "white" they are. The Aryan gene is too receptive. I have seen real Aryan people and I can say very few white people are really "white".

The white race shouldn't be a minority. It should be a majority with the subraces that ensued from race mixing being the minority as they themselves-the Aryans-are the breeding stock/originators. It was the Aryan race that created the other races so why should an Aryan do themselves the injustice of allowing other races mixed them out of existence?
Where's the pride? We need more pure Aryans in this world, accepting the genes of subservience and lesser intelligence is not good enough.

How many extra ordinary people have other races created that have continuously civilized us on a global level?

African subraces/tribes have also been bastardized endlessly.
An east african is quite different from a west african. It just like differentiating an Arab from an Indian. They are not the same. Places in Africa with endless strife are so because the people do not have a common language/culture.
Look at the country Nigeria just about the size of Texas has over different tribes occupying that space and battling for resources in a very "tribalistic", trying to bring each other down. Racial/tribal purity would have gone a long way in breeding superior individuals of each sub-races. The enemy religion is strong here and this comes with an unending multiculturalism.

Humans are inherently racist, even within the same race, they will most likely prefer people of their tribes to others. That competition for resources is very real and comes alive when you clump them together.
 
I feel like all this goes as well for Latinos that are in nowhere near having black genes and mostly are Asian or white so what we should do is continue making Hispanics? It's been a few hundred years of Hispanics being a thing. Do you think it's time for us to make our own "race"? Like the Indians? I've met very white looking Hispanics even met a blonde hair blue eyes Mexican girl. Besides the the nose being a little rounded at the end and maybe the forehead a little Asiatic looking I wouldn't had known she was Mexican if she didn't speak the same type of Spanish Mexicans speak. (Mexicans have their own lingo and the sounding is unique compared to the others. Mexican Spanish is considered it's own legit type of Spanish now like American English and British English). So reading all this it would be best for her to be with a white looking Hispanic or even just a Mexican? And the same for the other "shades" to go with the ones that look like them?

I understand everything for the other races but atm I'm still getting confused as to where I myself fit in. Maybe I'm doing a poor job explaining myself too since I can only explain so much with words and this would be easier if I could just show you how I look. Lol but obviously that's impossible to do. Its not like i stand out. I'm just a regular looking Mexican that I constantly get asked by different people if they know me. But I don't look Asian mostly or white. Just in the middle with maybe slightly more white genes I guess.

Feel free to ignore this reply if it's too confusing. I'm just letting out my thoughts on this instead of having them stuck in my mind.
 
hailourtruegod said:
I feel like all this goes as well for Latinos that are in nowhere near having black genes and mostly are Asian or white so what we should do is continue making Hispanics? It's been a few hundred years of Hispanics being a thing. Do you think it's time for us to make our own "race"? Like the Indians? I've met very white looking Hispanics even met a blonde hair blue eyes Mexican girl. Besides the the nose being a little rounded at the end and maybe the forehead a little Asiatic looking I wouldn't had known she was Mexican if she didn't speak the same type of Spanish Mexicans speak. (Mexicans have their own lingo and the sounding is unique compared to the others. Mexican Spanish is considered it's own legit type of Spanish now like American English and British English). So reading all this it would be best for her to be with a white looking Hispanic or even just a Mexican? And the same for the other "shades" to go with the ones that look like them?

I understand everything for the other races but atm I'm still getting confused as to where I myself fit in. Maybe I'm doing a poor job explaining myself too since I can only explain so much with words and this would be easier if I could just show you how I look. Lol but obviously that's impossible to do. Its not like i stand out. I'm just a regular looking Mexican that I constantly get asked by different people if they know me. But I don't look Asian mostly or white. Just in the middle with maybe slightly more white genes I guess.

Feel free to ignore this reply if it's too confusing. I'm just letting out my thoughts on this instead of having them stuck in my mind.

This is really a confusing matter not because you make it, but historically, demographically, etc.

Hispanic means people are speaking Spanish, and that they are coming from the broader region speaking "Spanish". This is why we have a lot of racial discrepancy in regards to people who are Hispanic. A striking majority of Spanish people are White, some with slight discrepancy, but still White. Others are part Black etc, so everyone here has to make their go. The same is the situation in Brazil.

As for Mexico, this isn't like "we" are going to cause this, this has already happens, Mexican people are Mexicans, self defined by a common identity, but also a race that has formed. There are a lot of discrepanices in Mexico, with some people having a lot of Asian, others being very far on the European side, but there is a middle where "Mexican" exists as a definition. Besides identity, people have to then be seeing race matters individually etc.

In Mexico you have three types of people in the many millions. One is the Native Mexicans, who are beyond any doubt a native people with native blood. Mexicans of European background who range from European to a bit non European but marginally, and then lastly you have people who are part of both, which again would be closer to the actual Mexican people. Some also have Chinese backround or Asian background.

If we are to define as Mexicans the natives and the people who are mixed, or have slight Chinese discrepancy and fit into the general two categories I mentioned earlier, then yes, these people can be defined as Mexican, but they aren't solidified yet as such. Europeans in that category do not count as Mexicans racially, but they are part of the Mexican Identity and have co-built it with others.

The actual "Mexican" racially, came from a mix between Natives and Spaniards. At least this is the belief that other Mexicans have related to me.

