Just my news

[Satanic Path]

I opened a blog.
And things are going good.
I have my first readers and grow day by day.
I opened this blog to have my space and be read, and like a diary in which I write my stories and poems.
Of course, that's the top of the iceberg.
I like to put hidden messages in my poems and stories, to talk about satanic values and things people don't know to be satanic.
I openly say I hate every religion, and talk about xians and muslims as fools, but I can't go further than that.
It makes me feel good to know all of my works are there, somewhere, and people can read them and then choose to follow me.
But of course, as every social media, many people have shit instead of their brain.

When someone asked me if I was transgender because of my face or my appaerance, this is what I said ( I'm not writing the same used words as I want to be safe)
"Being a boy and wearing a black eyeliner pencil doesn't make anyone who he/she is not."
I also said that I'm very close to nature and I follow his laws, whatever they are, and that people should connect more with it.
" I was born male, I will always be male, I'm fine with it and love my true self, my DNA can't lie."
And with this I tried to push my, our ideology.

I often talk about a unknown lover, my lover, I just touch upon "Him", and with "Him" I mean Satan. Sometimes I write about snakes and the number eight, or eight kings or hell. ( Hell as people can't see it, as a calm, placid place).
I usuallt try to help people who have the same issues I've had, mostly self-harm and depression, and how finding TRUTH can heal their pain.

Some days ago I also published a little blog where, talking about rape victims and how some shitty people blame them, I said:
" I'm not feminist, I will never be, but to be a good human you don't need to be feminist, and I don't believe in this movement."

And when those feminist sluts named
Trump's voters as hoes I could no longer contain myself.
I said that everyone must vote who he likes the most, and that this brain-washing is poisonous.

Apart from fools, I like it.
I get to know people and help others through my words and what I have to say.
Maybe It can become something more, in the future, I hope so.
It just takes me few hours a day, and in this covid pandemic, I have all the time for the RTR's.

Unfortunately I can't give people the RTR's, since my account would be deleted and I would end up marked.
If you have any advice about how to promote our TRUTH while being safe, tell me about them, I'm an open book.
Hail Satan!
And may The Gods bless you all!

 

[Gearshift]

Just to point out feminism isn't exclusive to communists and other judeo-bolshevik political groups.

Even NSDAP and Hitler had discussions and videos of feminism.

It works both way a path to destroy(communism) and a path to grow(NS).

 

[Satanic Path]

Just to point out feminism isn't exclusive to communists and other judeo-bolshevik political groups.

Even NSDAP and Hitler had discussions and videos of feminism.

It works both way a path to destroy(communism) and a path to grow(NS).

I personally don't like that extreme femminism, I think it can be so cruel. I believe in women empowerment, but not in that thing. Thanks for exposing your thoughts.
Hail Satan!

 

[Jack]

Just to point out feminism isn't exclusive to communists and other judeo-bolshevik political groups.

Even NSDAP and Hitler had discussions and videos of feminism.

It works both way a path to destroy(communism) and a path to grow(NS).

Feminism is exclusive to communists and other judeo-bolshevik political groups. The concept of women that the Nazis had we're of being exclusively mothers and home-makers. Hitler even said once publicly that he would prefer a mother at home over a secretary.

The first thing the Nazis did when they came into power was remove all women judges and lawmakers from the government, because they did not believe in women in politics meme that most people believe in.

“The slogan ’emancipation of women’ was invented by Jewish intellectuals, and its content was formed by the same spirit. In the really good times of German life, the German woman had no need to emancipate herself. She possessed exactly what nature had given her to administer and preserve; just as the man in his good times had no need to fear that he would be ousted from his position in relation to the woman.

If the man’s world is said to be the State, his struggle, his readiness to devote his powers to the service of the community, then it may perhaps be said that the woman’s is a smaller world. For her world is her husband, her family, her children, and her home. But what would become of the greater world if there were no one to tend and care for the smaller one? How could the greater world survive if there were no one to make the cares of the smaller world the content of their lives?

No, the greater world is built on the foundation of this smaller world. This great world cannot survive if the smaller world is not stable. Providence has entrusted to the woman the cares of that world which is her very own, and only on the basis of this smaller world can the man’s world be formed and built up. The two worlds are not antagonistic. They complement each other, they belong together just as man and woman belong together.

