intelligence paradox

[satanama666]

i want to talk about how my intelligence works like. there is a huge disparity between the things i understand and the things i do not. for example, as a kid i could easily make the connection between mythological Pagan Gods and their abrahamic versions, collectively speaking, of course; i can very easily draw parallels between monotheism and communism; i can understand how occult sciences and practices like meditation and witchcraft have to do with things like electromagnetic energy, light and even evolution, how immortality, both spiritual and physical, are merely stages of an endless process of evolution, whatever may be beyond that, i can even imagine possible explanations of how reincarnation works like at the soul level; i always easily understood that Satanas and the Gods and Demons under him are the only way to power and even virtue, how the jewish "god" is evil and very recent in human history, creating weakness and weak beings, with the jews being the first ones to worship it and to hate Paganism and its Gods, or how the National Socialists were creating the first Satanic Theocracy i knew of since the Antiquity / after the middle ages. and yet, when i was at highschool, i had trouble understanding 4 disciplines: math, i.t., physics and chemistry. normally at primary and secondary school i was very good at them, but highschool-level of all these things are simply too much for me to understand. even now i don't know what functions and derivatives are supposed to be in math for example, or working with excel and the like in i.t., or even the most basic coding lines and i cannot learn these because i simply lack the fundamental understanding of how are these supposed to work and what they are supposed to do. and here comes the interesting part: the things i do understand are simple, basic, fundamental and universal; they apply to any scale; they don't need measuring. the things i don't understand are too particular and complex; a small unit of measure differs from a big one significantly. i have no idea how to imagine 1 meter of air height, earth length, human height, elephant height or length or length in hedgehogs; or 1 kilo of grapes or pears in an open-air food marketplace, for example; they're very different from each other, how does one exact and ideal kilo of pears actually look like? does the last pear need to be cut up in a certain way? if so, how? how many beans and vines of grapes make up 1 kilo? and so on. supposing i was a very advanced meditator and i could levitate 1-2 meters above the ground (however it looks like), what would happen if i tried to levitate after throwing myself from the 10th floor of a residential block? would i fall until the point i can actually levitate? would i gradually lower to that level? would the force of gravity be too strong and make me crash into the ground and die? how are scalable things supposed to work like? it's much easier, for example, to draw randomly a triangle and say it's a triangle than starting to consider the length of the sides, the degrees of the angles, the kind of triangle it is - a right-angled triangle, one with a square angle of 90° and the other 2 45 each, 30 and 60 and so on; an isosceles triangle, with 2 equal sides and a base, shorter or longer; an equilateral triangle, with all sides equal and all angles 60° each; a random triangle, with random sides and angles; acute/obtuse triangle and so on. the more particular, complex and small-scaled or finite something is, the harder it becomes for me to understand it. thank you for the moderators if they decide to post this, for whomever reads this, for whomever reacts/replies to this and any kind of attention to this is appreciated. i hope i gave some food for thought for someone around here.

 

[SomewhatCoherent]

If I read that right, the first part of how you associate things called juxtaposition. You might better off by first learning things as "explain it to me like I'm 5" and then learn applied sciences side of things later. The school system tends to teach the math first then the purpose later if at all. Geometry makes sense when you can play with the shapes move them through space. Look into fractals and how they work and ancient monuments/buildings that where designed to inspire future generations. Most math is based on relative position/value with a "universal starting point". Juxtaposition works similar by relative association between object or concepts without a "universal starting point". If you can learn to use juxtaposition to your advantage you will be smarter than most people and better at teaching high level concepts to normal people. Unfortunately most materials are designed for applied sciences.

If you are going to study a field, focus on general knowledge first. For example Business -> Break it down into sub categories: Management, leadership, investing, general business practices, and biographies of successful people. If the topic is important each sub-category can broken down into subcategories. Don't worry about every detail just essence of the topic. If you want to understand distance try building a table and or something that requires a measuring tape.