So I think that YES, definitely, there is a people which is the original or the baseline of being Mexican. Exceptions can't make the rule. In Mexico, there is a rule, despite the discrepancies per region. You can look at someone and understand they are Mexican.

Mexico is a case of a lot of diversity where cases have to be taken individually, you can't just take all these people as the same, they are not. The identity is common, and then there is a middle axis which has formed, around which everyone falls on a different place really. Yet all of these people have Mexican identity at this point. Mexico is a bit like the USA in that regard. The difference is that in the USA there has not been created an "American Race" as a middle axis to base a theory upon in any huge amount of people.

There are lot of stereotypes about Mexico who are completely wrong, and also blanket terms who are too generalized and just can't work here. The same is the case in Brazil.

Mexican as a blanket term is weird as a lot of people have contributed to this culture, and they are very diverse. Mexico has a rich culture that came from a few places, this has to also be kept in mind.

As for the linguistic aspect I really can't answer you.
 
You don't need be pure to be aryan,pure aryans are rare,the avarage european has 3% of neandethal ancestry,the only pure aryans are the blonde,blue-eyed aryan,this was the goal of Lebensborn,select the purest aryan males to reproduce with purest aryan females,to create babes without non-aryan genes!
https://whitedeathofislam.deathofcommunism.com/on-race/
 
I see this way more than I'd like to. It's such a waste and so offensive to see ppl date outside their race. I never liked it, but it used to not bother me this much. It might be a little selfish but it just feels like so many people are totally ruined now. I understand that these things can be overcome with spirituality but it feels so wrong and forced and conformist when people race mix. There are so many men and women who would make a fine husband or wife but they've been soiled by their actions and inactions. I have always been conscious of who I date and was not rushing into sex with other races like everybody else does. I never understood how people are comfortable with themselves in the situations they put themselves in.

People are taught to hate whatever phenotype they are so they hate you if you basically look like or are in anyway reflective of their true selves, even though these people are meant to be together. Then multiculturalism is pushed because it's an easy way out of facing each other and looking each other in the eye. And it's painful to watch people ruin themselves and simultaneously watch them reject and be rejected by the ones they are genetically and spiritually supposed to be with.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Zammel said:
The indians are white, or asian or black?
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Zammel said:
The indians are white, or asian or black?
As you said there is no India and there is no such thing as an Indian race. There are different racial halotypes ranging from brahmin,Sikh and other higher castes who have retained many of the attributes of the ancient whites,to the north eastern Asian Nepalese, burmese to the south Indian Dravidian black,negroid etc. However I say that dravidians blacks are not blacks as of Africa but of Australian aboriginals.

India was once in ancient times called Aryabharta meaning the "land of abode" of Aryans. These three racial groups didn't mix and they had their own respective kingdoms who lived harmoniously. After the Mahabharata war and the beginning of the decline of the Aryan power dynamic there started incessant race mixing between the three sub groups living in the area. There are in today's India hundreds of thousands of jatis(tribes) than mentioned in the actual vedic texts. You have to understand with the decline of spirituality with the dawn of the Kali yuga and India being the focal point where the Aryan, Asian and Australian aboriginal races met, the soup was ripe for brewing. The current state of ethnography is an example of the failure of administration of the weak kings as well as weak will of the tribes themselves. So incessant race mixing went on to create thousands of sub races. The brahmin white tribes had a policy where the son of a brahmin would be a brahmin even if he we're of different race and this applied to all savarnas(three higher castes), and thus you'll see many general castes who don't look anywhere near Aryan but claim to be a general caste tribe. The opposite happened if the man was a lower caste and the female was a higher caste. So in this way the whole tribe system got cluster fucked with people claiming to be this and that while they truly are not tribe at all but a mixed race.

1400 years ago this was reaching brutal lengths and something had to be done. So the caste system then became hugely birth based. As in a brahmins son shall be a brahmin no matter what. Although earlier brahmin was the name of a societal structure. So there became clear distinction between the racial halotypes and it exists till date.

This problem is the same with any nation that will encounter it. Plato talked about this. Different racial groups cannot live as an organic society. The caste system cannot work in a mixed population. Because being mixed race, the person will get a IQ intermediate between the parents and he won't ever be able to rise beyond his caste in most cases ,as he is biologically incapable of doing that. This will eventually make the caste system a birth based system. The pure lines will maintain such a higher caste and it will create a injustice based caste system and the only people responsible are the ones who engaged in the race mixing and are long dead, unable to understand the suffering of their descendants.

Even if we had such problems, if we had applied a privatization type system the Nazis once did and how they restored their economy and had a lot of innovation and academic discoveries, all this past history would have been solved and no one would have cared as everyone would be making enough money. But congress instead of Subhash Chandra Bose the SS Indian leader won and a communist leader named Nehru created a socialist neo liberal type system which has not been removed till date. Giving out free gibs for votes is the norm. They don't care about innovation or anything related. They care about their coming into power. And anything goes for that end.

However apart from other socialist countries there is a severe problem in India. The problem is that only 30% of the population is general caste and the rest are low castes(sc/st) or other backward castes(obc) ,Muslims and Christians. The minority I.e the general caste does not get any bebefits but the lower castes get 50% reservation in academic government institutions, government jobs, free money for doing absolutely nothing from different schemes of the central and state government. The savarna general castes are completely fucked. There's just no way out. This genocidal and illogical system is being continued since independence.