We do not consider it correct for the woman to interfere in the world of the man, in his main sphere. We consider it natural if these two worlds remain distinct. To the one belongs the strength of feeling, the strength of the soul. To the other belongs the strength of vision, of toughness, of decision, and of the willingness to act. In the one case this strength demands the willingness of the woman to risk her life to preserve this important cell and to multiply it, and in the other case it demands from the man the readiness to safeguard life.

The sacrifices which the man makes in the struggle of his nation, the woman makes in the preservation of that nation in individual cases. What the man gives in courage on the battlefield, the woman gives in eternal self-sacrifice, in eternal pain and suffering. Every child that a woman brings into the world is a battle, a battle waged for the existence of her people. And both must therefore mutually value and respect each other when they see that each performs the task that Nature and Providence have ordained. And this mutual respect will necessarily result from this separation of the functions of each.

It is not true, as Jewish intellectuals assert, that respect depends on the overlapping of the spheres of activity of the sexes; this respect demands that neither sex should try to do that which belongs to the sphere of the other. It lies in the last resort in the fact that each knows that the other is doing everything necessary to maintain the whole community. So our women’s movement is for us not something which inscribes on its banner as its program the fight against men, but something which has as its program the common fight together with men. For the new National Socialist national community acquires a firm basis, precisely because we have gained the trust of millions of women as fanatical comrades…

Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist women’s movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist women’s movement has but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creature which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life-struggle.”

 

[Satanic Path]

Just to point out feminism isn't exclusive to communists and other judeo-bolshevik political groups.

Even NSDAP and Hitler had discussions and videos of feminism.

It works both way a path to destroy(communism) and a path to grow(NS).

Feminism is exclusive to communists and other judeo-bolshevik political groups. The concept of women that the Nazis had we're of being exclusively mothers and home-makers. Hitler even said once publicly that he would prefer a mother at home over a secretary.

The first thing the Nazis did when they came into power was remove all women judges and lawmakers from the government, because they did not believe in women in politics meme that most people believe in.

“The slogan ’emancipation of women’ was invented by Jewish intellectuals, and its content was formed by the same spirit. In the really good times of German life, the German woman had no need to emancipate herself. She possessed exactly what nature had given her to administer and preserve; just as the man in his good times had no need to fear that he would be ousted from his position in relation to the woman.

If the man’s world is said to be the State, his struggle, his readiness to devote his powers to the service of the community, then it may perhaps be said that the woman’s is a smaller world. For her world is her husband, her family, her children, and her home. But what would become of the greater world if there were no one to tend and care for the smaller one? How could the greater world survive if there were no one to make the cares of the smaller world the content of their lives?

No, the greater world is built on the foundation of this smaller world. This great world cannot survive if the smaller world is not stable. Providence has entrusted to the woman the cares of that world which is her very own, and only on the basis of this smaller world can the man’s world be formed and built up. The two worlds are not antagonistic. They complement each other, they belong together just as man and woman belong together.

We do not consider it correct for the woman to interfere in the world of the man, in his main sphere. We consider it natural if these two worlds remain distinct. To the one belongs the strength of feeling, the strength of the soul. To the other belongs the strength of vision, of toughness, of decision, and of the willingness to act. In the one case this strength demands the willingness of the woman to risk her life to preserve this important cell and to multiply it, and in the other case it demands from the man the readiness to safeguard life.

The sacrifices which the man makes in the struggle of his nation, the woman makes in the preservation of that nation in individual cases. What the man gives in courage on the battlefield, the woman gives in eternal self-sacrifice, in eternal pain and suffering. Every child that a woman brings into the world is a battle, a battle waged for the existence of her people. And both must therefore mutually value and respect each other when they see that each performs the task that Nature and Providence have ordained. And this mutual respect will necessarily result from this separation of the functions of each.

It is not true, as Jewish intellectuals assert, that respect depends on the overlapping of the spheres of activity of the sexes; this respect demands that neither sex should try to do that which belongs to the sphere of the other. It lies in the last resort in the fact that each knows that the other is doing everything necessary to maintain the whole community. So our women’s movement is for us not something which inscribes on its banner as its program the fight against men, but something which has as its program the common fight together with men. For the new National Socialist national community acquires a firm basis, precisely because we have gained the trust of millions of women as fanatical comrades…

Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist women’s movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist women’s movement has but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creature which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life-struggle.”

