666darkness said:
Id like if an expert satanist here would analyse this debate. How true the words of the satanist are here and overall the whole debate? Is the satanist using new age satanism for his debate or is he using actual ancient satanism?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQgDWcTFBdw
It's just poser nonsense.
Immediately he brings Aleister Crowley's Book of the Law, and this doesn't even answer the question that the muslim asks. As we know here, Aleister Crowley was not a Satanist at all. He was a drug addict who dabbled in enemy magick. Because of this, his books are irrelevant and should be avoided.
Then he's saying "we worship Baphomet" and "he's above Satan". Total hogwash. The Baphomet is only a symbol, not a real being.
"Satan means opposition to "god". BS as well, Satan means "enemy" or "adversary" in the enemy's language, but it goes back further to mean Truth in Sanskrit. "Enemy" in the enemy's language means enemy of the jews, not of the fake jewish god which doesn't exist.
He says he follows the buybull's timeline and he thinks the fake jewish "god" is good, more nonsense. The buybull has been exposed as a stolen hoax in the Exposing Christianity website, and it's been even shown that the fake jewish "god" in the buybull is a horrible monster ordering mass murder, human sacrifices and other horrible things.
Enough said, I didn't watch more than that. I couldn't waste 35 minutes of my life to watch this crap. It shows he's a reverse christian and not an actual Satanist. True Satanism is ancient Paganism and has nothing with the jewish/christian hoax and its lies. We don't follow buybull or accept its fake god. People who follow christianity upside down and believe in the christian version of Satan are not Satanists, but reverse christians.
It's interesting that this muslim debated this low hanging fruit, because if an actual Spiritual Satanist debated him the muslim would shut it down immediately because he would prove to him that islam is a jewish hoax. When you debate someone you don't play defense, you go into attack mode and expose his lies. I would ask him: why did your prophet marry a 6 year old who played with dolls and had sex with her when she was 9? All of this is mentioned in an authentic hadith (Sahih al-Bukhari). Mudhamhead was a literal pedophile.