The brahmins,sikhs and the high castes along with whites made numerous humanitarian discoveies like hargobind khurana who decoded the Genetic codons to Ramanujan who along with white scientists discovered advanced applied mathematics without which nothing that we see today would exist. All the brahmins and the high IQ people being shunned and now not being given positions that they deserve in academic institutions are going to the west. After Jews Hindus are the highest wage earners in the US almost completely based of High castes. These people who shouldn't Even be in the west are Now migrating due to this discriminatory socialist system. They are creating and discovering and helping in tech, it, science and innovation while India stagnates. The principal reason why India is the way it is right Now is because of nations intelligence has been shunned by the political parties and has been imported outside.

This is a big problem and is a testament that democracy does not work well with socialism based on minority needs(although in India its the majority thatre getting them). Neo liberal socialism is death of a nation. It just doesn't work. There should be equality of opportunity not equality of outcome. If not ,this creates a dangerous situation as we are seeing in India today. A nation which once accounted for 70% of the world economy. Where the current numeral system of zero was created, where first the distance between the sun and the earth, heliocentrism and much much more was discovered etc. That nation is today in a state of stagnation. Socialism stagnates a nation. Marxisms is the death of a nation.
 
jack said:
As you said there is no India and there is no such thing as an Indian race. There are different racial halotypes ranging from brahmin,Sikh and other higher castes who have retained many of the attributes of the ancient whites,to the north eastern Asian Nepalese, burmese to the south Indian Dravidian black,negroid etc. However I say that dravidians blacks are not blacks as of Africa but of Australian aboriginals.
Dravidans came from the kushite empire,India was ones part of the kushite kingdom which is why it was once called Indus kush.there are close relationships between African and indian spiritual system.
 
shinninglight said:
jack said:
As you said there is no India and there is no such thing as an Indian race. There are different racial halotypes ranging from brahmin,Sikh and other higher castes who have retained many of the attributes of the ancient whites,to the north eastern Asian Nepalese, burmese to the south Indian Dravidian black,negroid etc. However I say that dravidians blacks are not blacks as of Africa but of Australian aboriginals.
Dravidans came from the kushite empire,India was ones part of the kushite kingdom which is why it was once called Indus kush.there are close relationships between African and indian spiritual system.

There's ample evidence to suggest the Dravidians are descendants of Australian aboriginals or taking the time frame of the science its actually correct to say australian aboriginals are the descendants of dravidians. The point is they are the same. Races evolve and there might be a connection between the blacks and the dravidians but through evolution the Dravidians are now closer to the Australian aboriginals than blacks. It might be a spin off race entirely.

And Aryans brought civilization to them and build temples and generally created their civilization as HPMageson has said, sage Agasta who had blue eyes coming down from the mountains and giving them civilization. Also Tamil and Australian aboriginal language has a lot of phonetic similarity than to Sanskrit or info European languages. Also we have genetic evidence.

Wells was looking for a genetic marker called M130, the most ancient, non-African, Y-chromosome marker. It is rare in Dravidians, but quite common in Australian Aboriginal males — and, intriguingly, in the Na Dene peoples of the Pacific north-west of North America.
https://campaignprojects.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/tamil-and-australian-aboriginal-languages/amp/

https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2009-07-24/dna-confirms-prehistoric-coastal-trek-to-australia/1365824?pfmredir=sm

https://amp.economist.com/science-and-technology/2013/01/19/an-antipodean-raj

https://www.nationalgeographic.com.au/australia/four-thousand-years-ago-indians-landed-in-australia.aspx

It was fortunate for me that I knew about the ancient customs of the Dravidians, for this helped me greatly in my research. One of the most important customs of Aborigines all over Australia is that it is taboo for the son in law and the mother in law to be found in the same location at any one time. Now this is exactly the same custom practised by the Tamils and perhaps other Dravidian races as well. So strong is this custom in both the Aborigines and Tamils, that it is considered high treason if it is broken. Could this similarity be one of just coincidence ? It could, but I think not. Another custom is the way they treat a girl who has just attained womanhood. In both these societies, the girl is moved out of the family home when this happens, and is housed in a shed just outside the family home for a period of a few weeks. In both societies, the shed is decorated by the leaves of the fish tail palm. Could this also be just coincidence ?
http://creative.sulekha.com/the-mysterious-origin-s-of-the-australian-aborigines-part-ii_604469_blog

Also India wasn't a part of any empire. Rather as the HPs have written Egypt is descended from Ancient india. Same for Assyria and mesopotamia. The migration happened from Kumar kandam in ancient south India towards the west.

Also the Egyptians weren't black. They were white. See their statues and the hieroglyphics. These are descriptions of white Aryan features. Blonde haired pharoahs have been found with their mummified bodies with the hair crystallized. Blacks might have existed there as workers and citizens but the aristrocracy was all white. This "we wuz kangz" is just a stupid meme with no reality to support it.

If you make a statement I expect you to defend it or justify it with fact. To change anyone's mind I.e.However what your saying is simply improbable.
 
Jack said:
shinninglight said:
....
Frank Joseph's book The Lost Civilization of Lemuria is all about explaining these connections and much more of them. And Mark Amaru Pinkham's book The Return of the Serpents of Wisdom also shows much more connections between these ancient cultures all over the Earth.
 