As many times, I have to manually look for answers in my posts.
Sorry for being late.
I don't know wether I fully agree with you.
I mean women can be great people, I strongly believe it.
What about gay women? I'm gay, but adopting a child to ma seems weird.
So what about those women who don't want children?
Then I'm a man, so I can't really reply.
I am still fighting against the bad influence of Mageson and the Third Sex website I read few times.

 

[Jack]

Just to point out feminism isn't exclusive to communists and other judeo-bolshevik political groups.

Even NSDAP and Hitler had discussions and videos of feminism.

It works both way a path to destroy(communism) and a path to grow(NS).

Feminism is exclusive to communists and other judeo-bolshevik political groups. The concept of women that the Nazis had we're of being exclusively mothers and home-makers. Hitler even said once publicly that he would prefer a mother at home over a secretary.

The first thing the Nazis did when they came into power was remove all women judges and lawmakers from the government, because they did not believe in women in politics meme that most people believe in.

“The slogan ’emancipation of women’ was invented by Jewish intellectuals, and its content was formed by the same spirit. In the really good times of German life, the German woman had no need to emancipate herself. She possessed exactly what nature had given her to administer and preserve; just as the man in his good times had no need to fear that he would be ousted from his position in relation to the woman.

If the man’s world is said to be the State, his struggle, his readiness to devote his powers to the service of the community, then it may perhaps be said that the woman’s is a smaller world. For her world is her husband, her family, her children, and her home. But what would become of the greater world if there were no one to tend and care for the smaller one? How could the greater world survive if there were no one to make the cares of the smaller world the content of their lives?

No, the greater world is built on the foundation of this smaller world. This great world cannot survive if the smaller world is not stable. Providence has entrusted to the woman the cares of that world which is her very own, and only on the basis of this smaller world can the man’s world be formed and built up. The two worlds are not antagonistic. They complement each other, they belong together just as man and woman belong together.

We do not consider it correct for the woman to interfere in the world of the man, in his main sphere. We consider it natural if these two worlds remain distinct. To the one belongs the strength of feeling, the strength of the soul. To the other belongs the strength of vision, of toughness, of decision, and of the willingness to act. In the one case this strength demands the willingness of the woman to risk her life to preserve this important cell and to multiply it, and in the other case it demands from the man the readiness to safeguard life.

The sacrifices which the man makes in the struggle of his nation, the woman makes in the preservation of that nation in individual cases. What the man gives in courage on the battlefield, the woman gives in eternal self-sacrifice, in eternal pain and suffering. Every child that a woman brings into the world is a battle, a battle waged for the existence of her people. And both must therefore mutually value and respect each other when they see that each performs the task that Nature and Providence have ordained. And this mutual respect will necessarily result from this separation of the functions of each.

It is not true, as Jewish intellectuals assert, that respect depends on the overlapping of the spheres of activity of the sexes; this respect demands that neither sex should try to do that which belongs to the sphere of the other. It lies in the last resort in the fact that each knows that the other is doing everything necessary to maintain the whole community. So our women’s movement is for us not something which inscribes on its banner as its program the fight against men, but something which has as its program the common fight together with men. For the new National Socialist national community acquires a firm basis, precisely because we have gained the trust of millions of women as fanatical comrades…

Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist women’s movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist women’s movement has but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creature which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life-struggle.”

As many times, I have to manually look for answers in my posts.
Sorry for being late.
I don't know wether I fully agree with you.
I mean women can be great people, I strongly believe it.
What about gay women? I'm gay, but adopting a child to ma seems weird.
So what about those women who don't want children?
Then I'm a man, so I can't really reply.
I am still fighting against the bad influence of Mageson and the Third Sex website I read few times.

Why should Heterosexuals care about what gays do with their lives. We have fundamentally different drives so I can't say to what Gays should or should not do. I only thing I know is that Gays should no be allowed to adopt children .

