Syd Silver said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
Are we still working with facts or we started working with assumtions ?!
The fact that someone is defending a proven infiltrator it's no problem ?!
The fact that someone is telling lies and false accusation it's no problem ?!
When you label someone as JoS trusted member it is statement ... that person represents JoS
Are you sure that this is the JoS image you want to display in front tens thousands of members and tens of thousands of readers ?!
If you decide marching with weak questionable people then this is what you will attract weak questionable people
The ones who are looked higher and are respected SS members are visible, most of them are on the lone wolf path, only a few of these are still here but their presence on the forum is very very rare, those are the truly trusted members.
The people who you call weak, do things.
Yourself who think strong, do nothing.
The conclusion is merely that you are weak. Plus, do you recall the days when you were sending threats that you will keep creating fake accounts to spam the forums, such as in my e-mail, because you were angry over your perceived higherness and telling people like myself over nothing how we should do things, as we do today?
To put it simply to you this has arose out of uselessness, and the fact that you have a major idea without nothing to back it up, which is epitomal of weakness.
This could be used as proof to kick you out, fairly easily as far as I am concerned. Could it not? But you pretend that the issues of others are so much less important than your own. You're without error of course.
Ever since for example, people have been doing copious work compared to you, helping hundreds. The people that you 'accuse' of weakness.
In fact, you are here because people like me, in your opinion, wrongly believe people can advance. Well then, you'll have to move out, as someone who says they will spam the forum and essentially create discord is an infiltrator. I also know of other things, so don't play the dove here.
If mistakes are to get someone out, you should be banned. You always think you can criticize, but actively participate in no creative or decent way in this place, nor even advisory.
You are merely pre-occupied with judgement of others, while you practically practice no self judgement. Because you would see you do nothing, and want to do something. Yeah, big something, you blamed people with x50 times your helpful capacity, over a straw man meltdown.
As other members also told you, all you do is bitch that you aren't trusted. You repeat it's not the case, and act like giving posting privillege to people is the end of the world.
Them, unmoderated, do this better. For example, Agredco apologized for misplaced comments. What about you, keep the moral policing going. What should he do further than apologize exactly?
I set the standards of highness that you remind me of while it's only essentially pointless accusation. This revolves in that people advance and build out of problems. Which can be any, in fact.
You pretending online to be of no problems and trying to set a fake moral baseline because you want to make sure the JoS is seen adversely because you aren't more entitled in it [as revealed by your complaints] changes nothing.
As for the actual strong members that you imagine, those that matter aren't in mountains. We need help here, not in mountains. All at least have done, are doing, or will do an important work for this community.
Meanwhile you can repeat the meme of Xianity that those who don't exist are the saintly ones.