Jack said:
shinninglight said:
jack said:
As you said there is no India and there is no such thing as an Indian race. There are different racial halotypes ranging from brahmin,Sikh and other higher castes who have retained many of the attributes of the ancient whites,to the north eastern Asian Nepalese, burmese to the south Indian Dravidian black,negroid etc. However I say that dravidians blacks are not blacks as of Africa but of Australian aboriginals.
Dravidans came from the kushite empire,India was ones part of the kushite kingdom which is why it was once called Indus kush.there are close relationships between African and indian spiritual system.

There's ample evidence to suggest the Dravidians are descendants of Australian aboriginals or taking the time frame of the science its actually correct to say australian aboriginals are the descendants of dravidians. The point is they are the same. Races evolve and there might be a connection between the blacks and the dravidians but through evolution the Dravidians are now closer to the Australian aboriginals than blacks. It might be a spin off race entirely.

And Aryans brought civilization to them and build temples and generally created their civilization as HPMageson has said, sage Agasta who had blue eyes coming down from the mountains and giving them civilization. Also Tamil and Australian aboriginal language has a lot of phonetic similarity than to Sanskrit or info European languages. Also we have genetic evidence.

Wells was looking for a genetic marker called M130, the most ancient, non-African, Y-chromosome marker. It is rare in Dravidians, but quite common in Australian Aboriginal males — and, intriguingly, in the Na Dene peoples of the Pacific north-west of North America.
https://campaignprojects.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/tamil-and-australian-aboriginal-languages/amp/

https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2009-07-24/dna-confirms-prehistoric-coastal-trek-to-australia/1365824?pfmredir=sm

https://amp.economist.com/science-and-technology/2013/01/19/an-antipodean-raj

https://www.nationalgeographic.com.au/australia/four-thousand-years-ago-indians-landed-in-australia.aspx

It was fortunate for me that I knew about the ancient customs of the Dravidians, for this helped me greatly in my research. One of the most important customs of Aborigines all over Australia is that it is taboo for the son in law and the mother in law to be found in the same location at any one time. Now this is exactly the same custom practised by the Tamils and perhaps other Dravidian races as well. So strong is this custom in both the Aborigines and Tamils, that it is considered high treason if it is broken. Could this similarity be one of just coincidence ? It could, but I think not. Another custom is the way they treat a girl who has just attained womanhood. In both these societies, the girl is moved out of the family home when this happens, and is housed in a shed just outside the family home for a period of a few weeks. In both societies, the shed is decorated by the leaves of the fish tail palm. Could this also be just coincidence ?
http://creative.sulekha.com/the-mysterious-origin-s-of-the-australian-aborigines-part-ii_604469_blog

Also India wasn't a part of any empire. Rather as the HPs have written Egypt is descended from Ancient india. Same for Assyria and mesopotamia. The migration happened from Kumar kandam in ancient south India towards the west.

Also the Egyptians weren't black. They were white. See their statues and the hieroglyphics. These are descriptions of white Aryan features. Blonde haired pharoahs have been found with their mummified bodies with the hair crystallized. Blacks might have existed there as workers and citizens but the aristrocracy was all white. This "we wuz kangz" is just a stupid meme with no reality to support it.

If you make a statement I expect you to defend it or justify it with fact. To change anyone's mind I.e.However what your saying is simply improbable.
I never said anything about Egyptians being black,I didnt even mention Egypt,kush was a kingdom that shared the same culture and tradition with Egypt and there were many black rulers there.Indian was once called Hindus kush by the Greeks which was that the Indian empire spread from east to north Africa were the kushite empire once was,I had also taken this my quote from a post from one of our brother about the relationship between Africans and dravidans.maybe they may be close to aborinals but how did the aboriginals come from dravidans if the dravidans are mixed race,also what are the clues that shows that there was once aboriginal presence in India,the tradition about a girl hitting puberty was also done in Africa by many tribes.
Here is the post by our brother
https://www.flashback.org/t381478
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
Jack said:
shinninglight said:
....
Frank Joseph's book The Lost Civilization of Lemuria is all about explaining these connections and much more of them. And Mark Amaru Pinkham's book The Return of the Serpents of Wisdom also shows much more connections between these ancient cultures all over the Earth.
Can you tell me the page were the explanation stated,because sometimes I fill lazy reading all those books especially when am using my phone
 
shinninglight said:
Can you tell me the page were the explanation stated,because sometimes I fill lazy reading all those books especially when am using my phone
It's the entire plot of that first book, and most of the plot of the second. But both books are about very large portions of the earth, not specifically Australia and India. So I don't know what pages talk about Australia and Dravidians, but you can basically go to any page and start reading and see the same kind of situations spread over a much larger area. That first book, you can read chapter 2 which shows the connections between ancient India and Easter Island. Like how their written language is perfectly identical from both places.
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
shinninglight said:
Can you tell me the page were the explanation stated,because sometimes I fill lazy reading all those books especially when am using my phone
It's the entire plot of that first book, and most of the plot of the second. But both books are about very large portions of the earth, not specifically Australia and India. So I don't know what pages talk about Australia and Dravidians, but you can basically go to any page and start reading and see the same kind of situations spread over a much larger area. That first book, you can read chapter 2 which shows the connections between ancient India and Easter Island. Like how their written language is perfectly identical from both places.
Thanks although I was not talking about australians and Indians but the real thing itself I will go read about it
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
I wanted to clear up two or three very dysfunctional things that were put forth and confused a lot of people here. There are useless and disinformation, and have to put in their own place to avoid further issues.