 

[ZmajEriksson]

Just to point out feminism isn't exclusive to communists and other judeo-bolshevik political groups.

Even NSDAP and Hitler had discussions and videos of feminism.

It works both way a path to destroy(communism) and a path to grow(NS).

Feminism is exclusive to communists and other judeo-bolshevik political groups. The concept of women that the Nazis had we're of being exclusively mothers and home-makers. Hitler even said once publicly that he would prefer a mother at home over a secretary.

The first thing the Nazis did when they came into power was remove all women judges and lawmakers from the government, because they did not believe in women in politics meme that most people believe in.

“The slogan ’emancipation of women’ was invented by Jewish intellectuals, and its content was formed by the same spirit. In the really good times of German life, the German woman had no need to emancipate herself. She possessed exactly what nature had given her to administer and preserve; just as the man in his good times had no need to fear that he would be ousted from his position in relation to the woman.

If the man’s world is said to be the State, his struggle, his readiness to devote his powers to the service of the community, then it may perhaps be said that the woman’s is a smaller world. For her world is her husband, her family, her children, and her home. But what would become of the greater world if there were no one to tend and care for the smaller one? How could the greater world survive if there were no one to make the cares of the smaller world the content of their lives?

No, the greater world is built on the foundation of this smaller world. This great world cannot survive if the smaller world is not stable. Providence has entrusted to the woman the cares of that world which is her very own, and only on the basis of this smaller world can the man’s world be formed and built up. The two worlds are not antagonistic. They complement each other, they belong together just as man and woman belong together.

We do not consider it correct for the woman to interfere in the world of the man, in his main sphere. We consider it natural if these two worlds remain distinct. To the one belongs the strength of feeling, the strength of the soul. To the other belongs the strength of vision, of toughness, of decision, and of the willingness to act. In the one case this strength demands the willingness of the woman to risk her life to preserve this important cell and to multiply it, and in the other case it demands from the man the readiness to safeguard life.

The sacrifices which the man makes in the struggle of his nation, the woman makes in the preservation of that nation in individual cases. What the man gives in courage on the battlefield, the woman gives in eternal self-sacrifice, in eternal pain and suffering. Every child that a woman brings into the world is a battle, a battle waged for the existence of her people. And both must therefore mutually value and respect each other when they see that each performs the task that Nature and Providence have ordained. And this mutual respect will necessarily result from this separation of the functions of each.

It is not true, as Jewish intellectuals assert, that respect depends on the overlapping of the spheres of activity of the sexes; this respect demands that neither sex should try to do that which belongs to the sphere of the other. It lies in the last resort in the fact that each knows that the other is doing everything necessary to maintain the whole community. So our women’s movement is for us not something which inscribes on its banner as its program the fight against men, but something which has as its program the common fight together with men. For the new National Socialist national community acquires a firm basis, precisely because we have gained the trust of millions of women as fanatical comrades…

Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist women’s movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist women’s movement has but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creature which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life-struggle.”

As many times, I have to manually look for answers in my posts.
Sorry for being late.
I don't know wether I fully agree with you.
I mean women can be great people, I strongly believe it.
What about gay women? I'm gay, but adopting a child to ma seems weird.
So what about those women who don't want children?
Then I'm a man, so I can't really reply.
I am still fighting against the bad influence of Mageson and the Third Sex website I read few times.

I don't get why we even had a dependent website for gay stuff. I don't think it matters if you're gay or straight and people making gayness part of their identity, thus shoving their sexuality in other people's faces, is the main reason "homophobia" is on the rise even as the Abrahamic religions die.

And his including the T in the name of his website plays into the Jewish androgeny agenda to blurry all biological distinction between people

 

[Jack]

Feminism is exclusive to communists and other judeo-bolshevik political groups. The concept of women that the Nazis had we're of being exclusively mothers and home-makers. Hitler even said once publicly that he would prefer a mother at home over a secretary.

The first thing the Nazis did when they came into power was remove all women judges and lawmakers from the government, because they did not believe in women in politics meme that most people believe in.

As many times, I have to manually look for answers in my posts.
Sorry for being late.
I don't know wether I fully agree with you.
I mean women can be great people, I strongly believe it.
What about gay women? I'm gay, but adopting a child to ma seems weird.
So what about those women who don't want children?
Then I'm a man, so I can't really reply.
I am still fighting against the bad influence of Mageson and the Third Sex website I read few times.

