Dahaarkan said:
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
I do not think you for example, would deprive the public of essential spiritual knowledge to maintain spiritual health. But what of the one who succeeds you?
To give and take spiritual knowledge, it is a dangerous privilege to put in the hands of someone. It has the potential to bring total ruin with an incompetent or corrupt administration arising.
...
You must read the book "The Coming Race" by Lytton. This race described in the book, has extreme knowledge, the ability to kill and so on [every member of the race] but they are so wise and evolved that nobody uses these without proper judgement. This is where the Gods want to take us progressively. But this is inapplicable now.
This is done, broadly, with the gradual and proper sharing of knowledge. Even most of the JoS was 33rd degree freemasonic knowledge. Now all of this is out, and more will come. This is in accordance to what needs to happen.
Unfortunately, the two extremes are always destructive. In our history, we have been bled both by crazy "authoritative" figures, such as Olaf The Great and other vermin, but we also have increasingly fucked up in the sharing of the knowledge. For example, in India, some Gurus have initiated Cochin Jews, who later stole a lot of knowledge and passed it down to their bunch, causing intense problems for everyone else.
What is even worse, is that these "authoritative" figures, do not have any spiritual understanding. The Ancients bridged this gap [up until the good years] by initiation and training, and making sure nobody sat on the chair that was of lesser quality, because this can as you say ruin a civilization.
I do not think any of these figures will "make it" in the end, as they conduct crimes against the Gods and people too. But the problem is they do the damage when they are here. Olaf for example, destroyed Norse Paganism.
I understand how lengthy this conversation is, I hope I have transferred properly and more clearly the perspective of this.
These are very difficult questions and discussions, so don't think you go "against" anything in anyway by posing any of these questions. They have been a product of debating that is aeons old.
I believe the feelings of mutual level and not allowing the average person to be befallen by the lowest dung just because of the will of a "Few" to maintain this "Status", is integral in the European soul.
Plus at this level of affairs humanity is certainly not progressing forward. It's one thing to have the best smartphone and disallowing anyone else from having any, and another that most people have a mid range, some low, and some higher range. I do certainly agree all people have to be in the same "chapter" as a world too.
The enemy believes everyone is supposed to stay in eternal dung without no hope in sight, insofar they themselves line a mansion similar to a state of a spiritual deprivation of communistic fashion.