For one, it has been said that "One should go with the race that they feel more attracted towards". Ignorance here has been used even by the instructors and finders of these useless solutions, in what is material reality, and not a matter of feeling or any liberal sentimentality. Larping about how one 'is all about race' and pseudospiritualizing these matters where denying the evident isn't going to cut the deal either. As such these have to be put in proper context.

Race is far from a subject of what one likes or what dislikes. Anyone who has all the features of a black person but a little hues up the skin, equal to bleaching, did not suddenly become "White". Likewise, people who are half or race mixed, should simply go not "Where they feel like", as of course, due to brainwashing, most will decide to go with someone who will eventually breed out their race, but go where they have been mixed and where their bloodline will be restored faster in full power.

For example, in the case of a person who is half black, half white, if they go mate with "Whites" whom of course everyone will choose based on brainwashing, the "White" person in this union merely goes extinct. So the bullshit that started from some corrosive individual on go 'where you feel is best' is a train that leads to the same conclusive result as race mixing in itself.

Alternatively, if the person who is 'half black half white' chooses a person from Spain, Brazil, or many other places, where people are in the hundreds of billions in their ancestry already part black or part white, or has children with the Black race, the next generation of children will be instantly restored.

Likewise, the meme that "Go where you feel is best" is only a yet another liberal concoction as part of a greater disinformation campaign that was going on in our midst to loosen out what Satan wants to be fixed as the earth's axis. Race hardly has to do with any 'feelings' and 'going where you feel is best'. Loose minded people can feel as if they were fish or mermaids, but they cannot go live permanently into an aquarium. Reality has to be respected, where nature is concerned, for our better well being.

...

As a mixed race individual I have always felt pretty confused by this subject, and, if I remember correctly, I read a post by someone telling that HP Maxine said that you should stand with the race that you "feel" closer too. Now, if my memories are wrong, then that's that, I'll take my time and understand all of this thoroughly; instead, if what I said is correct, can you please clarify this contradiction?
 
Actually..

There are fairy tales, sagas or mythes or something of the like that have a part in them that more or less says the following.

A gnome fell in love with a dwarf, but their community didn't allow them to be together, so they were cast out and found a new home under (other kind of plant or stone or fungii) where they had children and kept living seperately.

I have read a similar story about lets say it was a fairy of one type of flower with a fairy from another type of flower.

Those stories however weren't stories that stood on their own. They were stories within a story, at least for some of them.

I have tried to find an example of this today, but I have not been succesfull so far.

I think that if you were to talk to children about the concept of race, such stories would be applied. Its not that they're not out there, they just don't seem to have a name or place of their own..
 
SonOfSatan666 said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:

As a mixed race individual I have always felt pretty confused by this subject, and, if I remember correctly, I read a post by someone telling that HP Maxine said that you should stand with the race that you "feel" closer too. Now, if my memories are wrong, then that's that, I'll take my time and understand all of this thoroughly; instead, if what I said is correct, can you please clarify this contradiction?

I think you recall incorrectly, this was another one who started this, and not HPS Maxine. And yes, your memories are wrong. HPS Maxine is an expert on races.

Eventually this slipped and nobody really paid too much attention, until more recently, where this had to be sorted out as it created all sorts of cognition problems. So it was set straight.

The situation is this is far from a thing related to feeling.

If one is a quarter White of course they will "Feel" white. Everyone "Feels" for where the benefits are, or whatever related to this. I do not want to get into the reasons here, as these are plain human and simple. Others "Feel" they are mermaids on this planet, too. Race is not about how one "feels".

There is nothing confusing here, If one has some White blood but is primarily non White, they are not White. This isn't any statement of value, just a realistic, scientific statement.

Your confusion has arised as a result of disinformation which I have cleared out as to why and how in this post. It's really simple in reality. What I array here is the reality despite kosher feelings.

Any "White" person that has mixed with people from other races, the "White" traits are lost, or very dilluted. This is for reasons of non compatibility, it's just simple observation. One resembles something else, not a White person, even if half, or quarter, or in some cases way less. Even if a person does not really 'resemble' the non white race, their children will, and sometimes this can go down in literally 10 or more generations, eventually, just ruining white people in the process to just re-whiten what could be white in 1 generation and without wasting any time and LIVING PEOPLE.

Nobody, race mixed or not, should engage in actions that destroy core races and just create further confusion. This is universal and applies to all of us.

If you are mixed, evaluate where you fall but with realism. If you do that, you will see that in 9.9/10 cases you will resemble a non White race, and that is nothing bad.
 
Jack said:
shinninglight said:
jack said:
As you said there is no India and there is no such thing as an Indian race. There are different racial halotypes ranging from brahmin,Sikh and other higher castes who have retained many of the attributes of the ancient whites,to the north eastern Asian Nepalese, burmese to the south Indian Dravidian black,negroid etc. However I say that dravidians blacks are not blacks as of Africa but of Australian aboriginals.
Dravidans came from the kushite empire,India was ones part of the kushite kingdom which is why it was once called Indus kush.there are close relationships between African and indian spiritual system.

There's ample evidence to suggest the Dravidians are descendants of Australian aboriginals or taking the time frame of the science its actually correct to say australian aboriginals are the descendants of dravidians. The point is they are the same. Races evolve and there might be a connection between the blacks and the dravidians but through evolution the Dravidians are now closer to the Australian aboriginals than blacks. It might be a spin off race entirely.