I don't get why we even had a dependent website for gay stuff. I don't think it matters if you're gay or straight and people making gayness part of their identity, thus shoving their sexuality in other people's faces, is the main reason "homophobia" is on the rise even as the Abrahamic religions die.

And his including the T in the name of his website plays into the Jewish androgeny agenda to blurry all biological distinction between people

Those websites were created by individuals who base their identities on where they put their penis into (or like to put it into.) And since most people are already insecure about themselves, they feel comforted when presented with asinine claims about 'Speacialness' based on these traits which have no bearing on ones character or conduct.

Mageson created the Transgender delusion from logically inaccurate interpretations of spiritual texts without any basis for it other than his own words. He wanted to turn a mental disorder into a special label, to make insane people look normal.

I can make claims that being Heterosexual is infact special. Why ? Because the union of the male and female energies being the goal of yoga. I will now say ,that because you put your penis in vagina and create a union of a biological male and female, that is special. And thus you are special. (Similar to what Mageson did.)

And then all the anti gay people will rush to support my logically falsifiable claim because of their biases. People are very weak mentally and they like listening to these tales that speak of inherent specialness (without any evidence. ) This is because deep down they feel they are not enough. Deep down they are insecure and feel that they need external labels to balance what's lacking inside.

Gays are not special, heterosexuals are not special. No such asinine label indicates anything other than average and normal. Because being Gay is normal and being heterosexual is average and normal. Transgenders are however mentally insane and thus a potential threat to our communities, and to themselves.

Specialness is earned through special deeds that you do for your community and for themselves. People who meditate and advance are special. People who raise awareness are special. People who fight against our enemies are special.

Everyone who contributed diligently to our spiritual warfare efforts is special in the eyes of our Gods.

 

[HailVictory88]

Be careful if you're putting pictures of your face on the Internet, I wouldn't recommend it.

 

[Gearshift]

...NS anti-Feminism...

Hmm after reading your forum post I'm a bit conflicted. I always thought Feminism can be done right not in an abrahamic manner like the enemy does.

For example on JoS Lilith's page it mentions she is a feminist in the sense of supporting Women's right. I assume what you mean [member: @Jack] is the support of Women is there by NSDAP, better and equal pay(no glass ceiling) etc.etc. but would rather relegate women to be childbearers than struggle through working.

I get that and I get that back THEN in 10s, 20s, 30s, up to 45 the Aryan race as well as really the entire World was in danger of extermination through communism and other judeo-bolshevistic activities. I mean we've already seen the malefic properties of the church such as killing over a "witch's mark" or killing some man or woman for being to "pretty/handsome" or exterminating whole villages cuz da bible said "Thou shalt not let a witch live" or some other dysgenic, anti-Eugenics properties. I mean hell I recall in recent times some member mentioning right up to nearing 1900 most christians viewed retards as utter abominations and devil people and wanted them gone from their lives. And then by around 1900 pre-WW1 everything flipped and all of a sudden they are "special people" and "are good".

I guess Feminism is exclusively a jewish ideological property for the subversion of State-Nation i.e. "fucking things up for the sake of fucking with civilizations".

[member: @Jack] I wish I had a more concrete view of National Socialism. I said this before on a separate thread. But I truly don't understand NS nor the NSDAP. For example I understand the NRM(Nordic Resistance Movement) but the original ballers I have very little. I guess sometimes I feel NS in name only and continuous debates with other people have left me going "Why the fuck do I debate with these fucking retards whom somehow catch my ignorance on NS manners and use it against me and rub it against my face". Like one person said "I'm in some cult or some liking of NSDAP and you don't know how evil those people are and other non-sense of being brainwashed or whatever". Sure I might sound brainwashed and maybe 15 years ago you could argue that through watching (((History Channel))) and other WW2 stuff but time and time again I've been proven right, it's NS or bust. And hell with current Trump v Biden situation it seems to me democraps and repubcucks are useless fucktards working for the enemy.

Like I said "NS or bust"

Anyways thanks for the insight but even that information makes me go "Is there more?"