And Aryans brought civilization to them and build temples and generally created their civilization as HPMageson has said, sage Agasta who had blue eyes coming down from the mountains and giving them civilization. Also Tamil and Australian aboriginal language has a lot of phonetic similarity than to Sanskrit or info European languages. Also we have genetic evidence.

Wells was looking for a genetic marker called M130, the most ancient, non-African, Y-chromosome marker. It is rare in Dravidians, but quite common in Australian Aboriginal males — and, intriguingly, in the Na Dene peoples of the Pacific north-west of North America.
https://campaignprojects.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/tamil-and-australian-aboriginal-languages/amp/

https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2009-07-24/dna-confirms-prehistoric-coastal-trek-to-australia/1365824?pfmredir=sm

https://amp.economist.com/science-and-technology/2013/01/19/an-antipodean-raj

https://www.nationalgeographic.com.au/australia/four-thousand-years-ago-indians-landed-in-australia.aspx

It was fortunate for me that I knew about the ancient customs of the Dravidians, for this helped me greatly in my research. One of the most important customs of Aborigines all over Australia is that it is taboo for the son in law and the mother in law to be found in the same location at any one time. Now this is exactly the same custom practised by the Tamils and perhaps other Dravidian races as well. So strong is this custom in both the Aborigines and Tamils, that it is considered high treason if it is broken. Could this similarity be one of just coincidence ? It could, but I think not. Another custom is the way they treat a girl who has just attained womanhood. In both these societies, the girl is moved out of the family home when this happens, and is housed in a shed just outside the family home for a period of a few weeks. In both societies, the shed is decorated by the leaves of the fish tail palm. Could this also be just coincidence ?
http://creative.sulekha.com/the-mysterious-origin-s-of-the-australian-aborigines-part-ii_604469_blog

Also India wasn't a part of any empire. Rather as the HPs have written Egypt is descended from Ancient india. Same for Assyria and mesopotamia. The migration happened from Kumar kandam in ancient south India towards the west.

Also the Egyptians weren't black. They were white. See their statues and the hieroglyphics. These are descriptions of white Aryan features. Blonde haired pharoahs have been found with their mummified bodies with the hair crystallized. Blacks might have existed there as workers and citizens but the aristrocracy was all white. This "we wuz kangz" is just a stupid meme with no reality to support it.

If you make a statement I expect you to defend it or justify it with fact. To change anyone's mind I.e.However what your saying is simply improbable.
I never said anything about Egyptians being black,I didnt even mention Egypt,kush was a kingdom that shared the same culture and tradition with Egypt and there were many black rulers there.Indian was once called Hindus kush by the Greeks which was that the Indian empire spread from east to north Africa were the kushite empire once was,I had also taken this my quote from a post from one of our brother about the relationship between Africans and dravidans.maybe they may be close to aborinals but how did the aboriginals come from dravidans if the dravidans are mixed race,also what are the clues that shows that there was once aboriginal presence in India,the tradition about a girl hitting puberty was also done in Africa by many tribes.
Here is the post by our brother
https://www.flashback.org/t381478
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
SonOfSatan666 said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:

As a mixed race individual I have always felt pretty confused by this subject, and, if I remember correctly, I read a post by someone telling that HP Maxine said that you should stand with the race that you "feel" closer too. Now, if my memories are wrong, then that's that, I'll take my time and understand all of this thoroughly; instead, if what I said is correct, can you please clarify this contradiction?

I think you recall incorrectly, this was another one who started this, and not HPS Maxine. And yes, your memories are wrong. HPS Maxine is an expert on races.

Eventually this slipped and nobody really paid too much attention, until more recently, where this had to be sorted out as it created all sorts of cognition problems. So it was set straight.

The situation is this is far from a thing related to feeling.

If one is a quarter White of course they will "Feel" white. Everyone "Feels" for where the benefits are, or whatever related to this. I do not want to get into the reasons here, as these are plain human and simple. Others "Feel" they are mermaids on this planet, too. Race is not about how one "feels".

There is nothing confusing here, If one has some White blood but is primarily non White, they are not White. This isn't any statement of value, just a realistic, scientific statement.

Your confusion has arised as a result of disinformation which I have cleared out as to why and how in this post. It's really simple in reality. What I array here is the reality despite kosher feelings.

Any "White" person that has mixed with people from other races, the "White" traits are lost, or very dilluted. This is for reasons of non compatibility, it's just simple observation. One resembles something else, not a White person, even if half, or quarter, or in some cases way less. Even if a person does not really 'resemble' the non white race, their children will, and sometimes this can go down in literally 10 or more generations, eventually, just ruining white people in the process to just re-whiten what could be white in 1 generation and without wasting any time and LIVING PEOPLE.

Nobody, race mixed or not, should engage in actions that destroy core races and just create further confusion. This is universal and applies to all of us.

If you are mixed, evaluate where you fall but with realism. If you do that, you will see that in 9.9/10 cases you will resemble a non White race, and that is nothing bad.

I won't hide the fact that this feels like a sudden cold shower, reason being I did "feel" what had more benefits, but, as I said, I'll accept reality as it is. Now then, I want to ask for some practical advice: since my mother is white, I have always lived with white people, I feel attracted by white girls and not by black/mixed women as of now, what can I do to "solve" this? Should I wait to date or have sex with someone until I find a black/mixed woman I like?
 
I’m half Irish half chinese, from what I understand that means I’m predominantly asian, so I intend to keep it that way if I were to reproduce, which I don’t have plans to, but in any case I’m pretty serious about the importance of this and agree with cobra. So I would choose a asian partner like he suggested in my post. I heard you get 50% of the genes from your father and 50% from your mother, I don’t know if this is true or false, but as recessive genes being irreplaceable that means the asian side is predominant even if I have Caucasian features. My younger brother is in a pretty serious relationship with a white girl and they live together, in The area I live in Canada, the asian population is pretty low I think like 1% in this city. So we were raised around white people all our lives and our interracial parents are divorced... he’s not a spiritual satanist, I had a chat with them about race mixing and they understood what I was saying but there’s not much can do about it, I’m just concerned about what is natural. I don’t promote it. The acceptance with other asian people has been a bit difficult because I’m half Caucasian and don’t speak chinese. asian people can be a bit racist, there’s not many Asian’s here but I have been doing my best to try and be a part of the community because as a spiritual satanist I think it is of importantance to get in touch with my culture. Any advice?
 
In all unions with mixed people, and that is nothing strange, just how nature does things, the predominant race is never the White race in the offspring. One may get whiter traits, or whiter skin, but they still resemble the other parent. This is typical with for example people who are half black half white, most of the times, people look like black people, but just with lighter skin.

A person known to me for example is half Japanese and half White, they look 100% Japanese, but they are just taller. We are talking solid 100%, if they don't tell you they have some White background, you will never figure it out. And they are half White.

The good news is that you yourself, when you will have kids, you will pass them down the white genes, plus your development from spirituality etc, so if you plan to have progeny and you have it with a person of your non-white backround, this will help everything around. Also, you have the benefit of being able to form a stronger line within another Gentile race, but without diluting said race.

Another thing people need to take care in, is the temperament. People more racially close to you, will also relate to you better in the sense of the temperament. There are people who have interracial relationships but they cannot keep up with one another in any fulfilling manner and only relate to one another superficially.

To give you an example, there are Whites, few of them, and in generally weird people, who are 'attracted' to Asian girls. They also have the bullshit opinions of "Muh Attraction", because they are weak to confront reality. Merely "I am attracted" in these cases is just not a stable way to define anything. Attractions change based on insight.

Then, they get their so called "Asian Waifu" girls, and when they see the difference in temperament or character, they just cannot take it and just complain like the whimps they are. This is because in the long term we have to be with people we match also, and racially. For example some of these guys complain about the smell their otherwise "attraction" has.

There are endless wonderful men and women in all races for people to choose from. We are talking billions. One's chances to meet someone are unprecedented in this age and era. Then, plus magick and meditation, you can make it work all out beautifully.

There are also a lot of White women who have visibly Asian ancestry. These women can also work in this case, and will be matching candidates.

Now the above is for people who want the best progeny and the best receptivity of relationships. What Muhammed Ali said that since he is black his own african wife feels him and understands him better than anyone, is correct. We stick way better to our own kind in general, and for reasons of emotional fulfillment above all.

If it is for just the sexual factor, people can buy a sex toy and have similar results. Relations with people should be thought on a bit of a better standard.

All spiritually advanced people and strong types go after people that they resemble for better sticking, success, and reception by their partner. This is nothing weird, it's a recipe for natural success.
 
Generations of race mixing in Latin America without any spirituality along it has caused much confusion for me. I understand the of how and where Mexicans and other LatinX people come from but now I need to know what we do from here and more specifically me since my racial makeup is different than from a Cuban/Puerto Rican but even some Mexicans like the black, euros, and very Asian/indigenous ones. Seeing there is a Mexican identity as you mentioned and I agree with this, my racial path seems to be getting clear especially walking it with a spiritual foundation and lifestyle.

For a bit I was feeling uncomfortable about my situation but I hung on and now I have no insecurities on this situation. Empowering my soul has given me things that no one can ever make me feel bad about thus I love who I am and will continue to better myself so I can be the best I version of myself and I wouldn't ever change who I am deep inside because that's what brought me here in the first place. It's only natural that I will figure out my place in the incoming Satan's Kingdom thanks to His spiritual knowledge.

I see it as a duty for every person here to be the prime example of their race. Best way to do this is to follow nature's laws and empower yourself spiritually.
 
shinninglight said:
Jack said:
shinninglight said:
Dravidans came from the kushite empire,India was ones part of the kushite kingdom which is why it was once called Indus kush.there are close relationships between African and indian spiritual system.

There's ample evidence to suggest the Dravidians are descendants of Australian aboriginals or taking the time frame of the science its actually correct to say australian aboriginals are the descendants of dravidians. The point is they are the same. Races evolve and there might be a connection between the blacks and the dravidians but through evolution the Dravidians are now closer to the Australian aboriginals than blacks. It might be a spin off race entirely.

And Aryans brought civilization to them and build temples and generally created their civilization as HPMageson has said, sage Agasta who had blue eyes coming down from the mountains and giving them civilization. Also Tamil and Australian aboriginal language has a lot of phonetic similarity than to Sanskrit or info European languages. Also we have genetic evidence.

Wells was looking for a genetic marker called M130, the most ancient, non-African, Y-chromosome marker. It is rare in Dravidians, but quite common in Australian Aboriginal males — and, intriguingly, in the Na Dene peoples of the Pacific north-west of North America.
https://campaignprojects.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/tamil-and-australian-aboriginal-languages/amp/

https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2009-07-24/dna-confirms-prehistoric-coastal-trek-to-australia/1365824?pfmredir=sm

https://amp.economist.com/science-and-technology/2013/01/19/an-antipodean-raj

https://www.nationalgeographic.com.au/australia/four-thousand-years-ago-indians-landed-in-australia.aspx

It was fortunate for me that I knew about the ancient customs of the Dravidians, for this helped me greatly in my research. One of the most important customs of Aborigines all over Australia is that it is taboo for the son in law and the mother in law to be found in the same location at any one time. Now this is exactly the same custom practised by the Tamils and perhaps other Dravidian races as well. So strong is this custom in both the Aborigines and Tamils, that it is considered high treason if it is broken. Could this similarity be one of just coincidence ? It could, but I think not. Another custom is the way they treat a girl who has just attained womanhood. In both these societies, the girl is moved out of the family home when this happens, and is housed in a shed just outside the family home for a period of a few weeks. In both societies, the shed is decorated by the leaves of the fish tail palm. Could this also be just coincidence ?
http://creative.sulekha.com/the-mysterious-origin-s-of-the-australian-aborigines-part-ii_604469_blog

Also India wasn't a part of any empire. Rather as the HPs have written Egypt is descended from Ancient india. Same for Assyria and mesopotamia. The migration happened from Kumar kandam in ancient south India towards the west.

Also the Egyptians weren't black. They were white. See their statues and the hieroglyphics. These are descriptions of white Aryan features. Blonde haired pharoahs have been found with their mummified bodies with the hair crystallized. Blacks might have existed there as workers and citizens but the aristrocracy was all white. This "we wuz kangz" is just a stupid meme with no reality to support it.

If you make a statement I expect you to defend it or justify it with fact. To change anyone's mind I.e.However what your saying is simply improbable.
I never said anything about Egyptians being black,I didnt even mention Egypt,kush was a kingdom that shared the same culture and tradition with Egypt and there were many black rulers there.Indian was once called Hindus kush by the Greeks which was that the Indian empire spread from east to north Africa were the kushite empire once was,I had also taken this my quote from a post from one of our brother about the relationship between Africans and dravidans.maybe they may be close to aborinals but how did the aboriginals come from dravidans if the dravidans are mixed race,also what are the clues that shows that there was once aboriginal presence in India,the tradition about a girl hitting puberty was also done in Africa by many tribes.
Here is the post by our brother
https://www.flashback.org/t381478
Your making similarities between "Hindu Kush" and "Kushnite Empire" ,right ?
The Hindu Kush (Pashto and Persian: هندوکش, Persian for “Indian Mountains”; /kʊʃ, kuːʃ/), also known in Ancient Greek as the Caucasus Indicus (Ancient Greek: Καύκασος Ινδικός) or Paropamisadae (Ancient Greek: Παροπαμισάδαι), is an 800-kilometre-long (500 mi) mountain range that stretches near the Afghan-Pakistan border,[2][3] from central Afghanistan to northern Pakistan. It forms the western section of the Hindu Kush Himalayan Region (HKH).[4][5][6] It divides the valley of the Amu Darya (the ancient Oxus) to the north from the Indus River valley to the south.

The Dravidian blacks may have migrated westward to form African kingdoms and thus the faint genetic resemblance and phonetic resemblance.
everything has been descended from the Ancient Aryan Hindus so the Kushnites may have taken as the Egyptians their religious and cultural practices from the region but India wasn't in anytime inside "kushnite empire." These new afro centric ideas trying to change history for some reason are of no real credibility. Hindu kush is a series of mountain ranges "bordering" ancient India. Its not "India" it's not even inside India as you can see from the above quote. So how can a thing that's not even India be proof that India was part of a black kingdom when absolutely no such evidence exists ? There's absolutely no relationship whatsoever to this.

The Dravidian Tamil is descended from Sanskrit so it also is a Aryan language. There's nothing black about it. Most brahmins in south India are also fair and have the features like north Indians do. So even Tamil was created by white Aryans

Possibly an Aryan ruler was ruling over a majority black population if that existed in the first place.

About the aboriginal presence in India. As I stated in the earlier post the evidence is simply that Dravidian are genetically very close with the aboriginal groups and they share same customs. There's nothing more to it really.
 
HP.HoodedCobra666 said:
There are endless wonderful men and women in all races for people to choose from. We are talking billions. One's chances to meet someone are unprecedented in this age and era. Then, plus magick and meditation, you can make it work all out beautifully.

Venus square can be started, any Friday from March 29 to April 19. Or other love magick workings, while Venus is in Pisces. April 12, waxing Moon in Cancer, or April 18/19 (before the VoC on the 19), Full Moon in Libra. Perfect dates for a love working :)
 
the jews do not suffer a state to be of a single ethnicity
 
sunmoonfire said:
the jews do not suffer a state to be of a single ethnicity

Jews, Have been ruling the earth for quite a while: "Clean for 1000 years on their ruling class, do everything in their power to stay a uniform race"

Gentiles, all day on the TV: "But I want to put Muh Dik inside Uh anyttin, U be restraing me from uhm, killing ma'self"
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top